This article explores the future imaginaries used in Facebook’s corporate communications. It aims to reconstruct how these “Facebook Futures” are constructed over time and across different contexts by Facebook’s CEO Mark Zuckerberg. Focus of the investigation is a discourse analysis of Zuckerberg’s public language from 2004 to 2017. By employing qualitative and interpretive modes of enquiry, this study attempts to show (1) how Facebook’s future imaginaries change over time, (2) how Facebook’s central imaginaries “global connectivity” and “global community” are substantiated, and (3) how these imaginaries are supported by norms and values inherent in Silicon Valley culture. Overall, Facebook is analyzed as an example of a prophetic corporation, not only providing an explicitly corporate vision of a better world, but also blending it with the digital technologies and practices involved in making this vision reality.
CorbinJStraussA (2015) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
8.
CouldryN (2015) The myth of “us”: digital networks, political change and the production of collectivity. Information, Communication & Society18(6): 608–626.
9.
DrorY (2015) “We are not here for the money”: founders’ manifestos. New Media & Society17(4): 540–555.
10.
FlichyP (2007) The Internet Imaginaire. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
FoucaultM (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge
12.
FreishtatRLSandlinJA (2010) Shaping youth discourse about technology: technological colonization, manifest destiny, and the frontier myth in Facebook’s public pedagogy. Educational Studies46(5): 503–523.
13.
FuchsC (2013) Social Media: A Critical Introduction. London: SAGE.
14.
GarudRSchildtHALantTK (2014) Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy. Organization Science25(5): 1479–1492.
15.
GiddensAPiersonC (1998) Conversations with Anthony Giddens: Making Sense of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
GillespieT (2010) The politics of “platforms.” New Media & Society12(3): 347–364.
17.
GillespieT (2018) Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions that Shape Social Media. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
GutheyEClarkTJacksonB (2009) Demystifying Business Celebrity. London: Routledge
19.
HaimsonOLHoffmannAL (2016) Constructing and enforcing “authentic” identity online: Facebook, real names, and non-normative identities. First Monday21(6).
20.
HoffmannALProferesNZimmerM (2018) “Making the world more open and connected”: Mark Zuckerberg and the discursive construction of Facebook and its users. New Media & Society20(1): 199–218.
21.
IversenS (2017) Narratives and online decorum: the rhetoric of Mark Zuckerberg’s personal storytelling on Facebook. Style51(3): 374–390.
22.
JasanoffS (2015) Future imperfect: science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity. In: JasanoffSKimSH (eds) Dreamscapes of Modernity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–33.
23.
JasanoffSKimSH (2009) Containing the atom: sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva47(2): 119–146.
24.
JasanoffSKimSH (2015) Dreamscapes of Modernity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
KellerR (2011) The sociology of knowledge approach to discourse (SKAD). Human Studies34(1): 43–65.
26.
KellerRHornidgeASchunemannWJ (2018) The Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse: Investigating the Politics of Knowledge and Meaning-Making. New York: Taylor & Francis.
27.
KoselleckR (1990) Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
LincolnSRobardsB (2014) 10 years of Facebook. New Media & Society16(7): 1047–1050.
29.
LounsburyMGlynnMA (2001) Cultural entrepreneurship: stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal22(6–7): 545–564.
30.
MorozovE (2013) To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: PublicAffairs.
Raynes-GoldieKS (2012) Privacy in the age of Facebook: discourse, architecture, consequences. PhD Thesis, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia.
33.
RiderKMurakami WoodD (2019) Condemned to connection?Network communitarianism in Mark Zuckerberg’s “Facebook Manifesto.” New Media & Society21(3): 639–654.
34.
SalisburyMPooleyJD (2017) The #nofilter self: the contest for authenticity among social networking sites, 2002–2016. Social Sciences6(1): 10.
35.
StoycheffELiuJWibowoKA, et al. (2017) What have we learned about social media by studying Facebook?A decade in review. New Media & Society19(6): 968–980.
36.
StraussA (1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
StreeterT (2015) Steve Jobs, romantic individualism, and the desire for good capitalism. International Journal of Communication9: 3106–3124.
38.
StreeterT (2016) Internet. In: PetersB (ed.) Digital Keywords: A Vocabulary of Information Society and Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 184–196.
39.
ThielP (2014) Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future. New York: Crown Business.
40.
TurnerF (2006) From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41.
TurnerF (2009) Burning man at Google: a cultural infrastructure for new media production. New Media & Society11(1–2): 73–94.
42.
TurnerF (2018) The arts at Facebook: an aesthetic infrastructure for surveillance capitalism. Poetics67: 53–62.
43.
UrryJ (2016) What Is the Future?Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.
44.
Van DijckJ (2013) The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
Van DijckJPoellTde WaalM (2018) The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. New York: Oxford University Press.
46.
ZhangYLeungL (2015) A review of social networking service (SNS) research in communication journals from 2006 to 2011. New Media & Society17(7): 1007–1024.
