Fake news and the discursive construction of technology companies’ social power

Abstract

In the research and commentary around ‘fake news’, there has been growing attention to the way the phrase evidences a growing field of technology industry critique, operating as a shorthand for understanding the nature of social media companies’ power over the public sphere. This article interrogates elite and popular discourses surrounding ‘fake news’, using the tools of critical discourse analysis to show how public commentary constitutes a discursive field that renders tech industry power intelligible by first defining the issue of fake news as a sociotechnical problem, then debating the infrastructural nature of platform companies’ social power. This article concludes that, as commentary moves beyond a focus on fake news and critiques of technology industries grow more complex, strains of elite discourse reveal productive constraints on tech power, articulating the conditions under which limits on that power are understood as legitimate.

Keywords

critical discourse analysis fake news Silicon Valley technology industries

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Rainie

(2017) The Future of Truth and Misinformation Online. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

Bakir

McStay

(2018) Fake news and the economy of emotions. Digital Journalism 6(2): 154–175.

Barbrook

Cameron

(1996) The Californian ideology. Science as Culture 6(1): 44–72.

Bell

Owen

(2017) The Platform Press: How Silicon Valley Reengineered Journalism. New York: TOW Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia University.

Benkler

Faris

Roberts

(2018) Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bennet

Livingston

(2018) The disinformation order: disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication 33(2): 122–139.

Bergen

Stone

(2017) Everyone is mad at Google and Sundar Pichi has to fix it. Bloomberg Businessweek, 19 October. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2017-10-19/everyone-s-mad-at-google-and-sundar-pichai-has-to-fix-it (accessed 28 December 2017).

Birdle

(2018) Rise of the machines: has technology risen beyond our control? The Guardian, 15 June. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/jun/15/rise-of-the-machines-has-technology-evolved-beyond-our-control-?CMP=share_btn_tw (accessed 25 June 2018).

Braun

Eklund

(2019) Fake news, real money: ad tech platforms, profit-driven hoaxes, and the business of journalism. Digital Journalism 1: 1–2.

10.

Brown

(2015) Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.

11.

Buchannon

(2017) Why fake news spreads so fast on Facebook. Bloomberg View. 1 September. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-08-31/why-fake-news-spreads-so-fast-on-facebook (accessed 25 June 2018).

12.

Burchell

(1991) Peculiar interests: civil society and governing ‘the system of natural liberty’. In: Burchell

Gordon

Miller

(eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 119–150.

13.

Cadwalladr

(2019) Cambridge Analytica a year on: a lesson in ‘institutional failure’. The Guardian, 17 March. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-year-on-lesson-in-institutional-failure-christopher-wylie (accessed 17 March 2019).

14.

Caplan

Hanson

Donovan

(2018) Dead Reckoning: Navigating Content Moderation After Fake News. New York: Data & Society.

15.

Carlson

(2018) Fake news as an informational moral panic: the symbolic deviancy of social media during the 2016 US presidential election. Information, Communication, and Society. Epub ahead of print 1 August 2018. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1505934.

16.

Chachra

(2017) Twitter’s harassment problem is baked into its design. The Atlantic, 18 October. Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/10/twitters-harassment-problem-is-baked-into-its-design/542952/ (accessed 25 June 2018).

17.

Chafkin

Frier

(2017) Mark Zuckerberg’s fake news problem isn’t going away. Bloomberg Businessweek, 21 September. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2017-09-21/mark-zuckerberg-s-political-awakening (accessed 25 June 2018).

18.

Chen

(2017) The fake news fallacy. New Yorker, 4 September. Available at: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/09/04/the-fake-news-fallacy (accessed 25 June 2018).

19.

Dent

(2008) ‘Journalists are confessors of the public’ says one Foucaultian. Journalism 9(2): 200–219.

20.

Eubanks

(2018) Automating Inequality: How High-Technology Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

21.

Farkas

Schou

(2018) Fake news as a floating signifier: hegemony, antagonisms, and the politics of falsehood. Javnost: The Public 25(3): 298–314.

22.

Foucault

(1976) The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1 (trans. Smith

A Sheridan

). New York: Vintage.

23.

Foucault

(1991) Politics and the study of discourse. In: Burchell

Gordon

Miller

(eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 53–72.

24.

Fraser

(1989) Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text 25(6): 56–80.

25.

Fuchs

(2014) Social media and the public sphere. Triple C 12(1): 57–101.

26.

Gandy

Jr Nemorin

(2019) Toward a political economy of nudge: smart city variations. Information, Communication, & Society 22: 2112–2126.

27.

Gillespie

(2010) The politics of platforms. New Media & Society 12(3): 347–364.

28.

Gillespie

(2018) Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

29.

Grim

(2017) Steve Bannon wants Facebook and Google regulated like utilities. The Intercept, 27 July. Available at: https://theintercept.com/2017/07/27/steve-bannon-wants-facebook-and-google-regulated-like-utilities/ (accessed 25 June 2018).

30.

Habermas

(1962) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into Bourgeois Society (trans. Burger

). Malden, MA: Polity Press.

31.

Hall

(2016) Cultural Studies: 1983. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

32.

Herder

(2019) The power of platforms: how biopolitical companies threaten democracy. Public Seminar, 25 January. Available at: http://www.publicseminar.org/2019/01/the-power-of-platforms/ (accessed 26 January 2019).

33.

Herrman

(2016) Fixation on fake news overshadows waning trust in real reporting. The New York Times, 18 November. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/19/business/media/exposing-fake-news-eroding-trust-in-real-reporting.html (accessed 25 June 2018).

34.

Herrman

(2017) What if platforms like Facebook are too big to regulate? The New York Times, 4 October. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/04/magazine/what-if-platforms-like-facebook-are-too-big-to-regulate.html (accessed 25 June 2018).

35.

Ingram

(2018) This is what happens when speech gets outsourced to Twitter and Facebook. Columbia Journalism Review, 21 June. Available at: https://www.cjr.org/the_new_gatekeepers/facebook-twitter-publishers-blocking.php (accessed 25 June 2018).

36.

Jack

(2017) Lexicon of Lies: Terms for Problematic Information. New York: Data & Society.

37.

Jamison

(2018) Cyberwar: How Russian Hackers and Trolls Helped Elect a President. New York: Oxford University Press.

38.

Kenney

Von Burg

(2000) Institutions and economies: creating Silicon Valley. In: Kenney

(ed.) Understanding Silicon Valley: The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, pp. 218–240.

39.

Kreiss

McGregor

(2018) Technology firms shape political communication: the work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google with campaigns during the 2016 election cycle. Political Communication 35(2): 155–177.

40.

Lomas

(2018) Fake news is an existential crisis for social media. TechCrunch, 18 February. Available at: https://techcrunch.com/2018/02/18/fake-news-is-an-existential-crisis-for-social-media/ (accessed 1 July 2018).

41.

McChesney

(2007) Communication Revolution: Critical Junctures and the Future of Media. New York: The New Press.

42.

Manjoo

(2017) How 2017 became a turning point for technology giants. The New York Times, 13 December. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/13/technology/tech-companies-social-responsibility.html (accessed 25 June 2018).

43.

Marwick

(2017) Silicon Valley and the social media industry. In: Burgess

Marwick

Poell

(eds) The Sage Handbook of Social Media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 314–329.

44.

Marwick

(2018) Why do people share fake news? A sociotechnical model of media effects. Georgetown Law Technology Review 2: 474–512.

45.

Marwick

Lewis

(2017) Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online. New York: Data & Society.

46.

Nadler

McGuigan

(2018) An impulse to exploit: the behavioral turn in data-driven marketing. Critical Studies in Media Communication 35(2): 151–165.

47.

Nadler

Crain

Donovan

(2018) Weaponing the Digital Influence Machine: The Political Perils of Online Ad Tech. New York: Data and Society.

48.

Napoli

Caplan

(2017) Why media companies insist they’re not media companies, why they’re wrong, and why it matters. First Monday 22(5): 0466. Available at: https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/7051/6124 (accessed 5 March 2019).

49.

Noble

(2018) Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.

50.

O’Neil

(2016) Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Penguin Books.

51.

Papacharissi

(2009) The virtual sphere 2.0: the internet, the public sphere, and beyond. In: Chadwick

Howard

(eds) The Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics. New York: Routledge, pp. 230–245.

52.

Parker

(2017) Facebook was designed to exploit human ‘vulnerability’. Axios, 9 November. Available at: https://www.axios.com/sean-parker-facebook-was-designed-to-exploit-human-vulnerability-1513306782-6d18fa32-5438-4e60-af71-13d126b58e41.html (accessed 25 June 2018).

53.

Pasquale

(2007) Technology, completion, and values. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science, and Technology 8(2): 607–622.

54.

Pasquale

(2015) Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms the Control Money and Information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

55.

Pasquale

(2017) From territorial to functional sovereignty: the case of Amazon. Law and Political Economy Blog. 6 December. Available at: https://lpeblog.org/2017/12/06/from-territorial-to-functional-sovereignty-the-case-of-amazon/ (accessed 5 March 2019).

56.

Pasquale

(2018) Technology platforms and the knowledge problem. American Affairs 2(2): 3–16.

57.

Phillips

(2018) The Oxygen of Amplification. New York: Data and Society.

58.

Pickard

(2017) The big picture: the misinformation society. Public Books, 28 November. Available at: http://www.publicbooks.org/the-big-picture-misinformation-society/ (accessed 25 June 2018).

59.

Pickard

(2019) Democracy without Journalism? Confronting the Misinformation Society. New York: Oxford University Press.

60.

Rosenberg

Confesorre

Cadwalldr

(2018) How Trump consultants exploited the Facebook data of millions. The New York Times, 17 March. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/17/us/politics/cambridge-analytica-trump-campaign.html (accessed 25 June 2018).

61.

Schmidt

(2008) Discursive institutionalism: the explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science 11(2): 303–326.

62.

Schmidt

(2011) Speaking of change: why discourse is key to the dynamics of policy transformation. Critical Policy Studies 5(2): 106–126.

63.

Schnellenbach

(2012) Nudges and norms: on the political economy of soft paternalism. European Journal of Political Economy 28(2): 266–277.

64.

Schulte

(2013) Cached: The Internet in Global Popular Culture. New York: New York University Press.

65.

Slack

(1984) The information revolution as ideology. Media, Culture & Society 6(3): 247–256.

66.

Striphas

(2015) Algorithmic culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies 18(4): 395–412.

67.

Tandoc

Wei Lim

Ling

(2018) Defining ‘fake news’: a typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism 6(2): 137–153.

68.

Tarnoff

Weigel

(2018) Why Silicon Valley can’t fix itself. The Guardian, 3 March. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/may/03/why-silicon-valley-cant-fix-itself-tech-humanism?CMP=share_btn_tw (accessed 25 June 2018).

69.

Tiku

(2017) Mark Zuckerberg’s makeover is a political campaign without the politics. Buzzfeed News, 16 April. Available at: https://www.buzzfeed.com/nitashatiku/how-mark-zuckerberg-is-writing-the-playbook-for-the-modern?utm_term=.evG4XP5Lj#.meDR5PKz7 (accessed 25 June 2018).

70.

Tufecki

(2018) Why Zuckerberg’s14-year apology tour hasn’t fixed Facebook. Wired, 6 April. Available at: https://www.wired.com/story/why-zuckerberg-15-year-apology-tour-hasnt-fixed-facebook/ (accessed 25 June 2018).

71.

Turner

(2006) From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

72.

Ungar

(2001) Moral panic versus the risk society: the implications of the changing sites of social anxiety. British Journal of Sociology 52(2): 271–291.

73.

Vaidhyanathan

(2011) The Googlization of Everything (And Why We Should Worry). Berkley, CA: University of California Press.

74.

Vaidhyanathan

(2018) Antisocial Media: How Facebook Disconnects Us and Undermines Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.

75.

van Dijck

(2013) The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. New York: Oxford University Press.

76.

van Dijk

(1993a) Elite Discourse and Racism. London: Sage.

77.

van Dijk

(1993b) Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society 4(2): 249–283.

78.

Waisbord

(2018) Truth is what happens to the news: on journalism, fake news, and post-truth. Journalism Studies 19(13): 1866–1878.

79.

Wardle

Derakhshan

(2017) Information Disorder: Toward and Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policy Making. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-researc/168076277c (accessed 25 June 2018).

80.

(2016) The Attention Merchants: The Epic Scramble to Get inside Our Head. New York: Vintage.

81.

Zuckerberg

(2018) Hearing before the United States house of representatives committee on energy and commerce. 11 April. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4434050-Mark-Zuckerberg-s-testimony.html (accessed 12 January 2019).

82.

Zuckerman

(2018) This is so much bigger than Facebook. The Atlantic, 23 March. Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/03/data-misuse-bigger-than-facebook/556310/ (accessed 25 June 2018).