One of the few actors whose mission is to provide support and advocacy for refugee communities with limited access to information and services are humanitarian non-governmental organizations (NGOs). This study examines the narratives produced by the leading humanitarian NGOs on one of the most popular social media platforms today—namely, Twitter. The study investigates which narratives are most popular among global NGOs and whether the way they frame the refugee issue is related to Twitter engagement. The findings contribute to scholarship on online communication and user engagement, and also inform humanitarian NGO practices and policy discussions regarding media and migration.
AtoubaYCShumateMD (2020) Meeting the challenge of effectiveness in nonprofit partnerships: examining the roles of partner selection, trust, and communication. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations31(2): 301–315.
2.
BarisioneMMichailidouAAiroldiM (2019) Understanding a digital movement of opinion: the case of #refugees welcome. Information, Communication & Society22(8): 1145–1164.
3.
BaumgartnerFRMahoneyC (2008) Forum section: the two faces of framing. European Union Politics9(3): 435–449. DOI: 10.1177/1465116508093492
BlevinsJLLeeJJMcCabeEE, et al. (2019) Tweeting for social justice in #Ferguson: affective discourse in twitter hashtags. New Media & Society21(7): 1636–1653.
6.
BonsónEPereaDBednárováM (2019) Twitter as a tool for citizen engagement: an empirical study of the Andalusian municipalities. Government Information Quarterly36(3): 480–489.
7.
BradleyM (2016) Protecting Civilians in War: the ICRC, UNHCR, and Their Limitations in Internal Armed Conflicts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
BryskA (2004) Human Rights and Private Wrongs: Constructing Global Civil Society. New York: Routledge.
9.
BudabinACPruceJR (2018) The elite politics of media advocacy in human rights. New Political Science40(4): 744–762.
10.
BürknerP-C (2017) brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software80(1). DOI: 10.18637/jss.v080.i01
ChonM-GParkH (2019) Social media activism in the digital age: testing an integrative model of activism on contentious issues. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly97(1): 72–97.
13.
ChouliarakiL (2006) The Spectatorship of Suffering. London: SAGE.
14.
ChouliarakiLVestergaardA (2021) Routledge Handbook of Humanitarian Communication. New York: Routledge.
15.
DaftRLLengelRH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science32(5): 554–571.
16.
D’AngeloP (2018) Doing News Framing Analysis II: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives. New York; London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
17.
DimitrovaDVÖzdora-AkşakEConnolly-AhernC (2018) On the border of the Syrian refugee crisis: views from two different cultural perspectives. American Behavioral Scientist62(4): 532–546.
EberlJ-MMeltzerCEHeidenreichT (2018) The European media discourse on immigration and its effects: a literature review. Annals of the International Communication Association42(3): 207–223.
20.
EnghelFNoske -TurnerJ (2018) Communication in International Development: Doing Good or Looking Good?London: Routledge.
21.
EntmanRM (1993) Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication43(4): 51–58.
GeddesA (2021) Governing Migration beyond the State: Europe, North America, South America, and Southeast Asia in a Global Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
GelmanARubinDB (1992) Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science7(4): 457–472.
25.
GelmanACarlinJBSternHS, et al. (2014) Bayesian Data Analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
26.
GrimmerJStewartBM (2013) Text as data: the promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis21(03): 267–297.
27.
GuoCSaxtonGD (2013) Tweeting social change. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly43(1): 57–79.
28.
HeidenreichTEberlJ-M (2021) Political elites’ migration discourses on social media. In: StrömbäckJMeltzerCEEberlJ-MSchemerCBoomgaardenHG (eds) Media and Public Attitudes toward Migration in Europe: A Comparative Approach. New York: Routledge, pp. 140–155.
29.
HeidenreichTLindFEberlJ-M, et al. (2019) Media framing dynamics of the ‘European refugee crisis’: a comparative topic modelling approach. Journal of Refugee Studies 32(Special_Issue_1): i172–i182.
30.
InceJRojasFDavisCA (2017) The social media response to black lives matter: how Twitter users interact with black lives matter through hashtag use. Ethnic and Racial Studies40(11): 1814–1830.
31.
IyengarSKinderDR (2010) News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago, IL; London: University Of Chicago Press.
32.
KyriakidouM (2021) The audience of humanitarian communication. In: ChouliarakiLVestergaardA (eds) Routledge Handbook of Humanitarian Communication. London: Routledge, pp. 88–103.
33.
LawlorATolleyE (2017) Deciding who’s legitimate: news media framing of immigrants and refugees. International Journal of Communication11: 967–991.
34.
LindFEberlJ-MHeidenreichT, et al. (2019) When the journey is as important as the goal: a roadmap to multilingual dictionary construction. International Journal of Communication13(21): 4000–4020.
35.
LumsdenKMorganH (2017) Media framing of trolling and online abuse: silencing strategies, symbolic violence, and victim blaming. Feminist Media Studies17(6): 926–940.
Özdora-AkşakEDimitrovaD (2021) Walking on a tightrope: challenges and opportunities for civil society organizations working with refugees and migrants in Turkey. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. Epub ahead of Print January. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-020-00312-8
39.
PancerEPooleM (2016) The popularity and virality of political social media: hashtags, mentions, and links predict likes and retweets of 2016 US presidential nominees’ tweets. Social Influence11(4): 259–270.
40.
PowersM (2014) The structural organization of NGO publicity work: explaining divergent publicity strategies at humanitarian and human rights organizations. International Journal of Communication 8. Available at: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2517
41.
PowersM (2018) Ngos as Newsmakers: The Changing Landscape of International News. New York: Columbia University Press.
42.
Raja-YusofRJNormanAAAbdul-RahmanSS, et al. (2016) Cyber-volunteering: social media affordances in fulfilling NGO social missions. Computers in Human Behavior57: 388–397. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.02
SafferAJYangAMorehouseJ, et al. (2019) It takes a village: a social network approach to NGOs’ international public engagement. American Behavioral Scientist63(12): 1708–1727.
45.
SalgadoSBobbaG (2019) News on events and social media: a comparative analysis of Facebook users’ reactions. Journalism Studies20(15): 2258–2276.
46.
ScheufeleDA (1999) Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication49(1): 103–122.
47.
SiaperaEBoudouridesMLenisS, et al. (2018) Refugees and network publics on Twitter: Networked framing, affect, and capture. Social Media + Society4(1): 1–21
StoneDA (1989) Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political Science Quarterly104(2): 281.
50.
TanupabrungsunSHemsleyJ (2018) Studying celebrity practices on twitter using a framework for measuring media richness. Social Media + Society4(1): 1–11.
51.
ThrallATSteculaDSweetD (2014) Maywe have your attention please? Human-rights NGOs and the problem of global communication. The International Journal of Press/politics19(2): 135–159.
van der MeerTGLA (2016) Automated content analysis and crisis communication research. Public Relations Review42(5): 952–961.
54.
VestergaardA (2021) Text-analytical approaches to humanitarian communication. In: ChouliarakiLVestergaardA (eds) Routledge Handbook of Humanitarian Communication. London: Routledge, pp. 104–118.
55.
ZiegeleMSpringerNJostP, et al. (2018) Online user comments across news and other content formats: Multidisciplinary perspectives, new directions. SCM Studies in Communication and Media6(4): 315–332.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
