To understand how individuals navigate the complex, dynamic, and bewildering media information environment, we propose a convergence framework theorizing individuals’ acquisition of information from distinct sources on multiple mediums, along with its antecedents and consequences. This study is among the first to test the convergence framework. Using a national sample during the COVID-19 pandemic, our results revealed four convergence patterns and key antecedents and outcomes of these patterns. Individuals’ information verification tendency, perceived medium anonymity, and trust in alternative sources were associated with distinct patterns of convergence, which led to different risk perceptions. Future research should explore different forms of convergence and additional antecedents and outcomes of convergence.
AnthonyKESellnowTL (2011) Information acquisition, perception, preference, and convergence by Gulf Coast residents in the aftermath of the Hurricane Katrina crisis. Argumentation and Advocacy48(2): 81–96.
2.
AnthonyKESellnowTL (2016) The role of the message convergence framework in medical decision making. Journal of Health Communication21: 249–256.
3.
AnthonyKESellnowTLMillnerAG (2013) Message convergence as a message-centered approach to analyzing and improving risk communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research41(4): 346–364.
Allen CatellierJRYangZJ (2012) Trust and affect: how do they impact risk information seeking in a health context?Journal of Risk Research15(8): 897–911. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2012.686048
6.
BrewerPRLeyBL (2013) Whose science do you believe? Explaining trust in sources of scientific information about the environment. Science Communication35(1): 115–137.
7.
BusbyJDuckettD (2012) Social risk amplification as an attribution: the case of zoonotic disease outbreaks. Journal of Risk Research15(9): 1049–1074.
8.
BanduraA (2001) Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology52(1): 1–26.
9.
ChaffeeS (1986) Mass media and interpersonal channels: competitive, convergent or complimentary? In: GumpertGCathcartR (eds) Intermedia: Interpersonal Communication in a Media World. London: Oxford University Press, pp. 62–80.
10.
EverittBSLandauSLeeseM, et al. (2011) Cluster Analysis. London: John Wiley & Sons.
11.
FigenschouTUIhlebækKA (2019) Challenging journalistic authority: media criticism in far-right alternative media. Journalism Studies20(9): 1221–1237.
12.
FoxJMcEwanB (2017) Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: the perceived social affordances of communication channels scale. Communication Monographs84(3): 298–318.
GibsonJJ (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghlin Mifflin.
15.
HeeterC (1985) Program selection with abundance of choice: a process model. Human Communication Research12(1): 126–152.
16.
HerovicESellnowTLAnthonyKE (2014) Risk communication as interacting arguments: viewing the L’aquila earthquake disaster through the message convergence framework. Argumentation and Advocacy51(2): 73–86.
17.
JenkinsH (2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University.
18.
KaspersonREKaspersonJX (1996) The social amplification and attenuation of risk. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science545(1): 95–105.
19.
KievikMter HuurneEFGuttelingJM (2012) The action suited to the word? Use of the framework of risk information seeking to understand risk-related behaviors. Journal of Risk Research15(2): 131–147.
20.
KimJNGrunigJE (2011) Problem solving and communicative action: a situational theory of problem solving. Journal of Communication61(1): 120–149.
21.
KimSJ (2016) A repertoire approach to cross-platform media use behavior. New Media & Society18(3): 353–372.
22.
LeeSYHawkinsR (2010) Why do patients seek an alternative channel? The effects of unmet needs on patients' health-related Internet use. Journal of Health Communication15(2): 152–166.
23.
LiuBFFraustinoJDJinY (2016) Social media use during disasters: how information form and source influence intended behavioral responses. Communication Research43: 626–646.
24.
LiuBFXuSLimJR, et al. (2019) How publics’ active and passive communicative behaviors affect their tornado responses: an integration of STOPS and SMCC. Public Relations Review45(4): 101831.
25.
MetzgerMJFlanaginAJZwarunL (2003) College student web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior. Computers & Education41(3): 271–290.
26.
MirbabaieMStieglitzSBrünkerF (2021) Dynamics of convergence behaviour in social media crisis communication—a complexity perspective. Information Technology & People35(1): 232–258.
27.
MourãoRRThorsonEChenW, et al. (2018) Media repertoires and news trust during the early Trump administration. Journalism Studies19(13): 1945–1956.
28.
NanXKimJ (2014) Predicting H1N1 vaccine uptake and H1N1-related health beliefs: the role of individual difference in consideration of future consequences. Journal of Health Communication19(3): 376–388.
29.
NeyaziTAKumarADuttaMJ (2019) Channel complementarity or displacement? Theory and evidence from a non-Western election context. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media63(4): 656–676.
30.
NormanDA (1990) The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Doubleday.
31.
PettyRECacioppoJT (1979) Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology37(10): 1915–1926.
32.
RainsSARuppelEK (2016) Channel complementarity theory and the health information-seeking process: further investigating the implications of source characteristic complementarity. Communication Research43(2): 232–252.
33.
RennOLevineD (1991) Trust and credibility in risk communication. In: KaspersonREStallenPJM (eds) Communicating Risks to the Public. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, pp. 175–218.
34.
RimalRNRealK (2003) Perceived risk and efficacy beliefs as motivators of change: use of the risk perception attitude (RPA) framework to understand health behaviors. Human Communication Research29(3): 370–399.
35.
RobertsHVeilSR (2016) Health literacy and crisis: public relations in the 2010 egg recall. Public Relations Review42(1): 214–218.
36.
RuppelEKRainsSA (2012) Information sources and the health information-seeking process: an application and extension of channel complementarity theory. Communication Monographs79(3): 385–405.
37.
SellnowDDSellnowTLMartinJM (2019) Strategic message convergence in communicating biosecurity: the case of the 2013 porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Communication Reports32(3): 125–136.
38.
SellnowTLLittlefieldRSVidoloffKG, et al. (2009) The interacting arguments of risk communication in response to terrorist hoaxes. Argumentation and Advocacy45(3): 139–154.
39.
SommerfeldtEJ (2015) Disasters and information source repertoires: information seeking and information sufficiency in postearthquake Haiti. Journal of Applied Communication Research43(1): 1–22.
40.
SundarSSLimperosAM (2013) Uses and grats 2.0: new gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media57(4): 504–525.
41.
TanejaHWebsterJGMalthouseEC, et al. (2012) Media consumption across platforms: identifying user-defined repertoires. New Media & Society14(6): 951–968.
42.
VanderfordMLNastoffTTelferJL, et al. (2007) Emergency communication challenges in response to Hurricane Katrina: lessons from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Journal of Applied Communication Research35(1): 9–25.
YuanE (2011) News consumption across multiple media platforms: a repertoire approach. Information, Communication & Society14(7): 998–1016.
45.
ZhaoXTsangSJ (2021) Self-protection by fact-checking: how pandemic information seeking and verifying affect preventive behaviors. Journal of Contingency and Crisis Management. Epub Ahead of Print, 12August2021. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5973.12372
46.
ZhaoXZhanMWongCW (2018) Segmenting and understanding publics in a social media information sharing network: an interactional and dynamic approach. International Journal of Strategic Communication12(1): 25–45.
