Disability is a long-standing area of digital inclusion finally emerging out of the shadows. In this article, we argue that a critical understanding of digital media from the perspectives of disability and intersectionality will offer generative insights for framing the terms and agenda of digital inclusion in the next decade. With a focus on the area of automated decision-making (ADM) in social and welfare services, we reflect upon the controversial 2015–2020 Australian government programme widely known as ‘Robodebt’ that recovers putative debts from support recipients – and we discuss implications for Indigenous Australians with disabilities in particular. We contrast the ‘Robodebt’ programme with explicit digital inclusion policy on disability in Australia, noting that such digital inclusion policy does not specifically acknowledge yet alone address ADM or other aspects of automation. Here, there is a major opportunity for overdue acknowledgement of disability and intersectionality to spur and shape an affirmative and just agenda on people with disabilities’ digital inclusion, ADM and other associated areas of automated technologies.
Al-MuwilAWeerakkodyVEl-haddadehR, et al. (2019) Balancing digital-by-default with inclusion: a study of the factors influencing e-inclusion in the UK. Information Systems Frontiers21(3): 635–659.
2.
AlperM (2015) Augmentative, alternative, and assistive: reimagining the history of mobile computing and disability. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing37(1): 96–96.
3.
AlperM (2017) Giving Voice: Mobile Communication, Disability, and Inequality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
AlperMKatzVSClarkLS (2016) Researching children, intersectionality, and diversity in the digital age. Journal of Children and Media10(1): 107–114.
5.
AndrejevicM (2019) Automated Media. London and New York: Routledge.
6.
ArtilesAJDornSBalA (2016) Objects of protection, enduring nodes of difference: disability intersections with ‘other’ differences, 1916 to 2016. Review of Research in Education40(1): 777–820.
7.
BaileyJSteevesVBurkellJ, et al. (2019) Getting at equality: research methods informed by the lessons of intersectionality. International Journal of Qualitative Methods18: 1–13.
8.
BeckettAE (2006) Citizenship and Vulnerability: Disability and Issues of Social and Political Engagement. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
9.
BenjaminR (2019) Race After Technology. London: Polity.
10.
BennettCLKeyesO (2020) What is the point of fairness? Disability, AI and the complexity of justice. ACM SIGACESS Accessibility and Computing125: Article 5.
11.
BigoDIsinERuppertE (eds) (2019) Data Politics: Worlds, Subjects, Rights. London: Routledge.
12.
BitmanNJohnNA (2019) Deaf and hard of hearing smartphone users: intersectionality and the penetration of ableist communication norms. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication24(2): 56–72.
13.
BlattnerCE (2020) Right to work or refusal to work: disability rights at a crossroads. Disability & Society36(9): 1375–1398.
14.
BriantEWatsonNPhiloG (2013) Reporting disability in the age of austerity: the changing face of media representation of disability and disabled people in the United Kingdom and the creation of new ‘folk devils’. Disability & Society28(6): 874–889.
15.
CarmiEYatesSJ (2020) Digital inclusion and data literacy. Internet Policy Review9(2): 1–14. DOI: 10.14763/2020.2.1474.
16.
CarneyT (2019) Robo-debt illegality: the seven veils of failed guarantees of the rule of law?Alternative Law Journal44(1): 4–10.
17.
ChávezKRGriffinCL (eds) (2012) Standing in the Intersection: Feminist Voices, Feminist Practices in Communication Studies. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
18.
ChristianAJDayFDíazM, et al. (2020) Platforming intersectionality: networked solidarity and the limits of corporate social media. Social Media + Society6(3): 1–12.
19.
CobbeJ (2019) Administrative law and the machines of government: judicial review of automated public-sector decision-making. Legal Studies39(4): 636–655.
Costanza-ChockS (2020) Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
DalvitL (2020) Mobile phones and visual impairment in South Africa: experiences from a small town. In: EllisKGogginGHallerBCurtisR (eds) Routledge Companion to Disability and Media. New York: Routledge, pp. 285–294.
24.
DencikLHintzACableJ (2016) Towards data justice? The ambiguity of anti-surveillance resistance in political activism. Big Data & Society3(2): 1–12.
25.
DencikLHintzAReddenJ, et al. (2019) Exploring data justice: conceptions, applications and directions. Information, Communication and Society22(7): 873–881.
26.
DobranskyKHargittaiE (2016) Unrealized potential: exploring the digital disability divide. Poetics58: 5818–5828.
27.
EllcessorE (2016) Restricted Access: Media, Disability, and the Politics of Participation. New York: NYU Press.
28.
EllcessorEKirkpatrickB (2017) (eds) Disability Media Studies. New York: NYU Press.
29.
ElliottA (2019) The Culture of AI: Everyday Life and the Digital Revolution. London and Yew York: Routledge.
30.
EllisKKentM (2011) Disability and New Media. London and New York: Routledge.
31.
ErevellesN (2011) Disability and Difference in Global Contexts: Enabling a Transformative Body Politic. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
32.
EubanksV (2018) Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
33.
FinkKA (2018) Opening the government’s black boxes: freedom of information and algorithmic accountability. Information, Communication & Society21(10): 1453–1471.
34.
GangadharanSP (2017) The downside of digital inclusion: expectations and experiences of privacy and surveillance among marginal Internet users. New Media & Society19(4): 597–615.
35.
GarthwaiteK (2011) ‘The language of shirkers and scroungers?’ Talking about illness, disability and coalition welfare reform. Disability & Society26(3): 369–372.
36.
Giritli NygrenKOlofssonAÖhmanS (2020) A Framework of Intersectional Risk Theory in the Age of Ambivalence. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
37.
GogginG (2018) Afterword: why digital inclusion now? In: RagneddaMMutsvairoB (eds) Digital Inclusion: An International Comparative Analysis. Lanham, MD: Lexington, pp. 205–212.
38.
GogginG (2021) Disability, Internet, and digital inequality: the research agenda. In: HargittaiE (ed) Handbook on Digital Inequality. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 255–273.
39.
GogginGNewellC (2003) Digital Disability: Social Construction of Disability in New Media. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
40.
GogginGNewellC (2005) Disability in Australia: Exposing a Social Apartheid. Sydney: University of NSW Press.
41.
GogginGEllisKHawkinsW (2019) Disability at the centre of digital inclusion: assessing a new moment in technology and rights. Communication Research and Practice5(3): 290–230.
42.
GrechSSoldaticK (eds) (2016) Disability in the Global South: The Critical Handbook. Cham: Springer.
43.
GriffinCLChávezKR (2012) Standing at the intersections of feminisms, intersectionality, and communication studies. In: ChávezKRGriffinCL (eds) Standing in the Intersection: Feminist Voices, Feminist Practices in Communication Studies. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 1–31.
44.
GurungP (2020) Our lives, our story: the journey of the voiceless towards advocacy in Nepal. In: SoldaticKJohnsonK (eds) Global Perspectives on Disability Activism and Advocacy. London: Routledge, pp. 145–160.
45.
HamraieA (2017) Building Access: Universal Design and the Politics of Disability. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
46.
HartblayC (2019) After marginalization: pixelization, disability, and social difference in digital Russia. South Atlantic Quarterly118(3): 543–572.
47.
HedrenS (2020) What Can a Body Do? How We Meet the Built World. New York: Riverhead Books.
48.
HeeksRShekharS (2019) Datafication, development and marginalised urban communities: an applied data justice framework. Information, Communication & Society22(7): 992–1011.
49.
HenmanP (2010) Governing Electronically: E-Government and the Reconfiguration of Public Administration, Policy, and Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
50.
HenmanP (2019) Of algorithms, apps, and advice: digital social policy and service delivery. Journal of Asian Public Policy12(1): 71–89.
JohnsonMR (2019) Inclusion and exclusion in the digital economy: disability and mental health as a live streamer on Twitch.tv. Information, Communication & Society22(4): 506–520.
53.
JordanK (2018) Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander employment policy and welfare to work: the community development programme and the need for new narratives, new alliances and new institutions. Australian Journal of Social Issues53(3): 239–261.
54.
KatzmanERKinsellaEAPolzerJ (2020) ‘Everything is down to the minute’: clock time, crip time, and the relational work of self-managing attendant services. Disability & Society35(4): 517–541.
55.
KuziemskiMMisuracaG (2020) AI governance in the public sector: three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications Policy44(6): 1–12.
56.
LangdonPLazarJHeylighenA, et al. (eds) (2020) Designing for Inclusion: Inclusive Design: Looking Towards the Future. Cham: Springer.
57.
LarssonATeiglandR (eds) (2019) Digital Transformation and Public Services: Societal Impacts in Sweden and Beyond. London: Routledge.
58.
LazarJSteinMA (eds) (2017) Disability, Human Rights, and Information Technology. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
59.
LinZYangLZhangZ (2018) To include, or not to include, that is the question: disability digital inclusion and exclusion in China. New Media & Society20(12): 4436–4452.
60.
LutzC (2019) Digital inequalities in the age of artificial intelligence and big data. Human Behaviour & Emerging Technologies1: 141–148.
McNamaraJ (2018) Organizational Listening: The Missing Essential Ingredient in Public Communication. New York: Peter Lang.
63.
MargettsHDorobantuC (2019) Rethink government with AI. Nature568(7751): 163–165.
64.
MendesP (2017) Australia’s Welfare Wars: The Players, the Politics, and the Ideologies. Sydney: UNSW Press.
65.
MengerFMorrisJSalisC (2016) Aphasia in an Internet age: wider perspectives on digital inclusion. Aphasiology30(2–3): 112–132.
66.
MoserI (2006) Disability and the promises of technology: technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal. Information, Communication & Society9(3): 373–395.
67.
MurrayS (2020) Disability and the Posthuman: Bodies, Technologies and Cultural Futures. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
68.
NeaveC (2016) Department of Human Services: Accessibility of Disability Support Pension for Remote Indigenous Australians. Canberra: Commonwealth Ombudsman. Available at: http://www.ombudsman.gov.au/
69.
OlneySDickinsonH (2019) Australia’s new national disability insurance scheme: implications for policy and practice. Policy Design and Practice2(3): 275–290.
70.
ParkSHumphryJ (2019) Exclusion by design: intersections of social, digital and data exclusion. Information, Communication & Society22(7): 934–995.
71.
PearsonCTrevisanF (2015) Disability activism in the new media ecology: campaigning strategies in the digital era. Disability & Society30(6): 924–940.
72.
PedersenMJStritchJMThuesenF (2018) Punishment on the frontlines of public service delivery: client ethnicity and caseworker sanctioning decisions in a Scandinavian welfare state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory28(3): 339–354.
73.
RamasubramanianSBanjoO (2020) Critical media effects framework: bridging critical cultural communication and media effects through power, intersectionality, context, and agency. Journal of Communication70(3): 379–400.
74.
RanerupAHenriksenHZ (2019) Value positions viewed through the lens of automated decision-making: the case of social services. Government Information Quarterly36(4): 101377.
75.
RavnebergBSöderströmS (2017) Disability, Society and Assistive Technology. London: Routledge.
76.
ReddenJ (2018) Democratic governance in an age of datafication: lessons from mapping government discourses and practices. Big Data & Society5(2): 1–13.
77.
RennieEThomasJWilsonC (2019) Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and digital inclusion: what is the evidence and where is it?Communication Research and Practice5(2): 105–112.
78.
RoulstoneA (2016) Disability and Technology: An Interdisciplinary and International Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
79.
RoyALewthwaiteS (2016) Critical silences: disability, networked technologies and the global south. In: GrechSSoldaticK (eds) Disability in the Global South. Cham: Springer, pp. 483–500.
80.
Runswick-ColeKGoodleyD (2015) DisPovertyPorn: benefits street and the dis/ability paradox. Disability & Society30(4): 645–649.
81.
SchouJPorsAS (2019) Digital by default? A qualitative study of exclusion in digitalised welfare. Social Policy & Administration53(3): 464–477.
82.
SoldaticK (2018) Disability poverty and ageing in regional Australia: the impact of disability income reforms for indigenous Australians. Australian Journal of Social Issues53(3): 223–338.
83.
SoldaticK (2019) Disability & Neoliberal State Formations. London: Routledge.
84.
SoldaticK (2020) Disability circularity: presence, absence & erasure in Australian settler-colonial biopolitical population regimes. Studies in Social Justice14(2): 306–320.
85.
SoldaticKFittsM (2020) Sorting yourself out of the system: everyday processes of elusive social sorting in Australia’s disability social security regime for Indigenous Australians. Disability & Society35(3): 347–365.
86.
SoldaticKSykesD (2017) Poverty and people with disability. In: SerrK (ed) Thinking about Poverty. 4th ed.Sydney: The Federation Press, pp. 189–207.
87.
SoldaticKVan ToornGDowseL, et al. (2014) Intellectual disability and complex intersections: marginalisation under the national disability insurance scheme. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities1(1): 6–16.
The Senate (2020) Centrelink’s Compliance Program: 2nd Interim Report. Senate Community Affairs Reference Committee, September. Canberra: Parliament of Australia.
90.
ThillC (2015) Listening for policy change: how the voices of disabled people shaped Australia’s National Disability Insurance Scheme. Disability & Society30(1): 15–28.
91.
ThomasJ (2019) Inside the institutions: culture and communication from digital transformations to automation. Cultural Studies Review25: 89–95.
92.
ThomasJBarraketJWilsonCK, et al. (2019) Measuring Australia’s Digital Divide: The Australian Digital Inclusion Index 2019. Melbourne: RMIT University and Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, for Telstra. Available at: https://apo.org.au/node/255341
93.
TilleyS (2020) In the name of ‘digital inclusion’: the true cost of the automation and privatisation of Australia’s social security system. Social Alternatives39(1): 28–38.
TrevisanF (2017) Crowd-sourced advocacy: promoting disability rights through online storytelling. Public Relations Inquiry6(2): 191–208.
96.
TrewinSBassonSMullerM, et al. (2019) Considerations for AI fairness for people with disabilities. AI Matters5(3): 40–63.
97.
TsatsouP (2020a) Digital inclusion of people with disabilities: a qualitative study of intra-disability diversity in the digital realm. Behaviour & Information Technology39(9): 995–1010.
98.
TsatsouP (2020b) Is digital inclusion fighting disability stigma? Opportunities, barriers, and recommendations. Disability & Society36(5): 702–729.
99.
Van DeursenAJAMvan der ZeeuwAde BoerP, et al. (2021) Digital inequalities in the Internet of Things: differences in attitudes, material access, skills, and usage. Information, Communication and Society24(2): 258–276.
100.
WatermeyerBGogginG (2018) Digital citizenship in the global south: ‘cool stuff for other people’?. In: WatermayerBMcKenzieJSwartzL (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Disability and Citizenship in the Global South. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 167–181.
101.
WhelanA (2020) ‘Ask for more time’: big data chronopolitics in the Australian welfare bureaucracy. Critical Sociology46(6): 867–880.
YuHGogginGFisherK, et al. (eds) (2019) Introduction: disability participation in the digital economy. Information, Communication & Society22(4): 467–473.
