This article presents a conceptual model that explores the extent to which various (non)-users can be subjected to mechanisms of inclusion or exclusion. The model consists of eight profiles of digital inequalities, ranging from deep exclusion to deep inclusion, and is based upon a combination of five key indicators at the social level (income, education, social participation, agency, well-being) and eight key indicators at the digital level (access, attitudes, digital skills, soft skills, media richness of the environment, autonomy of use, user practices and social support). This conceptual model, by going further than socio-demographics, (a) allows the formulation of an alternative lens through which to look at mechanisms of inclusion and exclusion and (b) brings a significant contribution to existing research by highlighting the co-action of social and digital indicators in mechanisms of inclusion and exclusion.
AsmarAMariënIVan AudenhoveL (2020a) A qualitative analysis of the development of digital autonomy beyond the life course perspective. Report, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, October.
2.
AsmarAVan AudenhoveLMariënI (2020b) Social support of digital inclusion: towards a typology of social support patterns. Social Inclusion8(2): 138–150.
3.
AtwellP (2001) The first and the second digital divide. Sociology of Education74(3): 171–191.
4.
BolNHelbergerNWeertJC (2018) Differences in mobile health app use: a source of new inequalities. The Information Society34(3): 183–193.
5.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJ (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Wesport, CT: Greenwood, pp. 241–258.
6.
BrantsKFrissenV (2003) Inclusion and exclusion in the information society. Report, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
7.
BrunoGEspositoEGenoveseA, et al. (2010) A critical analysis of current indexes for digital divide measurement. The Information Society27(1): 16–28.
8.
ByrneD (2005) Social Exclusion. New York: Open University Press.
9.
CastelR (1995) Les pièges de l’exclusion. Lien Social Et Politiques34: 13–21.
10.
CoeckelberghM (2013) Human Being @Risk: Enhancement, Technology and the Evaluation of Vulnerability Transformations. Dordrecht: Springer.
11.
CrangMCrosbieTGrahamS (2007) Technology, time-space, and the remediation of neighborhood life. Environment and Planning A39: 2405–2422.
12.
DiMaggioPHargittaiECelesteC, et al. (2004) From unequal access to differentiated use: a literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality. Report, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
13.
FaureLVendraminPSchurmansD (2020) A situated approach to digital exclusion based on the life courses. Internet Policy Review9(2): 1–18.
14.
FinemanMA (2017) Vulnerability and inevitable inequality. Oslo Law Review4(3): 133–149.
15.
GilbertM (2010) Theorizing digital and urban inequalities. Information, Communication & Society13(7): 1000–1018.
16.
GoedhartNSBroerseJEKattouwR, et al. (2019) ’Just having a computer doesn’t make sense’: the digital divide from the perspective of mothers with a low socio-economic position. New Media & Society21(11–12): 2347–2365.
17.
HachéACullenJ (2010) ICT and Youth at Risk: how ICT-driven initiatives can contribute to their socio-economic inclusion and how to measure it. Report JRC58427. Seville: Joint Research Center.
18.
HaddonL (2000) Social exclusion and information and communication technologies: lessons from the studies of single parents and the young elderly. New Media & Society2(4): 387–406.
19.
HargittaiE (2003) The digital divide and what to do about it. In: JonesD (ed.) New Economy Handbook. San Diego, CA: Elsevier, pp. 821–839.
20.
HargittaiEHinnantA (2008) Digital inequality: differences in young adults’ use of the internet. Communication Research35(5): 602–621.
21.
HelsperEJ (2012) A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital exclusion. Communication Theory22(4): 403–426.
22.
HelsperEJReisdorfBC (2017) The emergence of digital underclass in Great Britain and Sweden: changing reason for digital exclusion. New Media & Society19(8): 1253–1270.
23.
HüsingTSelhoferH (2004) DIDIX: a digital divide index for measuring inequality in IT diffusion. IT & Society1(7): 21–38.
24.
Jehoel-GijsbersGVroomanC (2007) Explaining social exclusion. Report, Narcis, The Hague.
25.
LevitasR (2005) The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour. New York: Palgrave.
26.
LevitasRPantazisCFahmyE, et al. (2007) The multidimensional analysis of social exclusion. Report, University of Bristol, Bristol.
27.
LivingstoneSHelsperE (2007) Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society9(4): 671–696.
28.
MariënI (2016) De Dichotomie van de Digitale Kloof Doorprikt: Een Onderzoek naar de Oorzaken van Digitale Uitsluiting en naar Strategieën voor een Duurzaam e-Inclusie Beleid. PhD Thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel.
29.
MariënIBaeldenD (2015) 8 profielen van digitale ongelijkheden. Report, Belspo, Brussels.
30.
MariënIProdnikJ (2014) Digital inclusion and user (dis)
empowerment: a critical perspective. Info16(6): 35–47.
31.
MariënIAsmarAVan AudenhoveL, et al. (2019) No one-size fits all: from digital inequality profiles to a customised digital inclusion strategy. In: Digital inclusion policy and research conference, London, 18–19 June.
32.
MariënIHeymansRSaleminkK, et al. (2016) Digital by default. Consequences, casualties and coping strategies. In: ServaesJOyedemiT (eds) Social Inequalities, Media and Communication: Theory and Roots. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 1–37.
33.
MilibandD (2006) Social exclusion: the next steps forward. Report, ODPM, London.
34.
ParkS (2017) Digital inequalities in rural Australia: a double jeopardy of remoteness and social exclusion. Journal of Rural Studies54: 399–407.
35.
PunieYLusoliWCentenoC, et al. (2009) The impact of social computing on the Eu information society and economy. Report JRC54327 Luxembourg: Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities.
36.
ReisdorfBCGroseljD (2017) Internet (non)-use types and motivational access: implications for digital inequalities research. New Media & Society19(8): 1157–1176.
37.
ReisdorfBCRhinesmithC (2020) Digital inclusion as a core component of social inclusion. Social Inclusion8(2): 132–137.
38.
RoomG (1995) Beyond the Threshold: The Measurement and Analysis of Social Exclusion. Bristol: The Policy Press.
39.
SaleminkK (2016) Digital margins: social and digital exclusion of Gypsy-travelers in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space48(6): 1170–1187.
40.
SelwynN (2004) Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society6(3): 341–362.
41.
SelwynN (2006) Digital division or digital decision? A study of non-users and low users of computers. Poetics 34(4–5):273–292.
42.
TownsendLSaleminkKWallaceCD (2020) Gypsy-Traveler communities in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands: socially and digitally excluded?Media, Culture & Society42(5): 637–653.
43.
Van AudenhoveLMariënIPhilipsenB, et al. (2020) Een digitale versnelling hoger schakelen? Ja, maar niet iedereen kan mee. In: BrengmanM (ed.) Post viraal naar een nieuw normaal: VUB-stemmen over de impact van corona op onze samenleving. Brussels: ASP/VUBPRESS/UPA, pp. 35–40.
44.
Van DeursenA (2018) Digitale ongelijkheden in Nederland, Report, University of Twente, Twente.
45.
Van DeursenAVan DijkJA (2010) Measuring internet skills. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction26(10): 891–916.
46.
Van DeursenAVan der ZeeuwAde BoerP, et al. (2021) Digital inequalities in the Internet of Things: differences in attitudes, material access, skills and usage. Information, Communication & Society24: 258–276.
47.
Van DijkJA (2005) The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
48.
Van DijkJA (2006) Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics34: 221–235.
49.
Van DijkJA (2012) The evolution of the digital divide: the digital divide turns to inequality of skills and usage. In: BusJCromptonMHildebrandtM, et al. (eds) Digital Enlightenment Yearbook. Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 57–75.
50.
Van DijkJA (2020) The Digital Divide. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
51.
WarrenL (2007) The digital vicious cycle: links between social disadvantage and digital exclusion in rural areas. Telecommunications Policy31(6–7): 374–388.
52.
WarschauerM (2003) Demystifying the digital divide. Scientific American289(2): 42–47.
53.
WautersCVan AudenhoveLMariënI (2020) E-inclusie beleid in België: Een overzicht van de bestaande en mogelijke beleidsplannen, acties en initiatieven. Report, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium, January.
54.
WitteJCMannonSE (2010) The Internet and Social Inequalities. New York and London: Routledge.
55.
YatesSJKirbyJLockleyE (2015) ‘Digital-by-default’: reinforcing exclusion through technology. Defence of Welfare2: 158–161.
56.
ZillienNHargittaiE (2009) Digital distinction: status-specific types of internet usage. Social Science Quarterly90(2): 274–291.
