This study examines startups’ social media communication practice in China through the theoretical lens of dialogic communication. Drawing interdisciplinary insights from public relations and computer-mediated communication, this study explored conversational human voice and social presence as antecedents of startups’ dialogic communication with publics on social media and explored publics’ trust and positive word-of-mouth as potential outcomes of this process. Results from an online survey with 1061 social media users in China who had followed at least one startup organization revealed that startups’ conversational human voice and social presence on social media helped drive organization–public dialogic communication, which in turn fostered publics’ trust and positive word-of-mouth toward startups. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
AbimbolaT (2001) Branding as competitive strategy for demand management in SMEs. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship3(2): 97–106.
2.
AlgharabatRRanaNPDwivediYK, et al. (2018) The effect of telepresence, social presence and involvement on consumer brand engagement: an empirical study of non-profit organizations. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services40: 139–149.
3.
AoSHHuangQS (2020) A systematic review on the application of dialogue in public relations to information communication technology-based platforms: comparing English and Chinese contexts. Public Relations Review46(1): 101814.
4.
AthertonAMNewmanA (2017) Entrepreneurship in China: The Emergence of the Private Sector. London: Routledge.
5.
BertotJCJaegerPTGrimesJM (2010) Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: e-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly27(3): 264–271.
6.
BortreeDSSeltzerT (2009) Dialogic strategies and outcomes: an analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles. Public Relations Review35(3): 317–319.
7.
BrescianiSEpplerM (2010) Brand new ventures? Insights on start-ups’ branding practices. Journal of Product & Brand Management19(5): 356–366.
8.
BrownTJBarryTEDacinPA, et al. (2005) Spreading the word: investigating antecedents of consumers’ positive word-of-mouth intentions and behaviors in a retailing context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science33(2): 123–138.
9.
ChenYRR (2017) Perceived values of branded mobile media, consumer engagement, business-consumer relationship quality and purchase intention: a study of WeChat in China. Public Relations Review43(5): 945–954.
10.
ChenYRRHung-BaeseckeCJFChenX (2020) Moving forward the dialogic theory of public relations: concepts, methods and applications of organization-public dialogue. Public Relations Review46(1): 101878.
11.
ChenZFJiYGMenLR (2017) Strategic use of social media for stakeholder engagement in startup companies in China. International Journal of Strategic Communication11(3): 244–267.
CummingsLLBromileyP (1996) The organizational trust inventory (OTI). Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research302(330): 39–52.
14.
Cyzone (2018) 2018创业邦100榜单出炉，我们从数千家公司挑出100家发展速度最快的，你Pick哪家？ [The top 100 startups list from Cyzone is out. We picked the 100 fastest growing startups among several thousand. Which one do you pick?]. Available at: https://www.cyzone.cn/article/484070.html (accessed 15 June 2019).
15.
DijkmansCKerkhofPBuyukcan-TetikA, et al. (2015) Online conversation and corporate reputation: a two-wave longitudinal study on the effects of exposure to the social media activities of a highly interactive company. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication20(6): 632–648.
GarrisonDRAndersonTArcherW (2000) Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education2(2–3): 87–105.
18.
GretryAHorváthCBeleiN, et al. (2017) “Don’t pretend to be my friend!” When an informal brand communication style backfires on social media. Journal of Business Research74: 77–89.
19.
GunawardenaCN (1995) Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications1(2): 147–166.
20.
GunawardenaCNZittleFJ (1997) Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education11(3): 8–26.
21.
HassaneinKHeadMJuC (2009) A cross-cultural comparison of the impact of social presence on website trust, usefulness and enjoyment. International Journal of Electronic Business7(6): 625–641.
22.
Hennig-ThurauTGwinnerKPWalshG, et al. (2004) Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet?Journal of Interactive Marketing18(1): 38–52.
HungCJFChenYRR (2009) Types and dimensions of organization–public relationships in greater China. Public Relations Review35(3): 181–186.
25.
JiangJWeiR (2013) Power distance and online organization–public relationship building: a comparative analysis of US and Chinese corporate websites. Chinese Journal of Communication6(1): 81–102.
26.
JohnsonMFSallisJFHovellMF (2000) Self-report assessment of walking: effects of aided recall instructions and item order. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science4(3): 141–155.
27.
KangMKimJRChaH (2018) From concerned citizens to activists: a case study of 2015 South Korean MERS outbreak and the role of dialogic government communication and citizens’ emotions on public activism. Journal of Public Relations Research30(5–6): 202–229.
28.
KaplanAMHaenleinM (2010) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons53(1): 59–68.
29.
KelleherT (2009) Conversational voice, communicated commitment, and public relations outcomes in interactive online communication. Journal of Communication59(1): 172–188.
30.
KelleherTMillerBM (2006) Organizational blogs and the human voice: relational strategies and relational outcomes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication11(2): 395–414.
31.
KentMLLaneAB (2017) A rhizomatous metaphor for dialogic theory. Public Relations Review43(3): 568–578.
32.
KentMLLiC (2020) Toward a normative social media theory for public relations. Public Relations Review46(1): 1–10.
33.
KentMLTaylorM (1998) Building dialogic relationships through the World Wide Web. Public Relations Review24(3): 321–334.
34.
KentMLTaylorM (2002) Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review28(1): 21–37.
35.
KimDChunHKwakY, et al. (2014) The employment of dialogic principles in website, Facebook, and Twitter platforms of environmental nonprofit organizations. Social Science Computer Review32(5): 590–605.
36.
KosterSvan StelA (2014) The relationship between start-ups, market mobility and employment growth: an empirical analysis for Dutch regions. Papers in Regional Science93(1): 203–217.
37.
KreijnsKKirschnerPAJochemsW, et al. (2011) Measuring perceived social presence in distributed learning groups. Education and Information Technologies16(4): 365–381.
38.
LeeKM (2004) Presence, explicated. Communication Theory14(1): 27–50.
39.
LeeMYounS (2009) Electronic word of mouth (eWOM): how eWOM platforms influence consumer product judgment. International Journal of Advertising28(3): 473–499.
40.
LiX (2018) 2018年国内最值得关注的十大创业公司 [Top 10 startups in China that are most worth paying attention to in 2018]. Available at: http://xkzzz.com/post/9652.html (accessed 15 June 2019).
41.
LiuJLiCJiYG, et al. (2017) Like it or not: the Fortune 500’s Facebook strategies to generate users’ electronic word-of-mouth. Computers in Human Behavior73: 605–613.
42.
LuBFanWZhouM (2016) Social presence, trust, and social commerce purchase intention: an empirical research. Computers in Human Behavior56: 225–237.
43.
LuoXHomburgC (2007) Neglected outcomes of customer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing71(2): 133–149.
44.
McAllisterSM (2012) How the world’s top universities provide dialogic forums for marginalized voices. Public Relations Review38(2): 319–327.
45.
MenLR (2014) Why leadership matters to internal communication: linking transformational leadership, symmetrical communication, and employee outcomes. Journal of Public Relations Research26(3): 256–279.
46.
MenLRTsaiWS (2012) How companies cultivate relationships with publics on social network sites: evidence from China and the United States. Public Relations Review38(5): 723–730.
47.
MenLRTsaiWS (2014) Perceptual, attitudinal, and behavioral outcomes of organization-public engagement on corporate social networking sites. Journal of Public Relations Research26(5): 417–435.
48.
MenLRTsaiWS (2016) Public engagement with CEOs on social media: motivations and relational outcomes. Public Relations Review42(5): 932–942.
49.
MenLRJiYGChenZF (2017) Dialogues with entrepreneurs in China: how start-up companies cultivate relationships with strategic publics. Journal of Public Relations Research 29(2–3):90–113.
50.
MenLRJiYGChenZF (2020a) Strategic Communication for Startups and Entrepreneurs in China. London: Routledge.
51.
MenLRO’NeilJEwingM (2020b) Examining the effects of internal social media on employee engagement. Public Relations Review46(2): 1–9.
52.
MenLRTsaiWSChenZF, et al. (2018) Social presence and digital dialogic communication: engagement lessons from top social CEOs. Journal of Public Relations Research30(3): 83–99.
53.
MichaelidouNSiamagkaNTChristodoulidesG (2011) Usage, barriers and measurement of social media marketing: an exploratory investigation of small and medium B2B brands. Industrial Marketing Management40(7): 1153–1159.
54.
MorehouseJSafferAJ (2018) A bibliometric analysis of dialogue and digital dialogic research: mapping the knowledge construction and invisible colleges in public relations research. Journal of Public Relations Research30(3): 65–82.
55.
NgaiCSBEinwillerSSinghRG (2020) An exploratory study on content and style as driving factors facilitating dialogic communication between corporations and publics on social media in China. Public Relations Review46(1): 101813.
56.
NowakKLBioccaF (2003) The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism on users’ sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments12(5): 481–494.
57.
OhJKiEJ (2019) Factors affecting social presence and word-of-mouth in corporate social responsibility communication: tone of voice, message framing, and online medium type. Public Relations Review45(2): 319–331.
58.
PaquetteMSommerfeldtEJKentML (2015) Do the ends justify the means? Dialogue, development communication, and deontological ethics. Public Relations Review41(1): 30–39.
59.
ParkHCameronGT (2014) Keeping It Real exploring the roles of conversational human voice and source credibility in crisis communication via blogs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly91(3): 487–507.
60.
ParkHLeeH (2013) Show us you are real: the effect of human-versus-organizational presence on online relationship building through social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking16(4): 265–271.
61.
PetkovaAPRindovaVPGuptaAK (2008) How can new ventures build reputation? An exploratory study. Corporate Reputation Review11(4): 320–344.
62.
QuY (2020) Engaging publics in the mobile era: a study of Chinese charitable foundations’ use of WeChat. Public Relations Review46(1): 101815.
63.
RodeVVallasterC (2005) Corporate branding for start-ups: the crucial role of entrepreneurs. Corporate Reputation Review8(2): 121–135.
64.
RourkeLAndersonTGarrisonDR, et al. (1999) Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. The Journal of Distance Education/revue De L’ducation Distance14(2): 50–71.
65.
ScobleRIsraelS (2006) Naked Conversations: How Blogs Are Changing the Way Businesses Talk with Customers. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
66.
SeltzerTMitrookMA (2007) The dialogic potential of weblogs in relationship building. Public Relations Review33(2): 227–229.
67.
ShortJWilliamsEChristieB (1976) The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.
SungKKimS (2014) I want to be your friend: the effects of organizations’ interpersonal approaches on social networking sites. Journal of Public Relations Research26(3): 235–255.
71.
TaylorMKentML (2014) Dialogic engagement: clarifying foundational concepts. Journal of Public Relations Research26(5): 384–398.
72.
TheunissenPNoordinWNW (2012) Revisiting the concept “dialogue” in public relations. Public Relations Review38(1): 5–13.
73.
Van der HeijdenHVerhagenTCreemersM (2003) Understanding online purchase intentions: contributions from technology and trust perspectives. European Journal of Information Systems12(1): 41–48.
74.
WangYZhouS (2015) How do sports organizations use social media to build relationships? A content analysis of NBA clubs’ Twitter use. International Journal of Sport Communication8(2): 133–148.
Weisfeld-SpolterSSussanFGouldS (2014) An integrative approach to eWOM and marketing communications. Corporate Communications: An International Journal19(3): 260–274.
77.
WhelanGMoonJGrantB (2013) Corporations and citizenship arenas in the age of social media. Journal of Business Ethics118: 777–790.
78.
WirtzJGZimbresTM (2018) A systematic analysis of research applying “principles of dialogic communication” to organizational websites, blogs, and social media: implications for theory and practice. Journal of Public Relations Research30(1–2): 5–34.
79.
XifraJHuertasA (2008) Blogging PR: an exploratory analysis of public relations weblogs. Public Relations Review34(3): 269–275.
80.
YangSULimJS (2009) The effects of blog-mediated public relations (BMPR) on relational trust. Journal of Public Relations Research21(3): 341–359.
81.
YangSUKangMChaH (2015) A study on dialogic communication, trust, and distrust: testing a scale for measuring organization–public dialogic communication (OPDC). Journal of Public Relations Research27(2): 175–192.
82.
YangSUKangMJohnsonP (2010) Effects of narratives, openness to dialogic communication, and credibility on engagement in crisis communication through organizational blogs. Communication Research37(4): 473–497.
83.
YueCAThelenPRobinsonK, et al. (2019) How do CEOs communicate on Twitter? A comparative study between Fortune 200 companies and top startup companies. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 24(3): 532–552.
