This study outlines four pathways toward satisfying the need to belong through media use: relational remembrance, mediated social interaction, connection with content or target, and shared human experience. In study 1, participants (N = 292) described moments of connection while using social media, and social interactions with existing relationship partners were most common. In study 2, participants (N = 188) screenshotted moments (n = 551) when they experienced social presence through media in daily life. Participants reported the degree to which they had an established relationship or a social interaction with the target, connected with the content or target absent any pre-existing relationship, and felt a shared experience. Multilevel models found all pathways were associated with social presence and perceived change in connection. Although social interactions within established relationships constitute most experiences of belongingness and social presence, a sense of identification, parasocial relationships, and online communities are other meaningful pathways.
AchterhofRKirtleyOJSchneiderM, et al. (2022) Adolescents’ real-time social and affective experiences of online and face-to-face interactions. Computers in Human Behavior129: 107159.
2.
BaumeisterRFLearyMR (1995) The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin117(3): 497–529.
3.
BeyensIPouwelsJLvan DrielII, et al. (2020) The effect of social media on well-being differs from adolescent to adolescent. Scientific Reports10(1): 10763.
4.
BioccaFHarmsCBurgoonJK (2003) Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: review and suggested criteria. Presence12(5): 456–480.
5.
BoydATRocconiLMMorrowJA (2024) Construct validation and measurement invariance of the parasocial relationships in social media survey. PLoS ONE19(3): e0300356.
6.
BurkeMKrautRE (2016) The relationship between Facebook use and well-being depends on communication type and tie strength. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication21(4): 265–281.
7.
ClarkJLGreenMC (2018) The social consequences of online interaction. In: Attrill-SmithAFullwoodCKeepM, et al. (eds) Handbook of Cyberpsychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 216–237.
8.
CummingsJJWertzEE (2022) Capturing social presence: concept explication through an empirical analysis of social presence measures. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication28(1): 1–14.
9.
FernándezAElmerTSádabaC, et al. (2025) The quality of face-to-face and digitally mediated social interactions: two experience sampling studies exploring the moderating role of physical location, interaction partner familiarity, and interaction purpose. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication30(2): zmaf004.
10.
GardnerWLPickettCLKnowlesM (2005) Social snacking and shielding: using social symbols, selves, and surrogates in the service of belonging needs. In: WilliamsKDForgasJPvon HippelW (eds) The Social Outcast: Ostracism, Social Exclusion, Rejection, and Bullying. Hove: Psychology Press, pp. 227–241.
11.
GilesD (2023) Defining parasocial relationship experiences. In: RTForster (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Parasocial Experiences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33–50.
12.
HallAE (2019) Identification and parasocial relationships with characters from Star Wars: The Force Awakens. Psychology of Popular Media Culture8(1): 88–98.
13.
HallJA (2018) When is social media use social interaction? defining mediated social interaction. New Media & Society20(1): 162–179.
14.
HallJA (2025) Social media elements, media content, and well-being: a communication approach. Communication Theory35(1): 1–13.
15.
HallJADavisDAC (2017) Proposing the communicate bond belong theory: evolutionary intersections with episodic interpersonal communication. Communication Theory27(1): 21–47.
16.
HallJAPenningtonNMerollaAJ (2023) Which mediated social interactions satisfy the need to belong?Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication28(1): 1–12.
17.
HoffnerCABondBJ (2022) Parasocial relationships, social media, and well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology45: 101306.
18.
Holt-LunstadJSmithTBBakerM, et al. (2015) Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science10(2): 227–237.
19.
KahlowJACokerMCRichardsR (2020) The multimodal nature of Snapchat in close relationships: toward a social presence-based theoretical framework. Computers in Human Behavior111: 106409.
20.
KnausenbergerJHellmannJHEchterhoffG (2015) When virtual contact is all you need: subtle reminders of Facebook preempt social-contact restoration after exclusion. European Journal of Social Psychology45(3): 279–284.
21.
KnowlesMLHaycockNShaikhI (2015) Does Facebook magnify or mitigate threats to belonging?Social Psychology46(6): 313–324.
22.
KrämerMDRoosYSchoedelR, et al. (2024) Social dynamics and affect: investigating within-person associations in daily life using experience sampling and mobile sensing. Emotion24(3): 878–893.
23.
KreijnsKXuKWeidlichJ (2022) Social presence: conceptualization and measurement. Educational Psychology Review34: 139–170.
24.
KroenckeLHarariGMBackMD, et al. (2023) Well-being in social interactions: examining personality-situation dynamics in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology124: 437–460.
25.
LearyMRKellyKM (2008) Belonging motivation. In: MRLearyRHHoyle (eds) Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior. New York: Guilford, pp. 400–409.
26.
LicoppeC (2004) “Connected” presence: the emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22(1): 135–156.
27.
LokIDunnE (2022) The UBC state social connection scale: factor structure, reliability, and validity. Social Psychological and Personality Science14(7): 835–844.
28.
LowenthalPRSnelsonC (2017) Live synchronous web meetings in asynchronous online courses: reconceptualizing virtual office hours. Online Learning Journal21(4): 177–194.
29.
LutzSSchneiderFMReichS (2023) Media as powerful coping tools to recover from social exclusion experiences? A systematic review on need restoration and emotion regulation through using media. Media Psychology26(4): 388–413.
30.
LutzSSchneiderFMReichS, et al. (2024) Fictional friends and enemies as first aid after ostracism? Experimentally investigating the potential of para-/orthosocial relationships in belongingness need restoration and emotion regulation. Human Communication Research50(3): 338–353.
31.
MilekAButlerEATackmanAM, et al. (2018) “Eavesdropping on happiness” revisited: a pooled, multisample replication of the association between life satisfaction and observed daily conversation quantity and quality. Psychological Science29(9): 1451–1462.
32.
OhHJOzkayaELaRoseR (2014) How does online social networking enhance life satisfaction? The relationships among online supportive interaction, affect, perceived social support, sense of community, and life satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior30: 69–78.
33.
OhmeJAraujoTBoeschotenL, et al. (2024) Digital trace data collection for social media effects research: APIs, data donation, and (screen) tracking. Communication Methods and Measures18(2): 124–141.
34.
OliverMB (2022) Social media use and eudaemonic well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology45: 101307.
35.
PrenticeMHalusicMSheldonKM (2014) Integrating theories of psychological needs-as-requirements and psychological needs-as-motives: a two process model. Social and Personality Psychology Compass8: 73–85.
36.
RaneyAAJanicke-BowlesSHOliverMB, et al. (2020) Introduction to Positive Media Psychology. London: Routledge.
37.
ReisHTGableSL (2000) Event-sampling and other methods for studying everyday experience. In: HTReisCMJudd (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 190–222.
38.
RiegerDKlimmtC (2019) The daily dose of digital inspiration: a multi-method exploration of meaningful communication in social media. New Media & Society21(1): 97–118.
39.
SaccoDFIsmailMM (2014) Social belongingness satisfaction as a function of interaction medium: face-to-face interactions facilitate greater social belonging and interaction enjoyment compared to instant messaging. Computers in Human Behavior36: 359–364.
40.
SandstromGMDunnEW (2014) Social interactions and well-being: the surprising power of weak ties. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin40(7): 910–922.
41.
SheldonKMGunzA (2009) Psychological needs as basic motives, not just experiential requirements. Journal of Personality77(5): 1467–1492.
42.
ShortJWilliamsEChristieB (1976) The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
43.
WolfersLNUtzS (2022) Social media use, stress, and coping. Current Opinion in Psychology45: 101305.
44.
ZhouXSedikidesCMoT, et al. (2022) The restorative power of nostalgia: thwarting loneliness by raising happiness during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Psychological and Personality Science13(4): 803–815.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
