The all-consuming nature of coronavirus news coverage has made the COVID-19 pandemic a unique opportunity to explore the relationship between audience trust in and engagement with news. This study examines that relationship through 60 Zoom-based qualitative interviews conducted with a diverse sample of US adults during the early phase of the pandemic. We find that how people approach the news stems not only from how they perceive the trustworthiness of individual news outlets, but also from their own self-perceptions. News consumers believe journalism generally suffers from issues of bias, but that they are savvy and independent-minded enough to see through those biases to find the truth. Putting the concept of partisan selective exposure into conversation with folk theories of news consumption, we conclude that people’s approach to and trust in news is as dependent on what they bring to the news as it is on what news brings to them.
BardMT (2017) Propaganda, persuasion, or journalism? Fox news’ prime-time coverage of health-care reform in 2009 and 2014. Electronic News11(2): 100–118.
2.
BennettWLPfetschB (2018) Rethinking political communication in a time of disrupted public spheres. The Journal of Communication68(2): 243–253.
3.
BerelsonB (1949) What “missing the newspaper” means. In: LazarsfeldPStantonFN (eds) Communication Research 1948–1949. Newport: Harper, pp. 111–129.
CarlsonMRobinsonSLewisSC (2020) Digital press criticism: the symbolic dimensions of Donald Trump’s assault on U.S. journalists as the “enemy of the people.”Digital Journalism. Epub ahead of print 5 November. DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2020.1836981.
8.
ChadwickAVaccariCO’LoughlinB (2018) Do tabloids poison the well of social media? Explaining democratically dysfunctional news sharing. New Media & Society20(11): 4255–4274.
9.
CurryALStroudNJ (2019) The effects of journalistic transparency on credibility assessments and engagement intentions. Journalism22(4): 901–918.
10.
DavisonWP (1983) The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly47(1): 1–15.
11.
EdgerlyS (2017) Seeking out and avoiding the news media: young adults’ proposed strategies for obtaining current events information. Mass Communication & Society20(3): 358–377.
HanitzschTVan DalenASteindlN (2017) Caught in the Nexus: a comparative and longitudinal analysis of public trust in the press. The International Journal of Press/Politics23(1): 3–23.
17.
HindmanMS (2009) The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
KimMLuY (2020) Testing partisan selective exposure in a multidimensional choice context: evidence from a conjoint experiment. Mass Communication and Society23(1): 107–127.
19.
KlapperJT (1965) The Effects of Mass Communication. New York: Free Press.
LaddJM (2011) Why Americans Hate the Media and How It Matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
LukerK (2010) Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences: Research in an Age of Info-Glut. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
MasulloGMCurryALWhippleKN, et al. (2021) The story behind the story: examining transparency about the journalistic process and news outlet credibility. Journalism Practice. DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2020.1870529.
NadlerABauerAJ (eds) (2019) News on the Right: Studying Conservative News Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
NechushtaiELewisSC (2019) What kind of news gatekeepers do we want machines to be? Filter bubbles, fragmentation, and the normative dimensions of algorithmic recommendations. Computers in Human Behavior90: 298–307.
27.
NelsonJL (2021) Imagined Audiences: How Journalists Perceive and Pursue the Public. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
NelsonJLKimSJ (2020) Improve trust, increase loyalty? Analyzing the relationship between news credibility and consumption. Journalism Practice15(3): 348–365.
29.
NelsonJLWebsterJG (2017) The myth of partisan selective exposure: a portrait of the online political news audience. Social Media + Society3(3): 729314.
NielsenRK (2016) Folk theories of journalism. Journalism Studies17(7): 840–848.
32.
PalmerR (2018) Becoming the News: How Ordinary People Respond to the Media Spotlight. New York: Columbia University Press.
33.
PariserE (2011) The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. New York: Penguin Press.
34.
PeacockCMasulloGMStroudNJ (2020) What’s in a label? The effect of news labels on perceived credibility. Journalism, 1464884920971522. DOI: 10.1177/1464884920971522.
35.
PeckR (2019) Fox Populism: Branding Conservatism as Working Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
PeckR (2021) ‘Listen to your gut’: how Fox News’s populist style changed the American public sphere and journalistic truth in the process. In: WaisbordSTumberH (eds) The Routledge Companion to Media Misinformation and Populism. New York: Routledge, (pp. 1–19).
PriorM (2009) The immensely inflated news audience: assessing bias in self-reported news exposure. Public Opinion Quarterly73(1): 130–143.
39.
RussmannUHessA (2020) News consumption and trust in online and social media: an in-depth qualitative study of young adults in Austria. International Journal of Communication14: 18. Available at: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/13774
40.
StroudNJ (2010) Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication60(3): 556–576.
41.
ToffBNielsenRK (2018) “I just Google it”: folk theories of distributed discovery. Journal of Communication68(3): 636–657.
42.
Van DuynECollierJ (2019) Priming and fake news: the effects of elite discourse on evaluations of news media. Mass Communication and Society22(1): 29–48.
43.
VragaEKTullyM (2021) News literacy, social media behaviors, and skepticism toward information on social media. Information, Communication & Society24: 150–166.
44.
WeaverDH (1980) Audience need for orientation and media effects. Communication Research7(3): 361–373.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
