Despite today’s ubiquitous nature of smartphones among adolescents, little is known about behavioural online and offline longitudinal predictors of problematic smartphone use (PSU). Guided by Uses and Gratifications Theory, we applied latent class analysis on survey data collected in 2017 from a cohort of 1096 adolescents (Mage = 12.4, SDage = 0.56) and regressed PSU measured 1 year later on class membership, controlling for socio-demographic characteristics, social desirability and autoregressive effects. We extracted four distinct classes: social-recreational onliners (n = 228), weekend onliners (n = 331), balanced (n = 404) and noninvolved (n = 153). Characterised by significantly more time spent online for recreational and social networking activities, both during weekdays and weekend days, as well as less time for sleep, the social-recreational onliners class showed significantly higher levels of PSU over time. Future studies should assess not only duration but also the frequency of daily online activities to provide further insights into behavioural predictors of PSU.
BellAFairbrotherMJonesK (2019) Fixed and random effects models: making an informed choice. Quality & Quantity53(2): 1051–1074.
2.
BianchiAPhillipsJG (2005) Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior8(1): 39–51.
3.
CameriniALSchulzPJ (2018) Social desirability bias in child-report social well-being: evaluation of the Children’s social desirability short scale using item response theory and examination of its impact on self-report family and peer relationships. Child Indicators Research11(4): 1159–1174.
4.
CarterBReesPHaleL, et al. (2016) Association between portable screen-based media device access or use and sleep outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics170(12): 1202–1208.
5.
CheungCMKChiuPYLeeMKO (2011) Online social networks: why do students use Facebook?Computers in Human Behavior27(4): 1337–1343.
6.
ChiuSI (2014) The relationship between life stress and smartphone addiction on Taiwanese University student: a mediation model of learning self-efficacy and social self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior34: 49–57.
7.
ChristensenMABettencourtLKayeL, et al. (2016) Direct measurements of smartphone screen-time: relationships with demographics and sleep. PLoS ONE11: e0165331.
8.
ElhaiJDContractorAA (2018) Examining latent classes of smartphone users: relations with psychopathology and problematic smartphone use. Computers in Human Behavior82: 159–166.
9.
ElhaiJDDvorakRDLevineJC, et al. (2017a) Problematic smartphone use: a conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology. Journal of Affective Disorders207: 251–259.
10.
ElhaiJDHallBJLevineJC, et al. (2017b) Types of smartphone usage and relations with problematic smartphone behaviors: the role of content consumption vs. social smartphone use. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace11(2): 3.
11.
EyalN (2014) Hooked: How to Build Habit-Forming Products. New York: Penguin Books.
12.
FoersterMRöösliM (2017) A latent class analysis on adolescents media use and associations with health related quality of life. Computers in Human Behavior71: 266–274.
13.
GogginG (2014) Facebook’s mobile career. New Media & Society16(7): 1068–1086.
14.
GraaflandJH (2018) New technologies and 21st century children: recent trends and outcomes. OECD Education working papers no. 179, Paris: OECD Publishing.
15.
GriffithsMDKussDJDemetrovicsZ (2014) Social networking addiction: an overview of preliminary findings. In: RosenbergKPFederLC (eds) Behavioral Addictions. New York: Elsevier, pp. 119–141.
16.
GuiMGerosaTGaravagliaA, et al. (2018) Digital well-being. Validation of a digital media education programme in high schools. Report, Research Center on Quality of Life in the Digital Society, University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy, November.
17.
HaleLGuanS (2015) Screen time and sleep among school-aged children and adolescents: a systematic literature review. Sleep Medicine Reviews21: 50–58.
18.
HwangYKimHJeongSH (2014) Why do media users multitask? Motives for general, medium-specific, and content-specific types of multitasking. Computers in Human Behavior36: 542–548.
19.
IhmJ (2018) Social implications of children’s smartphone addiction: the role of support networks and social engagement. Journal of Behavioral Addictions7(2): 473–481.
20.
JeongSHFishbeinM (2007) Predictors of multitasking with media: media factors and audience factors. Media Psychology10(3): 364–384.
21.
JeongSHKimHYumJY, et al. (2016) What type of content are smartphone users addicted to? SNS vs. games. Computers in Human Behavior54: 10–17.
22.
KatzEBlumlerJGGurevitchM (1974) The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
23.
KimDNamJKOhJ, et al. (2016) A latent profile analysis of the interplay between PC and smartphone in problematic internet use. Computers in Human Behavior56: 360–368.
24.
KussDJHarkinLKanjoE, et al. (2018) Problematic smartphone use: investigating contemporary experiences using a convergent design. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health15(1): 142.
25.
KwonMKimDJChoH, et al. (2013) The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS ONE8(12): e83558.
26.
LemolaSPerkinson-GloorNBrandS, et al. (2015) Adolescents’ electronic media use at night, sleep disturbance, and depressive symptoms in the smartphone age. Journal of Youth and Adolescence44(2): 405–418.
27.
LinzerDALewisJB (2011) poLCA: an R package for polytomous variable latent class analysis. Journal of Statistical Software42(1): 1–29.
28.
MokJYChoiSWKimDJ, et al. (2014) Latent class analysis on internet and smartphone addiction in college students. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment10: 817–828.
29.
MontagCJurkiewiczMReuterM (2010) Low self-directedness is a better predictor for problematic internet use than high neuroticism. Computers in Human Behavior26(6): 1531–1535.
OrbenAPrzybylskiAK (2019a) Screens, teens, and psychological well-being: evidence from three time-use-diary studies. Psychological Science30(5): 682–696.
32.
OrbenAPrzybylskiAK (2019b) The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use. Nature Human Behaviour3(2): 173–182.
33.
OrbenADienlinTPrzybylskiAK (2019) Social media’s enduring effect on adolescent life satisfaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America116(21): 10226–10228.
34.
OulasvirtaARattenburyTMaL, et al. (2012) Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing16(1): 105–114.
35.
PancaniLPretiERivaP (2019) The psychology of smartphone: the development of the smartphone impact scale (SIS). Assessment. Epub ahead of print 2 March. DOI: 10.1177/1073191119831788.
36.
PanovaTCarbonellX (2018) Is smartphone addiction really an addiction?Journal of Behavioral Addictions7(2): 252–259.
RaineLWellmanB (2012) Networked. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
RuggieroTE (2000) Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society3(1): 3–37.
40.
SalehanMNegahbanA (2013) Social networking on smartphones: when mobile phones become addictive. Computers in Human Behavior29(6): 2632–2639.
41.
SeaverN (2019) Captivating algorithms: recommender systems as traps. Journal of Material Culture24(4): 421–436.
42.
SeligJPLittleTD (2012) Autoregressive and cross-lagged panel analysis for longitudinal data. In: LaursenBLittleTDCardNA (eds) Handbook of Developmental Research Methods. New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 265–278.
43.
SlaterMD (2004) Operationalising and analysing exposure: The foundation of media effects research. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly81(1): 168–183.
44.
SohnSReesPWildridgeB, et al. (2019) Prevalence of problematic smartphone usage and associated mental health outcomes amongst children and young people: A systematic review, meta-analysis and GRADE of the evidence. BMC Psychiatry19(1): 1–10.
45.
SongILaroseREastinMS, et al. (2004) Internet gratifications and internet addiction: On the uses and abuses of new media. Cyberpsychology & Behavior7(4): 384–394.
46.
StierSBreuerJSiegersP, et al. (2019) Integrating survey data and digital trace data: key issues in developing an emerging field. Social Science Computer Review. Epub ahead of print 24 April. DOI: 10.1177/0894439319843669.
47.
SunSRubinAMHaridakisPM (2008) The role of motivation and media involvement in explaining internet dependency. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media52(3): 408–431.
48.
SüssDDWallerGLilianS, et al. (2018) JAMES – youth, activities, media – survey Switzerland. Report, Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften, Switzerland, November.
49.
Van DeursenAJAMBolleCLHegnerSM, et al. (2015) Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior: the role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age, and gender. Computers in Human Behavior45: 411–420.
50.
WangJLWangHZGaskinJ, et al. (2015) The role of stress and motivation in problematic smartphone use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior53: 181–188.
51.
WangZTchernevJMSollowayT (2012) A dynamic longitudinal examination of social media use, needs, and gratifications among college students. Computers in Human Behavior28(5): 1829–1839.
52.
WhitingAWilliamsD (2013) Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal16(4): 362–369.
53.
WilcocksonTDEllisDAShawH (2018) Determining typical smartphone usage: what data do we need?Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking21(6): 395–398.
54.
Zhitomirsky-GeffetMBlauM (2016) Cross-generational analysis of predictive factors of addictive behavior in smartphone usage. Computers in Human Behavior64: 682–693.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
