Theories explaining the impacts of online media often swing between the actions of empowered individuals and the distribution structures put in place by powerful corporations. To explicate how these factors interact, we adapt the concept of audience flow to highlight the temporal dimension of web use and demonstrate how digital architectures subtly nudge masses of people into online attention flows. We identify sequential usage patterns through a network analysis of passively measured clickstreams, combined with data on website ownership and website architectures. Our sample, based on a panel of 1 million users, includes 1761 websites that reached at least 1% of Internet users in the United States. Our findings reveal previously unseen patterns of online audience formation, which have implications for studying media effects and understanding institutional power on the Internet.
BalnavesMO’ReganTGoldsmithB (2011) Rating the Audience: The Business of Media. New York: Bloomsbury.
2.
BenklerY (2006) The Wealth of Networks. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3.
BlondelVDGuillaumeJLLambiotteR, et al. (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2008(10): P10008.
4.
BolañoC (2015) The Culture Industry, Information and Capitalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
5.
CaputiJ (1991) Charting the flow: the construction of meaning through juxtaposition in media texts. Journal of Communication Inquiry15(2): 32–47.
6.
ChadwickA (2013) The Hybrid Media System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
ChunWHK (2006) Control and Freedom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
CooperR (1996) The status and future of audience duplication research: an assessment of ratings-based theories of audience behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media40: 96–111.
9.
DowningJDH (2011) Media ownership, concentration, and control: the evolution of debate. In: WaskoJMurdockGSousaH (eds) The Handbook of Political Economy of Communications. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 140–168.
10.
EastmanSTFergusonDA (2013) Media Programming: Strategies and Practices. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
11.
FlichyP (1980) Les industries de l’imaginaire. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
12.
GentzkowMShapiroJM (2011) Ideological segregation online and offline. The Quarterly Journal of Economics126(4): 1799–1839.
13.
GoodhardtGJEhrenbergASCCollinsMA (1987) The Television Audience: Patterns of Viewing: An Update. Aldershot: Gower.
14.
HelmondA (2015) The platformization of the web: making web data platform ready. Social Media+ Society1(2): 1–11. DOI: 10.1177/2056305115603080.
15.
HindmanM (2018) The Internet Trap. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
JamiesonKHCappellaJN (2008) Echo Chamber. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
KreissD (2016) Seizing the moment: the presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle. New Media & Society18(8): 1473–1490.
18.
LaRoseR (2010) The problem of media habits. Communication Theory20(2): 194–222.
19.
McPhersonT (2006) Reload: liveness, mobility, and the web. In: KeenanTChunWHK (eds) New Media, Old Media. New York: Routledge, pp. 199–208.
20.
ManovichL (2001) The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
21.
MansellR (2012) Imagining the Internet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
MöllerJVan De VeldeRNMertenL, et al. (2019) Explaining online news engagement based on browsing behavior: creatures of habit?Social Science Computer Review. Epub ahead of print 10February. DOI: 10.1177/0894439319828012.
23.
MurdockG (2018) Media materialties: for a moral economy of machines. Journal of Communication68(2): 359–368.
24.
NieborgDBHelmondA (2018) The political economy of Facebook’s platformization in the mobile ecosystem: Facebook Messenger as a platform instance. Media, Culture & Society41(2): 196–218.
25.
OwenBMWildmanSS (1992) Video Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
PariserEHelsperDE (2011) The Filter Bubble. New York: Penguin Books.
27.
PetersCSchrøderKC (2018) Beyond the here and now of news audiences: a process-based framework for investigating news repertoires. Journal of Communication68(6): 1079–1103.
28.
PetersonRA (1992) Understanding audience segmentation: from elite and mass to omnivore and univore. Poetics21(4): 243–258.
29.
PlantinJCLagozeCEdwardsPN, et al. (2018) Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society20(1): 293–310.
30.
RustRTEechambadiNV (1989) Scheduling network television programs: a heuristic audience flow approach to maximizing audience share. Journal of Advertising18(2): 11–18.
31.
SandvigC (2015) The internet as the anti-television: distribution infrastructure as culture and power. In: ParksLStarosielskiL (eds) Signal Traffic. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 225–245.
32.
StroudNJ (2010) Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication60(3): 556–576.
33.
SundarSSLimperosAM (2013) Uses and grats 2.0: new gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media57(4): 504–525.
34.
SunsteinCR (2014) Nudging: a very short guide. Journal of Consumer Policy37: 583–588.
35.
TanejaHWuAXEdgerlyS (2017) Rethinking the generational gap in online news use: an infrastructural perspective. New Media & Society20(5): 1792–1812.
36.
ThalerRHSunsteinCR (2009) Nudge. New York: Penguin Books.
37.
ThorsonKWellsC (2016) Curated flows: a framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory26(3): 309–328.
38.
TurowJCouldryN (2018) Media as data extraction: towards a new map of a transformed communications field. Journal of Communication68(2): 267–277.
39.
Van DijckJPoellTDe WaalM (2018) The Platform Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
WebsterJG (2006) Audience flow past and present: television inheritance effects reconsidered. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media50(2): 323–337.
41.
WebsterJG (2014) The Marketplace of Attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
WebsterJGKsiazekTB (2012) The dynamics of audience fragmentation: public attention in an age of digital media. Journal of Communication62(1): 39–56.
43.
WilliamsR (1975) Television. New York: Schocken Books.
44.
WuAXTanejaH (2020) Platform enclosure of human behavior and its measurement: using behavioral trace data against platform episteme. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 1 July. DOI: 10.1177/1461444820933547.
45.
WuLAcklandR (2014) How web 1.0 fails: the mismatch between hyperlinks and clickstreams. Social Network Analysis and Mining4(1): 1–7.
46.
ZillmannD (2000) Mood management in the context of selective exposure theory. Annals of the International Communication Association23(1): 103–123.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
