Masspersonal information seeking repertoires are a person-centered method of gaining insight into the relationship between Internet use, subjective well-being, and political participation. Through latent profile analysis, three person types were identified in two waves of stratified samples in 18 countries (N = 8352). In accord with the “augmentation hypothesis,” high levels of interpersonal contact and traditional mass media usage covaried with high Internet use for the highly engaged type, that had highest political participation and life satisfaction, political knowledge, low depressive symptoms and also high anxiety. The other two types fit the “displacement hypothesis,” where Internet-based media displaces traditional media and face-to-face communication. Compared with the digitally immersed, the traditional repertoire was more knowledgeable and politically engaged, and had better well-being. Latent transition analysis showed these repertoires were stable over 6 months. Identifying different types of people with different information seeking styles clarifies mixed results on effects of online mass media use.
AsparouhovTMuthénB (2014) Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: three-step approaches using M plus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal21(3): 329–341.
2.
BakerDAPerez AlgortaG (2016) The relationship between online social networking and depression: a systematic review of quantitative studies. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking19(11): 638–648.
3.
BarghJAMcKennaKYA (2004) The internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology55: 573–590.
4.
BennettWLIyengarS (2008) A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication58(4): 707–731.
5.
BessiereKKieslerSKrautR, et al. (2008) Effects of Internet use and social resources on changes in depression. Information, Community & Society11(1): 47–70.
6.
BolterJDGrusinR (1999) Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
BoulianneS (2009) Does internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication26: 193–211.
8.
BoulianneS (2015) Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society18(5): 524–538.
9.
BrailovskaiaJVeltenJMargafJ (2019) Relationship between daily stress, depression symptoms, and Facebook addiction disorder in Germany and in the United States. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking22(9): 610–614.
10.
BrandtzaegPB (2010) Towards a unified Media-User Typology (MUT): a meta-analysis and review of the research literature on media-user typologies. Computers in Human Behavior26: 940–956.
11.
BrikšeI (2003) The information environment: theoretical approaches and explanations. European Journal of Communication19(2): 368–415.
12.
GervaisBT (2015) Incivility online: affective and behavioral reactions to uncivil political posts in a web-based experiment. Journal of Information Technology & Politics12(2): 167–185.
13.
BucyEGGroshekJ (2018) Empirical support for the media participation hypothesis: trends across presidential elections, 1992–2012. New Media & Society20(5): 1889–1909.
14.
CaplanSE (2003) Preference for online social interaction: a theory of problematic internet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication Research30(6): 625–648.
15.
ChadwickADennisJSmithAP (2016) Politics in the age of hybrid media: power, systems, and media logics. In: BrunsAEnliGSkogerbøE, et al. (eds) The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics. New York: Routledge, pp. 7–22.
16.
ChenWWellmanB (2004) The global digital divide—within and between countries. IT & Society1(7): 18–25.
17.
CohenJ (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18.
CollinsLMLanzaST (2013) Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis: With Applications in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences, Vol. 718. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
19.
CoyneSMRogersAAZurcherJD, et al. (2020) Does time spent using social media impact mental health? An eight year longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior. 104: 106160. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.106160.
20.
EdgerlySVragaEKBodeL, et al. (2018) New media, new relationship to participation? A closer look at youth news repertoires and political participation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly95: 192–212.
21.
EllisonNBSteinfieldCLampeC (2007) The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12: 1143–1168.
22.
FrenchMBazarovaNN (2017) Is anybody out there? Understanding masspersonal communication through expectations for response across social media platforms. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication22: 303–309.
23.
Gil de ZúñigaHLiuJH (2017) Second screening politics in the social media sphere: advancing research on dual screen use in political communication with evidence from 20 countries. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media61(2): 193–219.
24.
Gil de ZúñigaHValenzuelaS (2011) The mediating path to stronger citizenship: online and offline networks, weak ties, and civic engagement. Communication Research38: 397–421.
25.
Gil de ZúñigaHMolyneuxLZhengP (2014) Social media, political expression, and political participation: panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication64: 612–634.
26.
Gil de ZúñigaHWeeksBArdèvol-AbreuA (2017) Effects of the News-Finds-Me perception in communication: social media use implications for news seeking and learning about politics. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication22(3): 105–123.
27.
GoslingSDMasonW (2015) Internet research in psychology. Annual Review of Psychology66: 877–902.
28.
HagenaarsJAMcCutcheonAL (2002) Applied Latent Class Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
HankeKLiuJHSibleyC, et al. (2015) “Heroes” and “Villains” of world history across cultures. PLoS ONE10(2): e0115641.
30.
HargittaiENeumanWCurryO (2012) Taming the information tide: perceptions of information overload in the American home. The Information Society28(3): 161–173.
31.
HeeterC (1985) Program selection with abundance of choice: a process model. Human Communication Research12: 126–152.
32.
HolbertRLZengCRobinsonNW (2017) Adopting an integrated behavioral model approach to the study of news media exposure: a focus on experiential and instrumental attitudes toward politics. Mass Communication and Society20(4): 573–593.
33.
HoltKShehataAStrömbäckJ, et al. (2013) Age and the effects of news media attention and social media use on political interest and participation: do social media function as leveller?European Journal of Communication28(1): 19–34.
34.
HuangC (2010) Internet use and psychological well-being: a meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking13(3): 241–249.
35.
HuangC (2012) Internet use and psychological well-being. In: YanZ (ed.) Encyclopedia of Research on Cyber Behavior. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, IGI Global, pp. 302–314.
JiQHaLSypherU (2014) The role of news media use and demographic characteristics in the prediction of information overload. International Journal of Communication8: 699–714.
38.
JohnsonGMKulpaA (2007) Dimensions of online behavior: toward a user typology. Cyberpsychology & Behavior10(6): 773–780.
39.
KelesBMcCraeNGrealishA (2020) A systematic review: the influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth25(1): 800–808DOI: 10.1080/02673843.2019.1590851.
40.
KrautRKieslerSBonevaB, et al. (2002) Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues58(1): 49–74.
41.
KrautRPattersonMLundmarkV, et al. (1998) Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement. American Psychologist53(9): 1017–1031.
42.
KroenkeKSpitzerRLWilliamsJB, et al. (2009) An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: the PHQ–4. Psychosomatics50(6): 613–621.
43.
KsiazekTBMalthouseECWebsterJG (2010) News seekers and avoiders: exploring patterns of total news consumption across media and the relationship to civic participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media54(4): 551–568.
44.
LauALCumminsRAMcPhersonW (2005) An investigation into the cross-cultural equivalence of the Personal Well-being Index. Social Indicators Research72: 403–430.
45.
LeeHYangJ (2014) Political knowledge gaps among news consumers with different news media repertoires across multiple platforms. International Journal of Communication8: 597–617.
46.
LillekerDGKoc-MichalskaK (2017) What drives political participation? Motivations and mobilization in a digital age. Political Communication34(1): 21–43.
47.
LoYMendellNRRubinDB (2001) Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika88(3): 767–778.
48.
MarinoCGiniGVienoA, et al. (2018) The associations between problematic Facebook use, psychological distress and well-being among adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders226: 274–281.
49.
OberstUWegmannEStodtB, et al. (2017) Negative consequences from heavy social networking in adolescents: the mediating role of fear of missing out. Journal of Adolescence55: 51–60.
50.
OrbenAPrzybylskiAK (2019a) Screens, teens, and psychological well-being: evidence from three time-use-diary studies. Psychological Science30(5): 682–696.
51.
OrbenAPrzybylskiAK (2019b) The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use. Nature Human Behaviour3(2): 173–182.
52.
OrbenADienlinTPrzybylskiAK (2019) Social media’s enduring effect on adolescent life satisfaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America116: 10226–10228.
53.
O’SullivanPBCarrCT (2018) Masspersonal communication: a model bridging the mass-interpersonal divide. New Media & Society20(3): 1161–1180.
54.
PáezDDelfinoGVargas-SalfateS, et al. (2020) A longitudinal study of the effects of internet use on subjective well-being: effects of direct and online social contact among representative samples in 19 nations. Media Psychology23(5): 676–710DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2019.1624177.
55.
ParksMRFloydK (1996) Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication1: 80–97.
56.
PriorM (2005) News vs. entertainment: how increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science49(3): 577–592.
57.
ReardonKKRogersEM (1988) Interpersonal versus mass media communication: a false dichotomy. Human Communication Research15: 284–303.
58.
ReineckeLAufenangerSBeutelME, et al. (2017) Digital stress over the life span: the effects of communication load and internet multitasking on perceived stress and psychological health impairments in a German probability sample. Media Psychology20(1): 90–115.
59.
RubinAM (1993) Audience activity and media use. Communication Monographs60(1): 98–105.
60.
SavolainenR (2007) Information behavior and information practice: reviewing the “Umbrella Concepts” of information-seeking studies. The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy77(2): 109–132.
61.
SerratRVillarFGiulianiMF, et al. (2017) Older people’s participation in political organizations: the role of generativity and its impact on well-being. Educational Gerontology43(3): 128–138.
62.
SmithPBFischerR (2008) Acquiescence, extreme response bias and culture: a multilevel analysis. In: van de VijverFJRvan HermertDAPoortingaYH (eds) Multilevel Analysis of Individuals and Cultures. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 285–314.
63.
SongHZmyslinski-SeeligAKimJ, et al. (2014) Does Facebook make you lonely? A meta analysis. Computers in Human Behavior36: 446–452.
64.
SpitzerRLKroenkeKWilliamsJB, et al. (2006) A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine166(10): 1092–1097.
ValkenburgPMPeterJ (2009) Social consequences of the internet for adolescents: a decade of research. Current Directions in Psychological Science18(1): 1–5.
67.
WeaverJB III (1991) Exploring the links between personality and media preferences. Personality and Individual Differences12: 1293–1299.
68.
WellmanB (2001) Computer networks as social networks. Science293(5537): 2031–2034.
69.
WellmanBHaaseAQWitteJ, et al. (2001) Does the internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital?American Behavioral Scientist45(3): 436–455.
70.
WilliamsonK (1998) Discovered by chance: the role of incidental information acquisition in an ecological model of information use. Library & Information Science Research20: 23–40.
71.
WilsonTD (1999) Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation55(3): 249–270.
72.
WilsonTD (2000) Human information behavior. Informing Science3(2): 49–55.
YuanE (2011) News consumption across multiple media platforms: a repertoire approach. Information, Communication & Society14(7): 998–1016.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
