Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article analyzes the role of hype in performing and translating corporate sociotechnical imaginaries of digital technologies, into the context of Danish society. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork of technology events in Denmark, this article proposes “hot air” as a concept to describe how hype for the future performs these imaginaries. This article describes the overlapping sociotechnical imaginaries that dominate these events and the performative effects of hype and its critique, in articulating and translating them. This article makes an empirical and conceptual contribution to the study of sociotechnical imaginaries, in particular, their socio-material performance, the role of corporations in articulating them, and how hype is central to their translation.

Keywords

Big Tech corporations data Denmark digitalization digital transformation futures hot air hype sociotechnical imaginaries

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

Murphy

Clarke

(2009) Anticipation: technoscience, life, affect, temporality. Subjectivity 28(1): 246–265.

Anderson

(2006) Imagined Communities. London: Verso Books.

Anderson

(2008) The end of theory: the data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. WIRED, 23 June. Available at: https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/

Ball

Snider

(2013) The Surveillance-Industrial Complex. London: Routledge.

Bartlett

(2018) The People vs Tech. London: Penguin Random House.

Beer

(2018) The Data Gaze. London: SAGE.

boyd

Crawford

(2012) Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication & Society 15(5): 662–679.

Bridle

(2018) New Dark Age. London: Verso Books.

Brown

Michael

(2003) A sociology of expectations: retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 15(1): 3–18.

10.

Bucher

(2016) The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society 20(1): 30–44.

11.

Callon

(1984) Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review 32(Suppl. 1): 196–233.

12.

Castoriadis

(1997) The Imaginary Institution of Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

13.

Duhigg

(2012) How companies learn your secrets. The New York Times, 19 February. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/19/magazine/shopping-habits.html

14.

Dunleavy

Margetts

Bastow

, et al. (2006) Digital Era Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.

15.

European Commission (2017) The Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). DG Connect. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/desi (accessed 16 August 2017).

16.

Feldman

(1995) Strategies for Interpreting Qualitative Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

17.

Fishenden

Thompson

(2013) Digital government, open architecture, and innovation: why public sector IT will never be the same again. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23(4): 977–1004.

18.

Flyverbom

Deibert

Matten

(2019) The governance of digital technology, big data, and the internet: new roles and responsibilities for business. Business & Society 58: 3–19.

19.

Foer

(2017) World Without Mind. New York: Penguin Press.

20.

Frankfurt

(2009) On Bullshit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

21.

Greve

(2013) Ideas in public management reform for the 2010s: digitalization, value creation and involvement. Public Organization Review 15(1): 49–65.

22.

Halpern

(2015) Beautiful Data. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

23.

Irani

(2015) Hackathons and the making of entrepreneurial citizenship. Science, Technology, & Human Values 40(5): 799–824.

24.

Jæger

Löfgren

(2010) The history of the future: changes in Danish e-government strategies 1994–2010. Information Polity 15(4): 253–269.

25.

Jasanoff

Kim

S-H

(2009) Containing the atom: sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47(2): 119–146.

26.

Jasanoff

Kim

S-H

(2015) Dreamscapes of Modernity. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

27.

Jensen

Lauritsen

(2005) Reading digital Denmark: IT reports as material-semiotic actors. Science, Technology, & Human Values 30(3): 352–373.

28.

Kurzweil

(1999) The Age of Spiritual Machines. New York: Viking Press.

29.

Kurzweil

(2001) The law of accelerating returns. Kurzweil Network, 7 March. Available at: https://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns

30.

Latour

(2004) Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry 30(2): 225–248.

31.

Lehtiniemi

Ruckenstein

(2019) The social imaginaries of data activism. Big Data & Society 6(1): 1–12.

32.

Leivestad

Nyqvist

(2017) Ethnographies of Conferences and Trade Fairs (eds Høyer Leivestad

Nyqvist

). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

33.

Lippmann

(2017) The Phantom Public. London: Routledge.

34.

Mackenzie

(2013) Programming subjects in the regime of anticipation: software studies and subjectivity. Subjectivity 6(4): 391–405.

35.

Mayer-Schönberger

Cukier

(2013) Big Data. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

36.

Mertia

(2017) Socio-technical imaginaries of a data-driven city: ethnographic vignettes from Delhi. The Fibreculture Journal 29. Available at: http://twentynine.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-217-socio-technical-imaginaries-of-a-data-driven-city-ethnographic-vignettes-from-delhi/

37.

Miyazaki

(2006) The Method of Hope. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

38.

Morozov

(2013) To Save Everything, Click Here. London: Hachette.

39.

Olbrich

Witjes

(2016) Sociotechnical imaginaries of big data: commercial satellite imagery and its promise of speed and transparency. In: Bunnik

Cawley

Mulqueen

, et al. (eds) Big Data Challenges. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 115–126.

40.

Pfotenhauer

Jasanoff

(2017) Panacea or diagnosis? Imaginaries of innovation and the “MIT model” in three political cultures. Social Studies of Science 47(6): 783–810.

41.

Pfotenhauer

Juhl

Aarden

(2019) Challenging the “deficit model” of innovation: framing policy issues under the innovation imperative. Research Policy 48(4): 895–904.

42.

Poon

(2016) Corporate capitalism and the growing power of big data. Science, Technology, & Human Values 41(6): 1088–1108.

43.

Ruppert

(2018) Sociotechnical Imaginaries of Different Data Futures: An Experiment in Citizen Data. 3e Van Doornlezing. Available at: https://www.eur.nl/sites/corporate/files/2018-06/3e%20van%20doornlezing%20evelyn%20ruppert.pdf

44.

Ruppert

Isin

Bigo

(2017) Data politics. Big Data & Society 4(2): 1–7.

45.

Sadowski

Bendor

(2018) Selling smartness: corporate narratives and the smart city as a sociotechnical imaginary. Science, Technology, & Human Values 44(3): 540–563.

46.

Sandler

Thedvall

(2017) Meeting Ethnography. London: Routledge.

47.

Schiølin

(2019) Revolutionary dreams: future essentialism and the sociotechnical imaginary of the fourth industrial revolution in Denmark. Social Studies of Science 50(4): 542–566.

48.

Schou

(2018) Remaking Citizenship (ed Hjelholt

). Copenhagen: IT University of Copenhagen.

49.

Schwab

(2017) The Fourth Industrial Revolution. New York: Currency.

50.

Schwartzman

(2013) The Meeting. Boston, MA: Springer.

51.

Shapin

Schaffer

(2011) Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

52.

Smith

(2015) Corporate imaginaries of biotechnology and global governance: syngenta, golden rice, and corporate social responsibility. In: Jasanoff

Kim

S-H

(eds) Dreamscapes of Modernity. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 254–276.

53.

Srnicek

(2017) Platform Capitalism. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

54.

Steinhardt

Jackson

(2015) Anticipation work: cultivating vision in collective practice. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing—CSCW ‘15, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 28 February.

55.

Taplin

(2018) Move Fast and Break Things. New York: Little, Brown.

56.

Taylor

(2004) Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

57.

United Nations (2018) United Nations E-Government Survey 2018. Available at: https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/2018-un-e-government-survey.html

58.

Williamson

(2016) Silicon startup schools: technocracy, algorithmic imaginaries and venture philanthropy in corporate education reform. Critical Studies in Education 59(2): 218–236.

59.

Winthereik

(2011) Hopeful comparisons on the brink of the grave. Common Knowledge 17(1): 77–81.

60.

Zabusky

(2002) Ethnography in/of transnational processes: following gyres in the worlds of big science and European integration. In: Mertz

Greenhouse

(eds) Ethnography in Unstable Places. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 113–145.

61.

Zuboff

(2016) The secrets of surveillance capitalism. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 5 March. Available at: http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/thedigital-debate/shoshana-zuboff-secrets-of-surveillance-capitalism-14103616.html

Hot air and corporate sociotechnical imaginaries: Performing and translating digital futures in the Danish tech scene

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References