Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-3
From incidental exposure to intentional avoidance: Psychological reactance to political communication during the 2017 German national election campaign
This article deals with potential effects of incidental online exposure to political information (IOEP) on the German electorate during the 2017 national election campaign. We argue that the difference in currently unexpected and generally unwanted exposure to political online communication is crucial to the study of IOEP effects. While the former might result in “passive learning,” we hypothesize that–based on psychological reactance theory–the latter may be linked to defensive reactions with undesirable consequences among those who already are alienated from politics. Using cross-sectional data from an online survey among 1100 eligible voters, we can demonstrate that IOEP correlates with reactance in substantial segments. The study’s results are indicating, that the viral character of online campaigning may lead to the opposite of what was intended: voters are not only “trapped,” but might be repelled instead. Further empirical elaboration dealing with causal assumptions is encouraged.
AndreoliVAWorchelSFolgerR (1974) Implied threat to behavioral freedom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology30(6): 765–771.
5.
Ardèvol-AbreuADiehlTGil de ZúñigaH (2017) Antecedents of internal political efficacy incidental news exposure online and the mediating role of political discussion. Politics39(1): 82–100.
6.
BennettWLIyengarS (2008) A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication58(4): 707–731.
7.
BessarabovaEFinkELTurnerM (2013) Reactance, restoration, and cognitive structure: comparative statics. Human Communication Research39(3): 339–364.
8.
BlachaK (2014) Frustration in hierarchischen Kundenbindungsprogrammen: Eine empirische Untersuchung [Frustration in Hierarchical Customer Loyalty Programs: An empirical study]. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
9.
BlumlerJG (1970) The political effects of television. In: HalloranJD (ed.) The Political Effects of Television. London: Panther, pp. 68–104.
10.
BlumlerJGMcQuailD (1968) Television in Politics: Its Uses and Influence. London: Faber and Faber.
11.
BoczkowskiPJMitchelsteinEMatassiM (2018) “News comes across when I’m in a moment of leisure”: understanding the practices of incidental news consumption on social media. New Media & Society20(10): 3523–3539.
12.
BodeL (2016) Political news in the news feed: learning politics from social media. Mass Communication and Society19(1): 24–48.
13.
BowyerBTKahneJEMiddaughE (2017) Youth comprehension of political messages in YouTube videos. New Media & Society19(4): 522–541.
14.
BrehmJW (1966) A Theory of Psychological Reactance. New York: Academic Press.
15.
BrehmJWBrehmSS (1981) Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. New York: Academic Press.
16.
BurgoonJK (1978) A communication model of personal space violations: explication and an initial test. Human Communication Research4(2): 129–142.
17.
CappellaJNJamiesonKH (1997) Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
CeccobelliD (2018) Not every day is Election Day: a comparative analysis of eighteen election campaigns on Facebook. Journal of Information Technology & Politics15(2): 122–141.
19.
De VreeseCH (2005) The spiral of cynicism reconsidered. European Journal of Communication20(3): 283–301.
20.
DillardJPPeckE (2000) Affect and persuasion: emotional responses to public service announcements. Communication Research27(4): 461–495.
21.
DillardJPShenL (2005) On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs72(2): 144–168.
22.
European Social Survey (ESS) (2016) Fragebogen—Gesellschaft und Demokratie in Europa: Deutsche Teilstudie im Projekt “European Social Survey” (Welle 8) [Questionnaire—Society and Democracy in Europe: German Substudy within the “European Social Survey” (Wave 8)]. Available at: https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/methodology/ess_methodology/source_questionnaire/ (accessed 2 August 2019).
23.
FlemmingFMarcinkowskiF (2016) Der “trap effect” des Internet: Ausmaß und Folgen inzidenteller Rezeption von Wahlkampfkommunikation im Internet während des Bundestagswahlkampfs 2013 [The “trap effect” of the internet: extent and consequences of incidental online exposure to campaign communication during the 2013 German national election campaign]. In: HennPFrießD (eds) Digital Communication Research: Vol. 3. Politische Online-Kommunikation. Voraussetzungen und Folgen des strukturellen Wandels der politischen Kommunikation [Digital Communication Research: Vol. 3. Political Online Communication. Requirements and Consequences of Structural Change of Political Communication]. Berlin: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft, pp. 191–212.
24.
FletcherRNielsenRK (2018) Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis. New Media & Society20(7): 2450–2468.
25.
GelbrichK (2010) Anger, frustration, and helplessness after service failure: coping strategies and effective informational support. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science38(5): 567–585.
26.
Gil de ZúñigaHWeeksBArdèvol-AbreuA (2017) Effects of the news-finds-me perception in communication: social media use implications for news seeking and learning about politics. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication22(3): 105–123.
27.
HeissRMatthesJ (2019) Does incidental exposure on social media equalize or reinforce participatory gaps? Evidence from a panel study. New Media & Society21: 2463–2482.
28.
HeissRKnollJMatthesJ (2019) Pathways to political (dis-)engagement: motivations behind social media use and the role of incidental and intentional exposure modes in adolescents’ political engagement. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research. Epub ahead of print 9 April. DOI: 10.1515/commun-2019-2054.
29.
HolbertRLStephensonMT (2002) Structural equation modeling in the communication sciences, 1995-2000. Human Communication Research28(4): 531–551.
30.
HongS-MPageS (1989) A psychological reactance scale: development, factor structure and reliability. Psychological Reports64(3): 1323–1326.
31.
Hosch-DayicanBAmritCAartsK, et al. (2016) How do online citizens persuade fellow voters? Using Twitter during the 2012 Dutch parliamentary election campaign. Social Science Computer Review34(2): 135–152.
32.
HuLBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55.
33.
KaiserJKellerTRKleinen-von KönigslöwK (2018) Incidental news exposure on Facebook as a social experience: the influence of recommender and media cues on news selection. Communication Research. Epub ahead of print 23 October. DOI: 10.1177/0093650218803529.
34.
KarnowskiVKümpelASLeonhardL, et al. (2017) From incidental news exposure to news engagement. How perceptions of the news post and news usage patterns influence engagement with news articles encountered on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior76: 42–50.
35.
KatzSJByrneSKentAI (2017) Mitigating the perception of threat to freedom through abstraction and distance. Communication Research44(7): 1046–1069.
36.
KimS-YLevineTAllenM (2013a) Comparing separate process and intertwined models for reactance. Communication Studies64(3): 273–295.
37.
KimYChenH-TGil de ZúñigaH (2013b) Stumbling upon news on the internet: effects of incidental news exposure and relative entertainment use on political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior29(6): 2607–2614.
38.
KrugmanHEHartleyEL (1970) Passive learning from television. Public Opinion Quarterly34(2): 184–190.
39.
KümpelAS (2019) The issue takes it all? Incidental news exposure and news engagement on Facebook. Digital Journalism7(2): 165–186.
40.
LeeJKKimE (2017) Incidental exposure to news: predictors in the social media setting and effects on information gain online. Computers in Human Behavior75: 1008–1015.
41.
MeirickPCNisbettGS (2011) I approve this message: effects of sponsorship, ad tone, and reactance in 2008 presidential advertising. Mass Communication and Society14(5): 666–689.
42.
MetagJArltD (2017) Das Konstrukt Themenverdrossenheit und seine Messung. Theoretische Konzeptualisierung und Skalenentwicklung [The construct Issue-Fatigue and its Measuring. Theoretical conceptualizing and scale-development]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft64(4): 542–563.
43.
MironAMBrehmJW (2006) Reactance theory – 40 years later. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie37: 9–18.
MorrisDSMorrisJS (2017) Evolving learning: the changing effect of internet access on political knowledge and engagement (1998-2012). Sociological Forum32(2): 339–358.
47.
Oeldorf-HirschA (2018) The role of engagement in learning from active and incidental news exposure on social media. Mass Communication and Society21(2): 225–247.
48.
PingRAJr (1995) A parsimonious estimating technique for interaction and quadratic latent variables. Journal of Marketing Research32(3): 336–347.
49.
PinkletonEAustinEW (2001) Individual motivations, perceived media importance, and political disaffection. Political Communication18(3): 321–334.
50.
QuickBL (2012) What is the best measure of psychological reactance? An empirical test of two measures. Health Communication27(1): 1–9.
51.
QuickBLStephensonMT (2007) Further evidence that psychological reactance can be modeled as a combination of anger and negative cognitions. Communication Research34(3): 255–276.
52.
RainsSA (2013) The nature of psychological reactance revisited: a meta-analytic review. Human Communication Research39(1): 47–73.
RobinsonMJ (1976) Public affairs television and the growth of political malaise: the case of “the selling of the pentagon.”American Political Science Review70(2): 409–432.
56.
SachseM (2010) Negative Kommunikationseffekte von Sponsoring und Ambush-Marketing bei Sportgroßveranstaltungen [Negative Communication Effects of Sponsoring and Ambush-Marketing at Sport Mega Events]. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
57.
SchönbachKWeaverDH (1985) Finding the unexpected: cognitive bonding in a political campaign. In: KrausSPerloffRM (eds) Mass Media and Political Thought: An Information-Processing Approach. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE, pp. 157–176.
58.
SilviaPJ (2006) Reactance and the dynamics of disagreement: multiple paths from threatened freedom to resistance to persuasion. European Journal of Social Psychology36(5): 673–685.
59.
SteindlCJonasESittenthalerS, et al. (2015) Understanding psychological reactance: new developments and findings. Zeitschrift für Psychologie223(4): 205–214.
60.
SteinmetzHDavidovESchmidtP (2011) Three approaches to estimate latent interaction effects: intention and perceived behavioral control in the theory of planned behavior. Methodological Innovations6(1): 95–110.
61.
TewksburyDWeaverAJMaddexBD (2001) Accidentally informed: incidental news exposure on the World Wide Web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly78(3): 533–554.
62.
ValentinoNABeckmannMNBuhrTA (2001) A spiral of cynicism for some: the contingent effects of campaign news frames on participation and confidence in government. Political Communication18(4): 347–367.
63.
ValerianiAVaccariC (2016) Accidental exposure to politics on social media as online participation equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. New Media & Society18(9): 1857–1874.
64.
Van AelstPDe SwertK (2009) Politics in the news: do campaigns matter? A comparison of political news during election periods and routine periods in Flanders (Belgium). Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research34(2): 149–168.
65.
WalgraveSVan AelstP (2006) The contingency of the mass media’s political agenda setting power: toward a preliminary theory. Journal of Communication56(1): 88–109.
66.
WicklundRA (1974) Freedom and Reactance. Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum.
67.
WorchelSBrehmJW (1971) Direct and implied social restoration of freedom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology18(3): 294–304.
68.
YadamsurenBErdelezS (2010) Incidental exposure to online news. Asis&t47(1): 1–20.
69.
YadamsurenBHeinströmJ (2011) Emotional reactions to incidental exposure to online news. Information Research16(3): 1–24.
70.
ZukinCSnyderR (1984) Passive learning: when the media environment is the message. Public Opinion Quarterly48(3): 629–638.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
