In today’s high-choice media environments, newscasts increasingly compete for viewers against multiple entertainment options. This development has led to concerns over the demise of inadvertent news audiences, which is especially problematic for public service broadcasters who have an obligation to provide news to all segments of the population. However, this study demonstrates how entertainment shows can be used to create a favourable opportunity structure that generates substantial inadvertent news audiences. Using Danish TV meter data from 2008 to 2016, we show that scheduling the music talent show The X Factor before and after the newscast on the main public service channel increased news audiences dramatically. These ‘grab’ and ‘wrap’ effects of entertainment were particularly strong among young people and people with low news interest, and the effects became even stronger over time. Consequently, entertainment shows, indirectly, play a positive democratic role, by increasing the viewership of newscasts.
AalbergTvan AelstPCurranJ (2010) Media systems and the political information environment: A cross-national comparison. The International Journal of Press/Politics15(3): 255–271.
2.
AlthausSLCizmarAMGimpelJG (2009) Media supply, audience demand, and the geography of news consumption in the United States. Political Communication26(3): 249–277.
3.
ArceneauxKJohnsonM (2013) Changing Minds or Changing Channels? Partisan News in an Age of Choice. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
4.
BennettWLIyengarS (2008) A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication58(4): 707–731.
5.
BlekesauneAElvestadEAalbergT (2012) Tuning out the world of news and current affairs–An empirical study of Europe’s disconnected citizens. European Sociological Review28(1): 110–126.
6.
BlumlerJG (1970) The political effects of television. In: HalloranJD (ed.) The Political Effects of Television. London: Panther, pp. 68–104.
7.
CurranJIyengarSLundAB, et al. (2009) Media system, public knowledge & democracy: A comparative study. European Journal of Communication24(1): 5–26.
8.
DavidCC (2009) Learning political information from the news: A closer look at the role of motivation. Journal of Communication59(2): 243–261.
9.
DiddiALaRoseR (2006) Getting hooked on news: Uses and gratifications and the formation of news habits among college students in an Internet environment. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media50(2): 193–210.
10.
DondersKPauwelsC (2008) Does EU policy challenge the digital future of public service broadcasting?: An analysis of the commission’s state aid approach to digitization and the public service remit of public broadcasting organizations. Convergence14(3): 295–311.
11.
EsserFde VreeseCHStrömbäckJ, et al. (2012) Political information opportunities in Europe: A longitudinal and comparative study of thirteen television systems. The International Journal of Press/Politics17(3): 247–274.
12.
IyengarS (2017) A typology of media effects. In: KenskiKJamiesonKH (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 59–68.
13.
IyengarSCurranJLundAB, et al. (2010) Cross-National versus individual-level differences in political information: A media systems perspective. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties20(3): 291–309.
14.
KrugmanHEHartleyEL (1970) Passive learning from television. Public Opinion Quarterly34(2): 184–190.
15.
LaRoseR (2010) The problem of media habits. Communication Theory20(2): 194–222.
16.
PriorM (2005) News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science49(3): 577–592.
17.
PriorM (2007) Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
PriorM (2009) The immensely inflated news audience: Assessing bias in self-reported news exposure. Public Opinion Quarterly73(1): 130–143.
19.
SchönbachKLaufE (2002) The ‘trap’ effect of television and its competitors. Communication Research29(5): 564–583.
20.
SchönbachKLaufE (2004) Another look at the ‘trap’ effect of television – and beyond. International Journal of Public Opinion Research16(2): 169–182.
21.
ShehataA (2013) Active or passive learning from television? Political information opportunities and knowledge gaps during election campaigns. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties23(2): 200–222.
22.
ShehataAHopmannDNNordL, et al. (2015) Television channel content profiles and differential knowledge growth: A test of the inadvertent learning hypothesis using panel data. Political Communication32(3): 377–395.
23.
SkovsgaardMShehataAStrömbäckJ (2016) Opportunity structures for selective exposure: Investigating selective exposure and learning in Swedish Election Campaigns Using Panel Survey Data. The International Journal of Press/Politics21(4): 527–546.
24.
StrömbäckJ (2005) In Search of a Standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies6(3): 331–345.
25.
StrömbäckJ (2017) Does public service TV and the intensity of the political information environment matter?Journalism Studies18(11): 1415–1432.
26.
StrömbäckJShehataA (2010) Media malaise or a virtuous circle? Exploring the causal relationships between news media exposure, political news attention and political interest. European Journal of Political Research49(5): 575–597.
27.
StrömbäckJDjerf-PierreMShehataA (2013) The dynamics of political interest and news media consumption: A longitudinal perspective. International Journal of Public Opinion Research25(4): 414–435.
28.
SyvertsenT (1991) Public television in crisis: Critiques compared in Norway and Britain. European Journal of Communication6(1): 95–114.
29.
ThalerRHSunsteinCR (2009) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. London: Penguin Books.
30.
Van AelstPStrömbäckJAalbergT, et al. (2017) Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy?Annals of the International Communication Association41(1): 3–27.
31.
WonnebergerASchoenbachKvan MeursL (2011) Interest in news and politics–Or situational determinants? Why people watch the news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media55(3): 325–343.
32.
WonnebergerASchoenbachKvan MeursL (2012) Staying tuned: TV news audiences in the Netherlands 1988-2010. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media56(1): 55–74.
33.
ZukinCSnyderR (1984) Passive learning: When the media environment is the message. Public Opinion Quarterly48(3): 629–638.
