In this article, we consider the role of digital platforms for producing data and shaping how children’s rights are understood, monitored and advocated for. We present a typology of platforms impacting children’s rights, followed by the introduction of a ‘networked capability approach’. A case study is used to explore the potential of this approach for examining the purpose, practices and repercussions of digital platforms. We argue that to recognize and actualize children’s rights in a digital age, we need new conceptual tools to examine the interplay of platforms, people and places that include and exclude children’s valued ‘doings and beings’.
All Children Reading (2016) All Children Reading ‘Competition Seeks to Develop Education App for Syrian Children Fleeing Conflict’. Available at: http://allchildrenreading.org/2419-2/
2.
Annie E. Casey Foundation (2016) Kids Count. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation. Available at: www.aecf.org/work/kids-count/
3.
AtkinsonS (2013) Beyond components of wellbeing: the effects of relational and situated assemblage. Topoi32: 137–144.
4.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2015) Big Data, Statistical Inference and Official Statistics. Belconnen, ACT, Australia: ABS.
5.
Australian Child Rights Taskforce (2016) CRC25: Australian Child Rights Progress. Sydney, NSW, Australia: National Children’s and Youth Law Centre.
6.
Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) (2013) Like, Post, Share: Young Australians’ Experience of Social Media. Pyrmont, NSW, Australia: ACMA.
boydd (2010) Social network sites as networked publics: affordances, dynamics, and implications. In: PapacharissiZ (ed.) Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge, pp. 39–58.
10.
boyddCrawfordK (2012) Critical questions for Big Data. Information, Communication and Society15(5): 662–679.
11.
CastellsM (2000) Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. The British Journal of Sociology51(1): 5–24.
12.
CollinPSwistT (2016) From products to publics? The potential of participatory design for research on youth, safety and well-being. Journal of Youth Studies19(3): 305–318.
13.
DaasPJHPutsMJ (2014) Big Data as a source of statistical information. The Survey Statistician69: 22–31.
14.
Dal YongJ (2015) Digital Platforms, Imperialism and Political Culture. London: Routledge.
15.
DeneulinSMcGregorJA (2010) The capability approach and the politics of a social conception of wellbeing. European Journal of Social Theory13(4): 501–519.
Foundation for Young Australians (FYA) (2016b) Unlimited potential: a data and information resource on young Australians. Available at: http://unlimitedpotential.fya.org.au/about/
21.
GoldinNPatelPPerryK (2014) The Global Youth Wellbeing Index. Available at: www.youthindex.org
22.
KanngieserANeilsonBRossiterN (2014) What is a research platform? Mapping methods, mobilities and subjectivities. Media, Culture & Society36(3): 302–318.
23.
KennanDKeenagahvnCO’ConnorU. (2011) A Rights-Based Approach to Monitoring Children and Young People’s Wellbeing. Paris: UNESCO Children and Youth Programme.
LivingstoneSO’NeillB (2014) Children’s rights online: challenges, dilemmas and emerging directions. In: van der HofSvan den BergBSchermerB (eds) Minding Minors Wandering the Web: Regulating Online Child Safety. Berlin: Springer, pp. 19–38.
27.
LivingstoneSCarrJByrneJ (2016) One in three: Internet governance and children’s rights. Innocenti Discussion paper no. 2016-01. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research.
28.
Mayer-SchoenbergerVCukierK (2013) Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. London: John Murray Publishers.
29.
Moosa-MithaM (2005) A difference-centred alternative to theorization of children’s citizenship rights. Citizenship Studies9(4): 369–388.
30.
New South Wales Council for Civil Liberties (NSWCCL) (2015) Submission to the Inquiry into the Migration Amendment (Strengthening Biometrics Integrity) Bill. Available at: www.nswccl.org.au/asylum_seekers
31.
NotleyT (2009) Young people, online networks, and social inclusion. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication14(4): 1208–1227.
32.
O’HareWP (2014) Data-Based Child Advocacy. New York: Springer.
33.
OosterlakenI (2011) Inserting technology in the relational ontology of Sen’s capability approach. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities12(3): 425–432.
34.
PapacharissiZ (2010) Conclusion: a networked self. In: PapacharissiZ (ed.) A Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge, pp. 304–318.
35.
PelegN (2013) Reconceptualising the child’s right to development: children and the capability approach. International Journal of Children’s Rights21: 523–542.
36.
QuennerstedtA (2013) Children’s rights research moving into the future – challenges on the way forward. International Journal of Children’s Rights21: 233–247.
RuppertE (2011) Population objects: interpassive subjects. Sociology45(2): 218–233.
39.
RuppertESavageM (2009) New populations: scoping paper on digital transactional data. CRESC Working paper no. 74. Milton Keynes: Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change (CRESC). Available at: www.cresc.ac.uk/medialibrary/workingpapers/wp74.pdf
40.
SenA (1989) Development as capability expansion. Journal of Development Planning19: 41–58.
41.
SenA (1992) Inequality Re-Examined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
42.
SenA (2005) Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development6(2): 151–166.
43.
SmithMLSewardC (2009) The relational ontology of Amartya Sen’s capability approach: incorporating social and individual causes. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities10(2): 213–235.
44.
SpearsBATaddeoCMBarnesA. (2016a) Connect. Challenge. Do. Design and Evaluation of Goalzie: A Goal-Setting Campaign to Promote Positive Attitudes towards Help-Seeking for Wellbeing. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Young and Well Cooperative Research Centre.
45.
SpearsBATaddeoCMCollinP. (2016b) Safe and Well Online: Learnings from Four Social Marketing Campaigns for Youth Wellbeing. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Young and Well Cooperative Research Centre.
46.
SwistTCollinPMcCormackJ. (2015) Social Media and the Wellbeing of Children and Young People: A Literature Review. Perth, WA, Australia: West Australian Commission for Children and Young People.
47.
SwistTHodgeBCollinP (2016) ‘Cultural making’: how complexity and power relations are modulated in transdisciplinary research. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies30(4): 1–13.
