Online groups can become communities, developing group identification and fostering deindividuation. But is this possible for very large, anonymous groups with low barriers to entry, highly constrained formats, and great diversity of content? Applying social identity theory and social identification and deindividuation effects theory, this study assesses influences on group identification and deindividuation in the case of Imgur.com. Respondents reported slightly positive levels of the three forms of group identification, but mixed levels of two forms of deindividuation. As argued by proponents of computer-mediated communication, demographics play only a minor role on these outcomes. More involved usage, such as direct access and commenting on images, is more associated with these outcomes, while more basic usage, such as total hours and reading comments, has little influence. Deindividuation is positively associated with group identification.
AlbrechtS (2006) Whose voice is heard in online deliberation? A study of participation and representation in political debates on the Internet. Information, Communication & Society9(1): 62–82.
2.
AshforthBEMaelF (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. The Academy of Management Review14(1): 20–39.
3.
BieberMMcFallBSRiceRE. (2007) Towards systems design for supporting enabling communities. The Journal of Community Informatics, Special Issue: Community Informatics and System Design3(1) Available at: http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/281/313
4.
BlankG (2013) Who creates content?Information, Communication & Society16(4): 590–612.
5.
BrewerMB (1979) Ingroup bias in the minimal intergroup situation: a cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin86: 307–324.
BucknerJC (1998) The development of an instrument to measure neighborhood cohesion. American Journal of Community Psychology16(6): 771–791.
8.
BurkeMKrautRMarlowC (2011, May) Social capital on Facebook: differentiating uses and users. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 571–580. New York: ACM. DOI: 10.1145/1978942.1979023.
9.
CadinuMRothbartM (1996) Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology70(4): 661–677.
10.
CalhounCJ (1986) Computer technology, large-scale societal integration and the local community. Urban Affairs Quarterly22: 329–349.
11.
CannavaleFJScarrHAPepitoneA (1970) Deindividuation in the small group: further evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology16(1): 141–147.
12.
CulnanMJMarkusML (1987) Information technologies. In: JablinFMPutnamLLRobertsKH. (eds) Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 420–443.
13.
DienerE (1976) Effects of prior destructive behavior, anonymity and group presence on deindividuation and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology33: 497–507.
14.
DouglasKMMcGartyC (2001) Identifiability and self-presentation: computer-mediated communication and intergroup interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology40: 399–416.
15.
EllisonNSteinfieldCLampeC (2007) The benefits of Facebook “friends”: social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12(4): 1143–1168. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x/full
16.
FestingerLPepitoneANewcombT (1952) Some consequences of deindividuation in a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology47: 382–389.
HargittaiEWalejkoG (2008) The participation divide: content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Communication & Society11(2): 239–256.
19.
HeinzMRiceRE (2009) An integrated model of knowledge sharing in contemporary communication environments. In: BeckC (ed.) Communication Yearbook: 33. London: Routledge, pp. 172–195.
20.
HiltzSRJohnsonK (1989) Measuring acceptance of computer-mediated communication systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science40(6): 386–397.
21.
HiltzSRTuroffM (1978) The Network Nation: Human Interaction via Computer. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
22.
HiltzSRTuroffM (1993) The Network Nation: Human Interaction via Computer. 2nd ed.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
23.
HoggMA (2001) A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review5(3): 184–200.
24.
HoggMAHardieEAReynoldsKJ (1995) Prototypical similarity, self-categorization, and depersonalized attraction: a perspective on group cohesiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology25(2): 159–177.
25.
HowardMCMageeSM (2013) To boldly go where no group has gone before: an analysis of online group identity and validation of a measure. Computers in Human Behavior29: 2058–2071.
26.
HowardT (2010) Design to Thrive: Creating Social Networks and Online Communities That Last. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
27.
KatzJERiceRE (2002) Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement and Interaction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
28.
KatzJERiceREAcordS. (2004) Personal mediated communication and the concept of community in theory and practice. In: KalbfleischP (ed.) Communication Yearbook: 28. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 315–370.
29.
KieslerSSiegelJMcGuireTW (1984) Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist39(10): 1123–1134.
30.
KimJParkHS (2011) The effect of uniform virtual appearance on conformity intention: social identity model of deindividuation effects and optimal distinctiveness theory. Computers in Human Behavior27: 1223–1230.
31.
KrautPPattersonMLundmarkV. (1998) Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?American Psychologist53(9): 1017–1031.
32.
LeaMSpearsR (1992) Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing2: 321–342.
33.
LeachCWVan ZomerenMZebelS. (2008) Group-level self-definition and self-investment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology95(1): 144–165.
34.
Le BonG (1960) The Crowd (1895). New York: Viking.
35.
LeeE-J (2006) When and how does depersonalization increase conformity to group norms in computer-mediated communication?Communication Research33: 423–447.
36.
McCroskeyLLMcCroskeyJCRichmondVP (2006) Analysis and improvement of the measurement of interpersonal attraction and homophily. Communication Quarterly54(1): 1–31.
37.
MaelFATetrickLE (1992) Identifying organizational identification. Educational and Psychological Measurement52: 813–824.
38.
MarkusML (1987) Toward a “critical mass” theory of interactive media, universal access, interdependence and diffusion. Communication Research14(5): 491–511.
39.
MarkusML (1990) Toward a “critical mass” theory of interactive media. In: FulkJSteinfieldC (eds) Organizations and Communication Technology. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, pp. 194–218.
40.
MikalJPRiceREKentR. (2014) Common voice: analysis of content convergence on a website characterized by group identification and social attraction. Computers in Human Behavior35: 506–515.
41.
PearceKERiceRE (2013) Digital divides from access to activities: comparing mobile and PC Internet users. Journal of Communication63(4): 721–744.
42.
PoplinDE (1979) Communities: A Survey of Theories and Methods of Research. New York: Macmillan.
43.
PostmesTSpearsR (1998) Deindividuation and anti-normative behavior: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin123: 238–259.
44.
PostmesTSpearsR (2002) Behavior online: does anonymous computer communication reduce gender inequality?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin28(8): 1073–1083.
45.
PostmesTSpearsRLeaM (1998) Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research25: 689–715.
46.
PostmesTSpearsRSakhelK. (2001) Social influence in computer-mediated communication: the effects of anonymity on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin27(10): 1243–1254.
47.
PreeceJ (2000) Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
48.
Quan-HaaseAWellmanBWitteJ. (2002) Capitalizing on the Internet: network capital, participatory capital, and sense of community. In: WellmanBHaythornthwaiteC (eds) The Internet in Everyday Life. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 291–324.
49.
ReicherSDSpearsRPostmesT (1995) A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. In: StrobeWHewstoneM (eds) European Review of Social Psychology. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 161–198.
50.
RenYHarperFMDrennerS. (2012) Building member attachment in online communities: applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds. MIS Quarterly36(3): 841–864.
51.
RenYKrautRKieslerS (2007) Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organization Studies28: 377–408.
52.
RheingoldH (2000) The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. 2nd ed.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
53.
RiceRE (1987a) Challenges facing research on wired cities. In: DuttonWBlumlerJKraemerK (eds) Wired Cities: Shaping the Future of Communications. Boston, MA: G.K. Hall & Co., pp. 447–455.
54.
RiceRE (1987b) Computer-mediated communication and organizational innovation. Journal of Communication37(4): 65–94.
55.
RiceRELoveG (1987) Electronic emotion: socio-emotional content in a computer-mediated communication network. Communication Research14(1): 85–105.
56.
SchradieJ (2013) The digital production gap in Great Britain. Information, Communication & Society16(6): 989–998.
57.
ShawLHGantLM (2002) In defense of the Internet: the relationship between Internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support. CyberPsychology & Behavior5(2): 157–171.
58.
ShirkyC (2009) Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing without Organizations. New York: Penguin Press.
59.
TajfelHFlamentCBilligM. (1971) Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology1: 149–178.
60.
TepperM (1997) Usenet community and the cultural politics of information. In: PurterD (ed.) Internet Culture. New York: Routledge, pp. 39–54.
61.
TongSWaltherJB (2011) Relational maintenance and CMC. In: WrightKBWebbLM (eds) Computer-Mediated Communication in Personal Relationships. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, pp. 98–118.
62.
TurkleS (2012) Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.
63.
TurnerJC (1987) A self-categorization theory. In: TurnerJCHoggMAOakesPJ. (eds) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorisation Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Publishers, pp. 42–67.
64.
TurnerJCOakesPJ (1986) The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology25: 237–252.
65.
WaltherJB (1996) Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research23: 1–43.
WaltherJBAndersonJParkD (1994) Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: a meta-analysis of social and antisocial communication. Communication Research21(4): 460–487.
68.
WatsonRI (1973) Investigation into deindividuation using a cross-cultural survey technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology25: 342–345.
69.
WellmanBGuliaM (1999) Net surfers don’t ride alone: virtual community as community. In: WellmanB (ed.) Networks in the Global Village. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 331–367.
70.
ZabrickMMillerN (1972) Group aggression: the effects of friendship ties and anonymity. In: Proceedings of the 80th Annual Convention of the APA. vol. 7. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 211–212.
