A field experiment conducted in a church community tested the counterintuitive notion that individuals were more likely to respond affirmatively to donation requests made through email than face to face. According to social identity perspectives of computer-mediated communication, email increases the salience of group attributes and reduces cognitive perceptions of interpersonal differences. These processes depersonalize individuals who then become more sensitive to group norms and expectations. Analyses demonstrated that the predicted positive interaction was moderated by the degree of in-group identification, such that low identifiers were more likely to respond to email calls when the salience of social identity was heightened.
Aiken LS, West SG ( 1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions . Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications .
2.
Ajzen I. ( 1991) The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50: 179-211.
3.
Barna Group (2008) New research describes use of technology in churches. April 2009. Available at: http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/14-media/40-new-research-describes-use-of-technology-in-churches
4.
Barreto M., Ellemers N. ( 2000) You can’t always do what you want: Social identity and selfpresentational determinants of the choice to work for a low-status group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin26(8): 891-906.
5.
Barreto M., Ellemers N. ( 2002) The impact of anonymity and group identification on progroup behavior in computer-mediated groups. Small Group Research33(5): 590-610.
6.
Blanz M. ( 1999) Accessibility and fit as determinants of the salience of social categorizations. European Journal of Social Psychology29: 43-74.
7.
Brunsting S., Postmes T. ( 2002) Social movement participation in the digital age: Predicting offline and online collective action. Small Group Research33(5): 525-54.
8.
Crisp RJ, Ensari N., Hewstone M., and Miller N. ( 2002) A dual-route model of crossed categorisation effects . In: Hewstone M, Stroebe W (eds) European Review of Social Psychology. New York: Psychology Press, 35-73.
9.
Ellemers N., Spears R., and Doosje B. ( 2002) Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology53: 161-86.
10.
Greenberg A. ( 2000) The church and revitalization of politics and community . Political Science Quarterly115(3): 377-94.
11.
Hogg MA ( 2006) Social identity theory. In: Burke PJ (ed.) Contemporary Social Psychological Theories. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press , 111-36.
12.
Hogg MA, Reid SA ( 2006) Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory16(1): 7-30.
13.
Klandermans B. ( 2002) How group identification helps to overcome the dilemma of collective action. American Behavioral Scientist45(5): 887-900.
14.
Klandermans B. ( 2005) Social identification in groups. Advances in Group Processes22: 155-76.
15.
Lea M., Spears R., and de Groot D. ( 2001) Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin27(5): 526-37.
16.
Lee EJ ( 2004) Effects of visual representation on social influence in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research30(2): 234-59.
17.
Lee EJ ( 2006) When and how does depersonalization increase conformity to group norms in computer-mediated communication? Communication Research33(6): 423-47.
18.
Luhtanen R., Crocker J. ( 1992) A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin18: 302-18.
19.
Matheson K., Zanna MP ( 1990) ‘Computer-mediated communications: The focus is on me. Social Science Computer Review8: 1-12.
Oakes P. ( 1987) The salience of social categories. In: Turner JC, Hogg MA , Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, and Wetherell MS (eds) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorization Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell , 117-41.
22.
PEW (2007) Internet activities . November 2008. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/trends/Internet_Activities_6.15.07.htm
23.
Pew (2008) The internet and the 2008 election. August 2008. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_2008_election.pdf
24.
Postmes T., Spears R., and Lea M. ( 1998) Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer mediated communication. Communication Research25(6): 689-715.
25.
Postmes T., Spears R., and Lea M. ( 2000) The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication . Human Communication Research26(3): 341-71.
26.
Postmes T., Spears R., Sakhel K., de Groot D. ( 2001) Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin27(10): 1243-54.
27.
Prentice DA, Miller DT, and Lightdale JR ( 1994) Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin20(5): 484-93.
28.
Rees E. ( 2006) S.H.A.P.E. - Finding and Fulfilling Your Unique Purpose in Life. Lake Forest, CA: Purpose Driven.
29.
Rice R., Gattiker UE ( 2001) New media and organizational structuring. In: Jablin FM, Putnam LL (eds) The New Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research, and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 544-81.
30.
Sassenberg, K., Boos M. ( 2003) Attitude change in computer-mediated communication: Effects of anonymity and category norms. Group Processes Intergroup Relations6(4): 405-22.
31.
Sassenberg K., Postmes T. ( 2002) Cognitive and strategic processes in small groups: Effects of anonymity of the self and anonymity of the group on social influence . British Journal of Social Psychology41: 463-80.
32.
Simon B., Loewy M., Sturmer S., Weber U., Freytag P., Habig C., Kampmeier C., and Spahlinger P. ( 1998) Collective identification and social movement participation . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology74(3): 646-58.
33.
Simon B., Stürmer S., and Steffens K. ( 2000) Helping individuals or group members? The role of individual and collective identification in AIDS volunteerism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin26(4): 497-506.
34.
Spears R., Lea M., and Lee S. ( 1990) De-individuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology29: 121-34.
35.
Sproull L., Kiesler S. ( 1986) Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science32(11): 1492-1512.
36.
Tajfel H. ( 1972) Experiments in a vacuum. In: Israel J, Tajfel H (eds) The Context of Social Psychology: A Critical Assessment. London: Academic Press, 69-121.
37.
Tajfel H., Turner JC ( 1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour . In: Worchel S, Austin WG (eds) Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall, 7-24.
38.
Tanis M., Postmes T. ( 2003) Social cues and impression formation in CMC. Journal of Communication53(4): 676-93.
39.
Turner JC ( 1991) Social Influence. Buckingham : Open University Press.
40.
Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, and Wetherell MS ( 1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorization Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
41.
Turner JC, Wetherell MS, and Hogg MA ( 1989) Referent informational influence and group polarization . British Journal of Social Psychology25: 135-47.
42.
Waters RD ( 2007) Nonprofit organizations’ use of the internet: A content analysis of communication trends on the internet sites of the philanthropy 400. Nonprofit Management and Leadership18(1): 29-76.
43.
Wheeler L., Reis HT, and Bond MH ( 1989) Collectivism-individualism in everyday social life: The middle kingdom and the melting pot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology57(1): 79-86.
44.
Wright SG ( 2002) Strategic collective action: Social psychology and social change. In: Brown R, Gaertner S (eds) Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processes.. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 409-30.
45.
Wuthnow R. ( 1993) Pious materialism: How Americans view faith and money . The Christian Century (3 March): 239-42.
46.
Yanovitzky I., Rimal RN ( 2006) Communication and normative influence: An introduction to the special issue. Communication Theory16: 1-6.
