This study explores the various ways in which male young adults engage with violence in video games. Based on an ethnographic study (N = 26) with triangulation of diary reports, focus group interviews and a video commentary model, three conceptual axes are distinguished along which players differ in their enactment of video game violence: narration versus action, discovery versus mission-based play and reaction versus strategic play. The results suggest that individual playing styles result in exposure to different quantities and a different quality of virtual violence.
AdachiPJCWilloughbyT (2011) The effects of video game competition and violence on aggressive behaviour: which characteristics has the greatest influence?Psychology of Violence1(4): 259–274.
3.
AdachiPJCWilloughbyT (2013) More than just fun and games: the longitudinal relationships between strategic video games, self-reported problem solving skills, and academic grades. Journal of Youth and Adolescence42(7): 1041–1052.
4.
AndersonCADillKE (2000) Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology78(4): 772–790.
5.
AngCS (2006) Rules, gameplay, and narratives. Simulation & Gaming37(3): 306–325.
6.
BartleR (1996) Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: players who suit MUDs. Journal of MUD Research1(1). Available at: http://mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm (accessed 7 April 2014).
BlumerH (1969) Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
9.
BolgerNDavisARafaeliE (2003) Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology54: 579–616.
10.
BowenGA (2006) Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods5(3): 12–23.
11.
BushmanBHuesmannL (2006) Short-term and long-term effects of violent media on aggression in children and adults. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine160(4): 348–352.
12.
CallejaG (2007) Digital game involvement: a conceptual model. Games and Culture2(3): 236–260.
13.
ClarkeDDuimeringPR (2006) How computer gamers experience the game situation: a behavioral study. Computers in Entertainment4(3): 1–23.
14.
Da Mota MatosAPAlves FerreiraJAGHaaseRF (2012) Television and aggression: a test of a mediated model with a sample of Portuguese students. Journal of Social Psychology152(1): 75–91.
15.
De SchutterB (2011) De betekenis van digitale spellen voor een ouder publiek [The Meaning of Digital Games to An Older Audience]. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Leuven, Leuven.
16.
De SchutterBMallietS (2014) The older player of digital games: a classification based on perceived need satisfaction. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research39(1): 67–88.
17.
DeVaneBSquireKD (2008) The meaning of race and violence in Grand Theft Auto. Games and Culture3(3–4): 264–285.
FabricatoreCNussbaumMRosasR (2002) Playability in action videogames: a qualitative design model. Human–Computer Interaction17(4): 311–368.
20.
FergusonCJSan MiguelCHartleyRD (2009) A multivariate analysis of youth violence and aggression: the influence of family, peers, depression and media violence. Journal of Pediatrics155(6): 904–908.
21.
FrascaG (2003) Simulation versus narrative: introduction to ludology. In: WolfMJPPerronB (eds) The Video Game Theory Reader. New York: Routledge, pp. 221–236.
22.
GoldsteinJ (1998) Why We Watch: The Attractions of Violent Entertainment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
HartmannTVordererP (2010) It’s okay to shoot a character: moral disengagement in violent video games. Journal of Communication60(1): 94–119.
24.
HuesmannLRMoise-TitusJPodolskiC. (2003) Longitudinal relations between children’s exposure to TV violence and their aggressive and violent behavior in young adulthood: 1977–1992. Developmental Psychology39(2): 201–221.
25.
JanszJ (2005) The emotional appeal of violent video games for adolescent males. Communication Theory15(3): 219–241.
26.
JanszJTanisM (2007) Appeal of playing online First Person Shooter Games. Cyberpsychology & Behavior10(1): 133–136.
27.
JanszJAvisCVosmeerM (2010) Playing The Sims2: an exploration of gender differences in players’ motivations and patterns of play. New Media & Society12(2): 235–251.
28.
JuulJ (2005) Half-Real: Between Real Rules and Fictional Worlds. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
29.
JuulJ (2007) Without a goal. In: AtkinsBKrzywinskaT (eds) Videogame/Player/Text. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Available at: http://www.jesperjuul.net/text/withoutagoal/
30.
KlimmtCHefnerDVordererP (2009) The video game experience as ‘true’ identification: a theory of enjoyable alterations of players’ self-perception. Communication Theory19(4): 351–373.
31.
KlimmtCSchmidHNosperA. (2006) How players manage moral concerns to make video game violence enjoyable. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research31(3): 309–328.
LangA (2000) The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication50(1): 46–70.
34.
MallietS (2006) An exploration of adolescents’ perceptions of video game realism. Learning, Media and Technology31(4): 377–394.
35.
MallietS (2007) The challenge of video games to media effects theory. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Leuven, Leuven.
36.
MallietSThysenTPoelsK (2011) Digital game rhetoric. Examining political message construction in America’s Army and Grand Theft Auto IV. In: KirklandEEvansMRuchA (eds) Critical Game Studies: Theory, Ideology, Methodology. Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press, pp. 101–110.
37.
MurrayJ (1997) Hamlet on the Holodeck. New York: The Free Press.
38.
PengWLiuMMouY (2008) Do aggressive people play violent computer games in a more aggressive way? Individual difference and idiosyncratic game-playing experience. Cyberpsychology & Behavior11(2): 157–161.
SchottG (2009) I like the idea of killing but not the idea of cruelty: how New Zealand youth negotiate the pleasures of simulated violence. In: Proceedings of DiGRA: breaking new ground: innovation in games, play, practice and theory. Available at: http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/09287.36489.pdf (accessed 10 August 2013).
SteinkuehlerCA (2005) Cognition and learning in massively multiplayer online games: a critical approach. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
43.
StraussACorbinJ (1994) Grounded theory methodology: an overview. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 273–285.
44.
ValkenburgPMPeterJ (2013) The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication63(2): 221–243.
45.
WeberRBehrKMBatesC (2011) How video game interactivity moderates video game effects: An experimental study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Boston, MA, United States of America, 21-25 May.
46.
WeberRBehrKMTamboriniR. (2009) What do we really know about First-Person-Shooter games? An event-related high resolution content analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication14(4): 1016–1037.
47.
WilloughbyTAdachiPJCGoodM (2012) A longitudinal study of the association between violent video game play and aggression among adolescents. Developmental Psychology48(4): 1044–1057.
48.
YeeN (2006) The psychology of MMORPGs: emotional investment, motivations, relationship formation, and problematic usage. In: SchroederRAxelssonA (eds) Avatars at Work and Play: Collaboration and Interaction in Shared Virtual Environments. London: Springer-Verlag, pp. 187–207.
49.
YeeN (2007) Motivations for play in online games. Cyberpsychology & Behavior9(6): 772–775.
50.
YeeNDucheneautNYaoM. (2011) Do men heal more when in drag? Conflicting identity cues between user and avatar. In: Proceedings of CHI 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7–12May, pp. 773–776. New York: ACM Press.
51.
YoungGWhittyMT (2011) Should gamespace be a taboo-free zone? Moral and psychological implications for single-player video games. Theory & Psychology21(6): 802–820.
52.
YusoffACrowderRGilbertL. (2009) A conceptual framework for serious games. In: The 9th IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies, Riga, 15–17 July.
