Characterization refers to the process of attributing character traits to narrative entities called ‘characters'. While there is a long tradition of characterization theory in literary studies, the topic has not been examined extensively in game research. Based on insights from literary, film, and game studies, this article creates a theoretical model of how ‘character,' or character traits, can be attributed in video games, and offers a methodological vocabulary for further character(ization) research. First, this paper synthesizes the tradition of characterization research in literary studies. Second, it identifies three participants in video game characterization (developers, actors, and players) and introduces the concept of ergodic characterization to describe those instances in which players produce nontrivial characterization efforts. Finally, the framework itself is presented through application to various game titles, and several answers to methodological problems within game characterization analysis are suggested.
AarsethE. (1997). Cybertext. Perspectives on ergodic literature. John Hopkins University Press.
2.
AarsethE. (2003). Playing research: Methodological approaches to game analysis. In Melbourne DAC – The 5th International Digital Arts and Culture conference (pp. 1–7).
3.
AarsethE. (2004). Genre trouble: Narrativism and the art of simulation. In Wardrip-FruinN.HarriganP. (Eds.), First person: New media as story, performance, and game (pp. 45–55). MIT Press.
4.
AldredJ. (2016). Characters. In WolfM. J. P.PerronB. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to video game studies (pp. 355–363).Routledge. (Original work published in 2014).
ArcagniS.D’AloiaA. (2021). VR storytelling: Potentials and limitations of virtual reality narratives. Cinergi – Il Cinema e le Altre Arti, 10(19), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2280-9481/13412
ArjorantaJ. (2013, Oct 31-Nov 1). Meaning effects in video games. Focalization, granularity and mode of narration in games [Paper presentation]. First International Conference in Games and Literary Theory, Valetta, Malta). https://jonne.arjoranta.fi/2013/meaning-effects-in-video-games-talk/
10.
AtwoodM. (2018). The Penelopiad. Canongate. (Original work published in 2005)
11.
BalM. (1999). Narratology. Introduction to the theory of narrative (2nd ed.). University of Toronto Press. (Original work published in 1997).
12.
BarthesR. (1975). S/Z (R. Miller, Trans.). Jonathan Cape. (Original work published in 1970)
BaylissP. (2007). Beings-in-the-gameworld: Characters, avatars and players. In Proceedings of the 4th Australasian Conference on Interactive entertainment: IE2007(pp. 1–6).
15.
BermanR. A. (1997). Fade in: The screenwriting process (2nd ed.).Michael Wiese Productions. (Original work published in 1988).
BizzocchiJ.TanenbaumT. J. (2011). Well read: Applying close reading techniques to gameplay experiences. In DavidsonD. (Ed.), Well played 3.0. Video games, value and meaning (pp. 289–315). ETC Press.
21.
BoellstorffT. (2008). Coming of age in Second Life: An anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton University Press.
22.
Capcom. (1991). Street Fighter II [Video game].Capcom.
23.
CaraccioloM. (2015). Playing Home: Videogame experiences between narrative and ludic interests. Narrative,23(3), 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2015.0022
De JongI. (2018). Homer. In De Temmerman, K., & van Emde Boas, E. (Eds.), Characterization in ancient Greek literature (pp. 27–45).Brill.
29.
De TemmermanK.van Emde BoasE. (2018). Character and characterization in ancient Greek literature: An introduction. In De Temmerman, K., & van Emde Boas, E. (Eds.), Characterization in ancient Greek literature (pp. 1–23). Brill.
30.
DyerR. (2004). Stars. BFI Publishing. (Original work published in 1998).
31.
EderJ.JannidisF.SchneiderR. (2010). Characters in fictional worlds. An introduction. In EderJ.JannidisF.SchneiderR. (Eds.), Characters in fictional worlds. Understanding imaginary beings in literature, film, and other media (pp. 3–64). De Gruyter.
32.
EderJ.ThonJ.-N. (2012). Digitale Figuren in Kinofilm und Computerspiel. In SegebergH. (Ed.), Film im Zeitalter neuer Medien II: Digitalität und Kino (pp. 139–182). Fink.
33.
Egenfeldt-NielsenS.SmithJ. H.ToscaS. P. (2016). Understanding video games (3rd ed.). Routledge. (Original work published in 2008).
Fernández-VaraC. (2011, May 25). The paradox between player control and player character in adventure games [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association 2011, Boston (MA), USA.
36.
FitzpatrickR.WalshM.NitscheM. (2005, Oct 14–15).Character data sets and parameterized morality [Paper presentation]. Aesthetics of Play Conference, Bergen, Norway.
37.
FizekS. (2012). Pivoting the player. A methodological toolkit for player character research in offline role-playing games. [Doctoral dissertation, Bangor University].
38.
ForsterE. M. (1969). Aspects of the novel. Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd. (Original work published in 1927).
39.
FrascaG. (2003). Simulation versus narrative: Introduction to ludology. In WolfM. J. P.PerronB. (Eds.), The video game theory reader (pp. 221–236). Routledge.
40.
FrowJ. (2014). Character & person.Oxford University Press.
41.
GallowayA. R. (2006). Gaming. Essays on algorithmic culture.University of Minnesota Press.
42.
GenetteG. (1972). Figures III.Seuil.
43.
GilbertM.LynchT.BurridgeS.ArchipleyL. (2021). Formidability of male video game characters over 45 years. Information, Communication & Society, 26(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.2013921
GreimasA. J. (1966). Sémantique structurale. Recherche de méthode. Larousse.
46.
GrimesS. M. (2003). “You shoot like a girl!” The female protagonist in action-adventure video games. In DiGRA ‘03 – Proceedings of the 2003 DiGRA International Conference: Level up,2, 1–15.
47.
HadasL. (2020). Authorship as promotional discourse in the screen industries. Selling genius. Routledge.
48.
HagströmC. (2008). Playing with names: Gaming and naming in World of Warcraft. In CorneliussenH.RettbergJ. W. (Eds.), Digital culture, play and identity: A World of Warcraft reader (pp. 265–285). MIT Press.
HeidbrinkH. (2010). Fictional characters in literary and media studies. A survey of the research. In EderJ.JannidisF.SchneiderR. (Eds.), Characters in fictional worlds. Understanding imaginary beings in literature, film, and other media (pp. 67–110). De Gruyter.
51.
Hello Games. (2016). No Man’s Sky [Video game].Hello Games.
52.
HermanD. (2009). Basic elements of narrative. Wiley-Blackwell.
53.
HermanL.VervaeckB. (2005). Handbook of narrative analysis. University of Nebraska Press.
54.
Homer. (1999). Iliad. Books 1–12 (A. T. Murray, Trans.). Loeb Classical Library. (Original work published in 1924)
55.
IacovidesI.CoxA.KennedyR.CairnsP.JennettC. (2015). Removing the HUD: The impact of non-diegetic game elements and expertise on player involvement. In CHI Play ‘15: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 13–22).
56.
IsbisterK. (2006). Better game characters by design. A psychological approach.Morgan Kaufmann.
57.
Jagex. (2001-). RuneScape [Video Game].Jagex.
58.
JørgensenK. (2010). Game characters as narrative devices. A comparative analysis of Dragon Age: Origins and Mass Effect 2. Eludamos. Journal for Computer Game Studies,4(2), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.7557/23.6051
59.
JuulJ. (2005). Half-real. Video games between real and fictional worlds. MIT Press.
60.
KassabianA. (2000). Hearing film.Tracking identifications in contemporary Hollywood music.Routledge.
61.
KershnerI.(Director). (1980). The Empire Strikes Back.Lucasfilm Ltd.
KlevjerR. (2006). What is the avatar? Fiction and embodiment in avatar-based singleplayer computer games. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Bergen].
64.
KlimmtC.HefnerD.VordererP. (2009). The video game experience as “true” identification: A theory of enjoyable alterations of players’ self-perception. Communication Theory,19(1), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2009.01347.x
65.
KromandD. (2007). Avatar categorization. In Situated play: Proceedings of the 2007 DiGRA conference (pp. 400–406). University of Tokyo Press.
66.
LankoskiP. (2010). Character-driven game design. A design approach and its foundations in character engagement. WS Bookwell Ltd.
LankoskiP.BjörkS. (2010a). Character-driven game design: Characters, conflict, and gameplay. In LankoskiP. (Ed.), Character-driven game design. A design approach and its foundations in character engagement (pp. 163–180). WS Bookwell Ltd. (Original work published in 2008).
69.
LankoskiP.BjörkS. (2010b). Gameplay design patterns for believable non-player characters. In LankoskiP. (Ed.), Character-driven game design. A design approach and its foundations in character engagement (pp. 117–130). WS Bookwell Ltd. (Original work published in 2007).
70.
LankoskiP.HeliöS.EkmanI. (2010). Character in computer games: Toward understanding interpretation and design. In LankoskiP. (Ed.), Character-driven game design. A design approach and its foundations in character engagement (pp. 77–90). WS Bookwell Ltd. (Original work published in 2003).
71.
Looking Glass Studios. (2000). Thief II: The Metal Age.Eidos Interactive.
72.
LynchT.TompkinsJ. E.van DrielI. I.FritzN. (2016). Sexy, strong, and secondary: A content analysis of female characters in video games across 31 years. Journal of Communication,66(4), 564–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12237
73.
Macías VillalobosC. (2020). The videogame hero in his labyrinth. The hero in electronic gaming. In López GregorisR.Macías VillalobosC. (Eds.), The hero reloaded: The reinvention of the classical hero in contemporary mass media (pp. 73–102).John Benjamins.
MargolinU. (1986). The doer and the deed: Action as a basis for characterization in narrative. Poetics Today,7(2), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.2307/1772759
76.
MargolinU. (2010). From predicates to people like us. Kinds of readerly engagement with literary characters. In EderJ.JannidisF.SchneiderR. (Eds.), Characters in fictional worlds. Understanding imaginary beings in literature, film, and other media (pp. 400–415). De Gruyter.
77.
MascelliJ. V. (1998). The five C’s of cinematography. Motion picture filming techniques.Silman-James Press. (Original work published in 1965).
78.
MassoI. C. (2009). Developing a methodology for corpus-based computer game studies. Journal of Gaming and Virtual Worlds,1(2), 145–169.
79.
McKeeR. (2014). Story. Substance, structure, style, and the principles of screenwriting. Methuen. (Original work published in 1998).
Naughty Dog. (2013). The Last of Us [Video game].Sony Computer Entertainment.
84.
Naughty Dog. (2020). The Last of Us Part II [Video game].Sony Interactive Entertainment.
85.
NeitzelB. (2014). Narrativity of computer games. In HühnP.MeisterJ. C.PierJ.SchmidW. (Eds.), Handbook of narratology (2nd ed., pp. 608–622). De Gruyter.
PhelanJ. (1989). Reading people, reading plots. Character, progression, and the interpretation of narrative.University of Chicago Press.
91.
ProppV. J. (1968). Morphology of the folktale. University of Texas Press. (Original work published in 1928).
92.
Real World Multimedia. (1997). Ceremony of Innocence [Video game].Real World Multimedia.
93.
RichardsonB. (2010). Transtextual characters. In EderJ.JannidisF.SchneiderR. (Eds.), Characters in fictional worlds. Understanding imaginary beings in literature, film, and other media (pp. 527–541). De Gruyter.
94.
Rimmon-KenanS. (2004). Narrative fiction. Contemporary poetics (2nd ed.).Routledge. (Original work published in 1983).
SmithM. (1995). Engaging characters: Fiction, emotion, and the cinema.Clarendon Press.
104.
SmithM. (2010). Engaging characters: Further reflections. In EderJ.JannidisF.SchneiderR. (Eds.), Characters in fictional worlds. Understanding imaginary beings in literature, film, and other media (pp. 232–258). De Gruyter.
105.
Square Enix. (2020). Final Fantasy VII Remake [Video game].Square Enix.
106.
SummersT. (2016). Understanding video game music.Cambridge University Press.
ThonJ.-N. (2016). Transmedial narratology and contemporary media culture.University of Nebraska Press.
109.
ThonJ.-N. (2017). Transmedial narratology revisited: On the intersubjective construction of storyworlds and the problem of representational correspondence in films, comics, and video games. Narrative, 25(3), 286–320. https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2017.0016
TronstadR. (2008). Character identification in World of Warcraft: The relationship between capacity and appearance. In CorneliussenH.RettbergJ.W. (Eds.), Digital culture, play and identity: A World of Warcraft reader (pp. 249–264). MIT Press.
Ubisoft Toronto. (2021). Far Cry 6 [Video game].Ubisoft.
118.
VellaD. (2013). “It’s A-Me/Mario!”: Playing as a ludic character. In Foundations of Digital Games Conference Proceedings, 8, 31–38.
119.
VellaD. (2015). The ludic subject and the ludic self: Analyzing the ‘I-in-the-gameworld’. [Doctoral dissertation, IT University of Copenhagen].
120.
VoglerC. (2007). The writer’s journey. Mythic structure for writers (3rd ed.). Michael Wiese Productions. (Original work published in 1998).
121.
WillumsenE. C. (2018). Is my avatar MY avatar? Character autonomy and automated avatar actions in digital games. In DiGRA ‘18 – Proceedings of the 2018 DiGRA International Conference: The Game is the Message (pp. 1–17).
122.
WillumsenE. C.JaćevićM. (2018). Avatar-kinaesthetics as characterisation statements in Horizon: Zero Dawn. In DiGRA ‘18 – Abstract Proceedings of the 2018 DiGRA International Conference: The Game is the Message (pp. 1–4).
123.
Yager Development. (2012). Spec Ops: The Line [Video Game].2K Games.
