Journalism is twerking? How web analytics is changing the process of gatekeeping

Abstract

New communication technologies have allowed not only new ways in which the audience interacts with the news but also new ways in which journalists can monitor online audience behavior. Through new audience information systems, such as web analytics, the influence of the audience on the news construction process is increasing. This occurs as the journalistic field tries to survive a shrinking audience for news. In this study, I argue that how journalists conceive of the audience as a form of capital influences the extent to which journalists integrate audience feedback from web analytics in their news work. I developed this theoretical framework through case studies of three online newsrooms that included a total of 150 hours of observations and 30 respondent interviews. The findings showed the extent of influence of web analytics on traditional gatekeeping processes and on a new gatekeeping practice online, which I call the process of de-selection.

Keywords

Audience case study field theory gatekeeping journalism journalists online news twerking web analytics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

(2011a) Between creative and quantified audiences: web metrics and changing patterns of newswork in local US newsrooms. Journalism 12: 550–566.

Anderson

(2011b) Deliberative, agonistic, and algorithmic audiences: journalism’s vision of its public in an age of audience transparency. International Journal of Communication 5: 529–547.

Atkin

Burgoon

(1983) How journalists perceive the reading audience. Newspaper Research Journal 4: 51–63.

Beam

(1995) How newspapers use readership research. Newspaper Research Journal 16: 28–38.

Benson

(2004) Bringing the sociology of media back in. Political Communication 21: 275–292.

Benson

(2006) News media as a “journalistic field”: what Bourdieu adds to new institutionalism, and vice versa. Political Communication 23: 187–202.

Benson

Neveu

(2005) Introduction: field theory as a work in progress. In: Benson

Neveu

(eds) Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field. Malden, MA: Polity Press, pp. 1–28.

Boczkowski

(2004) The processes of adopting multimedia and interactivity in three online newsrooms. Journal of Communication 54: 197–213.

Boczkowski

(2005) Digitizing the News: Innovation in Online Newspapers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

10.

Boczkowski

(2010) The divergent online news preferences of journalists and readers. Communications of the ACM 53: 24–26.

11.

Boczkowski

Mitchelstein

Walter

(2011) Convergence across divergence: understanding the gap in the online news choices of journalists and consumers in Western Europe and Latin America. Communication Research 38: 376–396.

12.

Bourdieu

(1985) The social space and the genesis of groups. Theory and Society 14: 723–744.

13.

Bourdieu

(1986) The forms of capital. In: Richardson

(ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Publishing Group, pp. 241–258.

14.

Bourdieu

(1998) On Television. New York: The New Press.

15.

Bourdieu

(2005) The political field, the social science field and the journalistic field. In: Benson

Neveu

(eds) Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field. Malden, MA: Polity Press, pp. 29–47.

16.

Bruns

(2005) Gatewatching: Collaborative Online News Production. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.

17.

Butsch

(2011) Audiences and publics, media and public spheres. In: Nightingale

(ed.) The Handbook of Media Audiences. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 149–168.

18.

Corbin

Strauss

(1990) Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology 13: 3–21.

19.

Creswell

(2007) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

20.

Curtin

Maier

(2001) Numbers in the newsroom: a qualitative examination of a quantitative challenge. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 78: 720–738.

21.

Domingo

(2011) The centrality of online journalism today (and tomorrow). In: Domingo

Paterson

(eds) Making Online News. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc., pp. xiii-xx.

22.

Domingo

Quandt

Heinonen

. (2008) Participatory journalism practices in the media and beyond. Journalism Practice 2: 326–342.

23.

Donsbach

(2008) Journalists’ role perceptions. In: Donsbach

(ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Communication. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 2605–2610.

24.

Duncan

(2010) Using Web Analytics to Measure the Impact of Earned Online Media on Business Outcomes: A Methodological Approach. San Francisco, CA: Institute for Public Relations.

25.

Eisenhardt

(1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14: 532–550.

26.

Eisenhardt

Graebner

(2007) Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal 50: 25–32.

27.

Elster

(1989) Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

28.

Fengler

Russ-Mohl

(2008) The crumbling hidden wall: towards an economic theory of journalism. Kyklos 61: 520–542.

29.

Flegel

Chaffee

(1971) Influences of editors, readers, and personal opinions on reporters. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 48: 645–651.

30.

Gans

(1979) Deciding What’s News. New York: Pantheon Books.

31.

Glaser

(1965) The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems 12: 436–445.

32.

Handley

Rutigliano

(2012) Journalistic field wars: defending and attacking the national narrative in a diversifying journalistic field. Media, Culture & Society 34: 744–760.

33.

Hare

(2013) Miley Cyrus twerks, stuns VMAs crowd. CNN. Available at: http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/26/showbiz/music/miley-cyrus-mtv-vmas-gaga/index.html (accessed 8 October 2013).

34.

Herman

Chomsky

(2002) Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.

35.

Johnson

(1993) Editor’s introduction: Pierre Bourdieu on art, literature and culture. In: Johnson

(ed.) The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 1–28.

36.

Kaushik

(2010) Web Analytics 2.0: The Art of Online Accountability and Science of Customer Centricity. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley Publishing, Inc.

37.

Lasorsa

Lewis

Holton

(2011) Normalizing Twitter: journalism practice in an emerging communication space. Journalism Studies 13: 19–36.

38.

Lee

Lewis

Powers

(2012) Audience clicks and news placement: a study of time-lagged influence in online journalism. Communication Research. Epub ahead of print 20 November. DOI: 10.1177/0093650212467031.

39.

Lindlof

Taylor

(2010) Qualitative Communication Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

40.

Loosen

Schmidt

J-H

(2012) (Re-) discovering the audience. Information, Communication & Society 15: 867–887.

41.

Lowrey

Woo

(2010) The news organization in uncertain times: business or institution? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 87: 41–61.

42.

MacGregor

(2007) Tracking the online audience. Journalism Studies 8: 280–298.

43.

Mahoney

(2003) Tentative answers to questions about causal mechanisms. American Political Science Association conference, Philadelphia, PA, 27 August.

44.

Mitchelstein

Boczkowski

(2010) Online news consumption research: an assessment of past work and an agenda for the future. New Media & Society 12: 1085–1102.

45.

Napoli

(2011) Audience Evolution: New Technologies and the Transformation of Media Audiences. New York: Columbia University Press.

46.

The Onion (2013) Let me explain why Miley Cyrus’ VMA performance was our top story this morning. The Onion. Available at: http://www.theonion.com/articles/let-me-explain-why-miley-cyrus-vma-performance-was,33632/ (accessed 8 October 2013).

47.

Online Oxford Dictionary (2013) Definition of twerk in English. Oxford Dictionaries. Available at: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/twerk

48.

Paterson

(2008) Introduction: why ethnography? In: Paterson

Domingo

(eds) Making Online News. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc., pp. 1–14.

49.

Phillips

(2013) ‘The Onion’s’ CNN article draws response from network’s Meredith Artley over Miley Cyrus. Epoch Times. Available at: http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/264928-the-onions-cnn-article-draws-response-from-networks-meredith-artley-over-miley-cyrus/ (accessed 8 October 2013).

50.

Saldaña

(2009) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

51.

Sallaz

Zavisca

(2007) Bourdieu in American sociology, 1980–2004. Annual Review of Sociology 33: 21–41.

52.

Schlesinger

(1978) Putting ‘Reality’ Together. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.

53.

Schultz

(1998) Reviving the Fourth Estate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

54.

Shoemaker

Cohen

(2006) News around the World: Content, Practitioners, and the Public. New York: Routledge.

55.

Shoemaker

Reese

(1996) Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content. White Plains, NY: Longman.

56.

Shoemaker

Reese

(2013) Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective. New York: Routledge.

57.

Shoemaker

Vos

(2009) Gatekeeping Theory. New York: Routledge.

58.

Shoemaker

Vos

Reese

(2008) Journalists as gatekeepers. In: Wahl-Jorgensen

Hanitzsch

(eds) Handbook of Journalism Studies. New York: Routledge, pp. 73–87.

59.

Siapera

Spyridou

L-P

(2012) The field of online journalism: a Bourdieusian analysis. In: Siapera

Veglis

(eds) The Handbook of Global Online Journalism. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 77–98.

60.

Siebert

Peterson

Schramm

(1963) Four Theories of the Press; the Authoritarian, Libertarian, Social Responsibility, and Soviet Communist Concepts of What the Press Should Be and Do. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

61.

Singer

(2005) The political j-blogger. Journalism 6: 173–198.

62.

Sterne

(2003) Bourdieu, technique and technology. Cultural Studies 17: 367–389.

63.

Stinchcombe

(1991) The conditions of fruitfulness of theorizing about mechanisms in social science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21: 367–388.

64.

Sumpter

(2000) Daily newspaper editors’ audience construction routines: a case study. Critical Studies in Media Communication 17: 334–346.

65.

Tandoc

Hellmueller

Vos

(2012) Mind the gap: between role conception and role enactment. Journalism Practice 7: 539–554.

66.

Tilly

(2001) Mechanisms in political processes. Annual Review of Political Science 4: 21–41.

67.

Tracy

(2013) Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

68.

(2013) The online audience as gatekeeper: the influence of reader metrics on news editorial selection. Journalism. Epub ahead of print 28 October. DOI: 10.1177/1464884913504259.

69.

Wallenstein

(2013) Why the Onion is wrong about CNN and Miley Cyrus. Variety. Available at: http://variety.com/2013/digital/news/why-the-onion-is-wrong-about-cnn-and-miley-cyrus-1200589821/ (accessed 8 October 2013).

70.

Weaver

Wilhoit

(1986) The American Journalist: A Portrait of US News People and Their Work. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

71.

Weaver

Wilhoit

(1996) The American Journalist in the 1990s: U.S. News People at the End of an Era. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

72.

Weaver

Beam

Brownlee

. (2007) The American Journalist in the 21st Century: U.S. News People at the Dawn of a New Millennium. Mahwah, NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

73.

Webster

Phalen

(1994) Victim, consumer, or commodity? Audience models in communication policy. In: Ettema

Whitney

(eds) Audiencemaking: How the Media Create the Audience. New York: SAGE, pp. 19–37.

74.

Willig

(2013) Newsroom ethnography in a field perspective. Journalism 14: 372–387.

75.

Yin

(2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.