Much attention has been paid to the role of the audience in online news production. However, very little research has addressed how the audience understands this participation. Using the theories of affect and fandom, this paper will investigate the most popular form of online participation – comments. Based on a case study of Australian alternative journalism site, New Matilda, it will argue for a broader understanding of participation online, one that incorporates those who ‘internalise’ their participation and in particular the role emotion plays in audience engagement.
AitamurtoT (2011) The impact of crowdfunding on journalism: case study of Spot.Us, a platform for community-funded reporting. Journalism Practice5(4): 429–445.
2.
AttonC (2002) AlternativeMedia. London: SAGE.
3.
AttonC (2009) Why alternative journalism matters. Journalism10(3): 283–285.
4.
AttonCHamiltonJF (2008) Alternative Journalism. London: SAGE.
BergstromA (2010) The scope of user generated content: user contributions within online journalism. In: FranklinBCarlsonM (eds) Journalists, Sources, and Credibility: New Perspectives. London; Hoboken, NJ Taylor & Francis, pp. 167–181.
7.
BirdSE (2010) Seeking the audience for news response, news talk, and everyday practices. In: NightingaleV (ed.) The Handbook of Media Audiences. Chichester; Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 489–508.
8.
BirdSE (2011) Are we all produsers now?Cultural Studies25(4–5): 502–516.
9.
BowmanWWillisC (2003) We media: how audiences are shaping the future of news and information. The Media Center. Available at: http://www.hypergene.net/wemedia/weblog.php (accessed 10 February 2009).
10.
BrunsA (2005) Gatewatching: Collaborative Online News Production. New York: Peter Lang.
11.
BrunsA (2008) The active audience: transforming journalism from gatekeeping to gatewatching. In: PatersonCDomingoD (eds) Making Online News: The Ethnography of New Media Production. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 171–184.
12.
CarpentierN (2011) New configurations of the audience? The challenges of user-generated content for audience theory and media participation. In: NightingaleV (ed.) The Handbook of Media Audiences. Chichester; Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 190–212.
13.
CouldryN (2010) New online news sources and writer-gatherers. In: FentonN (ed.) New Media, Old News: Journalism and Democracy in the Digital Age. London: SAGE, pp. 138–151.
14.
CouldryNCurranJ (2003) The paradox of media power. In: CouldryNCurranJ (eds) Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 3–15.
15.
DeleuzeG (1988) Spinoza: Practical Philosophy (trans. HurleyR). San Francisco, CA: City Light Books.
16.
DeuzeM (2006) Ethnic media, community media and participatory culture. Journalism7(3): 262–280.
17.
DowningJ (2003) Audiences and readers of alternative media: the absent lure of the virtually unknown. Media, Culture & Society25(5): 625–645.
18.
FiskeJ (1992) The cultural economy of fandom. In: LewisL (ed.) The Adoring Audience: Fan Culture and Popular Media. London: Routledge, pp. 30–49.
19.
GibbsA (2011) Affect theory and audience. In: NightingaleV (ed.) The Handbook of Media Audiences. Malden, MA; Chichester: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 251–266.
20.
GortonK (2009) Media Audiences: Television, Meaning and Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
21.
GrayJ (2007) The news you gotta love it. In: GrayJSandvossCHarringtonCL (eds) Fandom: Identities and Communities in a Mediated World. New York: New York University Press, pp. 75–87.
22.
GrossbergL (1992) The affective sensibility of fandom. In: LewisL (ed.) The Adoring Audience: Fan Culture and Popular Media. London: Routledge, pp. 50–65.
23.
HamptonKNWellmanB (1999) Netville online and offline: observing and surveying a wired suburb. American Behavioral Scientist43(3): 475–492.
24.
HarcupT (2003) ‘The Unspoken – Said’: the journalism of alternative media. Journalism4(3): 356–376.
25.
HartleyJ (2009) Journalism and popular culture. In: Wahl-JorgensenKHanitzschT (eds) Handbook of Journalism Studies. New York: Routledge, pp. 310–324.
26.
HermidaAThurmanN (2007) Comments please: how the British news media is struggling with user-generated content. In: 8th international symposium on online journalism proceedings, University of Texas, Austin, TX, 30–31March. Available at: http://online.journalism.utexas.edu/papers.php?year=2007 (accessed 10 October 2009).
27.
Hornig PriestS (2010) Doing Media Research: An Introduction. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
28.
JenkinsH (1992) Textual Poachers: Television Fans & Participatory Culture. New York; London: Routledge.
29.
JenkinsH (2007) The Wow Climax: Tracing the Emotional Impact of Popular Culture. New York: New York University Press.
30.
KollockP (1999) The economies of online cooperation: gifts and public goods in cyberspace. In: SmithMAKollockP (eds) Communities in Cyberspace. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 219–239.
31.
LancasterK (2001) Interacting with Babylon 5. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
NorrisP (2002) The Virtuous Citizen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
ProbynE (2005) Blush: Faces of Shame. Minneapolis, MN: Minneapolis University Press.
35.
ReichZ (2011) User comments: the transformation of participatory space. In: SingerJBHermidaADomingoD. (eds) Participatory Journalism: Guarding the Open Gates at Online Newspapers. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 96–117.
36.
RheingoldH (2000) The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37.
RileyD (2005) Impersonal Passion: Language as Affect. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
38.
RobinsonS (2011) Journalism as process: the organizational implications of participatory online news. Journalism & Communication Monographs13(3): 138–210.
39.
RodriguezC (2001) Fissures in the Mediascape: An International Study of Citizens’ Media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
40.
SedgewickEKFrankA (1995) Shame and Its Sisters: A Silvan Tomkins Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
41.
SeigworthGJGreggM (2010) An inventory of shimmers. In: GreggMSeigworthGJ (eds) The Affect Theory Reader. Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press, pp. 1–28.
42.
SingerJBAshmanI (2009) Comment is free, but facts are sacred: user-generated content and ethical constructs at the Guardian. Journal of Mass Media Ethics24: 3–21.
43.
SingerJBHermidaADomingoD. (2011) Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
44.
Van DijckJ (2009) Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society31(1): 41–58.
45.
WaskoMMFarajS (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly29(1): 35–57.
46.
WetherellM (2012) Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. Los Angeles, CA; London; New Delhi, India; Singapore: SAGE.
47.
WilliamsAWardleCWahl-JorgensenK (2010) The limits of audience participation: UGC @ the BBC. In: FranklinBCarlsonM (eds) Journalists, Sources, and Credibility: New Perspectives. London; Hoboken, NJ: Taylor & Francis, pp. 152–166.
48.
YinR (2003) Applications of Case Study Research. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.