This article explores the role of trust in professional and alternative media as (a) antecedents of citizen news production, and (b) moderators of the effect of citizen news production on political participation. Using two-wave panel survey data collected in the United States between December 2013 and March 2014, results show that trust in citizen media predicts people’s tendency to create news. In turn, citizen news production is a positive predictor of both offline and online participation. More importantly, trust in the media moderates the effect of citizen news production over online political participation. Overall, this article highlights the importance of trust in the media with respect to citizen news production and how it matters for democracy. Thus, this study casts a much-needed light on how media trust and citizen journalism intertwine in explaining a more engaged and participatory citizenry.
American Association of Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) (2011) Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, 7th edn. AAPOR.
2.
BabbieEMoutonJ (2001) The Practice of Social Research, 9th edn.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
3.
BachmannICorreaTGil de ZúñigaH (2012) Profiling online political content creators: Advancing the paths to democracy. International Journal of E-Politics3(4): 1–19.
4.
BakerRBrickJMBatesNAet al. (2013) Summary report of the AAPOR task force on non-probability sampling. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology1: 90–143.
5.
BakkerTPde VreeseCH (2011) Good news for the future? Young people, internet use, and political participation. Communication Research38(4): 451–470.
6.
BeamMA (2014) Automating the news: How personalized news recommender system design choices impact news reception. Communication Research41(8): 1019–1041.
7.
BennettSERhineSLFlickingerRSet al. (1999) ‘Video Malaise’ revisited: Public trust in the media and government. The International Journal of Press/Politics4(4): 8–23.
8.
BerelsonBLazarsfeldPFMcPheeWN (1954) Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
BestSJKruegerBS (2005) Analyzing the representativeness of Internet political participation. Political Behavior27(2): 183–216.
10.
BimberB (2016) Three prompts for collective action in the context of digital media. Political Communication34: 6–20.
11.
BodeLVragaEKBorahPet al. (2014) A new space for political behavior: Political social networking and its democratic consequences .Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication19(3): 414–429.
12.
BosnjakMDasMLynnP (2016) Symposium issue on methods for probability-based online and mixed-mode panels. Social Science Computer Review34(1): 1–5.
13.
BurkeMKrautRE (2016) The relationship between Facebook use and well-being depends on communication type and tie strength. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication21(4): 265–281.
14.
CarpenterS (2010) A study of content diversity in online citizen journalism and online newspaper articles. New Media & Society12(7): 1064–1084.
15.
CarpiniMXDKeeterS (1993) Measuring political knowledge: Putting first things first. American Journal of Political Science37(4): 1179–1206.
16.
ChenHT (2007) Sharing, connection, and creation in the web 2.0 era: Profiling the adopters of video-sharing and social-networking sites. In: Paper presented at the meeting of the association for education in journalism and mass communication, August 9–12, Washington, DC.
17.
ChoJAhmedSKeumHet al. (2016) Influencing myself: Self-reinforcement through online political expression. Communication Research. Epub ahead of print 20April. DOI: 10.1177/0093650216644020.
18.
ChoJShahDVMcLeodJMet al. (2009) Campaigns, reflection, and deliberation: Advancing an O-S-R-O-R model of communication effects. Communication Theory19(1): 66–88.
19.
ColemanJS (1990) Foundations of Social Choice Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
ConoverPSearingDCreweI (2002) The deliberative potential of political discussion. British Journal of Political Science32: 21–62.
21.
CorreaT (2010) The participation divide among ‘online experts’: Experience, skills, and psychological factors as predictors of college students’ web content creation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication16(1): 71–92.
22.
CorreaTJeongSH (2011) Race and online content creation. Why minorities are actively participating in the Web. Information, Communication & Society14(5): 638–659.
23.
DavisKCNonnemakerJDukeJet al. (2013) Perceived effectiveness of cessation advertisements: The importance of audience reactions and practical implications for media campaign planning. Health Communication28(5): 461–472.
24.
DylkoIMcCluskeyM (2012) Media effects in an era of rapid technological transformation: A case of user-generated content and political participation. Communication Theory22(3): 250–278.
25.
EisenstadtSNRonigerL (1984) Patrons, Clients and Friends: Interpersonal Relations and the Structure of Trust in Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
EnliGSSkogerbøE (2013) Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication. Information, Communication & Society16(5): 757–774.
27.
EvelandWP (2002) News information processing as mediator of the relationship between motivations and political knowledge. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly79(1): 26–40.
28.
EvelandWPHivelyMH (2009) Political discussion frequency, network size, and ‘heterogeneity’ of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication59(2): 205–224.
29.
FukuyamaF (1995) Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York, NY: Free Press.
30.
GastilJXenosM (2010) Of attitudes and engagement: Clarifying the reciprocal relationship between civic attitudes and political participation. Journal of Communication60: 318–343.
31.
GazianoC (1988) How credible is the credibility crisis?Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly65: 267–278.
32.
GazianoCMcGrathK (1986) Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly63(3): 451–462.
33.
Gil de ZúñigaHJungNValenzuelaS (2012) Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17(3): 319–336.
34.
Gil de ZúñigaHLewisSCWillardAet al. (2011) Blogging as a journalistic practice: A model linking perception, motivation, and behavior. Journalism12(5): 586–606.
35.
Gil de ZúñigaHPuig-i-AbrilERojasH (2009) Weblogs, traditional sources online and political participation: An assessment of how the Internet is changing the political environment. New Media & Society11(4): 553–574.
36.
GoodeL (2009) Social news, citizen journalism and democracy. New Media & Society11(8): 1–19.
37.
GrahamTJacksonDWrightS (2015a) From everyday conversation to political action: Talking austerity in online ‘third spaces’. European Journal of Communication30(6): 648–665.
38.
GrahamTJacksonDWrightS (2015b) ‘We need to get together and make ourselves heard’: Everyday online spaces as incubators of political action. Information, Communication & Society19: 1373–1389.
39.
HargittaiEWalejkoG (2008) The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Communication & Society11(2): 239–256.
40.
HarpDBachmannIRosas-MorenoTCet al. (2010) Wave of hope: African American youth use media and engage more civically, politically than whites. The Journal of Communications22(3): 224–246.
41.
HarrisVWSkograndLHatchD (2008) Role of friendship, trust, and love in strong Latino marriages. Marriage & Family Review44(4): 455–488.
42.
HayesAF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
43.
HoltonAECoddingtonMLewisSCet al. (2015) Reciprocity and the news: The role of personal and social media reciprocity in news creation and consumption. International Journal of Communication9: 22.
44.
HovlandCIWeissW (1951) The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly15(4): 635–650.
45.
HuckfeldtRSpragueJ (1991) Discussant effects on vote choice: Intimacy, structure, and interdependence. The Journal of Politics53(01): 122–158.
46.
IyengarSHahnKS (2009) Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1): 19–39.
47.
JohnsonKASt.JohnBIII (2015) Citizen journalists’ views on traditional notions of journalism, story sourcing, and relationship building: The persistence of legacy norms in an emerging news environment. Journalism Studies18: 341–357.
48.
JonesDA (2004) Why Americans don’t trust the media: A preliminary analysis. The International Journal of Press/Politics9(2): 60–75.
49.
JonesSFoxS (2009). Generations Online in 2009. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
50.
JungNKimYGil de ZúñigaH (2011) The mediating role of knowledge and efficacy in the effects of communication on political participation. Mass Communication & Society14(4): 407–430.
51.
KalmusVPruulmann-VengerfeldtPRunnelPet al. (2009) Mapping the terrain of ‘Generation C’: Places and practices of online content creation among Estonian teenagers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication14(4): 1257–1282.
52.
KatzEBlumlerJGGurevitchM (eds) (1974) The Uses and Gratifications Approach to Mass Communication. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
53.
KaufholdKValenzuelaSGil de ZúñigaH (2010) Citizen journalism and democracy: How user-generated news use relates to political knowledge and participation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly87(3–4): 515–529.
54.
KenskiKStroudNJ (2006) Connections between internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media50(2): 173–192.
55.
KimD (2012) Interacting is believing? Examining bottom-up credibility of blogs among politically interested Internet users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17(4): 422–435.
56.
KiousisS (2001) Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication & Society4(4): 381–403.
57.
Koc-MichalskaKLillekerD (2016) Digital politics: Mobilization, engagement, and participation. Political Communication34: 1–5.
58.
KohringMMatthesJ (2007) Trust in news media development and validation of a multidimensional scale. Communication Research34(2): 231–252.
59.
KosickiGMMcLeodJM (1990) Learning from political news: Effects of media images and information-processing strategies. In: KrausS (ed.) Mass Communication and Political Information Processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 69–83.
60.
LazarsfeldPBerelsonBGaudetH (1948) The People’s Choice, 2nd edn.New York: Columbia University Press.
61.
LeeYYLinJL (2009) The effects of trust in physician on self-efficacy, adherence and diabetes outcomes. Social Science & Medicine68(6): 1060–1068.
LeungL (2009) User-generated content on the internet: An examination of gratifications, civic engagement and psychological empowerment. New Media & Society11(8): 1327–1347.
64.
LillekerDGKoc-MichalskaK (2016) What drives political participation? Motivations and mobilization in a digital age. Political Communication34(1): 21–43.
65.
LorenzE (1999) Trust, contract and economic cooperation. Cambridge Journal of Economics23(3): 301–315.
66.
McLeodJMKosickiGMMcLeodDM (1994) The expanding boundaries of political communication effects. In: BryantJZillmanD (eds) Media Effects Advances in Theory and Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 123–162.
67.
McLeodJMScheufeleDAMoyP (1999) Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication16(3): 315–336.
68.
McLeodJMZubricJKeumHet al. (2001) Reflecting and connecting: Testing a communication mediation model of civic participation. Paper presented to the communication theory and methodology division, AEJMC annual meeting, August 5–8, Washington, DC.
69.
MeyerP. (1988) Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly65(3): 567–574.
70.
MoellerJDe VreeseCEsserFet al. (2014) Pathway to political participation: The influence of online and offline news media on internal efficacy and turnout of first-time voters. American Behavioral Scientist58(5): 689–700.
71.
MoyPMcCluskeyMRMcCoyKet al. (2004) Political correlates of local news media use. Journal of Communication54(3): 532–546.
72.
NahSYamamotoMChungDSet al. (2015) Modeling the adoption and use of citizen journalism by online newspapers. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly1(1): 152–168.
73.
NorrisP (1996) Does television erode social capital? A reply to Putnam. PS: Political Science & Politics29(3): 474–480.
74.
PerseEM (1990) Media involvement and local news effects. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media34: 17–36.
75.
PingreeRJ (2007) How messages affect their senders: A more general model of message effects and implications for deliberation. Communication Theory17(4): 439–461.
76.
PutnamRD (1995) Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy6(1): 65–78.
77.
PutnamRD (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
78.
RitzerGDeanPJurgensonN (2012) The coming age of the prosumer. American Behavioral Scientist56: 379–398.
79.
RojasHPuig-i-AbrilE (2009) Mobilizers mobilized: Information, expression, mobilization and participation in the digital age. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication14(4): 902–927.
ShahDVChoJEvelandWPJret al. (2005) Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research32: 531–565.
82.
ShahDVChoJNahSet al. (2007) Campaign ads, online messaging, and participation: Extending the communication mediation model. Journal of Communication57(4): 676–703.
83.
SkocpolTFiorinaMP (1999) Making sense of the civic engagement debate. In: SkocpolTFiorinaMP (eds) Civic Engagement in American Democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings/Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 1–23.
SotirovicMMcLeodJM (2001) Values, communication behavior, and political participation. Political Communication18: 273–300.
86.
TolbertCJMcNealRS (2003) Unraveling the effects of the internet on political participation?Political Research Quarterly56(2): 175–185.
87.
TolbertCJMcNealRSSmithDA (2003) Enhancing civic engagement: The effect of direct democracy on political participation and knowledge. State Politics & Policy Quarterly3(1), 23–41.
88.
TsfatiY (2003) Does audience skepticism of the media matter in agenda setting?Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media47(2): 157–176.
89.
TsfatiYCappellaJN (2003) Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Communication Research30(5): 504–529.
90.
TsfatiYCappellaJN (2005) Why do people watch news they do not trust? The need for cognition as a moderator in the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Media Psychology7(3): 251–271.
VerbaSNieNH (1972) Participation in America: Social Equality and Political Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
93.
WantaWHuYW (1994) The effects of credibility, reliance, and exposure on media agenda-setting: A path analysis model. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly71(1): 90–98.
WeeksBEArdèvol-AbreuAZúñigaH (2015) Online influence? Social media use, opinion leadership, and political persuasion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. Epub ahead of print 30 December. DOI: 10.1093/ijpor/edv050.
96.
WyattROKatzEKimJ (2000) Bridging the spheres: Political and personal conversation in public and private spaces. Journal of Communication50(1): 71–92.
