This study investigated citizen participation in live blogs in the changing media ecosystem from the public sphere perspective. The live blog is a web-native, participatory-oriented journalistic genre comprised of brief updates of an event in motion and designed to deliver real-time information from multiple sources about breaking news and scheduled events. To examine participation in this contemporary news format, the current, exploratory study, collected survey responses from 339 volunteers and found that participation was not a motivating factor for readers to engage in live blogging on a deeper level. Other study findings pertaining to participation were also pessimistic, showing that the majority of participants were not personally interested in participating in live blogging. This is an important finding for digital journalism as it implies that the capacity of online platforms to accommodate participation does not necessarily translate into citizens’ willingness to participate.
BanksJ.DeuzeM. (2009). Co-creative labour. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 12(5), 419–431.
2.
BatsellJ. (2015). Engaged journalism: Connecting with digitally empowered news audiences. Columbia University Press.
3.
DahlbergL. (2001). The Internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 4(4), 615–633.
4.
DahlgrenP. (2011). Young citizens and political participation: Online media and civic cultures. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 7(2), 11–25.
5.
DrumhellerK. (2005). Millennial dogma: A fantasy theme analysis of the millennial generation’s uses and gratifications of religious content media. Journal of Communication & Religion, 28(1), 47–70.
6.
GerhardsJ.SchäferM. S. (2010). Is the internet a better public sphere? Comparing old and new media in the USA and Germany. New Media & Society, 12(1), 143–160.
7.
Gil de ZúñigaH.JungN.ValenzuelaS. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336.
8.
HabermasJ. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (BurgerT., Trans). Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
9.
HayesA. F. (2005). Statistical methods for communication science. Routledge.
10.
HeiseN.LoosenW.ReimerJ.SchmidtJ. H. (2014). Including the audience: Comparing the attitudes and expectations of journalists and users towards participation in German TV news journalism. Journalism Studies, 15(4), 411–430.
11.
HermidaA.ThurmanN. (2008). A clash of cultures: The integration of user-generated content within professional journalistic frameworks at British newspaper websites. Journalism Practice, 2(3), 343–356.
12.
HermidaA. (2012). Tweets and truth: Journalism as a discipline of collaborative verification. Journalism Practice, 6(5–6), 659–668.
13.
HujanenJ. (2016). Participation and the blurring values of journalism. Journalism Studies, 17(7), 871–880.
14.
IosifidisP. (2011). The public sphere, social networks and public service media. Information, Communication & Society, 14(5), 619–637.
15.
KovachB.RosenstielT. (2014). The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect (3rd ed.). Three Rivers Press.
16.
MuthukumaraswamyK. (2010). When the media meet crowds of wisdom: How journalists are tapping into audience expertise and manpower for the processes of newsgathering. Journalism Practice, 4(1), 48–65.
17.
NanabhayM.FarmanfarmaianR. (2011). From spectacle to spectacular: How physical space, social media and mainstream broadcast amplified the public sphere in Egypt’s ‘revolution’. The Journal of North African Studies, 16(4), 573–603.
18.
NipJ. Y. (2007). Exploring the second phase of public journalism. Journalism Studies, 7(2), 212–236.
19.
PapacharissiZ. (2002). The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society, 4(1), 9–27.
20.
PanticM. (2017). Active readers: Exploring uses and gratifications of live blogs. American Communication Journal, 19(1), 36–48.
21.
PanticM.WhitesideE.CvetkovicI. (2017). Politics, conflict generate more live-blog comments. Newspaper Research Journal, 38(3), 354–365.
22.
PetersC.WitschgeT. (2015). From grand narratives of democracy to small expectations of participation: Audiences, citizenship, and interactive tools in digital journalism. Journalism Practice, 9(1), 19–34.
23.
ScottJ.MillardD.LeonardP. (2015). Citizen participation in news: An analysis of the landscape of online journalism. Digital Journalism, 3(5), 737–758.
24.
Thayer-HartN.DykemaJ.ElverK.SchaefferN. C. (2010). Survey fundamentals: A guide to designing and implementing surveys. University of Wisconsin.
25.
ThurmanN. (2008). Forums for citizen journalists? Adoption of user generated content initiatives by online news media. New Media & Society, 10(1), 139–157.
26.
ThurmanN.WaltersA. (2013). Live blogging—digital journalism’s pivotal platform?Digital Journalism, 1(1), 82–101.
27.
ThurmanN.NewmanN. (2014). The future of breaking news online? A study of live blogs through surveys of their consumption, and of readers’ attitudes and participation. Journalism Studies, 15(5), 655–667.
28.
TreadwellD. (2017). Introducing communication research: Paths of inquiry. Sage.
