The impact of peer-produced criticism on cultural evaluation: A multilevel analysis of discourse employment in online and offline film reviews

Abstract

Traditionally, media critics play a central role in the attribution of symbolic value to cultural products. This article studies empirically how the process of cultural evaluation is affected by the rise of peer-produced criticism online. More specifically, I examine how the discourse that critics employ to substantiate their aesthetic evaluations differs across media platforms and is affected by the institutionalization of critics, the symbolic dimensions of the reviewed film and the overall media attention paid to that film. Empirically, this study involves a multi-level analysis of 624 film reviews, which attends to media-level and film-level characteristics. The results reveal that the ascendance of peer-produced content not only challenges the hierarchical model of cultural evaluation, which remains in use, but adds a further dimension. At the same time, differences across media platforms (print, webzines, film blogs, amateur postings) reveal continuous rather than dichotomous patterns, thus emphasizing the blurring of media boundaries.

Keywords

Arts journalism cultural evaluation film blogs institutionalization media critics multi-level analysis peer production

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

Lincoln

(2004) Critical discourse and the cultural consecration of American films. Social Forces 82(3): 871–894.

Anderson

(2006) The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More. New York: Hyperion.

Baumann

(2001) Intellectualization and art world development: film in the United States. American Sociological Review 66(3): 404–426.

Baumann

(2007) A general theory of artistic legitimation: how art worlds are like social movements. Poetics 35(1): 47–65.

Benkler

(2006) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Available at: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/wealth_of_networks/Download_PDFs_of_the_book (accessed 28 February 2010).

Bennett

Savage

Silva

. (2009) Culture, Class, Distinction. London: Routledge.

Bielby

(2004) Audience aesthetics and popular culture. In: Friedland

Mohr

(eds) Matters of Culture: Cultural Sociology in Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.295–317.

Bielby

Harrington

Bielby

(1999) Whose stories are they? Fans’ engagement with soap opera narratives in three sites of fan activity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 43(1): 35–51.

Bourdieu

(1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.

10.

Bourdieu

(1993) The Field of Cultural Production. Cambridge: Polity Press.

11.

Cassidy

(2007) Online news credibility: an examination of the perceptions of newspaper journalists. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12(2): 478–498.

12.

Curran

(2000) Literary editors, social networks and cultural tradition. In: Curran

(ed) Media Organizations in Society. London: Arnold, pp.215–239.

13.

Davenport

Beck

(2001) The Attention Economy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

14.

David

Pinch

(2006) Six degrees of reputation: the use and abuse of online review and recommendation systems. First Monday 11(3). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1315 (accessed 15 November 2007).

15.

Debenedetti

(2006) The role of media critics in the cultural industries. International Journal of Arts Management 8(3): 30–42.

16.

Deuze

(2007) Media Work. Cambridge: Polity Press.

17.

DiMaggio

(1987) Classification in art. American Sociological Review 52(4): 440–455.

18.

Dowd

(2011) Production and producers of life styles: fields of classical and popular music in the United States. In: Rössel

Otte

(eds) Life Style Research (Special issue 51 of Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp.113–138.

19.

Goldhaber

(1997) The attention economy and the net. First Monday 2(4). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/article/view/519/440 (accessed 1 February 2012).

20.

Hargittai

Walejko

(2008) The participation divide: content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Communication & Society 11(2): 239–256.

21.

Hennig-Thurau

Gwinner

Walsh

. (2004) Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing 18(1): 38–52.

22.

Holbrook

Addis

(2008) Art versus commerce in the movie industry: a two-path model of motion-picture success. Journal of Cultural Economics 32(2): 87–107.

23.

Hox

(2010) Multilevel Analysis. New York: Routledge.

24.

Hsu

(2006) Evaluative schemas and the attention of critics in the US film industry. Industrial and Corporate Change 15(3): 467–496.

25.

Janssen

Kuipers

Verboord

(2008) Cultural globalization and arts journalism. American Sociological Review 73(5): 719–740.

26.

Jenkins

(2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.

27.

Kersten

Bielby

(2012) Film discourse on the praised and the acclaimed: reviewing criteria in the United States and United Kingdom. Popular Communication 10(3): 183–200.

28.

Kinnally

Lacayo

McClung

. (2008) Getting up on the download: college students’ motivations for acquiring music via the web. New Media & Society 10(6): 893–913.

29.

Marwick

boyd

(2011) To see and be seen: celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence 17(2): 139–158.

30.

O’Reilly

Marx

(2011) How young, technical consumers assess online WOM credibility. Qualitative Market Research 14(4): 330–359.

31.

Otterbacher

(2011) Being heard in review communities: communication tactics and review prominence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 16(3): 424–444.

32.

Peterson

Kern

(1996) Changing highbrow taste: from snob to omnivore. American Sociological Review 61(5): 900–907.

33.

Shefrin

(2004) Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, and participatory fandom: mapping new congruencies between the internet and media entertainment culture. Critical Studies in Media Communication 21(3): 261–281.

34.

Shoemaker

Reese

(1996) Mediating the Message. New York: Longman.

35.

Suhr

(2009) Underpinning the paradoxes in the artistic fields of MySpace: the problematization of values and popularity in convergence culture. New Media & Society 11(1/2): 179–198.

36.

Tepper

Hargittai

(2009) Pathways to music exploration in a digital age. Poetics 37(3): 227–249.

37.

Van Dijck

(2009) Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society 31(1): 41–58.

38.

Van Rees

(1987) How reviewers reach consensus on the value of literary works. Poetics 16: 275–294.

39.

Van Venrooij

(2010) The evaluation of popular music in the United States, Germany and the Netherlands: a comparison of the use of high art and popular aesthetic criteria. Cultural Sociology 4(3): 395–421.

40.

Verboord

(2010) The legitimacy of book critics in the age of the internet and omnivorousness: expert critics, internet critics and peer critics in Flanders and the Netherlands. European Sociological Review 26(6): 623–637.

41.

Verboord

(2011) Cultural products go online: comparing the internet and print media on distributions of gender, genre and commercial success. Communications 36(4): 441–462.

42.

Webster

(2011) The duality of media: a structurational theory of public attention. Communication Theory 21: 43–66.

43.

Willemsen

Neijens

Bronner

. (2011) “Highly recommended!” The content characteristics and perceived usefulness of online consumer reviews. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17(1): 19–38.

44.

Huberman

(2007) Novelty and collective attention. PNAS 104: 17599–17601.

45.

Zuckerman

Kim

(2003) The critical trade-off: identity assignment and box-office success in the feature film industry. Industrial and Corporate Change 12(1): 27–67.