Since the 1990s, media coverage of economic issues has become increasingly complex. Personalization, shifting the focus from organizations to individuals, helps journalists simplify content and make it more relatable. While personalization in political news coverage has been widely studied, research on corporate news remains limited. Existing research that observes an increase in personalization over time often focuses on CEOs, short time periods, or single media outlets. This study examines personalization in corporate news across a 25-year period using a content analysis of multiple print media. It investigates two sub-dimensions of personalization, individualization and privatization, and assesses how media characteristics (article style, length, and media type) and actor characteristics (gender, leadership position) shape the coverage. Results show that leadership position, article style, media type, and article length are significantly associated with the frequency of actor mentions and mentions of their personal lives and personal characteristics. Overall, there has been no increase in individualization and portrayal of individuals in images in corporate news coverage over time; however, there has been a slight increase in privatization.
AdamSMaierM (2010) Personalization of politics: a critical review and agenda for research. Annals of the International Communication Association34: 213–257. doi: 10.1080/23808985.2010.11679101.
BalmasMRahatGSheaferTShenhavSR (2014) Two routes to personalized politics: centralized and decentralized personalization. Party Politics20(1): 37–51. doi: 10.1177/1354068811436037.
4.
BalmasMSheaferT (2013) Leaders first, countries after: mediated political personalization in the international area. Journal of Communication63(3): 454–475. DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12027.
CaliseM (2011) Personalization of politics. In: BadieBBerg-SchlosserDMorlinoL (eds). International Encyclopedia of Political Science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1858–1860.
8.
CapleHBednarekM (2015) Rethinking news values. What a discursive approach can tell us about the construction of news discourse and news photography. Journalism17(4): 435–455. DOI: 10.1177/1464884914568078.
9.
DennerNSchneiderH (2023) People want to see people? Personalization on Facebook as a tool for corporate communications. Corporate Communications: An International Journal28(1): 30–47. DOI: 10.1108/CCIJ-05-2022-0055.
10.
DennerNHeitzlerNKochT (2018) Presentation of CEOs in the media: a framing analysis. European Journal of Communication33(3): 271–289. DOI: 10.1177/0267323118763876.
11.
DennerNViererblBKochT (2019) A matter for the boss? How personalized communication affects recipients’ perceptions of an organization during a crisis. International Journal of Communication13: 2026–2044.
12.
DennerNKochTSengerS (2021) Faces of companies: personalization of corporate coverage in crisis and non-crisis periods. Journalism22(11): 2747–2763. DOI: 10.1177/1464884920901615.
13.
DennerNSchäferSSchemerC (2022) Passionate hiking fan or loving parent? How personalized self-presentation in the media affects the perception of female and Male politicians. International Journal of Communication16: 1778–1803.
14.
DennerNViererblBWeismantelM (2024) More than just a family affair? The preventive effect of privatized CEO communication on the perception of an organization in crisis. Corporate Communications: An International Journal29: 1054–1069. DOI: 10.1108/CCIJ-06-2024-0108.
15.
EildersC (2006) News factors and news decisions. Theoretical and methodological advances in Germany. Comm31(1): 5–24. DOI: 10.1515/COMMUN.2006.002.
16.
EildersCWirthW (1999) Die Nachrichtenwertforschung auf dem Weg zum Publikum: eine experimentelle Überprüfung des Einflusses von Nachrichtenfaktoren bei der Rezeption [News value research on the way to the audience: an experimental test of the influence of news factors on reception]. Publizistik44(1): 35–57. doi: 10.1007/BF03653963.
17.
EiseneggerMKonieczny-WössnerE (2010) Regularitäten personalisierter Reputationskonstitution in der medienvermittelten Kommunikation [Regularities of Personalized Reputation Constitution in Media-Mediated Communication]. In: EiseneggerMWehmeierS (eds). Personalisierung in der Organisationskommunikation [Personalization in Organizational Communication]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 117–131.
18.
EiseneggerMSchranzM (2013) Personalisierung: ein zu Unrecht der PR-Praxis überlassenes Thema [Personalization: a topic wrongly left to PR practice]. In: HoffjannOHuck-SandhuS (eds). UnVergessene Diskurse [Unforgotten Discourses]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 339–362.
19.
EngelenP-J (2012) What is the reputational cost of a dishonest CEO? Evidence from US illegal insider trading. CESifo Economic Studies58(1): 140–163. doi: 10.1093/cesifo/ifr031.
20.
EsserF (1999) “Tabloidization” of news. A comparative analysis of Anglo-American and German press journalism. European Journal of Communication14(3): 291–324. doi: 10.1177/026732319901400300.
21.
EsserF (2008) Dimensions of political news cultures: Sound bite and image bite news in France, Germany, Great Britain, and the United States. The International Journal of Press/Politics13(4): 401–428. doi: 10.1177/1940161208323691.
22.
EsserFStrömbäckJ (eds) (2014) Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of Western democracies. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
GaltungJRugeMH (1965) The structure of foreign news the presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research2(1): 64–90. doi: 10.1177/002234336500200104.
24.
GelmanAHillJ (2009) Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
HabermasJ (1992) The structural transformation of the public sphere. New Edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
HannahDRZatzickCD (2008) An examination of leader portrayals in the U.S. business press following the landmark scandals of the early 21st century. Journal of Business Ethics79(4): 361–377. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9406-4.
28.
HarcupTO’NeillD (2017) What is news? News values revisited (again). Journalism Studies18(12): 1470–1488. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2016.1150193.
29.
Holtz-BachaC (2002) Professionalization of political communication: the case of the 1998 SPD campaign. Journal of Political Marketing1(4): 23–37. DOI: 10.1300/J199v01n04_02.
30.
Holtz-BachaCLessingerE-MHettesheimerM (1998) Personalisierung als Strategie der Wahlwerbung [Personalization as a Strategy of Election Advertising]. In: ImhofKSchulzP (eds). Die Veröffentlichung des Privaten - die Privatisierung des Öffentlichen [The Publication of the Private - the Privatization of the Public]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 240–245.
31.
HoxJJMoerbeekMVan De SchootR (2017) Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (3. Aufl.). New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
JostP (2023) How politicians adapt to new media logic. A longitudinal perspective on accommodation to user-engagement on Facebook. Journal of Information Technology & Politics20(2): 184–197. DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2022.2076271.
33.
KepplingerHM (2008) News factors. In: DonsbachW (ed). The International Encyclopedia of Communication. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, Vol. 7, 3245–3248.
34.
KochTDennerNCoutandinF (2022) A CEO but also a parent: how strategic communication of private information about the CEO affects perceptions of an organization during a crisis. International Journal of Strategic Communication16: 1–13. doi: 10.1080/1553118X.2022.2075749.
35.
KruikemeierSvan NoortGVliegenthartR, et al. (2013) Getting closer: the effects of personalized and interactive online political communication. European Journal of Communication28(1): 53–66. DOI: 10.1177/0267323112464837.
36.
LangerAI (2010) The politicization of private persona. The International Journal of Press/Politics15(1): 60–76. DOI: 10.1177/1940161209351003.
37.
LarssonAO (2019) Skiing all the way to the polls: exploring the popularity of personalized posts on political Instagram accounts. Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies25(5-6): 1096–1110. DOI: 10.1177/1354856517741132.
38.
LawrenceRGMcGregorSCCardonaA, et al. (2016) Personalization and gender: 2014 gubernatorial candidates on social media. In: HendricksJASchillD (eds). Communication and Midterm Elections. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 191–206.
39.
LuceroMKwangATTPangA, et al. (2009) Crisis leadership: when should the CEO step up?Corporate Communications: An International Journal14(3): 234–248. DOI: 10.1108/13563280910980032.
40.
MaginMGeißS (2019) Beyond time and space: the impact of autonomy from politics and commercialization pressure on mediatization in German and Austrian newspapers—A multilevel approach. Political Communication36(4): 543–564. DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2019.1608605.
41.
MaierMStengelKMarschallJ (2010) Nachrichtenwerttheorie [News value theory]. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
42.
MarschlichSEiseneggerM (2024) Personalization of tech corporations: examining personalized news and the media reputation of Google, Facebook, and Apple in Swiss news media. Journalism26: 14648849241243044. DOI: 10.1177/14648849241243044.
43.
MazzoleniGSchulzW (1999) “Mediatization” of politics: a challenge for democracy?Political Communication16(3): 247–261. DOI: 10.1080/105846099198613.
44.
McGregorSC (2018) Personalization, social media, and voting: effects of candidate self-personalization on vote intention. New Media & Society20(3): 1139–1160. DOI: 10.1177/1461444816686103.
45.
MeeksL (2016) Gendered styles, gendered differences: candidates’ use of personalization and interactivity on Twitter. Journal of Information Technology & Politics13(4): 295–310. DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2016.1160268.
46.
MetzMKruikemeierSLechelerS (2020) Personalization of politics on Facebook: examining the content and effects of professional, emotional and private self-personalization. Information, Communication & Society23(10): 1481–1498. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1581244.
47.
MüllerPDennerN (2021) Populist words speak louder? Ideology-inconsistent personalization and voting for populist candidates. International Journal of Public Opinion Research33(4): 799–817. DOI: 10.1093/ijpor/edaa042.
48.
O’NeillDHarcupT (2009) News values and selectivity. In: Wahl-JorgensenKHanitzschT (eds). Handbook of Journalism Studies. Hoboken, NJ: Routledge, 161–174.
49.
ParkD-JBergerBK (2004) The presentation of CEOs in the press, 1990-2000: increasing salience, positive valence and a focus on competency and personal dimensions of image. Journal of Public Relations Research16(1): 93–125. DOI: 10.1207/s1532754xjprr1601_4.
50.
PedersenHHRahatG (2021) Political personalization and personalized politics within and beyond the behavioural arena. Party Politics27(2): 211–219. DOI: 10.1177/1354068819855712.
51.
PollachIKerblerE (2011) Appearing competent: a study of impression management in US and European CEO profiles. Journal of Business Communication48(4): 355–372. DOI: 10.1177/0021943611414687.
52.
PruysersSCrossWPKatzRS (2018) Personalism, personalization and party politics. In: CrossWPKatzRSPruysersS (eds). The Personalization of Democratic Politics and the Challenge for Political Parties. London: ECPR Press/Rowman & Littlefield, 1–18.
53.
ReinemannCWilkeJ (2007) Its the debates, stupid! how the introduction of televised debates changed the portrayal of chancellor candidates in the German press, 1949-2005. The International Journal of Press/Politics12(4): 92–111. doi: 10.1177/1081180X07307185.
54.
ScammellMLangerAI (2006) Political advertisement in the United Kingdom. In: KaidLL (ed). The Sage Handbook of Political Advertising. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 65–82.
55.
Seiffert-BrockmannJEinwillerSStranzlJ (2018) Character assassination of CEOs in crises – questioning CEOs’ character and values in corporate crises. European Journal of Communication33(4): 413–429. DOI: 10.1177/0267323118763860.
56.
SnijdersTABBoskerRJ (2012) Multilevel analysis. an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57.
StrömbäckJ (2008) Four phases of mediatization: an analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics13(3): 228–246. doi: 10.1177/1940161208319097.
58.
StrömbäckJEsserF (2014) Introduction. Making sense of the mediatization of politics. Journalism Studies15(3): 243–255. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2014.897412.
59.
Tkalac VerčičAVerčičDCoombsWT (2019) Convergence of crisis response strategy and source credibility: who can you trust?Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management27(1): 28–37. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5973.12229.
60.
Van AelstPSheaferTStanyerJ (2012) The personalization of mediated political communication: a review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism13(2): 203–220. DOI: 10.1177/1464884911427802.
61.
van DalenASvenssonHKalogeropoulosA, et al. (2019) Economic news: Informing the inattentive audience (Bd. 23). London, New York: Routledge.
62.
van SantenRvan ZoonenL (2010) The personal in political television biographies. Biography33(1): 46–67. DOI: 10.1353/bio.0.0157.
63.
ZerfassAVerčičDWiesenbergM (2016) Managing CEO communication and positioning: a cross-national study among corporate communication leaders. Journal of Communication Management20(1): 37–55. DOI: 10.1108/JCOM-11-2014-0066.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
