Framing and praising Allah on YouTube: Exploring user-created videos about Islam and the motivations for producing them

Abstract

Islam is a hotly debated topic on YouTube, comprising approximately a half-million videos, tagged with this word. The study presents empirical material regarding three aspects of Islam’s representation: (a) how Islam is framed in user-created videos; (b) how it is visualized; and (c) what are the motivations of the YouTubers who create these videos. The theoretical framework of the study is based on two pillars. The concept of valence framing was employed to identify positive/negative patterns of representation. The motivations to videoblog about Islam were examined from the perspective of the Uses and Gratifications Theory. Data comprised a content analysis of 120 videos and 15 in-depth interviews with content producers. Despite a number of extremely attacking videos about Islam, the overall tone of the coverage appeared to be balanced. However, images and ideas that are inappropriate for broadcasting on mainstream media repeatedly appear on this website.

Keywords

Framing Islam Islam user-generated content Uses and Gratifications Theory valence framing YouTube

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbas

(2000) Images of Islam. Index on Censorship 29(5): 64–68.

Abrahamian

(2003) The US media, Huntington and September 11. Third World Quarterly 24(3): 529–544.

Ahmed

(1992) Postmodernism and Islam: Predicament and Promise. London: Routledge.

Ahmed

(2003) Islam under Siege: Living Dangerously in a Post-Honor World. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Alexa (2011) YouTube.com: site information. Available at: www.alexa.com/siteinfo/youtube.com (accessed January 2011).

Anderson

(2003) New media, new publics: reconfiguring the public sphere of Islam. Social Research 70(3): 887–906.

Berkeley

(2006) Bloggers vs. Mullahs: how the Internet roils Iran. World Policy Journal 23(1): 71–78.

Bottici

Challand

(2006) Rethinking political myth: the clash of civilizations as a self-fulfilling prophecy. European Journal of Social Theory 9(3): 315–336.

Burgess

Green

(2009) YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.

10.

Cha

Kwak

Rodriguez

. (2007) I tube, you tube, everybody tubes: analyzing the world‘s largest user generated content video system. Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, San Diego, CA.

11.

Crichton

Kinash

(2003) Virtual ethnography: interactive interviewing online as method. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 29(2): 101–115.

12.

Daugherty

Eastin

Bright

(2008) Exploring consumer motivations for creating user-generated content. Journal of Interactive Advertising 8(2): 16–25.

13.

De Vreese

(2005) News framing: theory and typology. Information Design Journal & Document Design 13(1): 51–62.

14.

De Vreese

Boomgaarden

(2003) Valenced news frames and public support for the EU. Communications 28(4): 361–381.

15.

D’Haenens

Bink

(2007) Islam in the Dutch press: with special attention to the Algemeen Dagblad. Media Culture & Society 29(1): 135–149.

16.

Entman

(2007) Framing bias: media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication 57(1): 163–173.

17.

Hafez

(2000) Imbalances of Middle East coverage: a quantitative analysis of the German press. In: Hafez

(ed.) Islam and the West in the Mass Media: Fragmented Images in a Globalizing World. New York: Hampton Press, pp. 181–197.

18.

Heffernan

(2007) God and man on YouTube. Available at: www.nytimes.com/2007/11/04/magazine/04wwln-medium-t.html?scp=1&;sq=God%20and%20man%20on%20Youtube&st=cse (accessed August 2008).

19.

Huntington

(1993) The clash of civilizations? Foreign Affairs 72(3): 22–49.

20.

Hussain

(2007) The media’s role in a clash of misconceptions: the case of the Danish Muhammad cartoons. Harvard International Journal of Press-Politics 12(4): 112–130.

21.

Karim

(2000) Islamic Peril: Media and Global Violence. Montreal, QC: Black Rose Press.

22.

Karim

(2006) American media’s coverage of Muslims: the historical roots of contemporary portrayals. In: Poole

Richardson

(eds) Muslims and the News Media. London: IB Tauris, pp. 116–127.

23.

Krippendorff

(2004) Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methods. London: SAGE.

24.

Lange

(2007) Commenting on comments: investigating responses to antagonism on YouTube. Proceedings of the 67th Annual Conference of the Society for Applied Anthropology (SfAA), Tampa, FL.

25.

Levin

Schneider

Gaeth

(1998) All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76(2): 149–188.

26.

Mann

Stewart

(2002) Internet interviewing. In: Gubrium

Holstein

(eds) Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 603–628.

27.

Mark

(2003) Framing the Lewinsky affair: third-person judgments by scandal frame. Political Psychology 24(4): 829–844.

28.

Marshall

Rossman

(2006) Designing Qualitative Research. London: SAGE.

29.

Mohammad

(1999) Jihad as terrorism: the Western media and the defamation of the Quran. In: Ferell

Websdale

(eds) Making Trouble: Cultural Constructions of Crime, Deviance, and Control. New York: Aldine De Gruyter, pp. 303–318.

30.

Nacos

Torres-Reyna

(2003) Framing Muslim-Americans before and after 9/11. In: Norris

Kern

Just

(eds) Framing Terrorism: The News Media, the Government and the Public. New York: Routledge, pp. 133−158.

31.

Nardi

Schiano

Gumbrecht

. (2004) Why we blog. Communications of the ACM 47(12): 41–46.

32.

Norris

Inglehart

(2003) Public opinion among Muslims and the West. In: Norris

Kern

Just

(eds) Framing Terrorism: The News Media, the Government and the Public. New York: Routledge, pp. 203–228.

33.

Oreg

Nov

(2008) Exploring motivations for contributing to open source initiatives: the roles of contribution context and personal values. Computers in Human Behavior 24(5): 2055–2073.

34.

Paolillo

(2008) Structure and network in the YouTube core. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008), Waikoloa, HI. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4438859&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D4438859.

35.

Papacharissi

De Fatima Oliveira

(2008) News frames terrorism: a comparative analysis of frames employed in terrorism coverage in US and UK newspapers. Harvard International Journal of Press-Politics 13(1): 52–74.

36.

Papacharissi

Rubin

(2000) Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 44(2): 175–196.

37.

Poole

(2000) Framing Islam: an analysis of newspaper coverage of Islam in the British press. In: Hafez

(ed.) Islam and the West in the Mass Media: Fragmented Images in a Globalizing World. New York: Hampton Press, pp. 157–179.

38.

Poole

(2002) Reporting Islam: Media Representations of British Muslims. London: IB Tauris.

39.

Poole

(2006) The effects of September 11 and the war in Iraq on British newspaper coverage. In: Poole

Richardson

(eds) Muslims and the News Media. London: IB Tauris, pp. 89–102.

40.

Richardson

(2001) British Muslims in the broadsheet press: a challenge to cultural hegemony? Journalism Studies 2(2): 221–242.

41.

Richardson

(2006) Who gets to speak? A study of sources in the broadsheet press. In: Poole

Richardson

(eds) Muslims and the News Media. London: IB Tauris, pp. 103–115.

42.

Rubin

(1994) Media uses and effects: a uses-and-gratifications perspective. In: Bryant

Zillman

(eds) Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 417–436.

43.

Ruggiero

(2000) Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society 3(1): 3–37.

44.

Said

(1997) Covering Islam: How the Media and the Experts Determine How We See the Rest of the World. London: Vintage.

45.

Schuck

ART

De Vreese

(2006) Between risk and opportunity: news framing and its effects on public support for EU enlargement. European Journal of Communication 21(1): 5–32.

46.

Semetko

Valkenburg

(2000) Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication 50(2): 93–109.

47.

Shadid

Van Koningsveld

(2002) The negative image of Islam and Muslims in the West: causes and solutions. In: Shadid

Van Koningsveld

(eds) Religious Freedom and the Neutrality of the State: The Position of Islam in the European Union. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 174–196.

48.

Shao

(2009) Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: a uses and gratification perspective. Internet Research 19(1): 7–25.

49.

Stout

Buddenbaum

(2003) Media, religion, and ‘framing’. Journal of Media and Religion 2(1): 1–3.

50.

Ter Wal

(2004) Moslim in Nederland. De publieke discussie over de islam in Nederland: Een analyse van artikelen in de Volkskrant 1998–2002 [Muslims in the Netherlands. Public discussion about Islam in the Netherland: An analysis of articles in de Volkskant 1998–2002]. The Hague: Social and Cultural Planning Office.

51.

Trammell

Tarkowski

Hofmokl

. (2006) Rzeczpospolita blogow [Republic of Blog]: examining Polish bloggers through content analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11(3): 702−722.

52.

Van Dijck

(2009) Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media Culture & Society 31(1): 41–58.

53.

Van Zoonen

Vis

Mihelj

(2011) YouTube interactions between agonism, antagonism and dialogue: video responses to the anti-Islam film Fitna. New Media & Society 13: 1283–1300.

54.

Wall

(2006) Blogging Gulf War II. Journalism Studies 7(1): 111–126.