This study examines the factors that influence the willingness to contribute information to online communities from the perspectives of the discretionary database and expectancy theory. The study identified four groups of variables and tested their predictive value on the willingness to contribute information to online communities. The findings confirmed the effect of the perceived value of contributing and the likelihood of getting a reward for the willingness to contribute. Cost of contribution was not a significant predictor of the willingness to contribute information. Benefit from, and interest in, the community were significant predictors, but community affinity was not. Among the four groups of variables, social approval was the strongest predictor of the willingness to contribute.
Ajzen I., Fishbein M. ( 1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
2.
Basil MD, Brown WJ, and Bocarnea MC ( 2002) Differences in univariate values versus multivariate relationships . Human Communication Research28(4): 501-14.
3.
Bimber B., Flanagin AJ, and Stohl C. ( 2005) Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory15(4): 365-88.
4.
Bonacich P. ( 1990) Communication dilemmas in social networks: An experimental study. American Sociological Review55(3): 448-59.
5.
Bonacich P., Schneider S. ( 1992) Communication networks and collective action. In: Liebrand WBG, Messick DM, and Wilke HAM (eds) Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research Findings. New York: Pergamon, 225-45.
6.
Brewer MB, Kramer RM ( 1986) Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology50(3): 543-49.
7.
Canary D. ( 1991) Organizational commitment and identification: An examination of conceptual and operational convergence. Western Journal of Communication55(3): 275-93.
8.
Cheshire C. ( 2007) Selective incentives and generalized information exchange . Social Psychology Quarterly70(1): 82-100.
9.
Cheshire C., Antin J. ( 2008) The social psychological effects of feedback on the production of internet information pools. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication13(3): 705-27.
10.
Connolly T., Thorn BK ( 1990) Discretionary databases: Theory, data, and implications . In: Fulk J, Steinfield C (eds) Organizations and Communication Technology . Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications , 219-33.
11.
Cress U., Kimmerle J., and Hesse FW ( 2006) Information exchange with shared databases as a social dilemma: The effect of metaknowledge, bonus systems, and costs. Communication Research33(5): 370-90.
12.
Daugherty T., Eastin MS, and Bright L. ( 2008) Exploring consumer motivations for creating user-generated content. Journal of Interactive Advertising8(2): 1-24.
13.
Dawes RM ( 1980) Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology31: 169-93.
14.
DeSanctis G. ( 1983) Expectancy theory as an explanation of voluntary use of a decision support system. Psychological Reports52(1): 247-60.
15.
Foddy M. ( 1999) Resolving Social Dilemmas: Dynamics, Structural, and Intergroup Aspects. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
16.
Gould RV ( 1993) Collective action and network structure. American Sociological Review58(2): 182-96.
17.
Hardin G. ( 1968) The tragedy of the commons. The population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality . Science162(859): 1243-8.
18.
Hardin R. ( 1982) Collective Action. Baltimore , MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19.
Harkins SG, Szymanski K. ( 1989) Social loafing and group evaluation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology56(6): 934-41.
20.
Howard JR ( 2002) Do college students participate more in discussion in traditional delivery courses or in interactive telecourse? Journal of Higher Education73(6): 764-80.
21.
Isaac RG, Zerbe WJ, and Pitt DC ( 2001) Leadership and motivation: The effective application of expectancy theory. Journal of Managerial Issues, 13(2): 212-26.
22.
Kalman ME ( 1996) The motivational role of organizational commitment in the implementation of change: Focusing on the attitude-behavior relationship . Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Speech Communication Association.
23.
Kalman ME, Monge P., Fulk J., and Heino R. ( 2002) Motivations to resolve communication dilemmas in database-mediated collaboration. Communication Research29(2): 125-54.
24.
Kerr MS, Rynearson K., and Kerr MC ( 2006) Student characteristics for online learning success . Internet & Higher Education9(2): 91-105.
25.
Kinnally W., Lacayo A., McClung S., Sapolsky B. ( 2008) Getting up on the download: College students’ motivations for acquiring music via the web. New Media & Society10(6): 893-913.
26.
Kollock P. ( 1998) Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology24(1): 183-214.
27.
Kollock P. ( 1999) The economies of online cooperation. In: Kollock P, Smith MA (eds) Communities in Cyberspace. New York: Routledge, 220-39.
28.
Komorita SS, Parks CD ( 1994) Social Dilemmas. Madison, WI : Brown & Benchmark.
29.
Kramer RM, Brewer MB ( 1984) Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology46(5): 1044-57.
30.
Leung L.(2009) User-generated content on the internet: An examination of gratifications, civic engagement and psychological empowerment. New Media & Society11(8): 1327-47.
31.
Liebrand WBG, Messick DM (eds) (1996) Frontiers in Social Dilemma Research. New York: Springer.
32.
Liebrand WBG, Messick DM, and Wilke HAM ( 1992) Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research Findings . Oxford: Pergamon Press .
33.
Ling K., Beenen G., Ludford P., et al. (2005) Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication10(4). URL: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/ling.html
34.
Messick DM, Brewer MB ( 1983) Solving social dilemmas: A review. In: Wheeler L, Shaver P (eds) Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 4. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 11-44.
35.
Miller VD, Allen M., Casey MK, and Johnson JR ( 2000) Reconsidering the organizational identification questionnaire . Management Communication Quarterly13(4): 626-58.
36.
O’Brien RM ( 2007) A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity41(5): 673-90.
37.
Ogan CL, Ozakca M., and Groshek J. ( 2008) Embedding the internet in the lives of college students: Online and offline behavior. Social Science Computer Review26(2): 170-7.
38.
Oliver PE ( 1980) Rewards and punishments as selective incentives for collective action: Theoretical investigations. American Journal of Sociology85(6): 1356-75.
39.
O’Reilly C, Chatman J ( 1986) Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology71(3): 492-9.
40.
Sandler T. ( 1992) Collective Action: Theory and Applications. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press .
41.
Scott CR, Corman SR, and Cheney G. ( 1998) Development of a structurational model of identification in the organization. Communication Theory8(3): 298-336.
42.
Shankar A., Pavitt C. ( 2002) Resource and public goods dilemmas: A new issue for communication research. Review of Communication2(3): 251-72.
43.
Snead KC Jr, Harrell AM ( 1994) An application of expectancy theory to explain a manager’s intention to use a decision support system. Decision Sciences25(4): 499-513.
44.
Sohn D., Leckenby JD ( 2007) A structural solution to communication dilemmas in a virtual community. Journal of Communication57(3): 435-49.
45.
Staw BM ( 1984) Organizational behavior: A review and reformulation of the field’s outcome variables. Annual Review of Psychology35: 627-66.
46.
van Dijck J. ( 2009) Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society31(1): 41-58.
47.
Vroom VH ( 1964) Work and Motivation. New York : Wiley.
48.
Weisskirch RS, Milburn SS ( 2003) Virtual discussion: Understanding college students’ electronic bulletin board use. Internet & Higher Education6(3): 215-25.
49.
Yang X., Li Y., Tan C-H., and Teo HH ( 2007) Students’ participation intention in an online discussion forum: Why is computer-mediated interaction attractive? Information & Management44(5): 456-66.
