This piece speculates on the internet’s wider influences on the shape of institutional politics in representative ‘actually existing democracies’. Findings, based on 100 semi-structured interviews with political actors (politicians, journalists and officials) operating around the UK Parliament, suggest two contrasting trends. On the one hand, more political actors at the immediate edges of the UK institutional political process are being further engaged in a sort of centrifugal movement going outwards from the centre. At the same time, the space between this extended political centre and its public periphery is increasing. This fatter, democratic elitist shift in UK politics may be interpreted as ‘new’ and ICT-driven. It might equally be argued that new media is exacerbating pre-existing political party and media trends in mature democracies which fail to engage ordinary citizens.
Advertising Association (2007) The Advertising Statistics Yearbook. London: Warc.
2.
Allan, S. ( 2006) Online News: Journalism and the Internet. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
3.
Atton, C. ( 2004) An Alternative Internet. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press.
4.
Barnett, S. and I. Gaber ( 2001) Westminster Tales: The Twenty First Century Crisis in Political Journalism. London: Continuum .
5.
Bimber, B. ( 2003) Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Bohman, J. ( 1996) Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
Bonfadelli, H. ( 2002) ‘The Internet and Knowledge Gaps: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation’, European Journal of Communication , 17(1): 65-84.
8.
Brandenburg, H. ( 2006) ‘Pathologies of the Virtual Public Sphere’ , in S. Oates, D. Owen and R. Gibson (eds) The Internet and Politics: Citizens, Voters and Activists, pp. 207-22. London : Routledge.
9.
Butsch, R. (ed.) (2007) Media and Public Spheres. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
Calhoun, C. ( 1988) ‘Populist Politics, Communications Media and Large Scale Societal Integration’, Sociological Theory6: 219-41.
11.
Carlson, M. ( 2007) ‘Blogs and Journalistic Authority: The Role of Blogs in US Election Day 2004 Coverage’, Journalism Studies8(2): 264-79.
12.
Chadwick, A. ( 2006) Internet Politics: States, Citizens and New Communication Technologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
Cohen, E. ( 2002) ‘Online Journalism as Market-driven Journalism’ , Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media46(4): 532-48.
14.
Coleman, S. ( 2004) ‘Connecting Parliament to the Public via the Internet: Two Case Studies of Online Consultations’, Information, Communication & Society7(1): 1-22.
15.
Coleman, S. ( 2005) ‘New Mediation and Direct Representation: Reconceptualising Representation in the Digital Age’, New Media and Society7(2): 177-98.
16.
Coleman, S. and J. Gotze ( 2001) Bowling Together: Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation . London: Hansard Society.
17.
Couldry, N. (forthcoming, 2009) ‘New Online News Sources and Writer-gatherers’ , in N. Fenton (ed.) New Media, Old News. London: Sage.
18.
Crouch, C. ( 2004) Post-democracy. Cambridge: Polity.
19.
Dahl, R. ( 1989) Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
20.
Dahlberg, L. ( 2001) ‘The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring the Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere’ , Information, Communication and Society4(4): 615-33.
21.
Dahlberg, L. ( 2007) ‘Rethinking the Fragmentation of the Cyberpublic: From Consensus to Contestation’, New Media and Society9(5): 827-47.
22.
Dahlgren, P. ( 1995) Television and the Public Sphere: Citizenship, Democracy and the Media. London: Sage.
23.
Dahlgren, P. ( 2005) ‘The Internet and the Public Sphere’, Political Communications22(2): 147-62.
24.
Dalton, R. ( 2004) Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
Davies, N. ( 2008) Flat Earth News. London: Chatto and Windus.
26.
Davis, A. ( 2003) ‘Whither Mass Media and Power? Evidence for a Critical Elite Theory Alternative’, Media, Culture and Society25(5): 669-90.
27.
Davis, A. ( 2007) The Mediation of Power: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.
28.
Davis, R. ( 2005) Politics Online: Blogs, Chatrooms, and Discussion Groups in American Democracy. New York: Routledge.
29.
Dean, J., J. Anderson and G. Lovinck (eds) ( 2006) Reformatting Politics: Information Technology and Global Civil Society. London: Routledge .
30.
Domhoff, W. ( 2005) Who Rules America? Power, Politics and Social Change (5th edn). New York: McGraw Hill.
31.
Downing, J. ( 2001) Radical Media: Rebellious Communication and Social Movements . London: Sage.
32.
Dryzek, J. ( 2002) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
Fenton, N. (ed.) (forthcoming, 2009) New Media, Old News. London: Sage .
34.
Franklin, B. ( 1997) Newzak and News Media. London: Arnold.
35.
Fraser, N. ( 1992) ‘Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Consideration of Actually Existing Democracy’, in C. Calhoun (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere, pp. 109-42. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
Gandy, O. ( 1982) Beyond Agenda Setting: Information Subsidies and Public Policy. New York: Ablex.
37.
Gillmor, D. ( 2004) We the Media: Grassroots Journalism by the People, for the People. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.
38.
Goldenberg, E. ( 1975) Making the Papers: The Access of Resource-poor Groups to the Metropolitan Press. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Co.
39.
Golding, P. and G. Murdock ( 2000) ‘Culture, Communications and Political Economy’ , in J. Curran and M. Gurevitch (eds) Mass Media and Society (3rd edn), pp. 70-92. London: Arnold.
40.
Gulati, G. ( 2004) ‘Members of Congress and Presentation of Self on the World Wide Web’, Harvard Journal of Press/Politics9(1): 22-40.
41.
Habermas, J. ( 1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity.
42.
Habermas, J. ( 1996) Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge : Polity.
43.
Hansard (2004) An Audit of Political Engagement. London: Hansard Society and Electoral Commission.
44.
Hansard (2005) Members Only: Parliament in the Public Eye. London: Hansard Society.
45.
Hay, C. ( 2007) Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity.
46.
Herbst, S. ( 1998) Reading Public Opinion: Political Actors View the Democratic Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47.
Herman, E. and R. McChesney ( 1997) The Global Media: The New Missionaries of Global Capitalism . London: Cassell.
48.
House of Commons (HoC) (July 2002) Digital Technology: Working for Parliament. London: House of Commons Information Committee.
49.
House of Commons (HoC) (June 2004) Connecting Parliament with the Public: First Report of Session 2003-04. London: Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons.
50.
House of Commons (HoC) (2007) Twenty-ninth Annual Report - Financial Year 2006-07. London : House of Commons Commission.
51.
Jackson, N. ( 2003) ‘Vote Winner or a Nuisance: Email and British MPs Relationships with their Constituents’, paper presented to Political Studies Association, Leicester , 17 April.
52.
Jackson, N. and D. Lilleker ( 2004) ‘Just Public Relations or an Attempt at Interaction?: British MPs in the Press, On the Web and "In Your Face"’, European Journal of Communication19(4): 507-33.
53.
Jensen, J. ( 2006) ‘The Minnesota E-democracy Project: Mobilising the Mobilised?’, in S. Oates, D. Owen and R. Gibson (eds) The Internet and Politics: Citizens, Voters and Activists , pp. 39-58. London: Routledge.
54.
Kavada, A. ( 2005) ‘Civil Society Organisations and the Internet: The Case of Amnesty International, Oxfam and the World Development Movement’ , in W. de Jong, M. Shaw and N. Stammers (eds) Global Activism, Global Media, pp. 208-22. London: Pluto Press.
55.
Kellner, D. ( 2000) ‘Habermas, the Public Sphere, and Democracy: A Critical Intervention’, in L. Hahn (ed.) Perspectives on Habermas. Chicago: Open Court Press.
56.
Lewis, J., S. Inthorn and K. Wahl-Jorgensen ( 2005) Citizens or Consumers? What the Media Tell Us about Political Participation. Buckingham: Open University Press.
57.
Lindblom, C. ( 1977) Politics and Markets: The World’s Political Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books.
58.
Lovink, G. ( 2007) Zero Comments: Blogging and Critical Internet Culture . New York: Routledge.
59.
Lowrey, W. ( 2006) ‘Mapping the Journalism-Blogging Relationship’ , Journalism: Theory, Criticism and Practice7(4): 477-500.
60.
Lusoli, W. and S. Ward ( 2003) ‘Digital rank-and-file: Party Activists’ Perceptions and Use of the Internet’, paper for the American Political Science Association Conference, Philadelphia , August.
61.
Lusoli, W., S. Ward and R. Gibson ( 2006) ‘(Re)Connecting Politics? Parliament, the Public and the Internet’, Parliamentary Affairs59(1): 24-42.
62.
Marsh, D., D. Richards and M. Smith ( 2001) Changing Patterns of Governance in the United Kingdom , Houndsmill: Palgrave.
63.
Michels, R. ( 1967[1911]) Political Parties. New York : Free Press.
64.
Mills, C. Wright ( 1956) The Power Elite. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65.
Negroponte, N. ( 1995) Being Digital. LondonHodder and Staunton.
66.
Norris, P. ( 2000) A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67.
Norris, P. ( 2001) Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68.
Ofcom (2007) New News, Future News: The Challenges for Television News After Digital Switchover. London: Ofcom.
69.
Pickerill, J. ( 2004) ‘Rethinking Political Participation: Experiments in Internet Activism in Australia and Britain’, in R. Gibson, A. Roemmele and S. Ward (eds) Electronic Democracy: Mobilisation, Organisation and Participation Via New ICTs, pp. 170-93. London : Routledge.
70.
Pickerill, J. ( 2006) ‘Radical Politics on the Net’, Parliamentary Affairs59(2): 266-82.
71.
Pict (August 2006) ‘Internal House of Commons Statistics on Email Traffic’ (unpublished), produced by Parliamentary ICT Unit. London: House of Commons.
72.
Polat, R. ( 2005) ‘The Internet and Political Participation’ , European Journal of Communication20(4): 435-59.
73.
Poulantzas, N. ( 1975) Classes in Contemporary Capitalism. London: New Left Books.
74.
Putnam, R. ( 2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community . New York: Simon and Schuster.
75.
Quandt, T., M. Loffelholz, D. Weaver, T. Hanitzsch and K. Aitmeppen ( 2006) ‘American and German Online Journalists at the Beginning of the 21st Century: A Bi-national Survey’, Journalism Studies7(2): 171-86.
76.
Rash, W. ( 1997) Politics on the Net. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.
77.
Reese, S., L. Rutigliano, K. Hyun and J. Jeong ( 2007) ‘Mapping the Blogosphere: Professional and Citizen-based Media in the Global News Arena’, Journalism: Theory, Criticism and Practice8(3): 235-61.
78.
Rheingold, H. ( 2002) Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution. London: Perseus.
79.
Rommele, A. ( 2003) ‘Political Parties, Party Communication and New Information and Communication Technologies’, Party Politics9(1): 7-20.
80.
Schiller, H. ( 1996) Information Inequality: The Deepening Social Crisis in America. New York: Routledge.
81.
Schumpeter, J. ( 1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Unwin Books.
82.
Scott, B. ( 2005) ‘A Contemporary History of Digital Journalism’ , Television and New Media6(1): 84-126.
83.
Singer, J. ( 2003) ‘Who Are These Guys? The Online Challenge to the Notion of Journalistic Professionalism’, Journalism: Theory, Practice and Criticism4(2): 139-68.
84.
Smith, M. ( 2003) ‘The Core Executive and the Modernization of Central Government’, in P. Dunleavy, A. Gamble, R. Hefferman and G. Peele (eds) Developments in British Politics7, pp. 60-81. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
85.
Sunstein, C. ( 2001) Republic.Com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
86.
Trippi, J. ( 2004) The Revolution Will Not Be Televised: Democracy, the Internet and the Overthrow of Everything. New York: Regan Books.
87.
Ward, S. and R. Gibson ( 2000) ‘The Politics of the Future? UK Parties and the Internet’, in S. Coleman (ed.) Elections in the Age of the Internet: Lessons from the United States, pp. 29-36. London: Hansard Society.
88.
Ward, S., W. Lusoli and R. Gibson ( 2002) ‘Virtually Participating: A Survey of Online Party Members’, Information Polity7(4): 199-215.
89.
Ward, S., R. Gibson, and W. Lusoli ( 2005) The Promise and Perils of ‘Virtual Representation’: The Public’s View. London: NOP Opinion Survey.
90.
Wikland, H. ( 2005) ‘A Habermasian Analysis of the Deliberative Democratic Potential of ICT-enabled Services in Swedish Municipalities’, New Media and Society7(5): 701-23.
