Using a method incorporating both survey and trace data measures, this study presented and tested a theoretical model for understanding political expression on Facebook. The data suggested that self-reported measures of offline civic engagement, bonded social capital, and ideological extremity were predictive of a self-reported measure of general online political engagement. For its part, self-reported levels of online political engagement were positively and significantly associated with observed political expression on Facebook. These results are discussed in the context of both on and offline political connection and communication.
AdlerPSKwonS-W (2002) Social capital: prospects for a new concept. The Academy of Management Review27: 17–40.
2.
AllcottHGentzkowM (2017) Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives31: 211–236.
3.
AncuMCozmaR (2009) MySpace politics: uses and gratifications of befriending candidates. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media53: 567–583.
4.
BinderARDalrympleKEBrossardD, et al. (2009) The soul of a polarized democracy: testing theoretical linkages between talk and attitude extremity during the 2004 election. Communication Research36: 315–340.
5.
ColemanNVWilliamsP (2015) Looking for myself: identity-driven attention allocation. Journal of Consumer Psychology25: 504–511.
6.
DahlgrenP (2000) The Internet and the democratization of civic culture. Political Communication17: 335–340
7.
DozierDMShenHSweetserKD, et al. (2016) Demographics and Internet behaviors as predictors of active publics. Public Relations Review42: 82–90.
8.
FredericoCMHuntCV (2013) Political information, political involvement, and reliance on ideology in political evaluation. Political Behavior35: 89–112.
9.
GibsonRCantijochM (2013) Conceptualizing and measuring participation in the age of the Internet: is online political engagement really different to offline?The Journal of Politics75: 701–716.
10.
Gil de ZúñigaHVeenstraAVragaE, et al. (2010) Digital democracy: reimagining pathways to political participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics7(1): 36–51.
11.
Gil de ZúñigaHJungNValenzuelaS (2012) Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17(3): 319–336.
12.
Gil de ZúñigaHMolyneuxLZhengP (2014) Social media, political expression, and political participation: panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication64(4): 612–634.
13.
Gil de ZúñigaHValenzuelaS (2011) The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: online and offline networks, weak ties, and civic engagement. Communication Research38: 397–421.
14.
Gil de ZúñigaHBarnidgeMSchermanA (2017) Social media social capital, offline social capital, and citizenship: exploring asymmetrical social capital effects. Political Communication34: 44–68.
15.
Gil de ZúñigaHJungNValenzuelaS (2012) Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17: 319–336.
16.
Gil de ZúñigaHValenzuelaSWeeksBE (2016) Motivations for political discussion: antecedents and consequences on civic engagement. Human Communication Research42: 533–552.
17.
Gil de ZúñigaHVeenstraAVragaE, et al. (2010) Digital democracy: reimagining pathways to political participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics7: 36–51.
18.
KahneJBowerB (2018) The political significance of social media activity and social networks. Political Communication35: 470–493.
19.
KimYRussoSAmnåE (2017) The longitudinal relation between online and offline political participation among youth at two different developmental stages. New Media & Society19: 899–917.
20.
LaneDSLeeSSLiangF, et al. (2019) Social media expression and the political self. Journal of Communication69: 49–72.
21.
McFarlandDAThomasRJ (2006) Bowling young: How youth voluntary associations influence adult political participation. American Sociological Review71: 401–425.
22.
MilbrathLWGoelML (1977) Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics?New York: University Press of America.
23.
PapacharissiZ (2011) A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge.
24.
PasekJMoreERomerD (2009) Realizing the social Internet? Online social networking meets offline civic engagement. Journal of Information Technology & Politics6: 197–215.
PutnamRD (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
29.
Quan-HasseAYoungAL (2010) Uses and gratifications of social media: a comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society30: 350–361.
30.
SajuriaJVanHeerde-HudsonJHudsonD, et al. (2015) Tweeting alone? An analysis of bridging and bonding social capital in online networks. American Politics Research43: 708–738.
31.
SchneiderJA (2007) Connections and disconnections between civic engagement and social capital in community-based nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly36: 572–597.
32.
SommerfeldtEJ (2013) The civility of social capital: public relations in the public sphere, civil society, and democracy. Public Relations Review39: 280–289.
33.
UslanerEM (1999) Democracy and social capital. In: WarrenM (ed.) Democracy and Trust. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121–150.
34.
VerbaSSchlozmanKLBradyHE (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
VitakJZubePSmockA, et al. (2011) It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking14: 107–114.
36.
WilliamsD (2006) On and off the ’net: scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication11: 593–628.
37.
YooSWKimJWGildeZúñigaH (2017) Cognitive benefits for senders: antecedents and effects of political expression on social media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly94: 17–37.
