Social network services exhibit dual processes that enable both the creation of new public spaces and the controlling and monitoring of these spaces through mechanisms facilitated by the architecture of the network itself. This article explores how network science informs the design of for-profit networking services by providing templates for organizing the social. As the case of social networking websites illustrates, networks have gone from scientific frameworks or even mere descriptive metaphors to actualized models that normalize a particular kind of privatized sociality. In an attempt to theorize forms of resistance to these templates of social organization, I suggest two concepts crucial to the articulation of a critical theory of networks: nodocentrism and paranodality. The goal of such a critique is not a complete rejection of networks as models for organizing sociality but rather a shift in our ways of knowing the world through the epistemological exclusivity of the node.
Benjamin, W. ( 1968) Illuminations: Essays and Reflections (trans. H. Zohn) . New York: Harcourt and Brace.
2.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Boyd, D.M. and N.B. Ellison ( 2008) ‘Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship’, Journal of Computer-mediated Communication13(1): 210-30. URL (consulted 25 February 2009): http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html .
4.
Britton, D.B. and S. MacGonegal ( 2007) The Digital Economy Fact Book (9th edn). Washington, DC: The Progress & Freedom Foundation.
5.
Bruner, J.S. ( 1979) On Knowing: Essays for the Left Hand (expanded edn). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
6.
Burt, R.S. ( 1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Carr, N. ( 2008) ‘Is Google Making Us Stupid?’, Atlantic Monthly, August. URL (consulted 23 October 2008): http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google
8.
Castells, M. ( 2000) The Rise of the Network Society (2nd edn). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers .
9.
Coleman, J.S. ( 1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
10.
Coleman, S. ( 2008) ‘Doing IT for Themselves: Management versus Autonomy in Youth E-citizenship’, in W.L. Bennett (ed.) Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth (The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning), pp. 189-206. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
Crocker, S. ( 2007) ‘Noises and Exceptions: Pure Mediality in Serres and Agamben’, cTheory. URL (consulted 24 October 2008): http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=574 .
12.
Croteau, D.R. and W. Hoynes ( 2005) The Business of Media: Corporate Media and the Public Interest (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
13.
Deleuze, G. ( 1997) Negotiations 1972-1990. New York: Columbia University Press.
14.
Dewey, J. ( 1991) The Public and Its Problems. Athens : Swallow Press.
15.
Freire, P. ( 1978) Pedagogy in Process: The Letters to Guinea-Bissau. New York: Seabury Press.
16.
Galloway, A.R. and E. Thacker ( 2007) The Exploit: A Theory of Networks. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
17.
Gunther, M. ( 2006) ‘News Corp. (hearts) MySpace’, 29 March, CNN.com. URL (consulted 25 October 2008 ): http://money.cnn.com/2006/03/28/technology/pluggedin_fortune/
18.
Habermas, J. ( 1991) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
Hardt, M. and A. Negri ( 2004) Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: The Penguin Press.
20.
Holahan, C. ( 2008) ‘Crying Foul over Online Junk Food Marketing’, BusinessWeek: Technology, 12August. URL (consulted 24 October 2008): http://www.businessweek.com/print/technology/content/aug2008/tc20080811_394016.htm
21.
Kothari, M. and L. Mehta ( 2005) ‘Cancer’, in V. Lal and A. Nandy (eds) The Future of Knowledge & Culture: A Dictionary for the 21st Century, pp. 25-30. New Delhi: Penguin, Viking.
22.
Latour, B. ( 2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-network-theory . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
23.
Levine, P. ( 2008) ‘A Public Voice for Youth: The Audience Problem in Digital Media and Civic Education’, in W.L. Bennett (ed.) Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth (The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning), pp. 119-38. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
24.
Lin, N. ( 2001) Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Lippmann, W. ( 1993) The Phantom Public: Library of Conservative Thought. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
26.
Lovink, G. ( 2005) The Principles of Notworking: Concepts in Critical Internet Culture. Amsterdam: HvA Publicaties . URL (consulted 23 October 2008): http://www.hva.nl/lectoraten/documenten/ol09-050224-lovink.pdf
27.
Melber, A. ( 2007) ‘About Facebook’, The Nation , 285(23), 7 January. URL (consulted 23 October 2008): http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080107/melber
28.
Mills, C.W. ( 1956) The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
Monge, P.R. and N.S. Contractor ( 2003) Theories of Communication Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
Montgomery, K.C. ( 2008) ‘Youth and Digital Democracy: Intersections of Practice, Policy, and the Marketplace’, in W.L. Bennett (ed.) Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth (The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning), pp. 25-50. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
Putnam, R.D. ( 2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community . New York: Simon & Schuster .
32.
Rancière, J. ( 1999) Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
33.
Rosen, J. ( 2006) ‘The People Formerly Known as theAudience’, PressThink, URL (consulted 24 October 2008): http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/06/27/ppl_frmr.html
34.
Rossiter, N. ( 2006) Organized Networks: Media Theory, Creative Labour, New Institutions. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers .
35.
Scott, J. ( 1991) Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London: Sage.
36.
Serres, M. ( 2007) The Parasite. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
37.
Siemens, G. ( 2004) ‘Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age’, elearnspace, 12 December. URL (consulted 24 October 2008): http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm .
38.
Smith, A. and L. Rainie ( 2008) The Internet and the 2008 Election. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project . URL (consulted 23 October 2008): http://www.pewinternet.org/report_display.asp?r=252
39.
Sützl, W. ( 2007) ‘Tragic Extremes: Nietzsche and the Politics of Security’, cTheory. URL (consulted 24 July 2008): http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=582
40.
Terranova, T. ( 2004) Network Culture: Politics for the Information Age. London: Pluto Press.
41.
Thierer, A. and G. Eskelsen ( 2008) Media Metrics: The True State of the Modern Media Marketplace Version 1.0. Washington, DC: The Progress & Freedom Foundation. URL: http://www.pff.org/mediametrics/
42.
Tocqueville, A.D. ( 2004) Democracy in America. New York: Library of America.
43.
Van Dijk, J.A.G.M. (1999) The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media . London: Sage.
44.
Van Dijk, J.A.G.M. (2005) The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
45.
Vandenberghe, F.E.E. ( 2002) ‘Reconstructing Humants: A Humanist Critique of Actant-network Theory’, Theory, Culture & Society19(5-6), 51-67.
46.
Wellman, B. ( 1998) Networks in the Global Village: Life in Contemporary Communities . Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
