In order to assess the impact of cost-cutting and digitalization on the expansion or contraction of the mediated public sphere, we developed a quantitative and longitudinal content analysis focused on sourcing practices for foreign news reporting in four Belgian newspapers (1995–2010). The results show little to no shift in the news access of different types of sources. Political sources dominate foreign news output, but ordinary citizens also play a significant role. Although it becomes clear that Belgian journalists often do not explicitly mention their use of news agency copy, recycled news articles or PR material, our findings indicate that concerns about cost-cutting in newsrooms or sanguinity about the democratic potential of Web 2.0 seem exaggerated, at least in the Belgian context.
BoorstinD (1992[1962]) The image. In: TumberH (ed.) News: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 16–20.
2.
BrantsK (2005) Guest editor’s introduction: The internet and the public sphere. Political Communication22(2): 143–146.
3.
BroersmaM (2009) De Waarheid in Tijden van Crisis: Kwaliteitsjournalistiek in een Veranderend Medialandschap [Truth in times of crisis: Quality journalism in a changing media landscape]. In: UmmelenB (ed.) Journalistiek in Diskrediet [Journalism discredited]. Diemen: AMB, 23–39.
4.
BroersmaMGrahamT (2012) Social media as beat: Tweets as news source during the 2010 British and Dutch elections. Journalism Practice6(3): 403–419.
5.
BuijsKDaalmansSFryeAten HaafDHijmansESchafraadP (2009) De Onafhankelijkheid van Nieuwsbronnen en de Kwaliteit van de Journalistiek. Een Verkennende Analyse van Binnenlandse Nieuwsonderwerpen in Vier Nederlandse Dagbladen [The independence of news sources and the quality of journalism. An exploratory analysis of domestic news coverage in four Dutch newspapers]. Paper presented at Etmaal van de Communicatiewetenschap, February, Ghent, Belgium.
6.
CalhounC (1992) Introduction: Habermas and the public sphere. In: CalhounC (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1–48.
7.
CarstenR (2004) Everyone in Journalism Steals from Everyone Else: Routine Reliance on Other Media in Different Stages of News Production. Paper presented at ICA, May, New Orleans, LA.
8.
CastellsM (2008) The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science616: 78–93.
9.
ChuaAYKRazikinKGohDH (2011) Social tags as news event detectors. Journal of Information Science37(1): 3–18.
CottleS (2011) Media and the Arab uprisings of 2011: Research notes. Journalism12(5): 647–659.
12.
CurtinPA (1999) Re-evaluating public relations information subsidies: Market-driven journalism and agenda-building theory and practice. Journal of Public Relations Research11(1): 53–90.
13.
DahlgrenP (1991) Introduction. In: DahlgrenPSparksC (eds) Communication and Citizenship: Journalism and the Public Sphere. London: Routledge, 1–24.
14.
DahlgrenP (2005) The internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication22(2): 147–162.
15.
DaviesN (2008) Flat Earth News: An Award-winning Reporter Exposes Falsehood, Distortion and Propaganda in the Global Media. London: Vintage.
16.
DavisA (2000a) Public relations, business news and the reproduction of corporate elite power. Journalism1(3): 282–304.
17.
DavisA (2000b) Public relations, news production and changing patterns of source access in the British national media. Media, Culture and Society22(1): 39–59.
18.
De BensERaeymaeckersK (2010) De Pers in België: Het Verhaal van de Belgische Dagbladpers Gisteren, Vandaag en Morgen [The press in Belgium]. Leuven: LannooCampus.
19.
De KeyserJ (2010) Bronnen en nieuwe technologie voor nieuwsgaring [Sources and new technologies for news gathering]. In: PaulussenSRaeymaeckersK (eds) Journalisten: Profiel van een Beroepsgroep [Journalists: Profile of a professional group]. Leuven: LannooCampus, 81–97.
20.
DimitrovaDVStrömbäckJ (2009) Look who’s talking: Use of sources in newspaper coverage in Sweden and the United States. Journalism Practice3(1): 75–91.
21.
DowneyJFentonN (2003) New media, counter publicity and the public sphere. New Media and Society5(2): 185–202.
22.
FranklinB (2004) Packaging Politics: Political Communications in Britain’s Media Democracy. London: Arnold.
23.
FranklinBCarlsonM (2011) Journalists, Sources and Credibility. London: Routledge.
24.
FraserN (1999) Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In: DuringS (ed.) The Cultural Studies Reader. London: Routledge, 518–536.
25.
GaltungJRugeM (1965) The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research2: 64–91.
26.
GandyOH (1982) Beyond Agenda Setting: Information Subsidies and Public Policy. Norwood: Ablex.
27.
GansHJ (1979) Deciding What’s News. New York: Pantheon Books.
GerhardsJSchäferMS (2010) Is the internet a better public sphere? Comparing old and new media in the USA and Germany. New Media and Society12(1): 143–160.
30.
HabermasJ (1974) The public sphere: An encyclopedia article (1964). New German Critique3(Autumn): 49–55.
31.
HabermasJ (1992) Further reflections on the public sphere. In: CalhounC (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press, 421–461.
32.
HabermasJ (2006) Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory16(4): 411–426.
HallinDCManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
HargittaiE (2011) Minding the digital gap: Why understanding digital media inequality matters. In: PapathanassopoulosS (ed.) Media Perspectives for the 21st Century. London: Routledge, 231–240.
36.
HeinrichA (2011) Network Journalism: Journalistic Practice in Interactive Spheres. London: Routledge.
37.
HeinrichA (2012) Foreign reporting in the sphere of network journalism. Journalism Practice6(5–6): 766–775.
38.
HermidaA (2010) Twittering the news: The emergence of ambient journalism. Journalism Practice4(3): 297–308.
39.
HijmansESchafraadPBuijsKd’HaenensL (2011) Wie Schrijft ons Nieuws? Een Analyse van Voorverpakt Nieuws en Brontransparantie in Binnenlandse Nieuwsonderwerpen in Vier Nederlandse en Vlaamse Kwaliteitskranten [Who writes our news? An analysis of pre-packaged news and source transparency in domestic coverage in four Dutch and Flemish quality newspapers]. Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap39(2): 77–91.
40.
JongbloedWLaufENegenbornR (2009) Over Nieuws en het ANP [About news and ANP]. Hilversum: Commissariaat voor de Media.
41.
JoyeS (2010) De Media(de)constructie van Rampen: Een Multimethodisch Longitudinaal Onderzoek naar de Vlaamse Nieuwsberichtgeving over Nationale en Internationale Rampen [The media (de)construction of disasters]. Ghent: University Press.
42.
KaplanAMHaenleinM (2010) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons53: 59–68.
43.
KnightM (2011) The Origin of Stories: How Journalists Find and Create News in an Age of Social Media, Competition and Churnalism. Paper presented at the Future of Journalism Conference, September, Cardiff, UK.
44.
LariscyRWAveryEJSweetserKDHowesP (2009) An examination of the role of online social media in journalists’ source mix. Public Relations Review35(3): 314–316.
45.
LenattiC (2009) All a-Twitter: Social networking as a tool for newspaper journalists. The Seybold Report9(3): 2–4.
46.
LewisJWilliamsAFranklinBThomasJMosdellN (2006) The Quality and Independence of British Journalism: Tracking the Changes over 20 Years. Cardiff: Cardiff University.
47.
Lopez-RabadanP (2011) New Trends in Political Journalism: The Management of Specialized Sources as Criterion in the Professional Renewal of Press. Paper presented at the Future of Journalism Conference, September, Cardiff, UK.
48.
LotanGGraeffEAnannyMGaffneyDPearceIBoydD (2011) The revolutions were tweeted: Information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. International Journal of Communication5: 1375–1405.
49.
McManusJH (1999[1994]) Market-driven journalism: Let the citizen beware? In: TumberH (ed.) News: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 180–190.
50.
MessnerMSouthJ (2011) Legitimizing Wikipedia: How US national newspapers frame and use the online encyclopedia in their coverage. Journalism Practice5(2): 145–160.
51.
MorozovE (2009) Iran: Downside to the ‘Twitter Revolution’. Dissent56(4): 10–14.
52.
O’NeillDO’ConnorC (2009) The passive journalist: How sources dominate local news. Journalism Practice2(1): 487–500.
53.
PaulussenSUgilleP (2008) User generated content in the newsroom: Professional and organisational constraints on participatory journalism. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture5(2): 24–41.
54.
PaulussenSUgilleP (2010) Werkvoorwaarden in de Vlaamse pers [Work conditions in the Flemish press]. In: PaulussenSRaeymaeckersK (eds) Journalisten: Profiel van een Beroepsgroep [Journalists: Profile of a professional group]. Leuven: LannooCampus, 53–66.
55.
ReichZ (2010) Measuring the impact of PR on published news in increasingly fragmented news environments. Journalism Studies11(6): 799–816.
56.
ReichZ (2011) Source credibility and journalism: Between visceral and discretional judgement. Journalism Practice5(1): 51–67.
57.
SalterL (2005) The communicative structures of journalism and public relations. Journalism6(1): 90–106.
58.
SchaperJWelbersKDenekampMKrijtM (2010) News from abroad in the newspaper. Dutch News Monitor.
59.
Van HoutTJacobsG (2008) News production theory and practice: Fieldwork notes on power, interaction and agency. Pragmatics18(1): 59–85.
60.
VerstraetenH (1996) The media and the transformation of the public sphere: A contribution for a critical political economy of the public sphere. European Journal of Communication11(3): 347–370.
61.
WebsterF (2011) Information and democracy: The weakening of social democracy. In: PapathanassopoulosS (ed.) Media Perspectives in the 21st Century. New York: Routledge, 21–40.
62.
WesterFvan SelmM (2006) Inhoudsanalyse als systematisch-kwantificerende werkwijze [Content analysis as a systematic-quantifying method]. In: WesterFRenckstorfKScheepersP (eds) Onderzoekstypen in de Communicatiewetenschap [Research methods in communication sciences]. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 121–150.
63.
WolfsfeldG (2011) Making Sense of Media and Politics. New York: Routledge.
64.
WoutersRDe SwertKWalgraveS (2009) Een Venster op de Wereld – De Actuele Staat van Buitenlandberichtgeving: Feiten, Impact en Actieruimte [A window on the world – Status questions of foreign coverage: Facts, impact and space for action]. Brussel: Vlaams Vredesinstituut.
