Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

While international scholarly momentum continues to build around Ulrich Beck's ideas on risk, politics and reflexivity, his commentary on transformative democracy is only beginning to attract scholarly interest. To better understand the theoretical and conceptual dynamics of transformative democracy in the age of second modernity, I use Mark Poster's work on digital media and the culture of under-determination to focus analytical attention on the socio-technical domains from which the democratic-cosmopolitan imperative should be expected to garner strength. I argue that Beck's largely structuralist cosmopolitanization thesis can be strengthened by a supplemental understanding of the material-communicative dimensions inherent to processes of individualization, reflexive modernization and sub-political mobilization. Introducing certain correctives to Beck's `cosmopolitan manifesto', I explore the complexities of second modern communicative agency and the constitution of the reflexive, socio-technical subject. My primary purpose is to develop theoretical and conceptual insights into the socio-technical aspects of transformative democracy in second modernity.

Keywords

cosmopolitanism digitalization second modernity social movements socio-technologies subjectivity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agre, P. (2002) `Real-Time Politics: The Internet and the Political Process', The Information Society 18(5): 311—31.

Beck, U. (1992) `From Industrial Society to the Risk Society: Questions of Survival, Social Structure, and Ecological Enlightenment', Theory, Culture and Society 9(1): 97—123.

Beck, U. (1995) Ecological Enlightenment: Essays on the Politics of the Risk Society. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

Beck, U. (1999) World Risk Society. Cambridge : Polity Press.

Beck, U. (2000) `The Cosmopolitan Perspective: Sociology of the Second Age of Modernity', British Journal of Sociology 51(1): 79—105.

Beck, U. (2002a) `The Terrorist Threat: World Risk Society Revisited', Theory, Culture and Society 19(4): 39—55.

Beck, U. (2002b) `Cosmopolitan Society and its Enemies', Theory , Culture and Society 19(1—2): 17—44.

Beck, U. and E. Beck-Gernsheim (2002) Individualization. London: Sage.

Beck, U. Bonss , W. and C. Lau (2003) `The Theory of Reflexive Modernization: Problematic, Hypotheses and Research Programme', Theory, Culture and Society 20(2):1—33.

10.

Beck, U. and C. Lau (2005) `Second Modernity as a Research Agenda: Theoretical and Empirical Explorations in the “Meta-Change” of Modern Society', British Journal of Sociology 56(4): 525—58.

11.

Beck, U. and N. Sznaider (2006) `Unpacking Cosmopolitanism for the Social Sciences: A Research Agenda', British Journal of Sociology 57(1): 1—24.

12.

Beck, U. and L.J. Willms (2004) Conversations with Ulrich Beck. Cambridge: Polity Press.

13.

Bennett (2003) `Communicating Global Activism', Information, Communication and Society 6(2): 143—68.

14.

Brubaker, R. and F. Cooper (2000) `Beyond Identity', Theory and Society 29(1): 1—47.

15.

Buchstein, H. (1997) `Bytes that Bite: The Internet and Deliberative Democracy', Constellations 4(2): 248—63.

16.

Carroll, W. and Hackett ( 2006) `Democratic Media Activism Through the Lens of Social Movement Theory', Media, Culture & Society 28(1): 83—104.

17.

Castells, M. (1997) The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.

18.

Castells, M. (2001) The Internet Galaxy. Oxford : Oxford University Press.

19.

Delanty, G. (2006) `The Cosmopolitan Imagination: Critical Cosmopolitanism and Social Theory', British Journal of Sociology 57(1): 25—47.

20.

Deleuze, G. and F. Guattari (1987) A Thousand Plateaus. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.

21.

DeLuca, K. and J. Peeples (2002) `From Public Sphere to Public Screen: Democracy, Activism, and the “Violence” of Seattle', Critical Studies in Mass Communication 19(2): 125—51.

22.

Elliot, A. (2002) `Beck's Sociology of Risk: A Critical Assessment ', Sociology 36(2): 293—315.

23.

Fraser, N. (1997) Justice Interruptus. New York : Routledge.

24.

Falk, R. (1995) On Humane Governance. Cambridge : Polity Press.

25.

Hand, M. and B. Sandywell (2002) `E-Topia as Cosmopolis or Citadel: On the Democratizing and De-Democratizing Logics of the Internet, or, Towards a Critique of the New Technological Fetishism', Theory, Culture and Society 19(1—2): 197—225.

26.

Held, D. (1995) Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. California: Stanford University Press.

27.

Langman, L. (2005) `From Virtual Public Sphere to Global Justice: A Critical Theory of Internetworked Social Movements,' Sociological Theory 23(1): 42—74.

28.

Lash, S. (1994) `Reflexivity and its Double Structure: Structure, Aesthetics, Community ', in U. Beck, A. Giddens and S. Lash Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Aesthetics and Tradition in the Modern Social Order, pp. 110—73. Cambridge: Polity.

29.

Lash, S. (2002) `Forward By Scott Lash: Individualization in a Non-Linear Mode ', in U. Beck and E. Beck Gernsheim's Individualization , pp. vii-xii. Cambridge: Polity.

30.

Lash, S. (2003) `Reflexivity as Non-Linear', Theory, Culture and Society 20(2): 49—57.

31.

Latour, B. (2003) `Is Re-Modernization Occurring — And if so, How to Prove It?' Theory, Culture and Society 20(2): 35—48.

32.

Poster, M. (1990) The Mode of Information: Poststructuralism and Social Context. Cambridge: Polity Press.

33.

Poster, M. (1995) The Second Media Age. Cambridge : Polity Press.

34.

Poster, M. (2001) What's the Matter with the Internet? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

35.

Sardar, Z. (1996) `alt.civilization.faq: Cyberspace as the Darker Side of the West', in Z. Sardar and J. Ravetz (eds) Cyberfutures , pp. 14—41. New York: New York University Press.

36.

Stevenson, N. (2002) `Cosmopolitanism and the Future of Democracy: Politics, Culture and the Self', New Political Economy 7(2): 251—76.

Transformative democracy in the age of second modernity: cosmopolitanization,communicative agency and the reflexive subject

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References