Evidence-based policing (EBP) is an important strand of the UK’s College of Policing’s Police Education Qualifications Framework (PEQF), itself a component of a professionalisation agenda. This article argues that the two dominant approaches to EBP, experimental criminology and crime science, offer limited scope for the development of a comprehensive knowledge base for policing. Although both approaches share a common commitment to the values of science, each recognizes their limited coverage of policing topics. The fundamental difference between them is what each considers ‘best’ evidence. This article critically examines the generation of evidence by these two approaches and proposes an extension to the range of issues EBP should cover by utilizing a greater plurality of methods to exploit relevant research. Widening the scope of EBP would provide a broader foundational framework for inclusion in the PEQF and offers the potential for identifying gaps in the research, constructing blocks for knowledge building, and syllabus development in higher level police education.
BrinerRBDenyerD (2012) Systematic review and evidence synthesis as a practice and scholarship tool. In: RousseauDM (ed.) Handbook of Evidence-Based Management: Companies, Classrooms, and Research. New York: University Press, 112–129.
2.
BrinerRBDenyerDRousseauDM (2009) Evidence-based management: concept clean-up time?The Academy of Management Perspectives23(4): 19–32.
3.
BroughPBrownJMBiggsA (2015) Improving Criminal Justice Workplaces: Translating Theory and Research into Evidence-Based Practice(Vol. 32). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
4.
BroughPBrownJBiggsA. (2016) Improving criminal justice workplaces; translating theory and research into evidence-based practice. London: Routledge.
5.
BryantRCockcroftTTongSWoodD (2014) Police training and education; past, present and future. In: BrownJ (ed.) The Future of Policing. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 383–397.
6.
BullockKTilleyN (2009) Evidence-based policing and crime reduction. Policing3(4): 381–387.
7.
Cabinet Office (1999) Modernising Government, London: The Stationery Office.
8.
CainM (1979) Trends in the sociology of police work. International Journal of Sociology of Law7: 143–167.
9.
CanterDV (2004) A tale of two cultures: a comparison of the cultures of the police and academia. In: AdlamRVilliersP (eds) Policing a Safe, Just and Tolerant Society: An International Model for Policing. Winchester, UK: Waterside Press, 109–121.
10.
CartwrightN (2012) RCTs, evidence and predicting policy effectiveness. In: KincaidH (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 298–318.
11.
ClarkeRV (2004) Technology, criminology and crime science. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research10(1): 55–63.
12.
CockbainELaycockG (2017) Crime science. In: Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DickPJankowiczD (2001) A social constructionist account of police culture and its influence on the representation and progression of female officers: a repertory grid analysis in a UK police force. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management24(2): 181–199.
16.
DuttonDGCorvoK (2006) Transforming a flawed policy: a call to revive psychology and science in domestic violence research and practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior11(5): 457–483.
17.
FarrellGPeaseK (1993) Once bitten, twice bitten: Repeat victimisation and its implications for crime prevention. Home Office Police Research Group Crime and Detection Prevention Series. Paper 46. Available at: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/bitstream/2134/2149/1/Once_Bitten.pdf(accessed 20 December 2017).
18.
FarrellGTilleyNTseloniAMailleyJ (2010) Explaining and sustaining the crime drop: clarifying the role of opportunity-related theories. Crime Prevention and Community Safety12(1): 24–41.
19.
FarringtonDPPetrosinoA (2001) The Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science578(1): 35–49.
20.
Flanagan SirR (2008) Review of Policing; Final Report. London: HMSO.
21.
FosterJBaileyS (2010) Joining forces: maximizing ways of making a difference in policing. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice4(2): 95–103.
GreenTGatesA (2014) Understanding the process of professionalisation in the police organisation. The Police Journal87(2): 75–91.
24.
GreeneJR (2014) New directions in policing: balancing prediction and meaning in police research. Justice Quarterly31(2): 193–228.
25.
HaggertyKD (2007) The Novelty of Crime Science Review of Crime Science: New Approaches to Preventing and Detecting Crime,edited by SmithMelissa J.TilleyNick. Policing and Society17(1): 83.
26.
HallsworthS (2013) The Gang and Beyond; Interpreting Violent Street Worlds. New York: Palgrave.
27.
HeadBW (2008) Three lenses of evidence-based policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration67(1): 1–11.
28.
HeatonRTongS (2015) Evidence-based policing: from effectiveness to cost-effectiveness. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice10(1): 60–70.
29.
HeskethIIHartleyJ (2016) Public value; a new means to PEEL an apple. European Police Science and Research Bulletin13: 64–69.
30.
HollinCR (2008) Evaluating offending behaviour programmes: does only randomization glister?Criminology and Criminal Justice8(1): 89–106.
31.
HopeT (2004) Pretend it works: evidence and governance in the evaluation of the Reducing Burglary Initiative. Criminal Justice4(3): 287–308.
32.
HopeT. (2006) Book review. Theoretical Criminology, 10:245–250.
33.
HoughM (2010) Gold standard or fool’s gold? The pursuit of certainty in experimental criminology. Criminology and Criminal Justice10(1): 11–22.
34.
HoughM (2011) Criminology and the role of experimental research. In: BosworthMHoyleC (eds) What is Criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 198–210.
35.
HunterGMayTHoughM (2017) An Evaluation of the What Works Centre for Crime Reduction: Final Report. London: ICPR, Birkbeck.
36.
HunterGWigzellAMayTMcSweeneyT (2015) An Evaluation of the What Works Centre for Crime Reduction: Baseline Report. London: ICPR, Birkbeck.
37.
IngoldJMonaghanM (2016) Evidence translation: an exploration of policy makers’ use of evidence. Policy & Politics44(2): 171–190.
38.
InnesM (2005) Why ‘soft’ policing is hard: on the curious development of reassurance policing, how it became neighbourhood policing and what this signifies about the politics of police reform. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology15(3): 156–169.
39.
InnesM (2014) Reinventing the office of constable-progressive policing in an age of austerity. In: BrownJ (ed.) The Future of Policing. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 64–78.
40.
InnesMAbbottLLoweTRobertsC (2009) Seeing like a citizen: field experiments in ‘community intelligence-led policing’. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal10(2): 99–114.
JohnsonSDTilleyNBowersKJ (2015) Introducing EMMIE: an evidence rating scale to encourage mixed-method crime prevention synthesis reviews. Journal of Experimental Criminology11(3): 459–473.
43.
JonesTNewburnTSmithDJ (1996) Policing and the idea of democracy. British Journal of Criminology36(2): 182–198.
44.
KoperCS (1995) Just enough police presence: reducing crime and disorderly behavior by optimizing patrol time in crime hot spots. Justice Quarterly12(4): 649–672.
45.
KnutssonJTompsonL (eds) (2017) Advances in Evidence-Based Policing. London: Taylor & Francis.
46.
LaycockG (2000) From central research to local practice: identifying and addressing repeat victimization. Public Money and Management20(4): 17–22.
47.
LaycockG. (2005) Defining crime science. In: SmithMTilleyN. (Eds.) Crime science; new approaches to preventing and detecting crime. Cullompton: Willan (pp. 3–24).
48.
LaycockG (2008) What is crime science. Policing2: 149–153.
LeighAReadTTilleyN (1996) Problem-Oriented Policing. Brit Pop. Home Office Police Research Group Crime and Detection Prevention Series. Paper 75. London: Home Office.
51.
LippertRStensonK. (2010) Advancing governmentality studies Lessons from social constructionism. Theoretical criminology14(4): 473–494.
52.
LoaderISparksR. (2010) Public criminology?London: Routledge.
53.
LumCKennedyLW (2012) In support of evidence-based approaches: a rebuttal to Gloria Laycock. Policing6(4): 317–323.
54.
LumCKoperCS (2017) Evidence-Based Policing: Translating Research into Practice. Oxford: Clarendon.
55.
LumCKoperCSTelepCW (2011) The evidence-based policing matrix. Journal of Experimental Criminology7(1): 3–26.
56.
LumsdenKGoodeJ (2016) Policing research and the rise of the ‘evidence-base’: police officer and staff understandings of research, its implementation and ‘what works’. Sociology, iFirst: doi:http://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516664684
57.
MarunaS (2010) Mixed method research in criminology: why not go both ways? In: PiqueroARWeisburdD (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Criminology. New York: Springer, 123–140.
58.
MazeikaDBartholomewBDistlerMThomasKGreenmanSPrattS (2010) Trends in police research: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2000–2007 literature. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal11(6): 520–547.
59.
MazerolleLEgginsEHigginsonAStankoB. (2017) Evidence-based policing as a disruptive innovation: the Global Policing Database as a disruptive too. In: KnutssonJTompsonL. (eds) Advances in evidence-based policing. London: Routledge (pp. 117–138).
NeyroudP (2009) Squaring the circles: research, evidence, policy-making, and police improvement in England and Wales. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal10(5–6): 437–449.
62.
NeyroudPViegas FerreiraEVeraA (2015) European police science and evidence based policing. European Police Science and Research Bulletin13: 6–8.
63.
PawsonRTilleyN (1994) What works in evaluation research?British Journal of Criminology34(3): 291–306.
64.
PrenzlerTFlemingJBoyesA. (2010) Gender equity in Australian and New Zealand policing; a five year review. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 12: 584–595.
SackettDRosenbergJMuir GrayRHaynesWRichardsonS. (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 312: 71–72.
68.
RynesSBartunekJ. (2017) Evidence-based management; foundations, development, controversies and future. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior4: 295–261.
69.
SackettDLStrausSERichardsonWSRosenbergWMCHaynesRB (2000) Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. London: Churchill Livingstone.
70.
SavageS (2007) Police Reform: Forces for Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71.
SchulenbergJL (2007) Analysing police decision-making: assessing the application of a mixed-method/mixed-model research design. International Journal of Social Research Methodology10(2): 99–119.
ShermanLW (2009) Evidence based policing: what we know, and how we know it. Paper in Scottish Institute for Policing Research: Policing: Connecting Evidence and Practice. SIPR Annual Lectures, 2007–2012. Available at:http://www.sipr.ac.uk/downloads/SIPR_Annual_Lectures_0712.pdf(accessed 20 December 2017).
76.
ShermanLW (2015) A tipping point for ‘totally evidenced policing’ ten ideas for building an evidence-based police agency. International Criminal Justice Review25(1): 11–29.
77.
ShermanLWBerkRA (1984) The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review49: 261–272.
78.
SkalanskyD (2014) The promise and perils of police professionalism. In: BrownJ (ed.) The Future of Policing. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 343–354.
79.
SmithMTilleyN. (Eds) (2005) Crime science: new approaches to preventing and detecting crime. Cullompton: Willan.
TelepCW (2016) Expanding the scope of evidence-based policing. Criminology & Public Policy15(1): 243–252.
84.
ThacherD (2001) Policing is not a treatment: alternatives to the medical model of police research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency38(4): 387–415.
85.
ThacherD (2008) Research for the front lines. Policing & Society18(1): 46–59.
86.
TilleyN (2000) Realistic evaluation: an overview. In: Founding Conference of the Danish Evaluation Society, September 2000.
87.
TilleyN (2016) EMMIE and engineering; what works as evidence to improve decisions?Evaluation22(3): 304–372.
88.
TilleyNLaycockG (2016) Engineering a better society. Public Safety Leadership Research Forum4(2): 1–6.
89.
TilleyNLaycockG (2017) The why what when and how of evidence based policing. In: KnutssonJTompsonL (eds) Advances in Evidence-Based Policing. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 10–26.
90.
TompsonGKnutssonJ (2017) A realistic agenda for evidence based policing. In: KnutssonJTompsonL (eds) Advances in Evidence-Based Policing. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 214–224.
91.
TompsonLBelurJMorrisJTuffinR (2017) Elevating research receptivity through experiential learning: police–researcher partnerships. In: KnutssonJTompsonL (eds) Advances in Evidence-Based Policing. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 175–194.
92.
Van DijkAHoogewoningFPunchM (2016) Policing at a turning point; implications for research. In: BrungerMTongSMartinD (eds) Introduction to Policing Research. London: Routledge, 29–41.
93.
VeigasHLumC (2013) Assessing the evidence base of a police service patrol portfolio. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice7(3): 248–262.
94.
VollmerA (1936) The Police and Modern Society; Plain Talk Based on Practical Experience. Berkeley: University of California Press.
95.
WardAPrenzlerT (2016) Good practice case studies in the advancement of women in policing. International Journal of Police Science & Management18(4): 242–250.
96.
WeisburdDNeyroudP (2013) Police science: toward a new paradigm. Australasian Policing5(2): 13.
97.
WeisburdDTelepCW (2014) Hot spots policing: what we know and what we need to know. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice30(2): 200–220.
98.
WillisJJMastrofskiSD (2016) Improving policing by integrating craft and science: what can patrol officers teach us about good police work?Policing and Society1–18.
99.
WillisJJMastrofskiSSWeisburdD (2007) Compstat and bureaucracy: a case study of challenges and opportunities for change. Justice Quarterly21: 463–496.
100.
WilliamsECockcroftT(forthcoming)Knowledge wars: professionalisation, organisational justice and competing knowledge paradigms in British policing. In HueyLMitchellR (eds) Evidence-Based Policing: An Introduction. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
101.
WoodDCockcroftTTongSBryantR (2017) The importance of context and cognitive agency in developing police knowledge: going beyond the police science discourse. The Police Journaldoi: 0032258X17696101.
102.
WoodDTongD (2009) The future if initial police training; a university perspective. International Journal of Police Management and Science11: 294–305.
