Implementing Reforms in Community Corrections: Lessons Learned During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

This mixed-method study examined changes implemented in Pennsylvania community corrections agencies during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. We surveyed (N = 54; 83% response rate) and interviewed (N = 10) county Chiefs of probation and parole regarding changes to agency policies, processes of this change, and expected sustainability. Findings revealed meaningful changes to community corrections policy initiated by the pandemic through new modes of supervision contact —such as “curbside probation”— and new policies regarding violations of supervision that align with evidence-based principles. The moment’s urgency provided a rare but effective impetus for reform, but perceptions of sustainability varied across Chiefs’ role orientations. Our findings demonstrate how this moment expanded the footprint of evidence-based practice through local criminal justice reform and reveal new insights into capacities for and processes of change.

Keywords

community corrections mixed-methods evidence-based practice correctional reform implementation policy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahlin

E. M.

Hagen

C. A.

Harmon

M. A.

Crosse

(2016). Kiosk reporting among probationers in the United States. The Prison Journal, 96(5), 688–708.

Allard

T. J.

Wortley

R. K.

Stewart

A. L.

(2003). Role conflict in community corrections. Psychology Crime and Law, 9(3), 279–289.

Ballotpedia. (n.d.). Documenting Pennsylvania’s path to recovery from the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, 2020 2021. Retrieved September 20, 2021, from https://ballotpedia.org/Documenting_Pennsylvania%27s_path_to_recovery_from_the_coronavirus_(COVID-19)_pandemic,_2020-2021

Bonta

Andrews

D. A.

(2007). Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Die Rehabilitation, 6(1), 1–22.

Bourgon

(2013). The demands on probation officers in the evolution of evidence-based practice: The forgotten foot soldier of community corrections. Federal Probation, 77(2), 30–35.

Carr

(2021). Probation in a pandemic. Probation Journal, 68(1), 3–7.

Chamberlain

A. W.

Gricius

Wallace

D. M.

Borjas

Ware

V. M.

(2018). Parolee-Parole officer rapport: Does it impact recidivism? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(11), 3581–3602.

Clear

T. R.

Latessa

E. J.

(1993). Probation officers’ roles in intensive supervision: Surveillance versus treatment. Justice Quarterly, 10(3), 441–462.

Cullen

F. T.

Jonson

C. L.

Mears

D. P.

(2017). Reinventing community corrections. Crime and Justice, 46(1), 27–93.

10.

DeCelles

K. A.

Tesluk

P. E.

Taxman

F. S.

(2013). A field investigation of multilevel cynicism toward change. Organization Science, 24(1), 154–171.

11.

Deterding

N. M.

Waters

M. C.

(2021). Flexible coding of in-depth interviews: A twenty-first-century approach. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(2), 708–739.

12.

Huebner

B. M.

Lentz

T. S.

Gibson

(2020). Systematic case review strategies: An application for jail population reduction. Justice Quarterly, 37(7), 1–16.

13.

Jones

(2018). Correctional control 2018: Incarceration and supervision by state. Prison Policy Initiative. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/correctionalcontrol2018.html.

14.

Kaeble

Alper

(2020). Probation and Parole in the United States, 2017–2018. Bureau of Justice Statistics.

15.

Klingele

(2015). The promises and perils of evidence-based corrections. The Notre Dame Law Review, 91, 537.

16.

Kras

K. R.

Rudes

D. S.

Taxman

F. S.

(2017). Managing up and down: Community corrections middle managers’ role conflict and ambiguity during organizational change. Journal of Crime and Justice, 40(2), 173–187.

17.

Lin

Grattet

Petersilia

(2010). “Back-end sentencing” and reimprisonment: Individual, organizational, and community predictors of parole sanctioning decisions. Criminology, 48(3), 759–795.

18.

Lutze

F. E.

Johnson

W. W.

Clear

T. R.

Latessa

E. J.

Slate

R. N.

(2012). The future of community corrections is now: Stop dreaming and take action. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 28(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986211432193

19.

Marcum

C. D.

(2020). American corrections system response to COVID-19: An examination of the procedures and policies used in spring 2020. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 759–768.

20.

Miller

Maloney

(2020). Facilitators of practitioner adherence to a risk/need assessment tool: Hypothesis testing on a survey of juvenile probation officers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64(16), 1757–1778.

21.

Miller

J. M.

Blumstein

(2020). Crime, justice & the COVID-19 pandemic: Toward a national research agenda. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(4), 515–524.

22.

Miller

(2015). Contemporary modes of probation officer supervision: The triumph of the “synthetic” officer?. Justice Quarterly, 32(2), 314–336.

23.

Palinkas

L. A.

Aarons

G. A.

Horwitz

Chamberlain

Hurlburt

Landsverk

(2011). Mixed method designs in implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(1), 44–53.

24.

Pennsylvania Department of Corrections. (n.d.). COVID-19 and the DOC. Retrieved September 21, 2021, from https://www.cor.pa.gov/Pages/COVID-19.aspx.

25.

Petersilia

(2011). Community corrections: Probation, parole, and prisoner reentry. Crime and Public Policy, 499, 531.

26.

Phelps

M. S.

(2013). The paradox of probation: Community supervision in the age of mass incarceration. Law & Policy, 35(1-2), 51–80.

27.

Pickett

Cullen

Bushway

S. D.

Chiricos

Alpert

(2018). The response rate test: Nonresponse bias and the future of survey research in criminology and criminal justice. SSRN Electronic Journal, 43(1), 7–11.

28.

Rudes

D. S.

Lerch

Taxman

F. S.

(2011). Implementing a reentry framework at a correctional facility: Challenges to the culture. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50(8), 467–491.

29.

Saunders

Midgette

Taylor

Faraji

(2021). A hidden cost of convenience: Disparate impacts of a program to reduce burden on probation officers and participants. Criminology & Public Policy, 20(1), 71–122.

30.

Stickle

Felson

(2020). Crime rates in a pandemic: The largest criminological experiment in history. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(4), 525–536.

31.

Taxman

F. S.

(2008). No illusions: Offender and organizational change in Maryland’s proactive community supervision efforts. Criminology & Public Policy, 7(2), 275–302.

32.

Taxman

F. S.

(2018). The partially clothed emperor: Evidence-based practices. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 34(1), 97–114.

33.

Viglione

(2017). Street-level decision making: Acceptability, feasibility, and use of evidence-based practices in adult probation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(10), 1356–1381.

34.

Viglione

Alward

L. M.

Lockwood

Bryson

(2020). Adaptations to COVID-19 in community corrections agencies across the United States. Victims & Offenders, 15, 1277–1297.

35.

Viglione

Blasko

B. L.

Taxman

F. S.

(2018). Organizational factors and probation officer use of evidence-based practices: A multilevel examination. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(6), 1648–1667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X16681091

36.

Viglione

Taxman

F. S.

(2018). Low risk offenders under probation supervision: Risk management and the risk-needs-responsivity framework. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(12), 1809–1831.

37.

Walker

(1993). Taming the system: The control of discretion in criminal justice, 1950–1990. Oxford University Press.

38.

Wooditch

Duhaime

Meyer

(2016). Street-level discretion and organizational effectiveness in probation services. Federal Probation, 80, 39.

39.

World Health Organization. (n.d.). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Retrieved March 30, 2021, from https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019.