The process of developing organisational excellence requires identifying benchmarks and a model or framework to guide the operationalisation of an organisation's aspirations. Developing evidence through application of strategies to meet benchmark criteria requires commitment at all levels of an organisation to demonstrate a sustained quality level of achievement through continuous improvement to standards of excellence. This article presents the process and outcomes for a police organisation (Abu Dhabi Police [ADP]) utilising the European Foundation for Quality Management (EfQM) criteria to guide development and measurement of organisational excellence. In 2021 ADP were awarded a 6 Star Global Award from the EfQM. This case study explores the extent to which EfQM is an effective framework for organisational excellence in policing.
AlmazroueiA (2017) Framework for effective excellence model implementation in police organisations: case study in Abu Dhabi police. International Journal of Management Cases19(3): 47–78.
2.
AlosaniMS (2020) Case example of the use of Six Sigma and Kaizen projects in policing services. Teaching Public Administration38(3): 333–345.
3.
Al RamahiAM (2015) An examination of strategic performance enablers: a case study of Abu Dhabi Police perceptions. Unpublished dissertation, Nottingham Trent University, UK.
4.
BarendsERousseauDM (2018) Evidence-based Management: How to Use Evidence to Make Better Organisational Decisions. New York: Kogan Page.
BayleyDH (2006) Changing the Guard: Developing Democratic Police Abroad. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
BoulterLBendellTDahlgaardJ (2013) Total quality beyond North America: a comparative analysis of the performance of European Excellence Award winners. International Journal of Operations & Production Management33(2): 197–215.
8.
ColoverSQuintonP (2018) Neighbourhood Policing: Impact and Implementation. London: College of Policing.
Den HeyerG (2021) New Zealand Police’s Policing Excellence and Prevention First strategy: a new strategy to police service delivery. In: AlbrechtJFDen HeyerG (eds) Enhancing Police Service Delivery: Global Perspectives and Contemporary Policy Implications. Cham: Springer Nature.
11.
DonnellyMKerrNJRimmerR, et al. (2006) Assessing the quality of police services using SERVQUAL. Policing: An International Journal29(1): 92–105.
12.
EfQM (European Foundation for Quality Management) (2020) The EfQM Model. Available at: https://www.efqm.org/efqm-model/ (accessed 4 July 2023).
13.
EskildsenJKKristensenKJørn JuhlH (2004) Private versus public sector excellence. The TQM Magazine16(1): 50–56.
14.
FonsecaLAmaralAOliveiraJ (2021) Quality 4.0: the EFQM 2020 model and Industry 4.0 relationships and implications. Sustainability13(3107): 1–20.
15.
GayWG (1996) Benchmarking: A Method for Achieving Superior Performance in Law Enforcement. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs.
16.
GillCWeisburdDWTelepC, et al. (2014) Community-oriented policing to reduce crime, disorder and fear and increase satisfaction and legitimacy amongst citizens: a systematic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology10: 399–428.
17.
GomezJGCostaMMLorenteARM (2011) A critical evaluation of the EfQM model. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management28(5): 484–502.
18.
HitchcockAHolmesASundorphE (2017) Bobbies on the Net: A Police Workforce for the Digital Age. London: Reform.
KaufmannDKraayAMaztruzziM (2010) The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. The World Bank Development Research Group, Policy Research Working Paper 5430.
21.
LumCKoperC (2017) Evidence-based Policing. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
LumCKoperCSWilsonDB, et al. (2020) Body-worn cameras’ effects on police officers and citizen behavior: a systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews16: e1112.
23.
MaskályJIvkovićSKNeyroudP (2021) Policing the COVID-19 pandemic: exploratory study of the types of organizational changes and police activities across the globe. International Criminal Justice Review31(3): 266–285.
24.
NairA (2006) Meta-analysis of the relationship between quality management practices and firm performance - implications for quality management theory development. Journal of Operations Management24: 948–975.
25.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NAS) (2021) Policing to Promote the Rule of Law and Protect the Population: An Evidence-based Approach. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26217 (accessed 4 July 2023).
26.
National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA) (2011) What Works in Organisational Change and Business Improvement? Key Findings and Implications for Practice. A Summary of Two Rapid Evidence Assessments. London: NPIA, Research and Analysis Unit.
27.
NenadalJ (2020) The new EfQM model: what is really new and could be considered as a suitable tool as respect to quality 4.0 concept?Quality Innovation Prosperity24(1): 17–28.
28.
NeyroudPW (2021a) Policing “landscapes” for the rule of law and public protection: A review of the available evidence on organizational policies, structures, and human resources. Paper prepared for the Committee on the Evidence to Advance Reform in the Global Security and Justice Sectors, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Available at: https://www.nationalacademies.org/our-work/evidence-to-advance-reform-in-the-global-security-and-justice-sectors (accessed 4 July 2023).
29.
NeyroudPW (2021b) Community Policing Evidence review and Checklist. Unpublished papers prepared for the UNODC.
30.
NeyroudPWShermanLW (2013) Dialogue and dialectic: police legitimacy and the new professionalism. In: TankebeJLieblingA (eds) Legitimacy in Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 293–308.
31.
PizaELWelshBCFarringtonDP, et al. (2019) CCTV Surveillance for crime prevention: a 40-year systematic review with meta-analysis. Criminology and Public Policy18: 135–159.
ShermanLWMiltonCHKellyTV (1973) Team Policing: Seven Case Studies. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
36.
ShermanLWNeyroudPWNeyroudEC (2016) The Cambridge Crime Harm Index: measuring total harm from crime based on sentencing guidelines. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice10(3): 171–183.
37.
SklanskyDA (2007) Seeing blue: police reform, occupational culture and cognitive burn-in. In: O'NeillMMonique MarksM (eds) Police Occupational Culture: New Debates and Directions. New York: Elsevier Science.
38.
SuarezECalvo-MoraARoldanJL, et al. (2017) Quantitative research on the EfQM excellence model: a systematic review of the literature (1991–2015). European Research on Management and Business Economics23(3): 147–156.
39.
TariJ (2006) Improving service quality in a Spanish police service. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence17(3): 409–424.
40.
United Nations (2023) Available at: un.org/ruleoflaw/what-is-the-rule-of-law (accessed 4 July 2023).
41.
VitaleA (2017) The End of Policing. London: Verso Books.
