Recommended target audience,course content and learning arrangements for teaching health informatics competencies: A scoping review

Abstract

Background: As healthcare depends on health information technology, there is a growing need for Health Informatics competencies in daily practice. This review aimed to explore how the teaching of education in HI has been arranged. 28 publications, published in English between 2016 and 2020 and obtained from selected bibliographic databases, were reviewed. The data was analyzed using deductive content analysis with the following pre-formulated topics: target audience, course content and learning arrangements. The results highlight three key competencies: documentation and communication, management, and understanding of health information technology. It underlines a blended teaching method to improve the competencies of healthcare professionals, graduates, undergraduates, and suggests adding active interactions, multi-professional interactions, and hands-on skills. This study highlights the importance of adapting to changes in healthcare, improving HI competencies in healthcare, and fostering positive digital experiences. It underlined the need for practical training, in theory and hands-on sessions, including key competencies in documentation and communication, management and health information systems.

Keywords

Health informatics competencies course content learning arrangement target audience

Introduction

As healthcare services are based on patient data,¹ they cannot exist without health information technology (HIT). HIT supports daily work routines in healthcare, but it may also cause challenges and affect the work differently.² How well a system is integrated into the healthcare systems and individual health organizations varies depending on the user’s level of satisfaction.³ Some nurses, for example, may feel that they do not have the competencies or training to use digital tools for work. Currently, during typical educational programs for healthcare professionals, an inadequate level of education in informatics is offered, or in some cases no education in this field is provided.^2,3

Because of the challenges in healthcare, core competencies in informatics were developed to meet the needs of all healthcare professionals.⁴ Educational recommendations that have been developed to support education and competency developments in health informatics (HI).⁵ The International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) recommendations on Education in Biomedical and Health Informatics (BMHI) guide curricula and were developed by the IMIA for all healthcare professionals. The IMIA recommendations define and link the competencies and knowledge needed for all health informaticians and the profession.⁶ A certain level of expertise in HI is also essential in the nursing practice. For example, the Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform (TIGER), was developed to focus on integrating nursing, technology, and informatics into research development, education, and practice.⁷

The health IT Competences Tools and Repository (HITComp) was created as a recommendation for collecting data on the competencies and skills that are essential at various levels of knowledge and for various roles in healthcare. The HITComp Repository is a searchable database developed for everyone interested in HIT and plays a vital role in connecting competencies, education, and competence for all healthcare professionals.⁸ Further, the Commission on Accreditation for HI and Information Management Education (CAHIIM) focuses on establishing accreditation standards for the different programs.⁶ While HITComp is a tool and repository that can gather information on skills and competencies required in healthcare,⁸ CAHIIM is used to accredit educational programs to students aiming for a career in HI and health information management.⁹

Acquiring competencies in HI requires dedicated effort, motivating universities to proactively design and implement courses aimed at facilitating student’s in mastering these competencies. While optimal timing for introducing HI competencies to students remains uncertain, this presents an opportunity for universities to cultivate the competencies for students.^10–12 There are discussions about whether to teach HI at the bachelor’s and master’s levels,^1,10,13 or as a course for postgraduates and healthcare professionals.^11,14 The IMIA recommendations focus on delivering education, training, and high-quality healthcare in BMHI.⁶ The proposal suggests incorporating HI into the curriculum for undergraduates at both introductory and advanced levels within the first 2 years of their education. Introducing education on HIS in the later year of the academic program, particularly during the final years.¹⁵

The IMIA recommendations also divide learners into three different roles. The first role aims to introduce the learners to fundamental topics in BMHI, in other words a beginner’s level. Learners in the second role, the BMHI generalists, are learners from a non-BMHI background. The education for the BMHI generalists requires competencies and knowledge in assisting different biomedical and health informatics aspects and information technology. The third role, the BMHI specialists, are learners with a BMHI background. This role focuses on education where the learners focus on knowledge in their fields and specializations.¹⁵

A review by Nazeha¹⁶ indicates that competencies and knowledge in HI are relevant for all healthcare professionals and can be implemented into HI education.¹⁶ From a clinical practice perspective, it was shown that knowledge and positive experiences in HI contribute to the safe use of patient data and expertise to avoid errors in healthcare systems.¹⁷ Without training or HI education, healthcare professionals may be less interested and less willing to learn or use HIT due to feelings of incompetency.¹⁸ Positive experiences will encourage a willingness to adopt technology in daily work routines, and the work environment will also be positively affected.¹⁷

Objective

This review aimed to explore how the teaching of education in HI has been arranged. This study focuses on the content, learning arrangements, and target audience. The research questions for this study are: Who is the target audience for HI education? What is the typical content in HI education? What are the common methods of organizing HI education?

Methods

The scoping review methodology guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) were used to identify English language publications published between 2016 and January 2020. Table 1 Only publications published within this time frame were searched because of the competency needs generated by recent technology advancements.¹⁹

Table 1.

The search strategy.

Data base	Search string
Scopus	(TITLE-ABS-KEY (“health informatics” OR “medical informatics”) AND TITLE- ABS-KEY (education* OR curricul* OR program) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (recommendation* OR proposition* OR endorse*))
PubMed	(((“health informatics” OR “medical informatics”)) AND (education OR curricul* OR program)) AND (recommendation OR proposition* OR endorse*)
Web of Science (From web of Science core Collection)	TOPIC: ((“health informatics” OR “medical informatics”) AND (education* OR curricul* OR program) AND (recommendation* OR proposition* OR endorse*))

The PCC format¹⁹ was used to define the study population (P), concept (C), and context (C) (Figure 1, Table 2). The population was defined as the audience, including teachers, education planners, study advisers, executive teams, and HI-related teams. The concept was defined as educational recommendations, curricula, and degree programs in HI. The context included educational levels such as university education on all levels, basic studies, and advanced studies in HI. The bibliographical database MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were accessed with help from the informatics librarian. Only publications found in these three bibliographic databases were included in the review; gray literature was excluded. All publications were considered.

Figure 1.

Flow chart of the data collection according to PRISMA.²⁰

Table 2.

Inclusion criteria.

Inclusion criteria
PCC format	Participants	Concept	Context
Synonyms included	- Teachers - Students - Education planners - Study advisors - Executive teams - Different teams related to the teaching area	- Educational recommendations - Curricula - Degree programs in HI	- Educational environments in HI - University educational levels (undergraduate, graduates and postgraduates)
Timeline	2016 – 2020
Document type	- Articles (qualitative and quantitative)- Chapters in book- Conference proceedings- Book series
Language	English

Three members of the scoping review team screened the headings and abstracts of 359 publications (Figure 1). 72 full-text publications met the criteria for the second screening, of which 21 publications were excluded after the inclusion and exclusion criteria or were duplicates. Keywords (Table 1) that could be found in both the headings and abstracts were used as main inclusion criteria to find relevant publications. Figure 1 shows the PRISMA flowchart with a step-by-step method for how the scoping review was done .²⁰ Twenty-eight publications (Appendix 1) were chosen for the in-depth analysis and each of them was reviewed by at least two reviewers independently. The content was analyzed with deductive content analysis using a structured matrix²¹: ‘target audience’, learning arrangement’, and ‘course content’. Further, these preformulated themes were categorized into more accurate main themes and sub-themes. The content of the selected publications was read thoroughly and only content relevant to the preformulated themes were analyzed, categorized, and added under suitable main categories and sub-categories. Each main category and sub-category are presented in the tables with presentation of the results. Microsoft excel was used as the data extraction tool.

Results

Out of the 28 publications included, five studies were conducted in the USA, eight in Germany, four in Austria, three each in Finland and the UK, two in Canada, and one in Australia, Norway, and the Netherlands. Eight studies were published in both the years 2019 and 2017, six publications in 2018, and five publications in 2016. Only one study was published in January 2020.

11 studies discussed adapting and validating competencies in informatics, different standardized framework (e.g. TIGER and IMIA), nursing informatics and education in HI. Seven publications focused on the educational curriculum in HI and two publications discussed recommendations in HI. Two highlighted courses in HI, two highlighted hands-on skills, and one of each was concerned with online education, continuous education, and Health Data Sciences (Table 3).

Table 3.

Topics discussed in the publications.

Topics	Sub-category	References
Competency framework	Nursing informatics	^22–24
	Technology informatics guiding educational reform (TIGER)	^25–27
	American medical informatics association (AMIA)	²⁸
	International medical informatics association (IMIA)	²⁹
	Inter-professional eHealth competencies	³⁰
	Health informatics competencies	³¹
	Medical informatics	³²
Curriculum in HI	Nursing curricula	³³
	Biomedical and health informatics	³⁴
	Health informatics curricula	^35–37
	Pharmacy informatics	³⁸
	Public health informatics	³⁹
Recommendation	Health IT-evaluation	⁴⁰
Recommendation	National health information work force	⁴¹
Online course	Joint program	⁴²
Online course	Cross-countries and inter-professional	⁴³
Hands-on skills	Assess health informatics training	⁴⁴
Hands-on skills	Refresh ⁴⁵
Online degree	Online master’s program	⁴⁶
Continuous education	Topics for continuous education in nursing informatics	⁴⁰
Health data science	Health data system	⁴⁷

Who are the targets for HI education

Previous publications showed that healthcare professionals, including physicians^25,30,32,44 and nurses,^{23,25,26,30,31,46,48} as well as managers^25,31,46,48 should have competence in HI. It is also suggested for healthcare organizations,^26,27 employers ²⁴ and anyone working with HI⁴¹ (Appendix 1, Table 4).

Table 4.

Target audience.

Main category	Sub-category	References
Graduates	Master’s degree	^{23,27,28,34,35,39,42–46,49}
Undergraduates	Second-year students	³⁸
	Bachelor’s degree	^{33,34,36,42,43,48}
	Student trainees	²⁸
PhD students	PhD in clinical transitional sciences	²⁸
PhD students	Postgraduates	⁴⁹
Teachers	Educators	²²
Teachers	Teachers	^24,26,27
Healthcare professionals	Employers	²⁴
	Nurses	^{25,26,30,31,40,48}
	Nurse managers	^{23,25,31,40,48}
	Other staff members	^{29,37,40,41,44}
	Physicians	^{25,30,32,44,47}
	Specialists	²⁹
Other	Learners with different backgrounds	^24,28,29
	Certificates in informatics	³⁶
	Frontline clinicians	⁴⁴
	Healthcare organizations	^25,26,42

These competencies are also important for undergraduates,^{33,34,36,42,43,46,48} graduates^{23,27,28,34,35,39,40,42–46,49} PhD students and PhD candidates,^28,49 researchers²⁸ and teachers.^24,26,27 For those who want a certificate³⁶ or are interested in learning HI,^24,28,29 a continuing education program can be offered.

Course content

The studies (Appendix 1, Table 5) highlighted documentation and communication as one of the most important competencies in HI education. Documentation is the legal basis for electronic patient records and electronic medication and documentation systems⁴⁰ for transferring data between different systems in the care process.²⁴ To optimize the use of the healthcare systems, a standardized language is needed ^{24,28,29,31,33,37–40,43} to ensure the quality of documentation.⁴⁰ This also enables a better understanding of the care process²⁴ and patient-related work.³¹ It is important to understand both clinical and non-clinical data⁴³ and how to store, collect and access them.²⁸ The ideal is that every nursing and IT curriculum would teach basic terminologies in HI, classification systems and generic healthcare terminologies, although in practice not every nursing and IT curricula has included them.^29,30,33 Competencies in documentation and communication have an impact on hands-on skills³¹ in patient-related communication,^30,31,48 leadership-related communication,²⁶ and institutional-related communication.^{28,30,33,42,44} These competencies can be achieved by completing a practical training in which one could learn communication and documentation with the terminology used in HI.²⁶ Data protection and security is an essential part of documentation^{22,25,30,31,43,47} that needs to be taught. The same was true in the case of ethics in health IT.^24,25,30

Table 5.

Main category	Subcategory	References
Documentation and communication	Institutional-related information	^{28,30,33,42,44}
Leadership and communication	²⁶
Nursing-related documentation	^{22,25,27,31,40}
Standardized terminology	^{24,28,29,31,33,37–40,43}
Patient-related communication	^30,31,48
	Health literacy	²⁷
Data protection and security	Data privacy	^43,49
Patient privacy	²²
Management	Change management	^25,29
Data management	^27,28,32
Leadership in direct patient care	^24,30
Knowledge management	^22,33,34,44
Process management	^25,41–43
Project management	²²
Quality management	^26,30
Health information system	Architectures of health information systems	⁴²
Basics in information system	^37,42
Consumer-focused	^32,47,48
eHealth technology	⁴⁰
Electronic health record	^28,38,42,43
Information exchange	⁴³
Nursing information system	²⁹
Patient data	⁴³
System evaluation	^39,42,43
Ethics in health	Confidentiality	^24,26
Direct patient care	³⁰
Knowledge in computer science	Basic computer competencies	^{28,33,34,40,44}
Interoperability	^43,48
Competency framework	CanMeds	³²
TIGER	^22,27
Guidelines	^28,34,36,48
Research	Entrepreneurship	²⁶
Funding opportunity	⁴⁸

Most common learning arrangements

Previous publications (Appendix 1, Table 6) have shown that integration and cooperation are relevant pedagogical methods and were used as examples when developing online learning courses.⁴⁶ A course in HI is not only a blend of practice and theory but also an integration and collaboration with other students^38,42,46 and teachers.^{28,35,36,39,41–43,46} Another relevant pedagogical method used was creating learning activities suitable for the participants. Completing courses in HI could vary from face-to-face, online and hybrid teaching to blended learning activities.^46,49

Table 6.

Learning arrangements in the course.

Main category	Subcategory	References
Assessment	Evaluation	^29,42
	Evaluation criteria	⁴³
	Examination	^32,43
	Feedback	^42,44
Building blocks	Assignments	^42,43
	Learning modules	^{27,32,36,39,44–46,49}
	Learning objectives	⁴⁹
	Learning techniques	³⁹
	Seminars	^36,42
	Validations and adaptions	^23,28,44
	Workloads	³⁵
Continuous education	Educators in HI	⁴⁶
	Professional training	^37,45,48
	Refresh knowledge	⁴¹
	Specialist in HI	⁴⁹
Interaction and cooperation	Multi-professionally	^{23,28,33,35,48}
	Cooperation internationally	^42,48
	Discussion platforms	^41,43
	With other students	^38,42,46
	With students and educators	^{28,35,36,39,41–43,46}
Learning activities	Deadlines	⁴¹
Learning activities	Drop-in sessions	⁴⁹
Pre-requisites	Sufficient background knowledge	^33,35,40,49
Teaching and learning materials	Appropriate tools	²⁸
	Decided before the course	⁴²
	Easy to access	^41,42
	Necessary materials presented	⁴⁶
	Online materials	⁴¹
	Relevant regional and local materials	³²
Hands-on skills	Evaluation of practical training	⁴⁹
	Learning objectives	⁴⁹
	Practical skills experience	^{28,30,32,36,38,39,42,43,45,48}

Since learning is an individual process, a variety of options for primary learning and teaching periods should be offered to the learners.²⁶ This process can be actively stimulated with the participants’ general learning objectives and personal goals.^27,46 Each participant is given time to build their own learning outcomes based on the course content.^26,27,46 Setting personal goals in the learning process prepares students to think critically²⁸ and to develop their HI competencies.^33,40

HI courses are divided into building blocks that can be realized as classroom lectures or interactive seminars.^36,42 Publications reported various HI course offerings on campus, online, or in a hybrid learning fashion. Each block has different assignments^42,44 with separate learning objectives,⁴⁹ instructions, and literature,³⁹ and the content may be independent publications and lectures to understand better the practical use and implementation of the information systems.⁴² The publications reported that some of the building blocks were divided into learning modules,^{27,32,36,39,44–46,49} some were integrated into another course,⁴⁴ and some were only 1 week long.²⁷ The building blocks are planned and created depending on the target audience’s background and knowledge.^23,28,44

Creating and structuring a course in HI can be achieved in different ways. One way is to provide teaching materials consisting of both online materials,⁴¹ regional and local materials³² and tools.²⁸ The teacher presents necessary materials and instructions⁴⁶ for each learning activity that was decided before the course.⁴²

The assessment of the course is based on the evaluation^29,42 and evaluation criteria can be pre-defined for all assignments.^42,43 It is also important to present how the tasks are to be assessed,^29,32,42 for example examinations,^32,43 and the criteria should be presented during the first week.⁴³ Feedback should be given after an accomplished task.^42,44

All healthcare professionals should acknowledge the benefits associated with digital health and data science.⁴⁷ HI should be taught to students and recommended as a component of continuous education, job training, internships, and academic training.^28,37,45,48 If the participant does not know about the topic, they are recommended to take courses to increase their competence.⁴¹ They can take further education to become a specialist in HI or become educators.⁴⁶

In a computerized environment in which technology changes rapidly and the use of technology is a part of daily routines, there is a need for hands-on training. Compulsory practical training^37,48 supports practical experiences^32,33,37 and is a possibility to learn the implementation of technical competencies.^33,39,43 A mentor or supervisor should show the competencies,^32,42 set the learning objectives and evaluate the competencies.⁴⁹ However, all curricula do not include hands-on.³³

Discussion

Looking back at how healthcare systems have changed over the years and how the roles of HIT have changed, the need for effective use of IT in daily working lives,⁴² as well as knowledge and competencies in informatics, are growing.⁷ Healthcare services depend on the smoothly integrating of patient data into daily work routines.^1,2 The user’s proficiency and experience in HI notably affect the extent to which digital services are utilized³ leading to a growing demand for HI education.^10–12 The findings emphasize the importance of healthcare professionals having HI competencies.^{24–26,30,31,40,48} These competencies are first and foremost crucial for healthcare professionals,^28,39,49 including healthcare managers^25,31,40,48 who are directly working with the systems.

Because the demand for HI competencies is high, universities have created and developed courses on different levels of education.^10–12 The IMIA recommendations suggest that HI education should be introduced in the curricula for undergraduates¹⁵ and this study suggest that HI education should also focus on graduate students.^{27,28,34,35,39,42–46,49}

As a result, educational recommendations such as IMIA²⁹ and competency frameworks such as TIGER²⁵ are helpful in terms of improving competencies in HI. These recommendations and competency frameworks can be included in every curriculum³³ to support future education.²⁶ The competencies and recommendations can be interpreted and ranked differently^25,27 according to the healthcare professions.⁴⁴

As healthcare professionals may feel they are not confident or satisfied with their competencies and knowledge in HI,^2,3 the finding suggests offering more education in HI to all healthcare professionals especially for nurses,^{25,26,30,31,40,48} physicians^{25,30,32,44,47} and nurse managers.^{23,25,31,40,48} Having positive experiences in using digital technology creates more awareness at every organizational level.³⁸ To achieve this goal, one university does not need to be responsible for the whole content but can be shared among several universities.⁴³

With the growing importance of acquiring HI competencies,^10–12 specific competencies were considered more relevant than others. Key competencies such as documentation and communication,^{22,25–28,30,31,33,37,38,40,42–44,48} different types of management^{22,24–30,32–34,41–44} and learning about the HIS^{28,29,32,37–40,42,43,47,48} are recommended for incorporation in both theoretical and hands-on competency sessions.^{28,32,33,37–39,43,45,48}

In terms of teaching HI, the specific method was not explicitly applied. However, the structured teaching of HI competencies involved different building blocks and levels fostering active interaction between students and teachers.³² The arrangement of the HI courses seems to be a mix of online sessions, discussion panels,^41,43 and regular feedback from the teacher.^42,44 The findings highlighted that the preferred method for organizing HI courses involved building blocks with learning modules ^{27,32,36,39,44–46,49} and interactions between students and teachers.^{28,35,36,39,41–43,46} Additionally hands-on skills experiences were highly valued.^{28,30,32,36,38,42,43,45,48} Interestingly not much focus was put on the teaching and learning materials^28,41,46,49 nor the learning activities.^33,35,40,46 The focus is on individual and team-based learning, interactions between students, teachers, and evaluation of the learning activity of each participant is suggested.³⁵

A variation in teaching and learning styles was observed among universities,²⁵ and between different countries.^22,24,48 Joint programs³⁴ with preference for a hybrid teaching methodology. However, online courses in HI face challenges such as student isolation, lack of applicable knowledge, and no hands-on learning for the participants. The dropout rate is potentially higher, and the teacher might not be able to have interactive discussions with online students.^40,49 Further, some students might also have less experience in using the learning platform or different levels of interest in learning online.⁴³

In summary, this study proposes the inclusion of three fundamental HI competencies in HI educational programs. The first topic is documentation and nursing-related documentation^{22,25,27,31,40} with a focus on standardized terminology^{28,29,31,37–39,43} and institutional-related information^{28,30,33,42,44} The second topic centers around management and process management.^25,41–43 The third focuses on learning HIS prioritizing electronic health records^28,38,42,43 and HIS from a consumer’s perspective.^32,47,48

This study suggests adopting a blended teaching method for education programs in HI. The technique highlights interaction and collaboration among teachers and students^{28,35,36,39,41–43,46} and a multi-professional approach.^{23,28,33,35,48} The course content is structured in building blocks with various modules^{27,32,44–46,49} and includes a hands-on skills component.^{28,30,32,36,38,39,42,43,45,48}

This educational approach is designed to benefit healthcare professionals, graduates, and undergraduates.

Limitations

Three well-known databases were used to find the selected publications, but there is always a possibility of missing essential publications. Data retrieval was limited to January 2016 to January 2020, and as this review has taken time to finalize, newer publications may have been missed. Additionally, the indexation of publications based on specific keywords in databases always affects the use of keywords in data retrieval and search results. All the publications were read and commented on independently, and the reviewers were not influenced by each other. The first author did the content analysis, summarizing and analyzing the content independently from co-reviewers.

Most of the publications in HI were performed in developed countries, and we found only one study from the continent of Africa. A similar study focusing on developing countries would provide an exciting and valuable comparison to this study.

Conclusion

This study highlights the importance of adapting changes in healthcare systems, enhancing competencies in HI, and fostering positive experiences with digital technology in the healthcare field. It suggests the need for practical training in HI including key competencies such as documentation, communication, and data security, both in theory and hands-on sessions. The study proposes a plan to achieve competency and emphasizes practical teaching approaches. It also addresses the challenges faced by online courses in HI. The study highlights the universal importance of HI competencies, particularly for healthcare professionals and students.

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

This study was possible with the help and collaboration with the partner universities (the Osnabrück University of Applied Sciences/Osnabrück University, the University of Eastern Finland, and the University of Porto) involved in the Interprofessional European Health Program in Higher Education. The content solely the responsibility of the authors.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declare no potential conflicts of interests with respect to the study, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Interprofessional European Health Program in Higher Education (eHealth4all@EU) [grant nr: 109-1-DE01-KA203-005040], and the project was funded by Erasmus+. The project is being conducted by three partner universities: the Osnabrück University of Applied Sciences/Osnabrück University, the University of Eastern Finland, and the University of Porto.

ORCID iDs

Pauleen Mannevaara

Kaija Saranto

Ulla-Mari Kinnunen

Ursula Hübner

Data availability statement

All data used in this study is available to public. This study does not contain any personal data, or any data connected to a particular individual and therefore no ethical approval is required.*

Appendix

Table A1 Table A1.

List of selected publications 2016-2020.

First author, year (reference), country. Title	Population Context	Course content Learning arrangements Who to teach	Results
Ahonen et al. 2018.³³ Finland Title: Identifying biomedical and HI competencies in higher education	Population: Undergraduates Context: Undergraduate curriculum	Course content: IMIA recommendations Learning arrangements: Not specified. Who: Undergraduates	The nursing curriculum contains more competencies than any other healthcare curricula, but IT has the highest number of competencies. It is important to take the student’s background into consideration
Ammenwerth et al. 2018.⁴⁶ Austria Title: Building a community of inquiry within an online-based health informatics program: Instructional design and lessons learned	Population: Graduates Context: Online-based program	Course content: health informatics Learning arrangements: Learning activities (deadlines, interactions, literatures) Who: Graduates	An environment of effective learning and inquiry can be built. A guideline on how to create online cooperative learning is included
Ammenwerth et al. 2017.⁴⁹ Austria Title: How to teach health IT evaluation: Recommendations for health IT evaluation courses	Population: Experts in health IT and/or IT-evaluation courses Context: Course in health technology and informatics	Course content: Learning outcomes and activities Learning arrangements: Online, practical parts, different learning arrangements Who: Employed professionals and graduates	A course in HIT with 15 mandatory topics and 15 optional topics is recommended. Practical training should also be included
Ammenwerth et al. 2019.⁴⁰ Austria Title: Topics for continuous education in nursing informatics: Results of a Survey among 280 austrian nurses	Population: Healthcare professionals Context: Education	Course content: Information systems, common language, computer sciences Learning arrangements not specified Who: Employed professionals, graduates	Five topics in health informatics are considered important in continuous education: Project management, IT in nursing, eHealth, nursing terminologies, and computer science basics. Both nursing managers and nurses with IT responsibilities see continuing education as necessary. However, suitable continuous education is missing
Ammenwerth et al. 2017.⁴² Germany Title: On teaching international courses in health information systems: Lessons learned during 16 years of frank – van swieten lectures on strategic information	Population: Students learning health information systems Context: Online joint program	Course content: Information systems, management, learning outcomes Learning arrangements: Module, learning material, learning activities, seminar Who: Undergraduates and graduates	Positive feedback on an international course and international exchange on HI systems
Bhyat et al. 2017.³² Canada Title: Implementing informatics competencies in undergraduate medical education: A national-level “train the trainer” initiative	Population: Students Context: Webinar	Course content: Framework Learning arrangements: Learning activities, practical part, assessments Who: Employed professional, undergraduates	Two canadian faculties created an online collection of e-health educational resources with open access and two activities: Endorsement of eHealth and involvement in curriculum planning. Workshops and webinars were a great success and improved awareness of eHealth
Breil et al. 2018.³⁷ Germany Title: A comparative literature analysis of the HI curricula	Population: Students Context: health informatic curricula	Course content: Competencies in information systems Learning arrangements: Practical part, learning outcomes Who: Employed professionals	Key competencies in HI are identified. Students are recommended to learn skills, critical skills, and health information management
Butler-Henderson et al. 2017.⁴¹ Australia Title: The development of a national census of the health information workforce: Expert panel recommendations	Population: Experts Context: Recommendations	Course content: Management Learning arrangements: Online, learning activities, interactions, learning materials Who: Employed professionals	Highlighted themes for the national census of the health information workforce: Census delivery, global census and census advertisement, longitudinal study, and participants. Recommended types of data elements are development, ownership, standards, access, and governance
Egbert et al. 2018,²⁴ Germany Title: Competencies for nursing in a digital world. Methodology, results, and use of the DACH–recommendations for nursing informatics core competency areas in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland	Population: Experts (nursing and management) Context: Competencies in nursing education	Course content: Framework, management Learning arrangements: Not specified Who: Employed professionals, teachers	Learning across other countries in a combined course in nursing informatics; evidence-based nursing is supported
Egbert et al. 2017,²² Germany Title: An iterative methodology for developing national recommendations for nursing informatics curricula	Population: Experts Context: Competencies in nursing informatics	Course content: Framework Learning arrangements: Not specified. Who: Teachers	Core competencies in HI are defined and tailored to each country’s specific needs
Fossum et al. 2017.⁴³ Norway Title: Crossing borders: An online interdisciplinary course in HI for students from two countries	Population: Graduates Context: Online course	Course content: Common language, learning activities, information systems, learning outcomes, management, interoperability, practical work Learning arrangements: Interactions, assessment, learning activities Who: Undergraduates	Learning internationally is an advantage for students. Students can conduct discussions and create relationships between disciplines and international boundaries
Haux et al. 2017.³⁴ Germany Title: Should degree programs in biomedical and HI be dedicated or integrated?	Population: dual master’s degree students Context: Education	Course content: Computer science, extended studiesHI. Learning arrangements: Combined degree Who: Undergraduates and graduates	Students with a dual master’s degree in biomedical and HI may not be seen as computer scientists
Hincapie A. et al. 2016.³⁸ United States Title: Incorporating health information technology and pharmacy informatics in a pharmacy professional Didactic curriculum - with a team-based learning approach	Population: second-year students Context: Online course	Course content: Management, information systems, interoperability Learning arrangements: Interactions, extended studies Who: Undergraduates	Students are positive towards the course and have met the learning outcomes of the course content. The appropriate time for teaching informatics should be considered
Hübner et al. 2019.²⁶ Germany Title: Towards the TIGER international Framework for recommendations of core competencies in HI 2.0: Extending the Scope and the roles	Population: Experts Context: Framework	Course content: Framework Learning arrangements: Not specified Who: Employed professionals	Core competencies in informatics are highly important for nurses. The framework can be used as a support when shaping education in HI to improve safety and quality in using health information systems
Hübner et al. 2017.²⁵ Germany Title: Towards an international framework for recommendations of core competencies in nursing & inter-professional informatics: The TIGER competency synthesis project	Population: Experts Context: Framework	Course content: Modules, management, framework Learning arrangements: Learning outcomes, interactions, learning activities Who: Teachers, employed professionals, others	Informatics core competencies are highlighted in all domains. Different countries have their own ways of learning
Hübner et al. 2018.²⁷ Germany Title: Technology informatics guiding education reform – TIGER	Population: Experts Context: Education or recommendation	Course content: Framework, learning outcomes Learning arrangements: Not specified Who: Employed professionals, graduates, teachers	24 core competency areas are defined for five major nursing roles. Greater awareness of intrapreneurship and innovation are key factors to successful health information technology
Jidkov et al. 2019.⁴⁴ United Kingdom Title: HI competencies in postgraduate medical education and training in the UK: A mixed methods study	Population: Postgraduates Context: Practical training	Course content: Competency Learning arrangements: Modules, assessments Who: Postgraduates, trainees	Competencies in HI should be universal for clinicians and should be included in training curricula. The existing digital competencies are not designed for physicians, and not all competencies are relevant to all specialties
Kinnunen et al. 2018.³⁵Finland Title: A Synthesis of Students’ theses in the accredited HHSI Master’s program	Population: Graduates Context: Thesis writing	Course content: Learning activities Learning arrangements: Seminars Who: Graduates	Students focus on different research areas, and qualitative methods are used. There is a need for encouraging and guiding teachers to use more quantitative methods
Kinnunen et al. 2019.³¹ Finland Title: Factors related to HI competencies for nurses-results of a national electronic health record Survey	Population: Healthcare professionals Context: Competencies in nursing informatics	Course content: Information systems. Learning materials Learning arrangements. Not specified Who: Employed professionals (nursing, management)	One-third of respondents do not have sufficient training, and older nurses need complementary training and support in using electronic health records (EHR). Nurses with higher education are more informatics-competent and more experienced in using EHR.
Mantas et al. 2017.²⁹ The Netherlands Title: IMIA educational recommendations and nursing informatics	Population: Students Context: Education	Course content: Framework, management Learning arrangements: Learning outcomes, assessments Who: Employed professionals, education workers on all levels	Information technology skills are a part of most nursing courses, but it is not clear whether all undergraduate nursing programs teach nursing informatics. However, there are courses in HI for postgraduates. Reconsidering educational recommendations for nurses and other professionals is recommended
Sapci et al. 2020.⁴⁵ United States Title: Teaching hands-on informatics Skills to Future health informaticians: A competency Framework proposal and analysis of healthcare informatics curricula	Population: Graduates Context: Practical training	Course content: Information systems, competencies in health informatics, learning activities, extended studies Learning arrangements: Modules Who: Graduates	Not many publications have been conducted on hands-on skills in health informatics. There is a gap between in-demand skills and existing competencies, and most of the practical skills are gained from work experience. Occupational-specific terms in HI would enable technological solutions to health problems, and a specific competency assessment framework would be needed
Scott et al. 2018.⁴⁷ United Kingdom Title: Learning health systems need to bridge the ‘two cultures' of clinical informatics and data science	Population: Research Context: health data science	Course content: Management, information system Learning arrangements: Not specified Who: Not specified	The gap between conclusion policy makers and research funders needs to be acknowledged to recognize the social and economic benefits of eHealth
Strudwick et al. 2019.²³ Canada Title: Adapting and validating informatics competencies for senior nurse leaders in the Canadian context: Results of a Delphi study	Population: Management (nurse) Context: Framework	Course content: Competency Learning arrangements: Not specified Who: Employed professionals, graduates	24 informatics competencies are identified by canadian nurse leaders. Competencies related to collaboration are rated as important and highly relevant. The results will be presented to nursing informatics organizations and the senior national nursing leaders for approval
Thye et al. 2018.³⁰ Germany Title: What are inter-professional eHealth competencies?	Population: Healthcare professionals, management, researchers, experts, education Context: Education in eHealth	Course content: Direct patient care, IT, management, common language, learning outcomes, information system, practical part Learning arrangements: Not specified Who: Employed professionals (nurses, doctors)	There were not many differences between the various professions, but professionals involved in direct patient care rated some competencies differently from executives. Organizations issuing educational recommendations are encouraged to clarify their competency areas (e.g., communication and leadership, and ethics in health IT)
Topaz et al. 2016.⁴⁸ Canada Title: Advancing nursing informatics in the next decade: Recommendations from an international survey	Population: Students Context: Nursing informatics curricula	Course content: Practical work, research, visibility, collaboration, and integration Learning arrangements: Learning activities, learning outcomes, interactions Who: Undergraduates	Nursing informatics includes five central areas of recommendation: Nursing informatics visibility, practice, research, collaboration and integration, and education and training
Valenta et al. 2016,²⁸ United States Title: Core informatics competencies for clinical and translational scientists: What do our customers and collaborators need to know?	Population: Others (trainees) Context: Framework	Course content: Information systems Learning arrangements: Learning activities, learning materials, interactions Who: Graduates, PhD candidates, researchers	A set of new competencies updated by the clinical research informatics workgroup of american medical informatics association (AMIA) is presented. In the future, the current model of competencies can be used as a model for editing competencies over time
Walpole et al. 2016.³⁶ United Kingdom Title: HI in UK medical education: An online survey of current practice	Population: Teachers from school and work life Context: Curriculum in HI.	Course content: Framework (national guidelines) Learning arrangements: Learning activities, lectures and seminars, modules, learning arrangements Who: Undergraduates	Three main findings: 1) little education in HI is included in the curricula, 2) the pedagogy, content, and timing of teaching HI vary between schools, 3) the course content is not always updated, and HI is seldom assessed
Wholey et al. 2018,³⁹ United States Title: Developing workforce capacity in public health informatics: Core competencies and curriculum design	Population: master’s degree and certificate Context: Training curriculum	Course content: Practical part Learning arrangements: Learning activities, practical part Who: Graduates, certificate programs	Competencies in public HI are taken from information and organizational sciences and computer sciences. There is a need for core competencies in public health and in data sciences. The proposed educational program in public health can be used as a guideline

References

Engelbrecht

Hasman

Mantas

, et al. International aspects of education and training in telemedicine. International Journal on Biomedicine and Healthcare 2014; 2(2): 41–44.

Jedwab

Hutchinson

Manias

, et al. Nurse motivation, engagement and well-being before an electronic medical record system implementation: a mixed methods study. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2021; 18(5): 1–23.

Top

Gider

. Nurses’ views on electronic medical records (EMR) in Turkey: an analysis according to use, quality and user satisfaction. J Med Syst 2012; 36(3): 1979–1988.

HIMSS. Health Informatics . 2022. [cited 2022 Oct 9]. Aligning Core Health Informatics Competencies. Available from: https://www.himss.org/resources/health-informatics#Part2

Hovenga

EJS

. In: Hovenga

EJS

Mantas

(eds). A Health Informatics Education Framework. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004, pp. 55–62. Available from: https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use.

Mantas

Ammenwerth

Demiris

, et al. Recommendations of the international medical informatics association (IMIA) on education in biomedical and health informatics. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49(2): 105–120.

Toria Shaw

Blake

Hübner

, et al. 2022 The evolution of TIGER competencies and informatics resources [cited 9.10.22]. Available from: https://www.himss.org/membership-participation/technology-informatics-guiding-education-reform-tiger-interprofessional-community

HITComp . 2022. HITComp org. 2022 [cited 2022 Jun 5]. Health Information Technology Comptencies. Available from: http://hitcomp.org/introduction/

Cahiim. Cahiim. 2022. [cited 2022 Oct 17]. Available from: https://www.cahiim.org/about-us

10.

Ammenwerth

Hackl

. Job profiles of biomedical informatics graduates: results of a graduate survey. Methods Inf Med 2015; 54(4): 372–375.

11.

Wright

Verbeke

Nyssen

, et al. Health informatics: developing a masters programme in Rwanda based on the IMIA educational recommendations and the IMIA knowledge base. In Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. IOS Press, 2015, pp. 525–528.

12.

Botin

Bertelsen

Nøhr

. Challenges in improving health care by use of health informatics technology. Stud Health Technol Inf 2015; 215: 3–13.

13.

Dorsey

Clements

Garrie

, et al. Bridging the gap: a collaborative approach to health information management and informatics education. Appl Clin Inf 2015; 6(2): 211–223.

14.

Traver

Konstantinidis

Bamidis

, et al. Analysis of EU - USA cooperation opportunities on IT skills for healthcare workforce. In: Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. IOS Press, 2015, pp. 561–566.

15.

Bichel-Findlay

Koch

Mantas

, et al. Recommendations of the international medical informatics association (IMIA) on education in biomedical and health informatics, 2022. Second Revision.

16.

Nazeha

Pavagadhi

Kyaw

A Digitally Competent Health Workforce: Scoping Review of Educational Frameworks , et al. JMIR Publications Inc, 2020, vol 22. J Med Internet Res.

17.

Konttila

Siira

Kyngäs

, et al. Healthcare professionals’ competence in digitalisation: a systematic review. J Clin Nurs 2019; 28(5–6): 745–761, Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocn.14710

18.

De Leeuw

Woltjer

Kool

. Identification of factors influencing the adoption of health information technology by nurses who are digitally lagging: in-depth interview study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22(8).

19.

Peters

Godfrey

Munn

, et al. Chapter 11: scoping reviews. In: Aromataris

Munn

(eds). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis [Internet]. JBI, 2020. Available from: https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL/4687342/Chapter+11%3A+Scoping+reviews

20.

Page

McKenzie

Bossuyt

, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; n71.

21.

Kyngäs

Kaakkinen

. The application of content analysis in nursing science research [Internet]. In: Kyngäs

Mikkonen

Kääriäinen

(eds). The Application of Content Analysis in Nursing Science Research. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 23–30.

22.

* Egbert

Thye

Schulte

, et al. An iterative methodology for developing national recommendations for nursing informatics curricula. In: Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. IOS Press, 2017, pp. 660–664.

23.

* Strudwick

Nagle

Morgan

, et al. Adapting and validating informatics competencies for senior nurse leaders in the Canadian context: results of a Delphi study. Int J Med Inf 2019; 129: 211–228.

24.

* Egbert

Thye

Hackl

, et al. Competencies for nursing in a digital world. Vol. 27, Informatics for Health & Social Care. 2018.

25.

* Hübner

Shaw

Thye

, et al. Towards an international framework for recommendations of core competencies in nursing & inter-professional informatics: the TIGER competency synthesis project. In: Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. IOS Press, 2017, pp. 655–659.

26.

* Hübner

Thye

Shaw

, et al. Towards the TIGER international framework for recommendations of core competencies in health informatics 2.0: extending the scope and the roles. Stud Health Technol Inf 2019; 264: 1218–1222.

27.

* Hübner

Shaw

Thye

, et al. Technology informatics guiding education Reform - TIGER. Methods Inf Med 2018; 57(5): e30–e42.

28.

* Valenta

Meagher

Tachinardi

, et al.

Core informatics competencies for clinical and translational scientists: what do our customers and collaborators need to know?

J Am Med Inf Assoc 2016; 23(4): 835–839.

29.

* Mantas

Hasman

. IMIA educational recommendations and nursing informatics, 2017.

30.

* Thye

Shaw

Hüsers

, et al.

What are inter-professional eHealth competencies?

Available from https://netcase.hs-osnabrueck.de/index.php/s/4wfTXA8tYnQtOpT (2018).

31.

* Kinnunen

Heponiemi

Rajalahti

, et al. Factors related to health informatics competencies for nurses - results of a national electronic health record survey. Comput Inf Nurs 2019; 37(8): 420–429.

32.

* Bhyat

Gibson

Hayward

, et al. Implementing informatics competencies in undergraduate medical education: a national-level “train the trainer” initiative. In: Health Professionals’ Education in the Age of Clinical Information Systems, Mobile Computing and Social Networks. Elsevier Inc., 2017, pp. 347–370.

33.

* Ahonen

Kinnunen

Lejonqvist

, et al. Identifying biomedical and health informatics competencies in higher education curricula. Stud Health Technol Inf 2018; 251: 261–264.

34.

* Haux

Marschollek

Wolf

, et al. Should degree programs in biomedical and health informatics be dedicated or integrated? reflections and recommendations after more than 40 Years of medical informatics education at TU braunschweig, including 10 Years of B.Sc. And 15 Years of M.Sc. Integrated degree curricula. J Med Syst 2017; 41(7).

35.

* Kinnunen

Saranto

. A synthesis of students’ theses in the accredited HHSI master’s programme. In: Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. IOS Press BV, 2018, pp. 815–819.

36.

* Walpole

Taylor

Banerjee

. Health informatics in UK Medical Education: an online survey of current practice. JRSM Open 2017; 8(1): 205427041668267.

37.

* Breil

Kremer

Taweel

, et al. A comparative literature analysis of the health informatics curricula. In: 2018 IEEE/ACS 15th International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA), 2018, pp. 1–4.

38.

Hincapie

Cutler

Fingado

. INSTRUCTIONAL design and assessment incorporating health information technology and pharmacy informatics in a pharmacy professional didactic curriculum-with a team-based learning approach. 2016.

39.

* Wholey

LaVenture

Rajamani

, et al. Developing workforce capacity in public health informatics: core competencies and curriculum design. Front Public Health 2018; 6.

40.

* Ammenwerth

Hackl

. Topics for continuous education in nursing informatics: results of a survey among 280 Austrian nurses. In: Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. IOS Press, 2019, pp. 162–169.

41.

* Butler-Henderson

Gray

Greenfield

, et al.

The development of a national census of the health information workforce: expert Panel recommendations

. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. IOS Press, 2017, pp. 8–13.

42.

* Ammenwerth

Knaup

Winter

, et al. On teaching international courses on health information systems: lessons learned during 16 years of Frank – van Swieten lectures on strategic information management in health information systems. Methods Inf Med 2017; 56(MethodsOpen): e39–e48.

43.

* Fossum

Fruhling

Moe

, et al. Crossing borders: an online interdisciplinary course in health informatics for students from two countries. 2017. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/cinjournal

44.

* Jidkov

Alexander

Bark

, et al. Health informatics competencies in postgraduate medical education and training in the UK: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open 2019; 9(3).

45.

* Sapci

Sapci

. Teaching hands-on informatics skills to future health informaticians: a competency framework proposal and analysis of health care informatics curricula. In: JMIR Medical Informatics. JMIR Publications Inc, 2020, vol 8.

46.

Ammenwerth

Hackl

Felderer

, et al. Building a community of inquiry within an online-based health informatics program: instructional design and lessons learned. 2018.

47.

* Scott

Dunscombe

Evans

, et al. Learning health systems need to bridge the “two cultures” of clinical informatics and data science. J Innovat Health Inf 2018; 25(2): 126–131.

48.

* Topaz

Ronquillo

Peltonen

, et al. Advancing nursing informatics in the next decade: recommendations from an international survey. In: Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. IOS Press, 2016, pp. 123–127.

49.

* Ammenwerth

De Keizer

Brender Mcnair

, et al. How to teach health it evaluation: recommendations for health IT evaluation courses. In: Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. IOS Press, 2017, pp. 3–7.