This article describes a study of a major change management project involving the establishment of a shared services organization to align the information services functions for two district health boards in New Zealand. The research uncovered a capability crisis that many people experienced when they realized the magnitude of the task they were involved in. Not everyone experienced the crisis and it seems that learning, especially in a complex healthcare environment, plays an important role in reducing the negative impact of change.
Ashton T.Recent developments in the funding and organisation of the New Zealand health system. Australian and New Zealand Health Policy2005; 2 (9); 2—9.
2.
Ministry of Health.New Zealand Health and Disability Sector Overview. Wellington: Ministry of Health, New Zealand, 2003.
3.
Ministry of Health.The New Zealand Health Strategy. Wellington: Ministry of Health, New Zealand, 2000.
4.
Ministry of Health.Guide to Eligibility for Publicly Funded Health and Disability Services in New Zealand. Wellington: Ministry of Health, New Zealand, 2005.
5.
HealthInformation Steering Committee (NZ). Health Information Strategy for New Zealand. Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Health, 2005.
6.
Kakebadse A. , Kakebadse N.Sourcing: new face to economies of scale and the emergence of new organizational forms. Knowledge and Process Management2000; 7 (2); 107—18.
7.
Ministry of Health.From Strategy to Reality: The WAVE Project. Wellington: Ministry of Health, New Zealand, 2001.
8.
Brydon-Miller M., Greenwood D., Maguire P.Why action research?Action Research2003; 1 (1); 9—28.
9.
Waterman H., Tillen D., Dickson R., de Koning K.Action Research: A Systematic Review and Guidance for Assessment. Norwich: Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO, 2001.
10.
Thomas D.R.A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis (11 screens) . http://www.health.auckland.ac.nz/hrmas/resources/Inductive2003.pdf , 2003, 14 March 2006.
11.
Dooley K.A complex adaptive systems model of organization change. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences1997; 1 (1).
12.
Thomas D.R.A general inductive approach for analysing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 2006 ; 27 (2); 237—46.
13.
Fraser S., Greenhalgh T.Coping with complexity: educating for capability. British Medical Journal2001; 323 (7216); 799—803.
14.
Elrod II P.D. , Tippett D.D.The `death valley' of change . Journal of Organizational Change Management2002; 15 (3); 273—91.
15.
Moss Kanter R.The Change Masters: Corporate Entrepreneurs at Work. London : Unwin, 1985.
16.
Lewin K.Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper and Row, 1951.
17.
Schneider D.M. , Goldwasser C.Be a model leader of change. Management Review1998; 87 (3); 41—5.
18.
Day K., Norris A.C.Supporting information technology across health boards in New Zealand: themes emerging from the development of a shared services organization. Health Informatics Journal2006; 12 (1); 13—25.
19.
Heeks R., Mundy D., Salazar A.Why health care information systems succeed or fail: information systems for public sector management. Working Paper Series 9. Manchester : Institute for Development Policy Management , 1999.
20.
Dick B., Dalmau T.Argyris and Schon: some elements of their models. http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/arp/argyris2.html, 2000 , 14 March 2006.
