A preoccupation with a search for the authentic self has become widespread for individuals living in contemporary Western societies since the 1970s. Because academic consensus had been reached regarding the university student population anchoring their experiences of authenticity in a personal (impulsive or subconsensual) sense of identity in the last 35 years, the sociological-empirical study of the real self among students has been abandoned as a discipline for about the last 20 years. This article shows that this should not be the case any longer. I found that students’ meanings of authenticity are predominantly constructed within their social (institutional or consensual) roles. I present data from a survey conducted with 138 respondents from a university in Victoria, Australia, in 2013, and compare it with sociologist Ralph Turner's ground-breaking research on the same topic. I explain these findings through generational and cultural change reasons related to millennials’ Web 2.0 technology use.
BabbittC.E.BurbachH.J. (1990) ‘A Comparison of Self-orientation among College Students across the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s’, Youth and Society21(4): 472–82, https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X90021004003.
3.
BrymanA. (2001) Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
CrawfordL.A.NovakK.B. (2011) ‘Beliefs about Alcohol and the College, Experience, Locus of Self, and College Undergraduates' Drinking Patterns’. Sociological Inquiry81(4): 477–494.
5.
DonnellanM.B.TrzesniewskiK.H. (2009) ‘How Should We Study Generational ‘Changes'—Or Should We? A Critical Examination of the Evidence for ‘Generation Me’’. Social and Personality Psychology Compass3(5): 775–784.
FranzeseA. (2009) ‘Authenticity: Perspectives and Experiences’, pp. 87–101 in VanniniP.WilliamsJ.P. (eds) Authenticity in Culture, Self, and Society. Farnham: Ashgate.
GordonS. (1989) ‘Institutional and Impulsive Orientations in Selectively Appropriating Emotions to Self’, pp. 115–136 in D. Franks and E. McCarthy (eds) Contemporary Studies in Sociology, Vol. 9. The Sociology of Emotions. Greenwich: Jai Press.
10.
GraceS.L.CramerK.L. (2002) ‘Sense of Self in the New Millennium: Male and Female Student Responses to the TST’, Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal30(3): 271–9. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2002.30.3.271.
11.
HewittJ.P. (1994) ‘Self, Role, and Discourse’, pp. 155–73 in TurnerR.H.PlattG.M.GordonC. (eds) Self, Collective Behavior, and Society: Essays Honoring the Contribution of Ralph Turner. Stamford, CT: Jai Press.
12.
IllouzE. (2007) Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Bristol: Polity Press.
13.
JamesS.MallmanM.MidfordS. (2020) ‘University Students, Career Uncertainty, and the Culture of Authenticity’, Journal of Youth Studies24(4): 466–80, https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2020.1742300.
14.
KenistonK. (1968) ‘The Psychology of Alienated Students’, pp. 405–14 in GordonC.GergenK. (eds) The Self in Social Interaction. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
15.
KuhnM.H.McPartlandT.S. (1954) ‘An Empirical Investigation of Self-attitudes’, American Sociological Review19(1): 68–76, https://doi.org/10.2307/2088175.
16.
LTU (La Trobe University) (2012) ‘Pocket Statistics’, Planning and Institutional Performance Unit (PIPU). Melbourne: LTU Press.
17.
McHaneyR. (2011) The Digital Shoreline: How Web 2.0 and Millennials are Revolutionazing Higher Education. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
18.
McLeanS. (2015) ‘Individual Autonomy or Social Engagement? Adult Learners in Neoliberal Times’, Adult Education Quarterly65(3): 196–214, https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713615573984.
19.
Menéndez Domingo, R. (2013) 'The Culture of Authenticity: An Empirical Study of La Trobe University Students from Diverse Cultural Backgrounds', pp. 913-926, in (eds H. Forbes-Mewett, N. Osbaldishton & C. Strong (eds.) Reflections, Intersections and Aspirations: 50 years of Australian Sociology. Melbourne, Australia, 25–28 November, viewed 9 November 2021.
20.
Menéndez DomingoR. (2015) ‘Ethnic Background and Meanings of Authenticity: A Qualitative Study of University Students’, M/C Journal18(1), https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.945.
21.
Menéndez DomingoR. (2016) The Social Meanings of Authenticity: An Empirical Study of University Students PhD Thesis, La Trobe University, Australia, http://hdl.handle.net/1959.9/561313.
SchwartzS.H. (2007) ‘Value Orientations: Measurement, Antecedents and Consequences across Nations’, pp. 167–203 in Centre for Comparative Social Surveys (ed.) Measuring Attitudes Cross-nationally: Lessons from the European. London: Sage.
SloanM. (2007) ‘The “Real Self” and Inauthenticity: The Importance of Self-concept Anchorage for Emotional Experiences in the Workplace’, Social Psychology Quarterly70(3): 305–18, https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250707000308.
26.
SnowD.A.PhillipsC.L. (1982) ‘The Changing Self-orientations of College Students: From Institution to Impulse’, Social Science Quarterly63(3): 462–76. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42861415.
27.
SpitzerS.P.StrattonJ.R.CouchC.J. (1971) The Assessment of the Self. Iowa City, IO: Escort Sernoll.
28.
TrillingL. (1972) Sincerity and Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
TurnerR.H. (1976) ‘The Real Self: From Institution to Impulse’, American Journal of Sociology81(5): 989–1016, https://doi.org/10.1086/226183.
31.
TurnerR.H.GordonS. (1981) ‘Boundaries of the Self: The Relationship of Authenticity to Inauthenticity in the Self-conception’, pp. 39–57 in LynchM.D.Norem-HebeisenA.A.GergenK.J. (eds) Self-concept, Advances in Theory and Research. Pensacola, FL: Ballinger.
32.
TurnerR.H.SchutteJ. (1981) ‘The True Self Method for Studying the Self-conception’, Symbolic Interaction4(1): 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1981.4.1.1
33.
VanniniP. (2006) ‘Dead Poets’ Society: Teaching, Publish-or-perish, and Professors’ Experiences of Authenticity’, Symbolic Interaction29(2): 235–57, https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2006.29.2.235.
VeroffJ.DouvanE.KulkaR. (1981) The Inner American: A Self-portrait from 1957 to 1976. New York: Basic Books.
36.
WalterM. (2010) Social Research Methods,2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
WexlerP.TurnerR.H. (1977) ‘Comment on Ralph Turner’s “The Real Self: from Institution to Impulse”’, American Journal of Sociology83(1): 178–86.
38.
WilliamsJ.P.SchwarzK.C. (2020) ‘Introduction to the Social Construction of Identity and Authenticity’, pp. 1–24 in WilliamsJ.P.SchwarzK.C. (eds) Studies on the Social Construction of Identity and Authenticity. Abingdon: Routledge.
39.
WoodM.R.ZurcherL.A.Jr (1988) The Development of a Postmodern Self: A Computer-assisted Comparative Analysis of Personal Documents. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
40.
ZurcherL.A.Jr, (1977) The Mutable Self: A Self-concept for Social Change. London: Sage.
41.
ZurcherL.A.Jr, (1986) ‘The Bureaucratizing of Impulse: Self-conception in the 1980s’, Symbolic Interaction9(2): 169–78, https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1986.9.2.169.
