Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Ensuring adequate water supplies in urban Australia is a problem of considerable concern to State and federal governments. A variety of technical solutions are available, including water recycling. While there has been policy support for water recycling, public perceptions are seen by industry stakeholders as a significant impediment to the implementation of recycled water schemes. This article reports baseline data on attitudes to water recycling and its uses in a representative sample of Australians from major urban areas. Sociological frameworks for interpreting the results focus on understanding how people assess the risks associated with recycled water. Three perspectives are outlined, and their consistency with the survey results is analysed. The epistemologically realist view, often the fallback of water professionals and policy makers, is shown to have limited applicability. An interpretation focused on the cultural meanings associated with different forms and uses of water is found to be consistent with many aspects of Australians' expressed views about water recycling, as is a view focused on the `risk society' thesis. The article considers the implications of these findings.

Keywords

Australian public attitudes risk water recycling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) (2004 ) Environmental Issues: People's Views and Practices, Cat. No. 4602.0. Canberra: ABS.

ACIL Tasman (2005) Research into Access to Recycled Water and Impediments to Recycled Water Investment, report prepared for the Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry on behalf of the Natural Resource Policy and Programs Committee , Canberra, June.

ARCWIS (Australian Research Centre for Water in Society) (1999) The Social Basis for Urban Water Provision in the 21st Century, report, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Urban Water Program. Perth: CSIRO Land and Water.

Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: SAGE.

Beck, U. (1994) `The Reinvention of Politics: Towards a Theory of Reflexive Modernisation', pp. 1—55 in U. Beck , A. Giddens and S. Lash (eds) Reflexive Modernisation: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Beck, U. (1995) Ecological Enlightenment: Essays on the Politics of the Risk Society, trans. M. Ritter. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

Bruvold, W.H. (1972) Public Attitudes Towards Reuse of Reclaimed Water, Contribution No.137, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley.

Dillon, P.J. (2000) `Water Reuse in Australia: Current Status, Projections and Research', pp. 99—104 in P.J. Dillon (ed.) Water Recycling Australia 2000, Proceedings of the First Symposium, Adelaide, October, Australian Water Association Water Recycling Forum. Adelaide: CSIRO and AWA.

Douglas, M. (1966) Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

10.

Douglas, M. (1985) Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences . London: Routledge and Kegan Paul .

11.

Douglas, M. and A. Wildavsky (1982) Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.

12.

Fischhoff, B. , P. Slovic and S. Lichtenstein (1982) `Lay Foibles and Expert Fables in Judgments about Risk', American Statistician 36(3, Part 2): 240—55.

13.

Fischhoff, B. , P. Slovic , S. Lichtenstein , S. Read and B. Combs (1978) `How Safe is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes towards Technological Risks and Benefits', Policy Sciences 9: 127—52.

14.

Giddens, A. (1994) `Living in a Post-traditional Society', pp. 56—109 in U. Beck , A. Giddens and S. Lash (eds) Reflexive Modernisation: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.

15.

Gould, L.C. , G.T. Gardner , D.R. DeLuca , A.R. Tiemann , L.W. Doob and J.A.J. Stolwijk (1988) Perceptions of Technological Risks and Benefits. New York: Russell Sage.

16.

Lash, S. (1994) `Reflexivity and Its Doubles: Structure, Aesthetics, Community', pp. 110—73 in U. Beck , A. Giddens and S. Lash (eds) Reflexive Modernisation: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.

17.

Lupton, D. (1999) Risk. London: Routledge.

18.

McKay, J. and Hurlimann, A. (2003) `Attitudes to Reclaimed Water for Domestic Use: Part 1. Age', Water 30(8): 45—9.

19.

Marks J.S. (2003) `The Experience of Urban Water Recycling and the Development of Trust', PhD thesis, Flinders University of South Australia.

20.

Marris, C. and I. Langford (1996) `No Cause for Alarm', New Scientist 28 September: 36—9.

21.

Otway, H.J. and D. von Winterfeldt (1982) `Beyond Acceptable Risk: On the Social Acceptability of Technologies', Policy Sciences 14: 247—56.

22.

Po, M. , B.E. Nancarrow , Z. Leviston , N.B. Porter , G.J. Syme and J.D. Kaercher (2005) Predicting Community Behaviour in Relation to Wastewater Reuse: What Drives Decisions to Accept or Reject? Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship. Perth: CSIRO Land and Water.

23.

Roseth, N. (2000) `Community Views on Recycled Water', Proceedings Enviro 2000 Towards Sustainability, 9—13 April, Sydney.

24.

Roseth, N. (2004) `Community Views on Drinking Water Quality in Australia's Capital Cities', Water 31(8): 68—71.

25.

Slovic, P. (1987) `Perceptions of Risk', Science 236: 280—5.

26.

Star G. , A. Langley and A. Taylor (2000) Environmental Health Risk Perception in Australia: A Research Report to the Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. Adelaide: Centre for Population Studies in Epidemiology, Department of Human Services.

27.

Young, M.D. , W. Proctor , M.E. Qureshi and G. Wittwer (2006) Without Water: The Economics of Supplying Water to 5 Million More Australians, Water for a Healthy Country Flagship Report, CSIRO Land and Water, Monash University, May.

How Australians order acceptance of recycled water

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References