In this paper, a common social housing archetype design was studied in order to improve the energy and cost performance. The focus is on evaluating the effects of some parameters of the design of the façade in particular: the size of the windows and the optical and thermo-physical properties of the components. The aim is to obtain cost optimal energy efficient scenarios in accordance with the Recast of Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) by determining efficient thicknesses of the insulation for the exterior walls and efficient window sizes and types of glazing for each orientation, simultaneously. The parameters of the façade are optimized in order to obtain the dominant values and ranges in terms of energy and cost. There are remarkable differences in the dominant options for the thickness of the insulations, as well as the type and size of windows: they depend on whether they have a north, south and east–west orientation. The decision makers should design each façade in dependence on its orientation to determine its optimal optical and thermo-physical properties in terms of its cost and its consumption of energy. A reduction by approximately 5% in the life cycle cost and 17% in the primary energy use was achieved through the optimization of the base case.
Building Census 2000. Ankara: State Institute of Statistics Prime Ministry, 2000.
3.
Directive 2002/91/EC. Energy performance of buildings. European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the Energy Performance of Buildings, Brussels, 2002.
4.
Directive 2010/31/EU. Energy performance of buildings (recast). European Parliament and of the Council, Brussels, 2010.
RomaniaZDraouiaAAllardF.Metamodeling the heating and cooling energy needs and simultaneous building envelope optimization for low energy building design in Morocco. Energy Build2015;
102: 139–148.
7.
BamdadKCholetteMEGuanLBellJ.Ant colony algorithm for building energy optimisation problems and comparison with benchmark algorithms. Energy Build2017;
154: 404–414.
8.
Tuhus-DubrowDKrartiM.Genetic-algorithm based approach to optimize building envelope design for residential buildings. Build Environ2010;
45: 1574–1581.
9.
LiZChenHLinBZhuY.Fast bidirectional building performance optimization at the early design stage. Build Simul2018;
11: 647–661.
10.
LeeJWJungHJParkJYLeeJBYoonY.Optimization of building window system in Asian regions by analyzing solar heat gain and daylighting elements. Renew Energy2013;
50: 522–531.
11.
LartigueBLasternasBLoftnessV.Multi-objective optimization of building envelope for energy consumption and daylight. IndoorBuilt Environ2014;
23: 70–80.
12.
SuXZhangX.Environmental performance optimization of window-wall ratio for different window type in hot summer and cold winter zone in China based on life cycle assessment. Energy Build2010;
42: 198–202.
13.
BaglivoCCongedoPMDi CataldoMColucciaLDD’AgostinoD.Envelope design optimization by thermal modelling of a building in a warm climate. Energies2017;
10: 1808.
14.
GagneJAndersenM.A generative facade design method based on daylighting performance goals. J Build Perform Simul2012;
5: 141–154.
15.
KrartiMEricksonPMHillmanTC.A simplified method to estimate energy savings of artificial lighting use from daylighting. Build Environ2005;
40: 747–754.
16.
ZhaiYWangYHuangYMengX.A multi-objective optimization methodology for window design considering energy consumption, thermal environment and visual performance. Renew Energy2019;
134: 1190–1199.
17.
VanhoutteghemLSkarningGCJHviidCASvendsenS.Impact of façade window design on energy, daylighting and thermal comfort in nearly zero-energy houses. Energy Build2015;
102: 149–156.
18.
ZhangABokelRvan den DobbelsteenASunY.Optimization of thermal and daylight performance of school buildings based on a multi-objective genetic algorithm in the cold climate of China. Energy Build2017;
139: 371–384.
19.
LinYTsaiKLinMYangM.Design optimization of office building envelope configurations for energy conservation. Appl Energy2016;
171: 336–346.
20.
LeeBPourmousavianNHensenJ.Full-factorial design space exploration approach for multi-criteria decision making of the design of industrial halls. Energy Build2016;
117: 352–361.
21.
WetterM.GenOpt – a generic optimization program. 7th Int IBPSA Conf Proc2001;
7: 601–610.
22.
Braulio-GonzaloMBoveaMD.Environmental and cost performance of building’s envelope insulation materials to reduce energy demand: thickness optimization. Energy Build2017;
150: 527–545.
23.
HalawaEGhaffarianhoseiniAGhaffarianhoseiniATrombleyJHassanNBaigMYusoffSYAzzam IsmailM.A review on energy conscious designs of building façades in hot and humid climates: Lessons for (and from) Kuala Lumpur and Darwin. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2018;
82: 2147–2161.
24.
HasanAVuolleMSirenK.Minimisation of life cycle cost of a detached house using combined simulation and optimization. Build Environ2008;
43: 2022–2034.
25.
YangMDLinMDLinYHTsaiKT.Multi-objective optimization design of green building envelope material using a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. Appl Thermal Eng2017;
111: 1255–1264.
26.
Al-TamimiNFadzilS.Energy-efficient envelope design for high-rise residential buildings in Malaysia. Architect Sci Rev2012;
55: 119–127.
27.
D’AgostinoDDaraioLMarinoCMinichielloF.Cost-optimal methodology and passive strategies for building energy efficiency: a case-study. Architect Sci Rev2018;
61: 400–409.
28.
DombaycıÖAGölcüMPancarY.Optimization of insulation thickness for external walls using different energy-sources. Appl Energy2006;
83: 921–928.
29.
UcarABaloF.Effect of fuel type on the optimum thickness of selected insulation materials for the four different climatic regions of Turkey. Appl Energy2009;
86: 730–736.
30.
EkiciBBGultenAAAksoyUT.A study on the optimum insulation thickness of various types of external walls with respect to different materials, fuels and climate zones in Turkey. Appl Energy2012;
92: 211–217.
31.
ManganSDKoçlar OralG.Assessment of residential building performances for the different climate zones of Turkey in terms of life cycle energy and cost efficiency. Energy Build2016;
110: 362–376.
32.
YılmazYKoçlar OralG.An approach for an educational building stock energy retrofits through life-cycle cost optimization. Architect Sci Rev2018;
61: 122–132.
EN 15459:2007. Energy performance of buildings – economic evaluation procedure for energy systems in buildings.
Brussels:
European Committee for Standardization, 2007.
37.
MachairasVTsangrassoulisAKleoA.Algorithms for optimization of building design: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2014;
31: 101–112.
38.
WetterMWrightJ.A comparison of deterministic and probabilistic optimization algorithms for nonsmooth simulation-based optimization. Build Environ2004;
39: 989–999.
39.
KampfJHWetterMRobinsonD.A comparison of global optimization algorithms with standard benchmark functions and real-world applications using EnergyPlus. J Build Perform Simul2010;
3: 103–120.
40.
WetterM. GenOpt – generic optimization program user manual version 3.1.0. Simulation Research Group, Building Technologies Department, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2011, Berkeley, CA, USA.
41.
KaragüzelÖTZhangRLamKP.Coupling of whole-building energy simulation and multi-dimensional numerical optimization for minimizing the life cycle costs of office buildings. Build Simul2014;
7: 111–121.
