Nowadays, energy retrofit for existing buildings has become a worldwide approach to reduce total energy consumption. A wide range of energy-efficient retrofit measures is actively affecting the decision process, of which retrofit alternatives should be used. The existing study aims to evaluate the effects of façade retrofit measures in residential buildings in Cairo using life-cycle cost analysis. An extensive variety of façade retrofit alternatives was explored individually and combined. A hypothetical benchmark building was used as a reference to represent typical residential buildings in Cairo. DesignBuilder was adopted to assess and quantify the energy-saving potentials for the proposed measures. The evaluation process was based on a parametric analysis of four major façade parameters that are affecting building energy performance; exterior wall configuration, glazing type, window-to-wall ratio and external shading. Thermal characteristics for façade retrofit measures were analysed to give a better understanding of the thermal performance for each retrofitting case. Results showed that the most cost-effective alternative for façade retrofit is to install a 1 m overhang as an external shading device, which reached 1.4% life-cycle cost saving and 18% energy saving. Finally, a sensitivity analysis for the main life-cycle cost supplements was presented to show major variables that are affecting life-cycle cost analysis.
AmasyaliKEl-GoharyNM.A review of data-driven building energy consumption prediction studies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2018; 81: 1192–1205.
2.
CaoXDaiXLiuJ.Building energy-consumption status worldwide and the state-of-the-art technologies for zero-energy buildings during the past decade. Energy Build2016; 128: 198–213.
3.
Pablo-RomeroMDPPozo-BarajasRYñiguezR.Global changes in residential energy consumption. Energy Policy2017; 101: 342–352.
4.
MartinezAPattersonMCarlsonANobleD.Fundamentals in façade retrofit practice. Proc Eng2015; 118: 934–941.
5.
AyyadKMFekryAA.Green retrofitability index (GRI) as an indicator for decision-makers in green retrofitting projects. Proc Environ Sci2016; 34: 233–244.
6.
MaZCooperPDalyDLedoL.Existing building retrofits: methodology and state-of-the-art. Energy Build2012; 55: 889–902.
7.
RabaniMMadessaHBNordN.A state-of-art review of retrofit interventions in buildings towards nearly zero energy level. Energy Proc2017; 134: 317–326.
8.
FarCFarH.Improving energy efficiency of existing residential buildings using effective thermal retrofit of building envelope. Indoor Built Environ2019; 28: 744–760.
9.
ChidiacSECataniaEJCMorofskyEFooS.A screening methodology for implementing cost effective energy retrofit measures in Canadian office buildings. Energy Build2011; 43: 614–620.
10.
JafariAValentinV.Selection of optimization objectives for decision-making in building energy retrofits. Build Environ2018; 130: 94–103.
11.
MakantasiA-MMavrogianniA.Adaptation of London’s social housing to climate change through retrofit: a holistic evaluation approach. Adv Build Energy Res2016; 10: 99–124.
12.
KamelE.Integration and interoperability of building envelope information and energy modeling. PhD Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA, 2017.
13.
WangXSunXYuCWF.Building envelope with variable thermal performance: opportunities and challenges. Indoor Built Environ2018; 27: 72–-733.
14.
AttiaSEvrardAGratiaE.Development of benchmark models for the Egyptian residential buildings sector. Appl Energy2012; 94: 270–284.
PattersonMVaglioJNobleD.Incremental façade retrofits: curtainwall technology as a strategy to step existing buildings toward zero net energy. Energy Proc2014; 57: 3150–3159.
17.
RakhshanKFriessWA.Effectiveness and viability of residential building energy retrofits in Dubai. J Build Eng2017; 13: 116–126.
18.
TalebH.Using passive cooling strategies to improve thermal performance and reduce energy consumption of residential buildings in U.A.E. buildings. Collection Front Architect Res2014; 3: 154–165.
19.
Boukli HaceneMChabane SariN.Energy efficient design optimization of a bioclimatic house. Indoor Built Environ2020; 29: 270–285.
20.
CopielloSGabrielliLBonifaciP.Evaluation of energy retrofit in buildings under conditions of uncertainty: the prominence of the discount rate. Energy2017; 137: 104–117.
21.
RuparathnaRHewageKSadiqR.Economic evaluation of building energy retrofits: a fuzzy based approach. Energy Build2017; 139: 395–406.
22.
YılmazYYılmazBÇ.Life cycle cost optimization of building façade: a social housing case. Indoor Built Environ2021; 30: 215–228.
23.
KuuskKKalameesTMaivelM.Cost effectiveness of energy performance improvements in Estonian brick apartment buildings. Energy Build2014; 77: 313–322.
24.
KrartiMAldubyanMWilliamsE.Residential building stock model for evaluating energy retrofit programs in Saudi Arabia. Energy2020; 195: 116980.
25.
AshrafianTYilmazAZCorgnatiSPMoazzenN.Methodology to define cost-optimal level of architectural measures for energy efficient retrofits of existing detached residential buildings in Turkey. Energy Build2016; 120: 58–77.
26.
AlbadrySTarabiehKSewilamH.Achieving net zero-energy buildings through retrofitting existing residential buildings using PV panels. Energy Proc2017; 115: 195–204.
27.
EdeisyMCecereC.Envelope retrofit in hot arid climates. Proc Environ Sci2017; 38: 264–273.
28.
AttiaSDe HerdeA. Impact and potential of community scale low-energy retrofit: case study in Cairo. In: Proceedings of the 3rd CIB international conference on smart and sustainable built environment, TU Delft, June 15–19 2009; pp.400–406.
29.
AzizSGuindiSEShobokshi He OsmanHAdhamR.Residential building survey in Cairo and Alexandria. Cairo: Housing and Building Research Center, 2001.
30.
AlcazarSSBassB. Energy performance of green roofs in a multi-storey residential building in Madrid. In: annual international greening rooftops for sustainable communities conference, Washington, DC, 4–6 May 2005. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information. Available from Green Roofs for Healthy Cities, Ontario, 1 Jul 2005, pp. 569–582.
31.
RefahiAHTalkhabiH.Investigating the effective factors on the reduction of energy consumption in residential buildings with green roofs. Renew Energy2015; 80: 595–603.
32.
HeoYChoudharyRAugenbroeGA.Calibration of building energy models for retrofit analysis under uncertainty. Energy Build2012; 47: 550–560.
33.
AttiaSHamdyMEzzeldinS.Twenty-year tracking of lighting savings and power density in the residential sector. Energy Build2017; 154: 113–126.
HBRC.Egyptian Residential Energy Efficiency Building Code (EEBC). ECP 306. Cairo, Egypt: The Housing and Building Research Council, 2005.
36.
AttiaSWanasO.The database of Egyptian building envelopes (DEBE): a database for building energy simulations. Proc SimBuild2012; 5: 96–103.
37.
MahdyMMM.Applying architecture simulation tools to assess building sustainable design: adapting the Egyptian residential energy code for climate change. PhD Thesis, University of Kent, Canterbury, England, 2014.
38.
MHUC.Building materials price list for June 2020. Cairo, Egypt: Ministry of Housing, Utilities & Urban Communities, 2020.
39.
AmirifardFSharifSANasiriF.Application of passive measures for energy conservation in buildings – a review. Adv Build Energy Res2019; 13: 282–315.
40.
HetebaN.Life cycle cost and assessment model for systems and sources of lighting. M.Sc. Thesis, The American University in Cairo, Cairo, Egypt, 2013.
41.
ManganSDOralGK.A study on life cycle assessment of energy retrofit strategies for residential buildings in Turkey. Energy Proc2015; 78: 842–847.
42.
PetersenSR.BLCC: The NIST ‘building life-cycle cost’ program, Version 4.21 Users’s Guide and Reference Manual. Gaithersburg, USA: NIST, 1995.
KishoreN.Impact of climate change on future bioclimatic potential and residential building thermal and energy performance in India. Indoor Built Environ. Epub ahead of print, 20 February 2021; https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X219939191420326X–21993919.
