Female elderly individuals make up the majority of public housing residents. Inappropriate guidelines have been neglecting their differentiated needs and this has been negatively affecting their quality of life in public housing. Recognizing the specific needs of female seniors is a key to successful provision of public housing by the government because the proportion of female seniors in public housing has been increasing. This research aims to assess urban public rental housing through post-occupancy evaluation of six housing projects that were developed by public housing authorities in Korea. Focusing on flexibility, safety, accessibility and support for care, questionnaires and interviews were conducted to provide gender-sensitive directions for public housing designs in an ageing society. There are four main findings: (i) The nuclear family-oriented floor plan needs to be changed to provide flexibility reflecting the diverse lifestyles of one or two member residents. (ii) The life safety guideline that assumed housing is mainly catered for healthy young residents would need major revision. (iii) Accessibility issues would need to consider the presence of a caregiver and flexible application, depending on the lifecycle of elderly individuals. (iv) The support for care with a complicated smart home system would need improvement.
WHO. Active ageing: a policy framework.
Geneva:
WHO, 2002.
2.
OswaldFWahlH-WSchillingONygrenCFangeASixsmithASixsmithJSzemanZTomsoneSIwarssonS.Relationships between housing and healthy aging in very old age. Gerontologist2007;
47: 96–107.
3.
IwarssonSWahlH-WNygrenCOswaldFSixsmithASixsmithJSzemanZTomsoneS.Importance of the home environment for healthy aging: conceptual and methodological background of the European ENABLE-AGE project. Gerontologist2007;
47: 78–84.
4.
YanminZ.Report on residential requirement of the elderly in China. In: HongL (ed.) Senior housing.
London:
Design Media Publishing (UK) Limited, 2016, pp.12–29.
5.
WHO. Global age-friendly cities: a guide.
Geneva:
WHO, 2007, p.30.
6.
LawtonMP.The elderly in context: perspectives from environmental psychologyand gerontology. Environ Behav1985;
17: 501–519.
7.
WilesJLLeibingAGubermanNReeveJAllenRES.The meaning of “Aging in Place” to older people. Gerontologist2012;
52: 357–366.
8.
RowlesGDOswaldFHunterEG.Interior living environments in old age. Ann Rev Gerontol Geriatr2003;
23: 167–193.
9.
MicklowAKanciliaEWarnerM.The need to plan for women. Planning with a gender lens: issue brief.
New York:
Cornell University, 2015, pp.1–15.
10.
De MadariagaSNeumanM.Mainstreaming gender in the city. Town Plann Rev2016;
87: 494–504.
11.
PerroneC.Grounds for future gendered urban agendas: policy patterns and practice implications. Town Plann Rev2016;
87: 549–606.
12.
QuetsGDugganACooperG.A gender lens on affordable housing, re:gender.
Washington:
ICRW (International Center for Research on Women), 2016, pp.1–31.
13.
HowardM.Subsidized housing policy: defining the family. Berkeley J Gender Law Justice2013;
22: 97–134.
14.
National Low Income Housing Coalition. Housing Spotlight2012;
2: 1–6.
15.
ReidM.Public housing and gender: contextualizing the “We Call These Projects Home” report. Cities2013;
35: 335–341.
16.
HellströmYHallbergIR.Perspective of elderly people receiving home help on health, care and quality of life.Health Soc Care Commun2000;
9: 61–71.
17.
Statistics Korea. Statistics list, http://kosis.kr (accessed 1 July 2017).
18.
JooJSSongCSParkGP.Statistical handbook: women in Korea 2015.
Seoul:
KWDI (Korea Women’s Development Institute), 2016.
19.
Statistics Korea. Life table for Korea 2015, http://kostat.go.kr (accessed 1 July 2017).
20.
ParkMY.A study on the facility of elderly housing unit plan. Master Thesis, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul, Korea, 2008.
21.
ParkJYKwonHSKwonSS.Model development of national rental housing for the elderly in the aged society. J Archit Inst Korea Plann Des2007;
23: 83–92.
22.
ChangKSandKimKS.A study on the homemakers’ housing notion according to unit size in apartment. Korea Inst Interior Des J2003;
38: 116–124.
23.
ParkSB.A fundamental study on housing for the elderly through an analysis of senior adults’ needs. J Archit Inst Korea2007;
23: 49–58.
24.
LeeYSAhnCHChangJW.The conditions and needs for home modification of urban living low-income elderly. Design Convergence Study2014;
13: 288–307.
25.
LH (The Korea Land and Housing Corporation). Public housing design guideline (building).
Seoul, Korea:
LH, 2014.
26.
SH (Seoul Housing & Communities Corporation). A study on the database for apartment housing unit plan.
Seoul:
SH, 2003.
27.
LeeS.Aging in place and urban regeneration.
Seoul:
Joenddang, 2013, p.23.
28.
DenermarkBandEkstromM.Relocation and health effects on the elderly; a commented research review. J Sociol Social Welfare1990;
17: 25–49.
29.
KahanaELovegreenLKahanaBKahanaM.Person, Environment, and person-environment fit as influences on residential satisfaction of elders. Environ Behav2003;
35: 434–453.
30.
FuK.A review on housing tenure choice. In: WangJDingZZouLZuoJ (eds) Proceedings on 17th international symposium on advancement of construction management and real estate, Shenzhen, China, 17–18 November 2012.
Berlin:
Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2014; pp.351–360.
31.
HowellSC.Environment and the aging women: domains of choice. In: AltmanIChurchmanA (eds) Women and the environment.
New York:
Plenum Press, 1994, pp.105–131.
32.
PreiserWFERabinowitzHZWhiteET.Post occupancy evaluation.
New York:
Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1988.
33.
Sanni-AnibireMOHassanainMAAl-HammadgesAM.Post-occupancy evaluation of housing facilities: overview and summary of methods. J Perform Constr Facil2016;
30: 04016009.
34.
CutlerLJ.Physical environments of assisted living: research needs and challenges. Gerontologist2007;
47: 68–82.
35.
ShinHKLeeJM.A study on the evaluation for elderly housing environment-content analysis of elderly housing environment literature issued after 2000. J Korea Hous Assoc2010;
21: 151–159.
36.
PirinenA.Housing concepts for and by the elderly: from subjects of design to a design resource. J Hous Elderly2016;
30: 412–429.
37.
DanzigerSChaudhuryH.Older adults’ use of adaptable design features in housing units: an exploratory study. J Hous Elderly2009;
23: 134–148.
38.
MarcusCC.House as a mirror of self.
Berkeley:
Conari Press, 1995, pp.11–12.
39.
ChoiKJJungJ.A study on the change of the apartment unit plan in national housing-focused on institutional and social changes. J Korean Hous Assoc2015;
26: 123–131.
40.
KimHKwonS.A basic study on elderly residents’ requirement for unit renovation of permanent rental housing. J Korea Inst Healthc Archit2013;
19: 51–59.
41.
HanPWSohnMGKimHYParkJOLeeJO.A study on the planning elements for the elderly in remodeling the permanent rental apartment. J Archit Inst Korea2007;
23: 73–82.
42.
Public document SN2011-491. Housing safety criteria for seniors and handicapped. Seoul: Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 2011.
43.
PaulsJandJuilletE.Life safety standards and guidelines (Chapter 8). In: WFEPPreiserKHSmith (eds) Universal design handbook. 2nd ed.
New York:
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2011, pp. 8.1–8.6.
44.
SteinfeldEandMaiselJL.Universal design creating inclusive environments.
New Jersey:
John Wiley & Sons, 2012, pp.229–231.
45.
WahlH-WandOswaldF.Environmental perspectives on ageing. In: DDanneferCPhillipson (eds) The SAGE handbook of social gerontology.
London:
SAGE Publications Inc., 2010, pp.111–124.
46.
MahmoodAYamamotoTLeeMSteggellC.Perceptions and use of gerotechnology: implications for aging in place. J Hous Elderly2008;
22: 104–126.
