KuahATHDillonR. Digital transformation in a post-covid world: sustainable innovation, disruption and change. 1st ed. Boca Raton: Routledge, 2021.
2.
WangJCaoS-JYuCW. Development trend and challenges of sustainable urban design in the digital age. Indoor Built Environ2021; 30: 3–6. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X20976058
3.
WangTYanWPeiSZhangMZhangQTengYLiuGWangJYanSJiB. Planning for sustainable and ecological urban environment: Current trends and future developments. Int J Med Sci2023; 20: 627–638. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X221135758
4.
WillisVCThomas CraigKJJabbarpourYScheufeleELArriagaYEAjinkyaMRheeKBBazemoreAA. Digital health interventions to enhance prevention in primary care: scoping review. JMIR Med Inform2022; 10: e33518. DOI: 10.2196/33518
5.
MarstonHRHadleyRBanksDDuroMDCM. Mobile Self-Monitoring ECG Devices to Diagnose Arrhythmia that Coincide with Palpitations: A Scoping Review. Healthcare2019; 7: 96. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare7030096
6.
MarstonHRvan HoofJ. “Who doesn’t think about technology when designing urban environments for older people?” A case study approach to a proposed extension of the WHO’s age-friendly cities model. Int J Environ Res Public Health2019; 16: 3525. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16193525
7.
MarstonHRShoreLStoopsLTurnerR. Transgenerational technology and interactions for the 21st century: perspectives and narratives. Bingley: Emerald, 2022.
van HoofJDikkenJButtiġieġSCvan den HovenRFMKroonEMarstonHR. Age-friendly cities in the Netherlands: an explorative study of facilitators and hindrances in the built environment and ageism in design. Indoor Built Environ2020; 29: 417–437. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X19857216
10.
van HoofJMarstonHRKazakJKBuffelT. Ten questions concerning age-friendly cities and communities and the built environment. Build Environ2021; 199: 107922. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107922
11.
van HoofJKazakJK. Urban ageing. Indoor Built Environ2018; 27: 583–586. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X18768160
12.
MarstonHRShoreLWhitePJ. How does a (Smart) age-friendly ecosystem look in a post-pandemic society?Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 8276. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17218276
13.
FulmerTPatelPLevyNMateKBermanAPeltonLBeardJKalacheAAuerbachJ. Moving toward a global age-friendly ecosystem. J Am Geriatr Soc2020; 68: 1936–1940. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16675
14.
FreemanSMarstonHROlynickJMusselwhiteCKulczyckiCGenoeRXiongB. Intergenerational effects on the impacts of technology use in later life: insights from an international, multi-site study. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 5711. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17165711
15.
MarstonHRMorganDJWilson-MenzfeldGGatesJMaddockCAJonesEJPhillipsJBaileyGNicholsonJ. Chapter 29. Employing Citizen Science to understand the contemporary needs of older adults accessing and using technology in a Pandemic. In: UrbaniakAWankaA (eds). International handbook of participatory approaches in ageing research. 1st ed.Abingdon: Routledge, 2023. DOI: 10.4324/9781003254829
16.
ChidiacMRossCMarstonHRFreemanS. Age and gender perspectives on social media and technology practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 13969. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192113969
17.
Pan American Health Organization. Developing a national eHealth strategy. 2022. Washington DC: Pan American Health Organization, 2022. https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/55661 (Accessed 12 December 2022).
18.
World Health Organization. WHO compendium of innovative health technologies for low-resource settings: 2016-2017: medical devices, eHealth/mHealth, medical simulation devices, personal protective equipment, assistive products, and other technologies. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/274893 (Accessed 12 December 2022).
19.
Regional Committee for Africa, 70. Progress report on utilizing eHealth solutions to improve national health systems in the African Region: information document. World Health Organization. Brazzaville: Regional Office for Africa, 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/334099 (Accessed 12 December 2022).
20.
FiskMLivingstoneAPitSW. Telehealth in the context of COVID-19: changing perspectives in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. J Med Internet Res2020; 22: e19264. DOI: 10.2196/19264
21.
Regional Committee for Europe. Regional digital health action plan for the WHO European Region 2023-2030. Tel Aviv: World Health Organization, 2022: 12–14 september 2022. EUR/RC72/5.
22.
MarstonHRMorganDJWilson-MenzfeldGGatesJTurnerR. Written Evidence [PTC0018] the long-term impact of the pandemic on town and cities. UK: UK Government, 2021. Published 6th July 2021https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/37464/pdf/ (Accessed 12 December 2022).
WoutersEJMNieboerMENieboerKAMoonenMJGAPeekSTMSponseleeAAGvan HoofJvan der VoortCSLuijkxKG. How to guide the use of technology for ageing-in-place? An evidence-based educational module. In: ZhouJSalvendyG (eds). ITAP 2017, Part I, LNCS 10297. Cham: Springer, 2017, pp. 1–12. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58530-7_37
26.
NieboerMEvan HoofJvan HoutAMAartsSWoutersEJM. Professional values, technology and future health care: the view of health care professionals in The Netherlands. Technol Soc2014; 39: 10–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.05.003
27.
MarstonHRWilsonGMorganDJGatesJR. Written Evidence [LOL0017], Living online: the long-term impact on wellbeing. London, UK: COVID-19 Committee, Government, 2020. https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/18490/pdf/ (Accessed 17 March 2023).
IvanLBeuDvan HoofJ. Smart and age-friendly cities in Romania: an overview of public policy and practice. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 5202. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17145202
32.
DikkenJvan den HovenRFMvan StaalduinenWHHulsebosch-JanssenLMTvan HoofJ. How older people experience the age-friendliness of their city: development of the age-friendly cities and communities questionnaire. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 6867. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17186867
33.
van HoofJvan den HovenRFMHessMvan StaalduinenWHHulsebosch-JanssenLMTDikkenJ. How older people experience the age-friendliness of The Hague: a quantitative study. Cities2022; 124: 103568. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103568
34.
van HoofJ. Older people going green out of financial necessity: environmental sustainability and age-friendly cities. Indoor Built Environ2023: 1420326X2311566. in press. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X231156672
35.
SchellenLvan HoofJ. Thermal comfort in smart homes for an aging population. In: van HoofJDemirisGWoutersEJM (eds) Handbook of smart homes, health care and well-being. Cham: Springer, 2017, pp. 475–484.
36.
MaslowAH. A Theory of Human Motivation. Psy Rev1943; 50: 370–396. DOI: 10.1037/h0054346
37.
ChiversS. “With friends like these”: unpacking panicked metaphors for population ageing. Societies2021; 11: 69. DOI:10.3390/soc11030069
38.
LundHJuhlCBNørgaardBDraborgEHenriksenMAndreasenJChristensenRNasserMCiliskaDClarkeMTugwellPMartinJBlaineCBrunnhuberKRobinsonKAEvidence-Based Research Network. Evidence-based research series-paper 2: using an evidence-based research approach before a new study is conducted to ensure value. J Clin Epidemiol2021; 129: 158–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.019