The purpose of this study was to investigate patterns and factors related to 6- to 12-year-old children’s and their parents’ green space use behaviours in Çayyolu neighbourhood of Ankara, Turkey. Data were collected through draw and write surveys and questionnaire surveys at selected schools, and direct observations in eight parks in the neighbourhood. A total of 418 children and 383 of their parents participated in the surveys. In all, 498 recordings were made during on-site observations. Findings suggest that there is an interaction between park visiting patterns of parents and their children. Taking children to parks was a major motivation for – particularly female (p < 0.05) – parents to go outdoors. Most children (75%) used only gardens of their houses or housing complexes. There was a positive association between parents’ and children’s duration of visit (p = 0.00). Principal component analysis revealed three factors (52% of the total variance) effecting parents’ influence on their children’s use of green spaces; benefits of spending time outdoors, safety concerns and design characteristics. Results indicate that environmental design is not solely a factor in use of green spaces; understanding and promoting children’s use of green spaces should involve a holistic approach that includes social, cultural and physical aspects of the environment.
KarstenL. It all used to be better? Different generations on continuity and change in urban children’s daily use of space. Children Geogr2005; 3(3): 275–290.
2.
OğuzDÇakcıI. Changes in leisure and recreational preferences: a case study of Ankara. Sci Res Essays2010; 5(8): 721–729.
3.
ErkipF. The rise of shopping mall in Turkey: the use and appeal of a mall in Ankara. Cities2005; 22(2): 1073–1093.
4.
Ward-ThompsonC. Activity, exercise and the planning and design of outdoor spaces. J Environ Psychol2013; 3: 79–96.
5.
ZaskAvan BeurdenEBarnettLBrooksLODietrichUC. Active school playgrounds- myth or reality? Results of the “Move it groove it” project. Preven Med2001; 33: 402–408.
LouvR. Last child in the woods: saving our children from nature-deficit disorder, Chapel Hill: Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill, 2005.
9.
SallisJFBaumanAPrattM. Environmental Policy Interventions to promote physical activity. Am J Prev Med1998; 15(4): 379–397.
10.
Turkish Republic Ministry of Health. Türkiye sağlıklı beslenme ve hareketli hayat programı (2014-2017) (Healthy nutrition and active life program of Turkey 2014-2017), Ankara: Turkish Republic Ministry of Health, 2013.
11.
DavisonKKLawsonCT. Do attributes in the physical environment influence children's physical activity? A review of the literature. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act2006; 3: 19. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-3-19.
12.
Giles-CortiBDonovanRJ. The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity. Soc Sci Med2002; 54: 1793–1812.
KoohsariMJMavoaSVillanuevaKSugiyamaTBadlandHKaczynskiATOwenN. Public open space, physical activity, urban design and public health: concepts, methods and research agenda. Health Place2015; 33: 75–82.
15.
HumpelNOwenNLeslieE. Environmental factors associated with adults’ participation in physical activity: a review. Am J Prev Med2002; 22(3): 188–199.
16.
MyttonOTTownsendNRutterHFosterC. Green space and physical activity: An observational study using Health Survey for England data. Health Place2012; 18(5): 1034–1041.
17.
FrankLDEngelkePOSchmidTL. Health and community design: the impact of the built environment on physical activity, Washington, DC: Island Press, 2003.
18.
StevensRBBrownBB. Walkable new urban LEED_neighborhood development (LEED-ND) community design and children’s physical activity: selection, environmental, or catalyst effects?Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act2011; 8: 139. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-139.
19.
CohenDAAshwoodJSScottMMOvertonAEvensonKRStatenLKPorterDMcKenzieTLCatellierD. Public parks and physical activity among adolescent girls. Pediatrics2006; 118: 1381–1389.
20.
RoemmichJNEpsteinLHRajaSYinLRobinsonJWiniewiczD. Association of access to parks and recreational facilities with the physical activity of young children. Preven Med2006; 43(6): 437–441.
21.
TimperioACrawfordDTelfordASalmonJ. Perceptions about the local neighborhood and walking. Preven Med2004; 38(1): 39–47.
22.
Loukaitou-SiderisASiderisA. What brings children to the park?J Am Plann Assoc2010; 76(1): 89–107.
23.
VeitchJSalmonJBallK. Children’s perceptions of the use of public open spaces for active free-play. Children Geogr2007; 5(4): 409–422.
24.
WeirLAEtelsonDBrandDA. Parents’ perceptions of neighborhood safety and children’s physical activity. Preven Med2006; 43: 212–217.
25.
LachowyczKJonesAP. Greenspace and obesity: a systematic review of the evidence. Obesity Rev2011; 12: 183–189.
26.
TakahashiEYoshidaKSugimoriHMiyakawaMIzunoTYamagamiTKagamimoriS. Influence factors on the development of obesity in 3-year-old children based on the Toyama study. Preven Med1999; 28: 293–296.
27.
FogelholmMNuutinenOPasanenMMyöhänenESääteläT. Parent-child relationship of physical activity patterns and obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord1999; 23(12): 1262–1268.
28.
MooreLLLombardiDAWhiteMJCampbellJLOliveriaSAEllisonRC. Influence of parents’ physical activity levels on activity levels of young children. J Pediatr1991; 118(2): 215–219.
29.
AkpınarACankurtM. Parental influence on children’s physical activity in urban green spaces. J Faculty Forestry İstanbul Univ2016; 66(2): 471–482.
30.
JanssonM. Attractive playgrounds: some factors affecting user interest and visiting patterns. Landscape Res2010; 35(1): 63–81.
31.
HepcanŞKaplanAKüçükerbaşEÖzkanB. A research on the qualitative assessment of urban outdoor spaces in the case of Kemalpaş a İzmir. J Ege Univ Faculty Agric2001; 38: 143–150.
32.
GülAKüçükV. Kentsel açık yeş il alanlar ve Isparta kenti örneğinde irdelenmesi (The research of Isparta and the open-green areas). J Faculty Forestry SDU A2001; 2: 27–48.
33.
ÖzgünerH. Cultural differences in attitudes towards urban parks and green spaces. Landscape Res2011; 36(5): 599–620.
34.
AltınçekiçHSarıY. Bartın kenti çocuk oyun alanlarının irdelenmesi (An assessment of children playgrounds in Bartın). Rev Faculty Forestry Univ İstanbul2005; 55(1): 33–45.
35.
ÖzgünerHŞahinC. Isparta kent merkezindeki çocuk oyun alanlarının mevcut durumu ve çocukların bu alanlara karş ı davranış biçimleri (An examination of the existing situation of children play areas in Isparta city and children’s attitudes towards these areas). J Faculty Forestry SDU A2009; 1: 129–143.
Shaw B, Bicket M, Elliot B, Fagan-Watson B, Mocaa E and Hillman M. Children’s independent mobility: an international comparison and recommendations for action. Policy Studies Institute, http://www.psi.org.uk/docs/7350_PSI_Report_CIM_final.pdf (2015, accessed 16 February 2017).
WillenbergLJAshboltRHollandDGibbsLMacDougallCGarrardJGreenJBWatersE. Increasing school playground physical activity: a mixed methods study combining environmental measures and children’s perspectives. J Sci Med Sport2010; 13: 210–216.
44.
SallisJFConwayTLProchaskaJJMcKenzieTLMarshallSJBrownM. The association of school environments with youth physical activity. Am J Public Health2001; 91(4): 618–620.
45.
JannsonMPerssonB. Playground planning and management: an evaluation of standard-influenced provision through user needs. Urban Forestry Urban Green2010; 9: 33–42.
