A randomised clinical trial was conducted in order to compare treatment results between Minnesota model treatment for alcohol abuse and outpatient treatment. The trial had to be discontinued due to problems in recruitment of subjects and a high rate of attrition among subjects allocated to Minnesota model treatment. In this paper the problems encountered during the trial are discussed. Different methods of recruitment of subjects to a randomised trial are compared.
5. Keso L.Inpatient treatment for employed alcoholics: a randomized clinical trial on Hazelden and traditional treatment. Thesis. Helsinki1988.
6.
6. Gerdner A, Bodin L, Söderfeldt B. Behandling som hjälp till självhjälp. Minnesotamodellen tillämpad på ett svenskt LVM-hem, Runnagården. Bakgrundsfaktorer och resultat. Högskolan i örebro 1988, Rapportserie 47.
7.
7. Potamianos G.Randomised trial of community based centre versus conventional hospital management in treatment of alcoholism. Lancet1986; ii: 797–99.
8.
8. Longabaugh R.Cost effectiveness of alcoholism treatment in partial vs inpatient settings. J Stud Alcohol1983; 44: 1049–71.
9.
9. Edwards G, Guthrie S.A controlled trial of inpatient and outpatient treatment of alcohol dependence. Lancet1967; i: 555–59.
10.
10. Ritson B.The prognosis of alcohol addicts treated by a specialised unit. Br J Psychiatry1968; 114: 1019–29.
11.
11. Howdon Chapman PL, Huygens I.An evaluation of three treatment programmes for alcoholism: an experimental study with 6- and 18-month follow-ups. Br J Addic1988; 83: 67–81.
12.
12. Andréasson S, Parmander M, Allebeck P.Utvärdering av alkoholbehandling: jämförelse mellan Minnesotamodellen, öppen alkoholmottagning och ingen behandling av alkoholmissbruk. Läkartidningen, accepted for publication 1989 (English summary).
13.
13. Stinnett JL, Schechter JO.A quantitative inventory of alcohol disorders (QIAD): a severity scale for alcohol abuse. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse1982–83; 9: 413–30.
14.
14. Selzer ML.The Michigan alcohol screening test: the quest for a new diagnostic instrument. Amer J Psychiat1971; 127: 1653–58.
15.
15. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, Williams J, Papp E.The Nottingham health profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med1981; 15A: 221–29.
16.
16. Persson J.Hur mycket sjukvård – och av vilken typ – konsumerar en alkoholmiss-brukare?I: Problemet alkohol. Svenska Läkaresällskapets handlingar, band 95, häfte 4, 1986.
17.
17. Ewing JA.Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaire. JAMA1984; 252: 1905–7.
18.
18. Farrell MP, David AS.Do psychiatric registrars take a proper drinking history?Br Med J1988; 296: 395–96.
19.
19. Berglund M, öjehagen A, Nordström G.Behandling av patienter med alkohol problem. Läkartidningen1989; 86: 2215–18 (English summary).
20.
20. Rothman KJ, Boice JD.Epidemiologic analysis with a programmable calculator. Boston: Epidemiology resources Inc., 1982.
21.
21. Pattison EM.A critique of alcoholism treatment concepts. With special reference to abstinence. Quarterly J Stud Alcohol1966; 27: 49–71.
22.
22. Chick J, Lloyd G, Crombie E.Counselling problem drinkers in medical wards: a controlled study. Br Med J1985; 290: 965–67.
23.
23. Wallace P, Cutler S, Haines A.Randomised controlled trial of general practitioner intervention in patients with excessive alcohol consumption. Br Med J1988; 297: 663–68.
24.
24. Goldstein AP.Patient's expectancies and non-specific therapy as a basis for (un)spontaneous remission. J Clin Psychol1960; 16: 399–403.
25.
25. Edwards G, Orford J, Egert S et al.Alcoholism: A controlled trial of “treatment” and “advice”. J Stud Alcohol1977; 38: 1004–31.
26.
26. Vaillant GE.The natural history of alcoholism: causes, patterns and paths to recovery. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1983.
