Association between one’s own consumption and harm from others’ drinking: Does education play a role?

Abstract

Introduction: We examined (a) whether risky drinking behaviour is related to experienced harm from others’ drinking (EHFOD) and (b) whether any found relationship is modified by educational level, such that those of lower socio-economic status (SES) experience more harm even when adjusted for drinking behaviour. Method: Data from the Danish national alcohol and drug survey of 2011 (N=5133) were linked with registry data from Statistics Denmark. Eight EHFOD indicators were grouped into nuisance, harassment or harm/damage categories. Indicators for mean alcohol consumption, Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) and binge drinking were examined in relation to respondents’ EHFOD with multiple logistic regression, stratified by sex and education (proxy for SES). Results: One-year prevalence of EHFOD was 50%. We found a positive and significant relationship between own alcohol consumption and EHFOD categories of harassment as well as harm/damage. Effect modification of education was significant for harassment. Among men, odds ratios for the association between risky drinking behaviour and harassment were 5.50 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.49–8.65) in the low educational group versus 1.42 (95% CI 0.98–2.07) in the high educational group. Conclusions: Our study confirmed an overall positive relationship between EHFOD and drinking behaviour, but it varied by type of EHFOD. Furthermore, education modified this effect for harassment, suggesting evidence of the alcohol harm paradox with respect to EHFOD. More research is necessary to understand better how drinking patterns diverge between low and high educational groups as well as sex, and how this differentially affects risk for alcohol-related harms, including EHFOD.

Keywords

Experienced harm from others’ drinking risky drinking alcohol use education Denmark socio-economic status alcohol’s harm to others alcohol harm paradox

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Moan

Storvoll

Sundin

, et al. Experienced harm from other people’s drinking: a comparison of Northern European countries. Subst Abuse 2015;9:45–57.

Ramstedt

Sundin

Moan

, et al. Harm experienced from the heavy drinking of family and friends in the general population: a comparative study of Six Northern European countries. Subst Abuse 2016;9:107–18.

Seid

Grittner

Greenfield

, et al. To cause harm and to be harmed by others: new perspectives on alcohol’s harms to others. Subst Abuse 2015;9:3–22.

Bloomfield

. Chapter 13: Hvordan alkohol skader andre [How alcohol harms others]. In: Becker

Tolstrup Schurmann

(eds) Alkohol: brug, konsekvenser og behandling [Alcohol: consumption, consequences and treatment]. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 2016.

Storvoll

Moan

Lund

. Negative consequences of other people’s drinking: prevalence, perpetrators and locations. Drug Alcohol Rev 2016;35:755–62.

Fillmore

. The social victims of drinking. Br J Addict 1985;80:307–14.

Greenfield

Kerr

, et al. Externalities from alcohol consumption in the 2005 US National Alcohol Survey: implications for policy. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2009;6:3205–24.

Clausen

Martinez

Towers

, et al. Alcohol consumption at any level increases risk of injury caused by others: data from the Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health. Subst Abuse 2016;9:125–32.

Nayak

Patterson

Wilsnack

, et al. Alcohol’s secondhand harms in the United States: new data on prevalence and risk factors. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2019;80:273–81.

10.

Kantor

Asdigian

. When women are under the influence. In: Galanter

, et al. (eds) Recent developments in alcoholism. Vol. 13. Boston, MA: Springer, 2002.

11.

Sieving

Perry

Williams

. Do friendships change behaviors, or do behaviors change friendships? Examining paths of influence in young adolescents’ alcohol use. J Adolesc Health 2000;26:27–35.

12.

Livingston

Chikritzhs

Room

. Changing the density of alcohol outlets to reduce alcohol-related problems. Drug Alcohol Rev 2007;26:557–66.

13.

Institute of Alcohol Studies. Alcohol, health inequalities and the harm paradox: why some groups face greater problems despite consuming less alcohol 2014, www.ias.org.uk/uploads/pdf/IAS%20reports/IAS%20report%20Alcohol%20and%20health%20inequalities%20FULL.pdf (2015, accessed 7 August 2019).

14.

Katikireddi

Whitley

Lewsey

, et al. Socioeconomic status as an effect modifier of alcohol consumption and harm: analysis of linked cohort data. Lancet Public Health 2017;2:e267–76.

15.

Christensen

Diderichsen

Hvidtfeldt

, et al. Joint effect of alcohol consumption and educational level on alcohol-related medical events: a Danish register-based cohort study. Epidemiology 2017;28:872–9.

16.

Probst

Kilian

Sanchez

, et al. The role of alcohol use and drinking patterns in socioeconomic inequalities in mortality: a systematic review. Lancet Public Health 2020;5:e324–32.

17.

Bloomfield

Berg-Beckhoff

Seid

, et al. Area-level relative deprivation and alcohol use in Denmark: is there a relationship? Scand J Public Health 2019;47:428–38.

18.

Bloomfield

Elmeland

Villumsen

. Rusmidler i Danmark. Forbrug, holdninger og livsstil. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University, Centre for Alcohol and Drug Research.

19.

Room

. Stigma, social inequality and alcohol and drug use. Drug Alcohol Rev 2005;24:143–55.

20.

Thompson

Davis-MacNevin

Teehan

, et al. The association between secondhand harms from alcohol and mental health outcomes among postsecondary students. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2017;78:70–8.

21.

Sundhedsstyrelsen. Forbyggelsespakke – Alkohol. 2nd ed. Copenhagen: Sundhedsstyrelsen.

22.

Babor

Higgins-Biddle

Saunders

, et al. AUDIT – the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: guidelines for use in primary care. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.

23.

Bloomfield

Grittner

Kramer

, et al. Social inequalities in alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems in the study countries of the EU concerted action: ‘Gender, culture and alcohol problems: a multi-national study’. Alcohol Alcoholism 2006;41:i26–i36.

24.

Lund

Moan

Storvoll

. Harm from others’ drinking: how problematic do people with and without experience of harm perceive it to be? Int J Drug Policy 2016;38:43–9.

25.

Stanesby

Rankin

Callinan

. Experience of harm from others’ drinking and support for stricter alcohol policies: analysis of the Australian National Drug Strategy Household Survey. Int J Drug Policy 2017;45:25–32.

26.

Bloomfield

Karlsson

Grittner

. How do drinking cultures change – or do they? A provisional model based on evidence of transitions in Denmark. Drugs (Abingdon Engl) 2016;23:283–92.

27.

Lewer

Meier

Beard

, et al. Unravelling the alcohol harm paradox: a population-based study of social gradients across very heavy drinking thresholds. BMC Public Health 2016;16:599.

28.

Van Oers

Bongers

Van De Goor

, et al. Alcohol consumption, alcohol-related problems, problem drinking, and socioeconomic status. Alcohol Alcohol 1999;34:78–88.

29.

Beard

Brown

West

, et al. Deconstructing the alcohol harm paradox: a population based survey of adults in England. PLoS One 2016;11:e0160666.

30.

Bloomfield

Grittner

Rasmussen

, et al. Socio-demographic correlates of alcohol consumption in the Danish general population. Scand J Public Health 2008;36:580–8.

31.

Hart

Burns

. The relationship between alcohol consumption and related harm among young university students. Health Promot J Austr 2016;27:15–20.

32.

Elmeland

Villumsen

. Changes in Danish public attitudes and norms regarding alcohol consumption and alcohol policy, 1985–2011. Nord Stud of Alcohol Drug 2013;30:525–38.

33.

Anker

Lindén

Hauge Wegner

, et al. Overview and analysis minimum income schemes in Denmark. A study of national policies, https://ec.europa.eu/social/home.jsp, (2009, accessed 7 August 2019).

34.

Bloomfield

. Understanding the alcohol-harm paradox: what next? Lancet Public Health 2020;5:e300–1.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.10 MB