Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Aims: To examine the role of self-rated quality of life, as a whole, on the risk of developing ischemic heart disease. Methods: Information on self-rated quality of life and covariates was obtained from 4497 people from the Copenhagen Perinatal Cohort. The study population, consisting of both men and women aged 31–33 years at baseline, was followed for registration of ischemic heart disease in national registers. Two different follow-up periods were examined. Results: Using a follow-up of 13 years, the basis-adjusted hazard ratio among women who rated their quality of life as poor was 2.93 (95% CI: 1.09–7.86), compared with women who rated their quality of life as very good. The hazard ratio of women who rated their quality of life as good, compared to very good, was 2.99 (95% CI: 1.22–7.29). When analyzing 16 years of follow-up, estimates among women were lower and some of the hazard ratios were insignificant. All hazard ratios among men were below two and none were statistically significant. Conclusions: Among women, the risk for ischemic heart disease was two to four times greater for those who rated their quality of life as poor or good, than for women with the most positive rating. For men, the association was not statistically significant.

Keywords

Epidemiology myocardial ischemia prospective studies quality of life

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

World Health Organization. The global burden of disease. 2004 Update, http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GBD_report_2004update_full.pdf (2008, accessed 17 June 2013).

Roger

Lloyd-Jones

. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011;123:e18–e209.

Albus

. Psychological and social factors in coronary heart disease. Ann Med 2010;42:487–94.

Barth

Schneider

von Kanel

. Lack of social support in the etiology and the prognosis of coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychosom Med 2010;72:229–38.

Kaplan

Goldberg

Everson

. Perceived health status and morbidity and mortality: evidence from the Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study. Int J Epidemiol 1996;25:259–65.

Kuper

Marmot

Hemingway

. Systematic review of prospective cohort studies of psychosocial factors in the etiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease. Semin Vasc Med 2002;2:267–314.

Lett

Blumenthal

Babyak

. Social support and coronary heart disease: epidemiologic evidence and implications for treatment. Psychosom Med 2005;67:869–78.

Moller

Kristensen

Hollnagel

. Self rated health as a predictor of coronary heart disease in Copenhagen, Denmark. J Epidemiol Commun H 1996;50:423–8.

Rozanski

Blumenthal

Davidson

. The epidemiology, pathophysiology and management of psychosocial risk factors in cardiac practice – The emerging field of behavioral cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:637–51.

10.

Siegrist

. Impaired quality-of-life as a risk factor in cardiovascular-disease. J Chron Dis 1987;40:571–8.

11.

Agewall

Wikstrand

Fagerberg

. Stroke was predicted by dimensions of quality of life in treated hypertensive men. Stroke 1998;29:2329–33.

12.

Benjak

Mavrinac

. Subjective quality of life and cardiovascular risk factors in a Croatian adult population. Collegium Antropol 2009;33:159–63.

13.

Ventegodt

Henneberg

Merrick

. Validation of two global and generic quality of life questionnaires for population screening: SCREENQOL and SEQOL. Scientific World Journal 2003;3:412–21.

14.

Ventegodt

. The quality of life of 4500 31–33 year olds: Result from a study of the prospective pediatric cohort of persons born at the University Hospital in Copenhagen [Partly in Danish]. Copenhagen: Forskningscentrets Forlag, 1996.

15.

Jurgensen

Frolund

Gustafsen

. Registration of diagnoses in the Danish National registry of patients. Method Inform Med 1986;25:158–64.

16.

Juel

Helweg-Larsen

. The Danish registers of causes of death. Dan Med Bull 1999;46:354–7.

17.

Fayers

Machin

. Principles of measurement scales. In: Quality of life. The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2007, pp. 31–48.

18.

de Boer

van Lanschot

Stalmeier

. Is a single-item visual analogue scale as valid, reliable and responsive as multi-item scales in measuring quality of life? Qual Life Res 2004;13:311–20.

19.

Gill

. Quality of life assessment: values and pitfalls. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 1995;88:680–2.

20.

World Health Organization. WHOQOL measuring quality of life, http://www.who.int/mental_health/media/68.pdf (1997, accessed 17 June 2013).

21.

Hallman

Burell

Setterlind

. Psychosocial risk factors for coronary heart disease, their importance compared with other risk factors and gender differences in sensitivity. J Cardiovasc Risk 2001;8:39–49.

22.

Jousilahti

Vartiainen

Tuomilehto

. Sex, age, cardiovascular risk factors, and coronary heart disease: a prospective follow-up study of 14 786 middle-aged men and women in Finland. Circulation 1999;99:1165–72.

23.

Rothman

. Controlling Confounding by Stratifying Data. In: Epidemiology. An introduction. Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 144–167.

A prospective cohort study of quality of life and ischemic heart disease

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References