Front-Line Work in Employment Services after Ten Years of New Public Management Reform: Governance and Activation in Australia,the Netherlands and the UK

Abstract

This study examines the impact of adminstrative reforms upon the work of frontline staff in the employment services of three refrom-oriented countries – Australia, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. These changes have involved greater use of private agents, more detailed performance contracts, clearer expectations about outcomes for job-seekers, and increased competition between agencies seeking government work. The study compares the work characteristics and strategies of front-line staff in agencies in the three systems in 2008 and a decade earlier, using surveys.

The results show that there are substantial differences in the level of tailoring and investment in these countries. There are three relatively stable modes of governance in these cases and the most stable of these types across countries and across time is what we term the corporate-market mode – more generally labelled New Public Management (NPM). Despite the expectations of theorists and of reformers, the role of network governance proves neither as stable nor as generalised as expected.

Keywords

contracting-out governance new public management street level bureaucracy unemployment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barbier

J.-C.

and Ludwig-Mayerhofer

(2004) ‘Introduction: The many worlds of activation’, European Societies, 6(4), 423–436.

Christensen

and Lægreid

(2001) New Public Management: The Transformation of Ideas and Practice, Aldershot, Ashgate.

Considine

(2001) Enterprising States: The public management of welfare-to-work, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Considine

and Painter

(eds.) (1987) Managerialism: The Great Debate, Melbourne, Melbourne University Press.

Considine

and Lewis

J.M.

(1999) ‘Governance at ground level: The front-line bureaucrat in the age of markets and networks’, Public Administration Review, 59(6), 467–480.

Considine

and Lewis

J.M.

(2003) ‘Bureaucracy, network or enterprise? Comparing models of governance in Australia, Britain, the Netherlands and New Zealand’, Public Administration Review, 63(2), 131–140.

Gregory

(1995) ‘The Peculiar Tasks of Public Management: Towards Conceptual Discrimination’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 54(2), 171–183.

Hood

(1991). ‘A Public Management for all Seasons’. Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.

Kickert

Klijn

E.H.

and Koppenjan

(eds.) (1997) Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector, London, Sage.

10.

Lewis

J.M.

(2005) Health Policy and Politics: Networks, Ideas and Power, Melbourne, IP Communications.

11.

OECD (2010) Employment Outlook, Paris.

12.

Pollitt

(1990) Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo-American experience Oxford and Cambridge, MA, Blackwell.

13.

Sol

and Hoogtanders

(2005) ‘Steering by Contract in the Netherlands: New Approaches to labour Market Integration’ in Sol

and Westerveld

(eds) Contractualism in Employments Services: A New Form of Welfare State Governance, The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 139–166.

14.

Van Berkel

and Van der Aa

(2005), ‘The marketization of activation services: A modern panacea? Some lessons from the Dutch experience’, Journal of European Social Policy, 15(4), 329–343.