Modular Integrated Construction (MiC) is gaining popularity for high quality, fast construction, and lower pollution. Precast concrete modules are assembled on-site, with cast-in-place shear walls connecting them. However, poor construction and inadequate concrete vibration could cause voids and delamination. Prompt detection of these defects is vital for maintaining structural integrity. This paper examines the detection abilities of impact echo (IE), ultrasonic testing (UT), infrared thermography (IRT), and ground penetrating radar (GPR) for interfacial delamination and internal voids in shear walls between modules. By analyzing variations in the IE dominant frequency, minor delamination (50 mm × 50 mm) and voids (40 mm × 40 mm), as well as deep voids up to 240 mm in depth, can be identified. Defects reduce ultrasonic amplitude and increase time-of-flight. However, UT is less effective for minor and deep defects. By observing surface temperature changes, the IRT can detect shallow defects up to a depth of 60 mm. GPR cannot detect defects due to the dense rebar in the concrete slab. In summary, IE is best suited for detecting defects in shear walls between modules. This study offers a solution for the on-site detection of typical connection components in MiC.
AbdelmageedSZayedT (2020) A study of literature in modular integrated construction - critical review and future directions. Journal of Cleaner Production277: 124044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124044
2.
Abdul RazakNSeninSFHamidR (2015) Detection of sizes and locations air voids in reinforced concrete slab using ground penetrating radar and impact-echo methods. Jurnal Teknologi74(3): 63–67. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v74.4553
3.
AzariHNazarianSYuanD (2014) Assessing sensitivity of impact echo and ultrasonic surface waves methods for nondestructive evaluation of concrete structures. Construction and Building Materials71: 384–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.056
4.
CoppolaLBerettaSBignozziMC, et al. (2022) The improvement of durability of reinforced concretes for sustainable structures: a review on different approaches. Materials15(8): 2728. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15082728
DorafshanSAzariH (2020) Evaluation of bridge decks with overlays using impact echo, a deep learning approach. Automation in Construction113: 103133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103133
7.
EppTChaY-J (2017) Air-coupled impact-echo damage detection in reinforced concrete using wavelet transforms. Smart Materials and Structures26(2): 025018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665x/26/2/025018
8.
GuQZhaoDLiJ, et al. (2022) Seismic performance of T-shaped precast concrete superposed shear walls with cast-in-place boundary columns and special boundary elements. Journal of Building Engineering45: 103503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103503
9.
HassanWMElmorsyM (2021) Database trends and critical review of seismic performance tests on high strength steel reinforced concrete components. Engineering Structures239: 112092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112092
10.
HusseinMZayedT (2021) Critical factors for successful implementation of just-in-time concept in modular integrated construction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production284: 124716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124716
11.
IbrahimAFarisNZayedT, et al. (2024) Application of infrared thermography in concrete bridge deck inspection: current practices, challenges and future needs. Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation41: 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2024.2443810
12.
JaillonLPoonCSChiangYH (2009) Quantifying the waste reduction potential of using prefabrication in building construction in Hong Kong. Waste Management29(1): 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.015
13.
JainHPatankarVH (2024) Simulations and experimentation of ultrasonic wave propagation and flaw characterisation for underwater concrete structures. Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation39(6): 1581–1598. https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2023.2274006
14.
JuJTianXZhaoW, et al. (2023) Detection and identification for void of concrete structure by air-coupled impact-echo method. Sensors23(13): 6018. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23136018
15.
KaurNLiLBhallaS, et al. (2017) A low-cost version of electro-mechanical impedance technique for damage detection in reinforced concrete structures using multiple piezo configurations. Advances in Structural Engineering20(8): 1247–1254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216677124
16.
KuchipudiSTGhoshDGuptaH (2022) Automated assessment of reinforced concrete elements using ground penetrating radar. Automation in Construction140: 104378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104378
17.
KumavatHRChandakNRPatilIT (2021) Factors influencing the performance of rebound hammer used for non-destructive testing of concrete members: a review. Case Studies in Construction Materials14: e00491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00491
18.
LiXWuGKuramaYC, et al. (2020) Experimental comparisons of repairable precast concrete shear walls with a monolithic cast-in-place wall. Engineering Structures216: 110671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110671
19.
LiuY-LLiuZLaiS-K, et al. (2021) Debonding detection in the grouted joints of precast concrete shear walls using impact-echo method. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation40(2): 50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-021-00783-9
20.
LuoHLiuJLiC, et al. (2020) Ultra-rapid delivery of specialty field hospitals to combat COVID-19: lessons learned from the Leishenshan Hospital project in Wuhan. Automation in Construction119: 103345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103345
21.
MaXPanJCaiJ, et al. (2022) A review on cement-based materials used in steel structures as fireproof coating. Construction and Building Materials315: 125623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125623
22.
MaierhoferCBrinkARölligM, et al. (2003) Detection of shallow voids in concrete structures with impulse thermography and radar. NDT & E International36(4): 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0963-8695(02)00063-4
23.
MaoCShenQShenL, et al. (2013) Comparative study of greenhouse gas emissions between off-site prefabrication and conventional construction methods: two case studies of residential projects. Energy and Buildings66: 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.033
24.
MizutaniTIwaiS (2024) Accurate and fast damage thickness estimation in concrete using handheld GPR and spectral pattern matching. Advances in Structural Engineering27(16): 2864–2878. https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332241267909
25.
PetroJTKimJ (2011) Detection of delamination in concrete using ultrasonic pulse velocity test. Construction and Building Materials26(1): 574–582.
26.
PozzerSEl RefaiALópezF, et al. (2024) Passive infrared thermography for subsurface delamination detection in concrete infrastructure: inference on minimum requirements. Computers & Structures305: 107529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2024.107529
27.
PristovEDaltonWLikinsG (2008) Measurement of concrete thickness and detection of defects using ultrasound methods. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Concrete Pavements.
28.
QinDGaoPAslamF, et al. (2022) A comprehensive review on fire damage assessment of reinforced concrete structures. Case Studies in Construction Materials16: e00843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00843
29.
ShinSWPopovicsJSOhT (2012) Cost effective air-coupled impact-echo sensing for rapid detection of delamination damage in concrete structures. Advances in Structural Engineering15(6): 887–895. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.15.6.887
30.
SultanAAWasherGA (2018) Reliability analysis of ground-penetrating radar for the detection of subsurface delamination. Journal of Bridge Engineering23(2): 04017131. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001182
31.
TaQTMacVHHuhJ, et al. (2023) Nondestructive detection of delamination in painted concrete structures through square pulse thermography. Journal of Building Engineering70: 106360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106360
32.
TiwariSMondalGDashSR, et al. (2023) Experimental investigation of unbonded reinforced concrete PT shear wall under lateral loading: a state-of-the-art review. Journal of Building Engineering78: 107504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107504
33.
WuYWangYLiD, et al. (2023) Two-step detection of concrete internal condition using array ultrasound and deep learning. NDT & E International139: 102945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.102945
34.
WuYFanXZhangJ (2024) Ensemble learning model for concrete delamination depth detection using impact echo. NDT & E International145: 103119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2024.103119
35.
WuniIYShenGQ (2020) Barriers to the adoption of modular integrated construction: systematic review and meta-analysis, integrated conceptual framework, and strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production249: 119347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119347
36.
YumnamMGuptaHGhoshD, et al. (2021) Inspection of concrete structures externally reinforced with FRP composites using active infrared thermography: a review. Construction and Building Materials310: 125265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125265
37.
ZameeruddinMSangleKK (2016) Review on recent developments in the performance-based seismic design of reinforced concrete structures. Structures6: 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2016.03.001
38.
ZhangHShiZLiL, et al. (2024) Code-specified early delamination detection and quantification in a RC bridge deck: passive vs. active infrared thermography. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring15: 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-024-00823-8
39.
ZhouMLuWSongJ, et al. (2018) Application of Ultra-High Performance Concrete in bridge engineering. Construction and Building Materials186: 1256–1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.036
